
Canadians proud to be considered ‘nasty' in defending sovereignty, Eby says
But he says Americans are friends, colleagues and family members, and B.C. has worked in close partnership with states in the U.S. Pacific Northwest for many years, spurring economic growth and other benefits on both sides of the border.
Eby's remarks come the day after U.S. Ambassador to Canada Pete Hoekstra told a conference that Canadians avoiding U.S. travel and banning American alcohol are among the reasons Trump thinks they are 'nasty' to deal with.
The ambassador told the crowd at the annual Pacific NorthWest Economic Region Foundation summit in Bellevue, Washington, that such steps 'don't send positive signals' about Canada treating the United States well.
Eby told media at a premiers' gathering in Huntsville, Ont., that cross-border co-operation in the region is an example of why Canadians 'have no interest in being mean and nasty' and instead want to work together with Americans.
Statistics Canada figures show the number of Canadians returning home by car from south of the border fell just over 33 per cent in June compared with the same month last year, marking the sixth consecutive month of year-over-year declines.
Return trips by air fell just over 22 per cent year-over-year.
The number of Americans arriving in Canada by air decreased 0.7 per cent in June compared with the same time last year, while arrivals by car dropped 10.4 per cent.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 22, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
19 minutes ago
- UPI
Rubio says Harvard might lose visa program eligibility
The State Department on Wednesday announced it is investigating Harvard University's participation in a visa program to determine if it runs counter to Trump administration policies or compromises national security. File Photo (2019) by Matthew Healey/UPI | License Photo July 23 (UPI) -- The State Department is investigating whether Harvard University undermines U.S. policy via educational and cultural exchanges that enable international students, professors and others to obtain visas. The investigation's purpose is to determine whether or not Harvard officials are undermining national security and foreign policy through its participation in the Exchange Visitor Program, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced on Wednesday. "All sponsors participating in this program are required to fully comply with exchange visitor regulations, transparency in reporting and a demonstrated commitment to fostering the principles of cultural exchange and mutual understanding upon which the program was founded," Rubio said in a prepared statement. Harvard "must comply with all regulations ... in a manner that does not undermine the foreign policy objectives or compromise the national security interests of the United States," Rubio continued. "The American people have the right to expect their universities to uphold national security, comply with the law and provide safe environments for all students." He said the investigation will ensure the university's participation in State Department programs does not "run contrary to our nation's interests." The Trump administration in May revoked Harvard's eligibility to participate in the Exchange Visitor Program. U.S. District Court of Massachusetts Judge Allison Burroughs overturned the revocation of Harvard's program eligibility. Rubio notified Harvard University President Dr. Alan Garber of the investigation on Wednesday but did not accuse university officials of any wrongdoing in the matter. He gave Harvard a week to provide relevant university records and said the department will interview university staff and possibly students who are participating in the exchange program. The Department of Homeland Security in July likewise subpoenaed Harvard to obtain information on the university's program participation. The State Department's investigation will not affect Harvard's sponsorship and enrollment of students, professors and researchers, according to a statement shared with United Press International. "This investigation is yet another retaliatory step taken by the administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights," a Harvard spokesperson said. "Harvard continues to enroll and sponsor international scholars, researchers and students and will protect its international community and support them as they apply for U.S. visas and travel to campus this fall."


New York Post
20 minutes ago
- New York Post
US importers bear brunt of Trump tariffs with higher consumer prices ‘in the pipeline': Deutsche Bank
US importers, not the foreign-based exporters who are shipping them goods from overseas, are shouldering the cost of President Trump's tariffs — and higher prices for US shoppers are 'in the pipeline,' according to Deutsche Bank. In a research note, analysts at the German financial giant contradicted the White House's assertions that foreign exporters abroad are on the hook for Trump's trade taxes, which have reeled in more than $100 billion in tariff revenue so far this year The White House disputed the analysts' assertions on Wednesday. The analysts examined US import prices for manufactured goods during the second quarter, when the tariffs were implemented. The bank said the behavior of import prices helps reveal who is actually paying the duties. 'If foreigners were paying for the tariffs, we would expect to see a sharp reduction in the price of imported goods as they absorbed it into their own margins,' the bank wrote. 4 Analysts at Deutsche Bank say that US consumers should brace for higher prices as a result of President Trump's tariff policies. Davide Bonaldo/SOPA Images/Shutterstock Instead, the data show only 'mild price reductions,' mainly from Canada and, to a lesser extent, the UK. In China's case, where average tariff rates rose more than 30%, dollar import prices dropped by just 1%, said the bank. 'To be sure, there are specific industry examples of a greater impact,' Deutsche Bank acknowledged. 'For now, however, the top-down macro evidence seems clear: Americans are mostly paying for the tariffs.' Since consumer price gains have remained relatively contained, the analysts said it suggests US importers are absorbing the costs in the form of squeezed profit margins rather than passing them on to consumers. 4 'The top-down macro evidence seems clear: Americans are mostly paying for the tariffs,' according to analysts at Deutsche Bank. Getty Images Deutsche Bank drew three conclusions: first, exporters abroad 'are not yet feeling much pain from the tariffs,' which could strengthen their bargaining power ahead of the Aug. 1 trade deadline. Second, there may be 'more pressure on US consumer prices in the pipeline.' Third, because the economic cost is falling more heavily on the US, the situation adds 'an added dollar negative' to the broader macroeconomic outlook. White House spokesman Kush Desai panned the Deutsche Bank analysis, pointing to a White House analysis that the administration says is proof that 'prices of imported goods have actually fallen this year despite President Trump's historic tariffs.' 'The Administration has consistently maintained that the cost of tariffs will be borne by foreign exporters who rely on access to the American economy, the world's biggest and best consumer market,' Desai told The Post. 4 Since Trump rolled out his 'Liberation Day' tariffs, the US has raked in $64 billion in customs duties, according to data. Getty Images Trump's Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) found that imported goods prices have fallen this year and declined faster than overall goods prices since February — 'contradict[ing] claims that tariffs or tariff‑fears would lead to an acceleration of inflation' — a pattern the CEA says holds across core goods, durables and nondurables. From December 2024 through May 2025, overall PCE goods prices rose 0.4% (about a 1% annualized pace) while the imported component fell 0.1%, according to CEA data. A similar breakdown of consumer price index data shows imported goods deflated 0.8% while aggregate CPI goods were flat. When services are stripped out, the CEA finds outright import‑goods deflation beginning in March. CEA also noted that lower energy prices — more heavily weighted in the import basket — help explain the gap but that imported core goods still rose less than overall core. The White House analysis concludes tariffs are 'not a first‑order consideration for inflation' and have 'not reduced the disinflationary impulse from imported goods' through May. 4 Honda vehicles are lined up at a vehicle storage yard at an industrial port near Tokyo as car companies say they have seen profits dip as a result of tariffs. REUTERS Last week, the Financial Times reported that the Trump administration raked in $64 billion in customs duties during the second quarter of this year which ended in late June. The three-month period began when Trump rolled out his 'Liberation Day' tariffs that included a universal 10% levy on imports from most nations in addition to higher duties on certain sectors such as steel and foreign cars. Domestic automakers have indicated that tariffs are eating into their profits. General Motors, the Detroit-based producer of iconic brands such as Cadillac and Buick, told investors this week that Trump's trade policies have cost the company $1.1 billion in the most recent quarter. Stellantis, the Netherlands-based parent of US brands Ram and Jeep, said Monday that it lost $350 million as a result of Trump's tariff policies. Other multinationals such as Texas Instruments, ASM International, AMD and Best Buy — companies that are vulnerable to tariffs due to their reliance on key commodities such as steel, aluminum and semiconductors — have all cited tariffs as one of the reasons behind weakening demand and lower profits. Meanwhile, the latest inflation figures indicate that consumers are starting to feel the pinch of tariffs. The headline inflation figure rose 2.7% year over year in June, up from 2.4% in May, according to the latest data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Prices climbed month-over-month by 0.3% — the largest monthly gain since January after a 0.1% increase in May. Headline inflation has now risen for a second straight month after a period of steady decline earlier this year.


CNBC
20 minutes ago
- CNBC
French President Macron, wife Brigitte sue Candace Owens for defamation from transgender claim
French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte, on Wednesday sued right-wing provocateur podcaster Candace Owens for repeatedly falsely claiming that Brigitte Macron "is in fact a man." The Macrons' 22-count civil lawsuit accusing Owens of defamation and false light alleges that Owens, since March 2024, has "used this false statement" about Brigitte Macron "to promote her independent platform, gain notoriety, and make money." "Owens disregarded all credible evidence disproving her claim in favor of platforming known conspiracy theorists and proven defamers," the lawsuit filed in Delaware Superior Court says. "And rather than engage with President and Mrs. Macron's attempts to set the record straight, Owens mocked them and used them as additional fodder for her frenzied fan base," says the suit, which notes that Brigitte Macron bore three children from her first husband. The complaint says that Owens' allegedly knowingly false statements about the Macrons include claims that they are blood relatives who have committed incest, and that President Macron was chosen to be president as part of a CIA-operated program or "similar mind-control program." The statements were made in an eight-part podcast, "Becoming Brigitte," and in accompanying posts on the social media site X, the suit says. "These lies have caused tremendous damage to the Macrons," the suit says. The complaint seeks monetary damages to be determined at trial. The Macrons are being represented in the suit by the law firm Clare Locke. Clare Locke in April 2023 with another law firm, obtained a $787.5 million settlement for the voting machine company Dominion Voting System from Fox Corp. and its cable networks, including Fox News, to resolve a defamation suit related to claims about the 2020 presidential election. "If ever there was a clear-cut case of defamation, this is it," said the firm's attorney Tom Clare, about the lawsuit filed by the Macrons. The Macrons, in a statement, said, "Because Ms. Owens systematically reaffirmed these falsehoods in response to each of our attorneys' repeated requests for a retraction, we ultimately concluded that referring the matter to a court of law was the only remaining avenue for remedy." "Ms. Owens' campaign of defamation was plainly designed to harass and cause pain to us and our families and to garner attention and notoriety. We gave her every opportunity to back away from these claims, but she refused," the couple said. "It is our earnest hope that this lawsuit will set the record straight and end this campaign of defamation once and for all." A spokesperson for Owens, in a statement to CNBC, said "Candace Owens is not shutting up. This is a foreign government attacking the First Amendment rights of an American independent journalist." "Candace repeatedly requested an interview with Brigitte Macron," the spokesperson said. "Instead of offering a comment, Brigitte is resorting to trying to bully a reporter into submission." "In France, politicians can bully journalists, but this is not France. It's America. Candace will address everything on her show today, where she will continue to express her First Amendment rights." Owens, on July 2, published on her website a letter from Clare Locke to her attorney demanding that Owens "and the entities she controls retract her false and defamatory statements" about the Macrons.