Does Tom Thibodeau's Knicks dismissal prove no NBA coach's job is safe?
On this date in 1987, Michael Cooper set a finals record with six made 3-pointers. At the time, single games averaged 2.8 made 3-pointers per game, so that's the equivalent of someone hitting roughly 58 3-pointers in a finals game in today's NBA. Feels like Steph Curry could do it. Also, nobody check that math.
Will Knicks replace Tom Thibodeau with clone?
Leading up to the playoffs, you'd hear a lot of rumors about the future of Tom Thibodeau with the Knicks. It often sounded like anything short of a conference finals appearance (or beyond) for Thibodeau's Knicks was going to result in him being fired. However, it also just sounded like people trying to guess whether or not James Dolan was going to be an itchy owner once again.
Advertisement
Well, after making the Eastern Conference finals and losing to the Pacers in six games, the Knicks actualized those rumors. They relieved Thibodeau of his duties, which is a nice way of saying they kicked his ass to the curb. After five seasons with the Knicks, Thibodeau is out and the Knicks are now looking for a new head coach.
Before we get to the coaching possibilities, I'm not sure Thibodeau's firing was warranted. Above all, the organization can definitely decide there's a better voice out there. But in five seasons, Thibodeau gave the Knicks an identity, clicked with their new star player Jalen Brunson and brought them to the conference finals for the first time in 25 years. He's the fourth-winningest coach in franchise history (226).
James Edwards III wrote that Thibs deserved another season and I tend to agree. He didn't seem to lose the locker room. He seemed to learn in real time during the conference finals that he needed to adapt to more depth. His coaching and minutes didn't lead to some big injury. I guess I'm failing to understand what the problem is. It feels like they're firing against the potential problem of a fallout on the sidelines, rather than something actually happening.
That brings us to the top candidates, as of right now. The natural one that comes up, first and foremost, is Michael Malone. He just got fired from the Nuggets with three games left in the season. He's a New York guy, he has a championship ring and he also is repped by CAA, which fits in nicely with the assumed preferences of the Knicks over the last couple decades (give or take a couple years).
Malone is a really good coach, but let's remember what got him fired in Denver. The criticism from the Nuggets front office the coach was feuding with was he didn't play enough of his bench, he played his starters a lot of minutes, and there were a lot of questions about their team defense. Thibodeau is known as a defensive-minded coach from his days as an assistant for the Celtics and as a head coach for the Bulls, but his teams really haven't defended consistently since. Malone's teams were getting pretty rough defensively, but he also had flawed rosters with questionable personnel and injuries to go with it.
Advertisement
Does any of this sound familiar? You'd essentially be hiring the same guy with a different voice and hairline. Maybe that works. Sometimes, a change in voice does do the trick. And Malone is a good coach. I'm just not sure he's a better coach than Thibodeau. I have no idea if Malone's 'give the ball to Nikola Jokić' offense works with the Knicks, mostly because they don't have Jokić.
Other candidates could include Cleveland assistant Johnny Bryant, who is one of the top candidates for the Phoenix job. There's also Taylor Jenkins, who was just fired with nine games left in the season by the Grizzlies. Mike Brown, who was fired midseason by the Kings? All of these are good coaches or potentially good coaches. I'm just not sure they're better than Thibodeau. Regardless, the Knicks have decided to make a change.
In the words of Knicks legend Charles Oakley, 'If it ain't broke, don't break it.'
Finals flights had to avoid poor weather
✈️ Flight diverted. The Pacers actually had to land in Tulsa due to a tornado warning. Thankfully, everybody landed safely.
🏀 What a journey. The path of Pascal Siakam's NBA career has prepared him. It's time for another finals appearance.
🏀 Progress? It's been 12 years since Jason Collins came out as an openly gay athlete. Is it any easier?
🚫 Thank Indy. The Pacers never cared to tank. Jason Lloyd explains why the NBA should rejoice.
🎧 Tuning in. Today's 'NBA Daily' discusses why Jalen Williams is the make-or-break player in the NBA Finals.
The story of the greatest players in NBA history. In 100 riveting profiles, top basketball writers justify their selections and uncover the history of the NBA in the process.
The story of the greatest players in NBA history.
Are the Thunder a team people don't like?
I've been trying to figure something out about this Thunder team as they seem to be on the cusp of winning their first NBA championship. Do people outside of Oklahoma City hate this team? Maybe hate is too strong of a word, especially considering how loosely it's used in sports on the internet. But something I've noticed during this run by the Thunder, as they've trounced the league in front of them, is how little people outside of the Thunder fan base appear to be embracing them as a team they like and enjoy.
It's confusing for a few reasons. After all, this is a …
This Thunder team is deep and awesome, and yet I tend to find negativity thrown its way along this journey. I've wondered if some of this is just the bubble I'm in with friend groups and on social media. I have some friends with some basketball opinions I really respect, and so few of them have embraced enjoying this Thunder team. I've asked them what their issue is and these are some of the replies:
There were more, but this seems like a good representation. The most common ones were the accusations of corniness, the foul calls and the Seattle factor. But everybody also seemed resigned to the fact that they're going to win the title, and were wondering if people will care at all, outside of OKC. It makes me wonder if 1) this is true and 2) if this is a fair question. So, I bring it to you, The Bouncers!
Here is a Google Form about whether you hate the OKC Thunder. We'll share the results later this week.
NBA, Stanley Cup Finals share similar vibes
Over at our behemoth of a newsletter The Pulse, Chris Branch had the fun idea of having a conversation between me and Sean McIndoe about the respective championship series we're covering in our newsletters. Sean is one of the amazing scribes of Red Light, our incredible hockey newsletter. And … well … you know me from this space.
Advertisement
The NBA Finals and the Stanley Cup Final both feature fascinating matchups. We have a battle of some of the smallest markets in the NBA with Indianapolis (25th) and OKC (47th). In the NHL, we have a fun rematch of last year's seven-game chaotic series between the Edmonton Oilers and Florida Panthers. Branch asked us questions, and we gave answers.
Branch: What's the most interesting thing to you about the other sport's title series?
Sean: Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, so I think it's cool how you guys have copied the NHL's longstanding 'the best player in the final is a Canadian' gimmick.
Zach: They move around on knives! How does this not freak people out?! I also find it fascinating that we haven't had a Canadian team win a Stanley Cup title in over 30 years, and a team from Florida could block the Oilers two years in a row.
There is anxiety over the marketability of both series. What are you most wary about?
Sean: The concern these days in the NHL isn't that smaller-market teams are having success. The problem is whether those smaller markets now have an advantage over the bigger ones, due to financial factors and player preferences, among other things. There's debate over whether this is actually a real problem at all. But as a league, and a business, you don't want the markets that are driving your revenue to feel like they're falling behind. That narrative, accurate or not, will only get stronger with another Florida win.
Zach: I think I'm most wary about this being a short series. The basketball should be really good. But you can have good basketball in all of the games and end up with a sweep. Just ask last year's Pacers, who played the Celtics extremely well in the conference finals but ended up getting swept. This is a great basketball matchup, but the Thunder might make quick work of it.
Concerns aside, there are superstars here aplenty. Outside of the obvious names, who's the most interesting player a general fan should know before puck drop/tipoff?
Sean: Let me go off the board here with my pick: Sasha Barkov, the Panthers center who may be the best two-way player in the league. On a team full of rats (and proud of it), he just quietly goes about his business, dominating at both ends of the rink. He's kind of the Phil Hartman of the Panthers, the glue guy who makes it all work even if he isn't the one getting most of the headlines.
Zach: Chet Holmgren and Pascal Siakam! Holmgren moves around like his shoulders are held up by a wire coat hanger. He can do it all on the court and is 7-foot-1. It's like watching a Tim Burton drawing audition for a new 'Space Jam' movie. And despite Siakam giving himself the horrible 'Spicy P' nickname, he's been a tremendous weapon. He's scoring within four seconds after opponent baskets and has been the Pacers' leading scorer.
Advertisement
In 25 or fewer words, give us one wild yet realistic prediction for your series.
Sean: The Edmonton Oilers become the greatest Canadian Stanley Cup winners of the last 32 years.
Zach: The Pacers will win Game 1, and Haliburton will have his teammates mock the Thunder by doing the sideline interview together.
Streaming links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lakers jersey history No. 1 — Anthony Peeler
Through the 2024-25 season, the Los Angeles Lakers have had a total of 506 players suit up for them, going back to their days in Minneapolis. Some were forgettable, some were serviceable, some were good and a select few were flat-out legendary. As the Lakers approach their 80th season of existence (they were founded back in 1946 as the Detroit Gems in the National Basketball League), LeBron Wire is taking a look at each player who has worn their jersey, whether it has been a purple and gold one or the ones they donned back in the Midwest during their early years. We now take a look at Anthony Peeler, a guard who played for the Lakers during the 1990s. In 1992, the Lakers were in a depressing and daunting situation. Magic Johnson retired in November 1991 after testing positive for HIV, and while he tried to make a comeback during the 1992 preseason, he quickly changed his mind after multiple players around the league expressed fear about competing against an HIV-positive player. Therefore, the franchise was forced to start a rebuilding project. It needed to start collecting young, viable talent, and with the No. 15 pick in the 1992 NBA Draft, it took University of Missouri guard Anthony Peeler. Peeler was a stellar player in college and had been named the Big Eight Player of the Year in 1992 with an average of 23.4 points a game, but there were questions about his character, as he had been involved in multiple incidents with ex-lovers. With L.A., he quickly started to show promise, averaging 10.4 points a game as a rookie and 14.1 points a game the following year. By the 1994-95 season, Peeler was part of a promising young core that took the team to the second round of the playoffs. But his tenure with the team ended in the summer of 1996 when he was traded along with forward George Lynch to the Vancouver Grizzlies as a salary dump move. The trade cleared enough money for the Lakers to sign Shaquille O'Neal as a free agent that offseason, and O'Neal, along with Kobe Bryant, whom they acquired the draft rights to that summer, would lead the organization into its next era of success. Peeler would spend nine more seasons in the NBA with four different teams. His greatest strength was his 3-point shooting — he led the league with a 48.2% 3-point shooting percentage during the 2003-04 season, and he ended his career with a 38.4% accuracy from that distance. This article originally appeared on LeBron Wire: Lakers jersey history No. 1 — Anthony Peeler
USA Today
16 minutes ago
- USA Today
Lakers jersey history No. 1 — Anthony Peeler
Through the 2024-25 season, the Los Angeles Lakers have had a total of 506 players suit up for them, going back to their days in Minneapolis. Some were forgettable, some were serviceable, some were good and a select few were flat-out legendary. As the Lakers approach their 80th season of existence (they were founded back in 1946 as the Detroit Gems in the National Basketball League), LeBron Wire is taking a look at each player who has worn their jersey, whether it has been a purple and gold one or the ones they donned back in the Midwest during their early years. We now take a look at Anthony Peeler, a guard who played for the Lakers during the 1990s. In 1992, the Lakers were in a depressing and daunting situation. Magic Johnson retired in November 1991 after testing positive for HIV, and while he tried to make a comeback during the 1992 preseason, he quickly changed his mind after multiple players around the league expressed fear about competing against an HIV-positive player. Therefore, the franchise was forced to start a rebuilding project. It needed to start collecting young, viable talent, and with the No. 15 pick in the 1992 NBA Draft, it took University of Missouri guard Anthony Peeler. Peeler was a stellar player in college and had been named the Big Eight Player of the Year in 1992 with an average of 23.4 points a game, but there were questions about his character, as he had been involved in multiple incidents with ex-lovers. With L.A., he quickly started to show promise, averaging 10.4 points a game as a rookie and 14.1 points a game the following year. By the 1994-95 season, Peeler was part of a promising young core that took the team to the second round of the playoffs. But his tenure with the team ended in the summer of 1996 when he was traded along with forward George Lynch to the Vancouver Grizzlies as a salary dump move. The trade cleared enough money for the Lakers to sign Shaquille O'Neal as a free agent that offseason, and O'Neal, along with Kobe Bryant, whom they acquired the draft rights to that summer, would lead the organization into its next era of success. Peeler would spend nine more seasons in the NBA with four different teams. His greatest strength was his 3-point shooting — he led the league with a 48.2% 3-point shooting percentage during the 2003-04 season, and he ended his career with a 38.4% accuracy from that distance.
Forbes
17 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why NBA Teams Are Afraid Of The Second Apron
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - FEBRUARY 24: Kristaps Porzingis #8 of the Boston Celtics is congratulated by ... More Jrue Holiday #4 and Jayson Tatum #0 after scoring a basket against the New York Knicks during the second half at Madison Square Garden on February 24, 2024 in New York City. NOTE TO USER: User expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, User is consenting to the terms and conditions of the Getty Images License Agreement. (Photo by) One year ago, the Boston Celtics won their 18th NBA championship in franchise history. Fast-forward 14 months, and their roster is hardly recognizable. Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Derrick White, Payton Pritchard and Sam Hauser are their lone remaining rotation players from that championship squad. The NBA's second apron is largely to blame for that level of turnover. Had the Celtics not detonated their roster this offseason, they were in line to become the NBA's first-ever $500 million team when factoring in both payroll and luxury-tax penalties. They might have been open to shelling out that type of dough had they repeated as champions last season; after all, how can you turn down the opportunity at a three-peat? But when Jayson Tatum tore his Achilles tendon in the Eastern Conference Semifinals against the New York Knicks, it sealed the fate for that era of the Celtics. The Celtics aren't the only team that has cowed in the face of the second apron, though. The Minnesota Timberwolves traded Karl-Anthony Towns to the New York Knicks right before training camp last year, largely for financial reasons. Doing so gave them enough wiggle room under the second apron to re-sign both Julius Randle and Naz Reid this offseason, although they still wound up losing Nickeil Alexander-Walker to the Atlanta Hawks. Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Clippers allowed Paul George to walk in free agency last summer, as they refused to give him the same four-year, $211.6 million max contract that he wound up signing with the Philadelphia 76ers. "We wanted Paul back," team governor Steve Ballmer told ESPN's Ohm Youngmisuk last November. "We made him a big offer. We really wanted him here. We just wanted to not put ourselves in a position where we can't consistently be good. We offered them the max for three years and Philly offered them the max for four years. OK, I get it. But in terms of our trajectory and staying really good, it was really going to be an issue for us." Hardcore NBA fans have become painfully aware of the new team-building realities that the second apron brought about, but casual fans might not fully grasp what makes the second apron so terrifying to teams. That's what we're here to explain. The Second Apron's Trade And Free-Agency Restrictions The NBA's previous collective bargaining agreement had only one apron, which was roughly $6-7 million above the luxury-tax line. Teams that went above the apron had the smaller taxpayer mid-level exception rather than the non-taxpayer mid-level exception, couldn't acquire free agents via sign-and-trade and lost access to the bi-annual exception, but those were their main restrictions. Under the new CBA, first-apron teams are subject to all of those limitations and then some. They also aren't allowed to take back more salary in a trade than they send out—they were previously allowed to take back 125% of what they sent out—and once the regular season begins, they can't sign someone off the buyout market if that player was previously earning more than the non-taxpayer MLE. Lastly, they can't use trade exceptions that were created in a previous season. Teams that go above the second apron face all of those restrictions as well. Beyond that, they also can't aggregate two smaller contracts in a trade to acquire a larger salary, send out cash in a trade or acquire players when they sign-and-trade their own free agents away. They also lose access to any mid-level exception in free agency, which means they can only hand out veteran-minimum contracts to external free agents. The Phoenix Suns were effectively the NBA's first second-apron guinea pig, and they demonstrated how quickly things can go south for teams above that line. In 2023, they quickly signed Keita Bates-Diop, Yuta Watanabe and Drew Eubanks once free agency began, and they added Eric Gordon and Bol Bol later on. Last summer, they landed one of the biggest steals of the summer by inking Tyus Jones to a one-year, veteran-minimum contract. Some of those signings (Jones, Eubanks) worked out for the Suns. Others did not. When Grayson Allen went down two games into the 2024 playoffs with an ankle injury, the Suns didn't have the adequate depth to replace him. The same went for whenever Kevin Durant, Bradley Beal and/or Devin Booker missed time over the past two seasons. Second-apron teams with elite college and NBA scouting departments might be able to work the margins in the draft and free agency and harvest some gems with their limited resources. However, the second-apron restrictions are effectively designed to limit teams' ability to improve their roster via free agency or trades. The Second Apron's Draft Pick Penalties Teams that go above the second apron aren't just limited in free agency and on the trade market. They face a pair of severe draft-related penalties as well. If a team finishes above the second apron in a given year, it is no longer allowed to trade its first-round pick seven years in the future. That means the Suns, Celtics and Timberwolves—all of whom finished as second-apron teams in 2024-25—are not allowed to trade their 2032 first-round pick for the time being. It gets worse. If any of those teams stay above the second apron for at least two of the next four years, that first-round pick will automatically move to the bottom of the round. If multiple teams have their picks moved down in the same draft, they'll be arranged in reverse order of their winning percentage from that season. If a second-apron team finishes below the second apron for at least three of the following season, its first-round pick becomes trade-eligible again. However, the Suns, Celtics and Timberwolves will not be able to trade their 2032 first-round pick until 2028 at the earliest. All three teams have already dipped below the second apron in 2025-26, which suggests they're being mindful of those draft-pick penalties. The Cleveland Cavaliers are the only team above the second apron at the moment. If they fall short in the playoffs again, it's fair to wonder whether they'll be compelled to trade one of their larger contracts to escape from the second-apron restrictions that they'll face this coming season. The second apron increases at the same percentage as the salary cap and luxury-tax lines do on a year-to-year basis, so teams will begin to gain a bit more breathing room as the decade progresses. There was less than an $11 million gap between the first and second apron in 2024-25, whereas there's nearly a $12 million one in 2025-26. However, the NBA dropped an unpleasant surprise on teams just before the start of free agency when it issued an updated projection for the 2026-27 salary cap. According to ESPN's Bobby Marks, the cap is only expected to rise by 7% rather than the full 10% that it's allowed to increase. John Hollinger of The Athletic noted that teams "had budgeted for another 10% raise, but now must change their projections downward for the luxury tax and aprons by roughly $5 million apiece." The league's new national TV deals should still send the salary cap, luxury tax and aprons soaring over the coming years, but ongoing disruption with regional sports networks is cutting into the NBA's projected revenue. Teams have to factor those variables in while plotting their long-term strategy, as the second-apron restrictions have proven to be no joke. "I think the second-apron basketball penalties are real, and I'm not sure I understood how real until they were staring me in the face in the last month," Celtics president Brad Stevens told reporters after the first round of the 2025 NBA draft in June. "So I do think that that can't be overstated." The Celtics won't be the last team to feel the wrath of the second apron. The Cavaliers' day of reckoning is fast approaching, and the Orlando Magic and Oklahoma City Thunder could eventually join them in the years to come. Unless otherwise noted, all stats via PBPStats, Cleaning the Glass or Basketball Reference. All salary information via Spotrac and salary-cap information via RealGM. All odds via FanDuel Sportsbook. Follow Bryan on Bluesky.
