West Midlands road safety and travel commissioners in new roles
Two people have been appointed to new roles to improve road safety and increase cycling and walking across the West Midlands region.They will work with a new transport task force being set up through the West Midlands Combined Authority (WMCA).The roles have been created after campaigners called for action due to the number of deaths on roads and speed limits to be cut.The new road safety commissioner is Mat MacDonald, an NHS doctor with experience supporting victims of road collisions. Beccy Marston, who has worked with charities, communities and councils, becomes the active travel commissioner.
They will be expected to work one day a week and be each paid £10,000, which is about £200 per day, for their contributions.Last month, West Midlands Mayor Richard Parker said he was "blown away" by the standard of applicants, and had received about 300 applications.The pair will work towards making roads in the region safer while encouraging more people to choose cycling and walking for shorter journeys, improving the environment and reducing traffic congestion, Mr Parker said.The key target, set out in the WMCA's Regional Road Safety Strategy, was to reduce the numbers of people killed or seriously injured on our roads by half by 2030.At a protest in Birmingham last July, campaign group Better Streets for Birmingham said at least 23 people had died on city roads in a year and called for speed limits to be lowered.
'Future generations'
Mr MacDonald, a former chair of the campaign group, said being appointed to the new role was a privilege and he looked forward to working towards that target. "Achieving this vital objective is the least we owe – not only to the victims of the tragic crashes on our streets, but also to the future generations of the West Midlands, whose safety and happiness is critical to realising the exceptional potential of our remarkable region," he said.The region's Local Transport Plan has set a target for everyone to be able to safely reach a range of local destinations on foot, in a wheelchair or on a bike or scooter, with the aim of at least half of all trips being made by active travel by 2030, Mr Parker said.Ms Marston said: "By working hand-in-hand with communities and grassroots organisations, we aim to bring our new infrastructure to life and help individuals experience the practical benefits of walking or cycling for everyday journeys."She added that she understood walking and cycling may not work for everyone but it was their "collective responsibility to make these options safer, more accessible, and easier, helping them become the natural and preferred choice for short journeys". Police and Crime Commissioner Simon Foster, who chairs the West Midlands Road Safety Strategic Group, welcomed the appointments, adding reducing number of people "tragically and avoidably killed" remained a priority.
Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
Flag lady raising the standards in her village
For the last 30 years, wherever she has lived, Sue Wiles has had a flag pole in her is known as the "flag lady of Stapleford" - the village in Cambridgeshire she now calls home."I don't feel I'm making a statement flying a flag but I like to be patriotic," she said."I like to keep people amused and I know people notice my flags when they drive along the road."The 82-year-old always has one of her 20 flags flying when she is at home. Her flags include well-known national ones like the union flag, the St George's flag and the stars and stripes of America, along with quirkier options. "I've been flying the Ukrainian flag a lot so much I am now on my fourth one," she she also has ones for Christmas and other special occasions."I made three during lockdown. I made a 'Thank you NHS' flag and when the Queen gave a pep talk I made one that said: 'Never give up, never despair.'"She also made one following the Queen's address on the eve of lockdown which read "We will meet again"."I had a lot of reaction. I would look out the window and nearly every time somebody was on the pavement taking a picture," she said."People put notes through the door saying: 'Thank you so much for flying the flag and keeping us jollied along.'"You have to keep on the ball though because there are royal birthdays when it is appropriate to fly the union flag." Has flag flying become too political? The flying of flags has become a talking point with several local authorities restricting the number being flown outside council week the Conservative MP for Romford, Andrew Rosindell, held a special debate in parliament encouraging more authorities to follow suit."The flying of identity-based political banners especially those representing what is sometimes only a slim, exclusive and often exclusionary subset of a particular interest group of social movement is often seen as implicitly endorsing a specific view point" he said"If a town hall chooses to fly a banner for one group of people it would surely be obliged to fly one for another group and another group and so on. In doing so it will inevitably appear to be endorsing every cause identity and political campaign"And this week councillors at West Northamptonshire Council, which is run by Reform UK, approved new protocol which will see only the union, St George's and Northamptonshire flags regularly flown, alongside the occasional military people have expressed their disappointment that Pride and Windrush flags will no longer be council said it would "continue to give its backing to a busy and varied local community events calendar". Conservative-run Suffolk County Council has also limited the number of flags it flies. A Suffolk County Council spokesman said: "In the past we've flown a variety of flags on a fairly ad hoc basis. "We didn't have an agreed schedule or anything like that. We've wanted more rigour for some for Mrs Wiles, there can never be too many flags. "I don't think councils should restrict the flags they are flying."Obviously we don't want to have hundreds of flags but to restrict them to two or three would be very sad," she said. "To use flags to make a political point I think would be a great mistake in my opinion."I think people like to see public building flying flags. Maybe that would encourage more people to have their own flag pole." BBC Politics East will be broadcast on Sunday, 29 June at 10:00 BST on BBC One in the East of England, and will be available after broadcast on BBC Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
Reform the NHS, not our shopping baskets
This week, the NHS will publish its 10 Year Health Plan. The most we can expect from this exercise in Soviet-style planning is tinkering around the edges of an edifice that was erected when Joseph Stalin ruled in Moscow. By 2035, the end date of this 10-year plan, the country will almost certainly be unable to afford the NHS in its present form – if, indeed, it hasn't collapsed under the weight of its own contradictions by then. Unable to address the fundamental problems of the NHS, the dirigistes of Whitehall have come up with a new plan to direct us how to lead our lives – telling us what we should or shouldn't be allowed to choose to put in our shopping baskets. Supermarkets will be expected to cut 100 calories from the average shopping basket by limiting sales of sugary and salty snacks or other 'junk food'. Ever since Napoleon Bonaparte sneered at England as 'a nation of shopkeepers', we have worn his insult as a badge of honour. We are proud to be a people who earn our living by trade and we cherish the liberties that are the glory of a commercial society. Even those of us who are not shopkeepers are at least customers. So little does this Labour Government know the British people that it is about to resort to distinctly Napoleonic measures to punish both retailers and consumers. Yet previous attempts to control consumption have never succeeded in changing enduring patterns of behaviour rooted in human nature. It is outrageous that officials feel empowered to tell us what we can, and cannot, eat. The public is being infantilised and robbed of agency. Centuries have passed since Parliament abandoned sumptuary laws that prohibited the lower orders from imitating the luxurious dress of the aristocracy. But the bureaucratic mind is obdurate in its disdain for popular tastes in food and drink. Combined with Labour's instinct to meddle, along with its insatiable fiscal appetite, it is no surprise that, as we report today, a modern version of the sumptuary laws is about to land on an unsuspecting nation. Obesity is a genuine and growing problem, but, hitherto, all attempts to address it by fiscal means have failed. The latest obesity tax – supermarkets will be fined if they don't reduce the nation's calorie intake, and this will inevitably be passed on to consumers – now emerging from the bowels of the Health Department and the Treasury, claims to be aimed directly at our waistlines. In reality, like all its predecessors, it will target our wallets. There is a certain grim irony in the fact that this policy should have been adopted at the same time as the decision by the NHS to prescribe the weight-loss drug semaglutide (contained in Ozempic and Wegovy). It is fairly obvious that the underlying rationale of the new regulations is less about obesity than about the Government's failure to control spending. No doubt figures will be trotted out about how many lives will be saved by cutting consumption of ultra-processed foods or any other category of comestible that attracts the ire of the health bureaucrats. But the truth is that new rules are being concocted because the Government is running scared of its own MPs, who have effectively imposed a veto on cuts in welfare spending. What would genuinely make a difference to life expectancy and health outcomes would, of course, be a radical reform of the NHS, a more active population, and a reduction in the numbers wasting their lives on benefits. Rachel Reeves has just poured another £29 billion into the health service, without any clear cost-benefit calculation. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, is intelligent enough to know that he has inherited an obsolete behemoth that is crying out for root-and-branch reform. But building a new consensus for a new NHS would require the Labour Party to rethink its assumptions about the social contract, as well as the role of insurance and individual responsibility. The original 1946 NHS Act created 'a comprehensive health service designed to secure improvement in the physical and mental health of the people of England and Wales'. Today, the nation's health is not safe in the hands of a dysfunctional Labour Party that would rather do anything – even introducing an assisted-dying service – than take on the overdue task of making the NHS fit for purpose. These new directives are at best a displacement activity, at worst an act of fiscal condescension. A nation of shopkeepers deserves better than to be bossed around by its own government.
Glasgow Times
6 hours ago
- Glasgow Times
Bereaved urge ‘truth' as Covid inquiry shifts focus to care homes
Grieving relatives will give evidence this week as the module looking at the adult social care sector begins. The first week of what is to be a five-week module will also hear from former health secretary Matt Hancock. Former health secretary Matt Hancock has given evidence to the Covid inquiry multiple times (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Mr Hancock, who resigned from government in 2021 after admitting breaking social distancing guidance by having an affair with a colleague, has given evidence to the inquiry multiple times. He will return on Wednesday for a full-day session to face questions specifically about the care sector. In 2023 he admitted the so-called protective ring he said had been put around care homes early in the pandemic was not an unbroken one, and he understood the strength of feeling people have on the issue. At a Downing Street press conference on May 15 2020, Mr Hancock said: 'Right from the start, we've tried to throw a protective ring around our care homes.' Bereaved families have previously called this phrase a 'sickening lie' and a 'joke'. When the pandemic hit in early 2020, hospital patients were rapidly discharged into care homes in a bid to free up beds and prevent the NHS from becoming overwhelmed. However, there was no policy in place requiring patients to be tested before admission, or for asymptomatic patients to isolate, until mid-April. This was despite growing awareness of the risks of people without Covid-19 symptoms being able to spread the virus. The Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice (CBFFJ) campaign group said people want answers about decisions made 'at the highest levels of government'. From Monday, module six of the inquiry will look at the effect the pandemic had on both the publicly and privately funded adult social care sector across the UK. Among the issues to be examined will be decisions made by the UK Government and devolved administrations on moving people from hospitals into adult care and residential homes in the early stages of the pandemic. The module will also consider how the pandemic was managed in care and residential homes, including infection prevention and control measures, testing for the virus, the availability and adequacy of personal protective equipment (PPE), and the restrictions on access to such locations by healthcare professionals and loved ones. Charlie Williams' 85-year-old father, Vernute, died at a care home in April 2020. The latest module will focus on the care sector (Alamy/PA) Mr Williams, a member of CBFFJ, said: 'We have been waiting years for this moment. What happened in care homes during the pandemic was not a tragic accident, it was the result of decisions made at the highest levels of government. 'Covid-positive patients were knowingly discharged from hospitals into care homes. There was no testing, no PPE, and no plan to protect the most vulnerable. 'Those in care were left to die. Bereaved families deserve to know who made those decisions and why.' The CBFFJ group has written to inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett, to express their concern at some 'key decision-makers' not expected to be called in this module, including former prime minister Boris Johnson. Mr Williams said not calling Mr Johnson and other senior figures was 'shocking', adding: 'They were at the centre of government when these choices were made, and the inquiry's decision to exclude them is baffling and deeply damaging to any sense of justice.' He said: 'This is the moment for those responsible to finally tell the truth. We want answers. We want accountability. We want justice.' Members of bereaved groups from across the UK will give evidence on Tuesday, while representatives of the National Care Forum and Royal College of Nursing will give evidence on Thursday. Public hearings for the care sector module are expected to run until the end of July.
