Losing weight in your 40s and 50s may seem unbearably hard — but it could keep you alive longer
Working to lose weight in your 40s and 50s may help to reduce your risk of developing a chronic disease, a new study reveals.
Researchers based in the U.K. and Finland say they found health benefits in people who lost an average of 6.5 percent of their body weight in early middle age and maintained that weight loss throughout a period of 12 to 35 years.
Those benefits especially include a lessened risk for cardiovascular disease and diabetes as well as an overall lower risk of death from chronic disease.
'The benefits of lifestyle-based weight management are widely discussed even though studies have found it surprisingly difficult to demonstrate health benefits beyond the prevention of diabetes,' University of Helsinki professor Dr. Timo Strandberg said in a statement.
Strandberg was the lead author of the study which was published recently in the journal JAMA Network Open, the open-access journal of the American Medical Association.
To reach these conclusions, the study tracked and analyzed the health of 23,000 white Europeans who were between the ages of 30 and 50 years old using data from three studies, conducted from 1985 to 1988, from 1964 to 1973, and between 2000 and 2013.
They sorted the participants into four groups: people with persistent healthy weight, people who were overweight but became a healthy weight, people who were healthy and became overweight, and people who were overweight the entire time.
'Measurement of weight and height was conducted at a time when surgical and pharmacological weight-loss interventions were nearly nonexistent,' the authors noted. The cause of weight loss was not assessed, but given the age of the participants and lack of diagnosed disease, it was more likely intentional than caused by severe chronic conditions or frailty.'
In one study, a reduction in body mass from overweight to normal weight over six years in mid-life was tied to a lower risk of developing chronic diseases. There was also a 48 percent lower risk for chronic illness compared to those who remained overweight, which largely held even after excluding participants who developed diabetes during follow-up.
Another study showed a 57 percent risk for chronic illness. A third study, with the longest follow-up period, showed that weight loss in mid-life was associated with a 19 percent reduction in overall mortality.
'I'm certain that overall prevention of overweight and obesity starting in early life is absolutely the best thing to do,' Stranberg told The Independent. 'Our study indirectly proves this by showing that persistent healthy weight over the life-course is best.'
He said that he hopes the findings will inspire people to see that lifestyle changes can lead to a longer life.
'This is particularly important today as more people are overweight than when the collection of our research data began 35 years ago,' he said in the statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
9 hours ago
- Gizmodo
This Prehistoric Trick Shows How Ice Age People Harvested Teeth for Jewelry
When piecing together the cultural practices of ancient humans, traditional archaeologists rely on clues from artifacts such as tools, bones, and pottery. Experimental archaeologists, however, go a step further—recreating past behaviors to experience how people once lived. That's precisely what a team of researchers recently did to investigate how Stone Age communities in northeastern Europe extracted animal teeth to produce accessories. Led by Aija Macāne, a visiting scholar in the Department of Cultures at the University of Helsinki, the archaeologists personally tested seven different extraction methods to determine which were most effective and efficient. Their findings, published June 20 in the journal Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, offer new insights into the lives of prehistoric hunter-gatherers. 'Our experiments show that tooth extraction was a deliberate, time-sensitive process embedded in daily life, especially cooking practices,' Macāne said in a university statement. 'This challenges the assumption that teeth used for ornaments were simply scavenged or easily available.' According to the researchers, animal teeth were among the most common materials used to make jewelry, accessories, and other personal adornments during the Stone Age, especially in the Northern Hemisphere. Experts know this thanks to sites like Zvejnieki, a burial ground in northern Latvia where hunter-gatherers laid people to rest for about five millennia—from 7,500 to 2,600 BCE. More than 2,000 animal teeth have been excavated from the graves at Zvejnieki, making it a prime location to study how ancient humans interacted with these materials. Archaeologists have extensively studied animal tooth pendants from this site, investigating which species they came from, how they were used, where they were placed inside graves, and how they were made. Far fewer studies, however, have looked into the process of extracting teeth and the physical traces this leaves behind, the researchers note. To fill that knowledge gap, Macāne and her colleagues got their hands dirty—literally. The team carried out a series of experiments to test seven different prehistoric methods for extracting teeth: cutting, percussion (or striking), air drying, soaking, direct heat, and two cooking techniques. They chose these techniques based on previous archaeological and ethnographic research. 'While other methods could be tested, we argue that these seven are the most likely given the technologies available at this time,' the researchers state in their report. Over the course of one year, they experienced what it was like to be Stone Age humans in need of some toothy bling. The researchers conducted their experiments at the Īdeņa Experimental Centre in eastern Latvia, which allowed them to source the necessary raw materials from licensed local hunters. In total, they used seven skulls or mandibles from Eurasian elk, two from wild boar, and two from roe deer. Of all the methods they tested, the two cooking techniques proved most effective. Boiling a mandible in a ceramic pot not only poached the meat, but caused soft tissues to detach from the bone, making it easy to manually extract the teeth. Placing entire skulls inside an earth oven—a dug-out pit used to trap heat and, in this case, steam food—had the same effect. Both methods allowed for high extraction rates without damaging the teeth, with the added bonus of making a meal and rendering the rest of the bones suitable for tool-making. These findings suggest that tooth extraction may have been integrated into broader cultural practices, merging food preparation, the making of personal adornments, and funerary rituals. As for the other techniques, soaking proved successful, but did not offer additional benefits. Cutting or striking the teeth to remove them also worked, but that often cause damage. The last two methods—air drying and applying direct heat—did not yield successful results. 'While this study focused principally on the tooth pendant assemblage from the Zvejnieki cemetery, our results have broader implications for understanding tooth extraction and pendant production across prehistory,' the researchers state. 'By examining techniques used for tooth extraction, we have gained valuable insights into human behavior and cultural practices during the Stone Age.' Still, questions remain. The researchers hope their study will inspire other archaeologists to look for physical traces of the extraction process on animal teeth artifacts. They also emphasize the importance of investigating teeth from other species, including humans and dogs. Such work, they argue, would shed 'a critical light on the complexity and significance of these practices.'
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
A rundown of recent Trump administration vaccine policy changes
The Trump administration continued to reshape U.S. health policy in recent days with several moves that could change what vaccines people can get to protect themselves from common illnesses. Some of the changes are immediate, others are still being discussed, and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. must still sign off on some. Doctors' groups have expressed alarm at the moves made by Kennedy, a longtime anti-vaccine activist, and his appointees, who at times have ignored well-established science. Nearly 80 medical groups, including the American Medical Association, issued a statement backing vaccines against common respiratory ailments as 'among the best tools to protect the public.' 'We come together as physicians from every corner of medicine to reaffirm our commitment to these lifesaving vaccines,' the groups wrote. Here's what to know about some of the recent vaccine policy changes: Flu shots and thimerosal On Thursday, a vaccine advisory group handpicked by Kennedy recommended that just about every American get a flu shot this fall. But the group also said people should avoid shots containing thimerosal, a preservative used only in large multi-dose vials that has been proven to be safe. The ingredient isn't used in single-dose flu shots, the type of syringe used for about 95% of U.S. flu shots last season. Status: Kennedy must sign off on the recommendations. Read more AP coverage here. How to get a COVID-19 shot Universal access to updated COVID-19 shots for the fall remains unclear, even after Kennedy's vaccine advisers were shown data showing how well the vaccines are working. Kennedy changed CDC guidance last month, saying the shots are no longer recommended for healthy children and pregnant women — even though doctors groups disagree. And the Food and Drug Administration has moved to limit COVID-19 vaccinations among healthy people under age 65. Expanded warnings on COVID-19 vaccine labels At the request of the FDA, makers of the two leading COVID-19 vaccines on Wednesday expanded existing warnings about a rare heart side effect mainly seen in young men. Prescribing information from both Pfizer and Moderna had already advised doctors about rare cases of myocarditis, a type of heart inflammation that is usually mild. The FDA had asked the drugmakers to add more detail about the problem and to cover a larger group of patients. Status: Labels are being updated now. Read more AP coverage here. Changes considered for the childhood vaccine schedule On Wednesday, Kennedy's vaccine advisers said they would be evaluating the 'cumulative effect' of the children's vaccine schedule — the list of immunizations given at different times throughout childhood. The announcement reflected vaccine skeptics' messaging: that too many shots may overwhelm kids' immune systems. Scientists say those claims have been repeatedly investigated with no signs of concern. The American Academy of Pediatrics said it would continue publishing its own vaccine schedule for children but now will do so independently of the government advisory panel, calling it 'no longer a credible process.'
Health Line
a day ago
- Health Line
Is Thimerosal in Flu Shots Safe? Experts Discuss CDC Vaccine Decision
A CDC advisory panel voted 5–1 to recommend only flu vaccines without the preservative thimerosal. Thimerosal is a mercury-containing compound used as a preservative in vaccines and other drugs. Doctors and physician advocacy groups warn that the decision could lead to more confusion and vaccine hesitancy. A CDC advisory committee voted 5-1 on Thursday to recommend only single-dose formulations of flu shots that do not contain the preservative thimerosal. The vote follows a shakeup of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), in which Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dismissed all 17 members of the panel and hand-picked their replacements. The ouster and subsequent ACIP vote have caused alarm among doctors and physician advocacy organizations—including the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) — who claim the committee is stoking confusion and distrust in vaccines. 'It further undermines vaccine confidence. And they're doing this despite a massive amount of data that confirms that thimerosal is a safe and effective preservative,' said Jake Scott, MD, clinical associate professor of infectious diseases at Stanford Medicine. Thimerosal, a mercury-containing preservative, has been used since the 1930s in vaccines and other drugs. Since the 1990s, it has been the target of intense speculation and debate due to claims — now debunked — that linked it to autism and neurotoxicity. ACIP's new recommendations contradict numerous studies and decades' worth of data showing no link between thimerosal and autism or other neurological conditions. 'This decision does not appear to be data-driven at all,' said Saahir Khan, MD, PhD, an infectious disease specialist with Keck Medicine of USC. 'This will sow a lot of distrust and probably lead to reduced vaccine uptake rates because they are sending a message that indirectly says that we don't think vaccines with thimerosal are safe, whereas the evidence shows that they are safe,' Khan said. What is thimerosal? Thimerosal, which contains about 50% mercury by weight, is one of the most widely used preservatives in vaccines. Every time a drug vial is pierced, it is susceptible to bacterial and fungal contamination. Thimerosal prevents microbial growth and contamination. Today, the use of thimerosal-containing vaccines has declined due to the advent of single-dose vaccine formulations. All routinely recommended vaccines for U.S. children ages 6 and younger are available in formulations without thimerosal. The vast majority of flu shots administered last flu season, about 96%, were also free of thimerosal. ACIP's recommendation this week against thimerosal-containing flu shots applies only to vaccines packaged in multi-dose vials. While multi-dose vials make up only a small subset of flu shots, the format is important for public health. 'Multi-dose vials are cheaper, easier to deploy, and essential for equitable access. They're especially important during pandemics. They proved to be essential during the H1N1 pandemic when single-dose supplies run out a lot faster,' said Scott. Following a review in 1999, conducted as part of the FDA Modernization Act (FDAMA), the FDA, National Institutes of Health (NIH), CDC, and others recommended that thimerosal be removed from childhood vaccines as a precautionary measure. That recommendation was based on 'scientific uncertainty' at the time and sought to reduce total mercury exposure in infants. That review found ' no evidence of harm ' caused by thimerosal in vaccines beyond localized reactions. However, it noted that some infants' cumulative mercury exposure in their first six months exceeded EPA recommendations, and that removing thimerosal could reduce this overall exposure. At vaccine concentrations, thimerosal delivers roughly 25 micrograms of mercury per 0.5 mL dose — about the same amount found in a three-ounce can of tuna. However, there's also an important distinction between the mercury found in thimerosal and tuna. Certain kinds of fish contain methylmercury, which can be toxic. Thimerosal contains ethylmercury, which, in contrast, is eliminated far more rapidly from the body and thus is far less likely to persist and cause harm. Revisiting the thimerosal controversy In the lead-up to this week's vote, Lyn Redwood, a retired nurse practitioner and president emeritus of Children's Health Defense — a group formerly chaired by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose mission is 'ending childhood health epidemics by eliminating toxic exposures' — reiterated many claims against thimerosal in an ACIP presentation. However, those claims — especially the alleged link between thimerosal and neurotoxicity — have been extensively debunked. 'There have been multiple well-controlled studies, randomized meta-analyses, and trials comparing vaccines with thimerosal to vaccines without thimerosal to see if there was any difference in neurological outcomes, and these trials generally did not find any connection between thimerosal at the doses used in vaccines and neurological conditions,' said Khan. An often-cited Danish study that included over half a million children found no causal relationship between thimerosal and the development of autism. Another large study of more than 100,000 children in the United Kingdom also found no evidence to support a link between thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders. A 2010 study found that exposure to thimerosal in prenatal or infant stages did not increase the risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Perhaps most telling, Scott points out, is that even after thimerosal has been removed from vaccines, autism rates continued to rise. Such was the case for Denmark, which removed thimerosal in 1991, and the United States in 2003. Doctors warn that ACIP's recommendation fails to consider these studies and the large body of evidence supporting vaccine safety. And that will inevitably have consequences for the health of Americans. 'Our studies show that vaccines are safe and effective. I recommend them based on my medical experience, but some people are going to refuse. And unfortunately, they're going to put themselves at higher risk of infection and they're going to put the people around them at higher risk of infection,' said Khan.
