Media Insider: Taxpayer-funded Jacinda Ardern movie ‘Mania' scrapped
Mania producer Emma Slade, of Auckland-based Firefly Films, confirmed on Wednesday that the film had been scrapped.
'Once we heard that another project was underway and further advanced than we were, we decided not to pursue the project further,' Slade said in a brief email response to a list of questions.
Former NZ Prime Minister Dame Jacinda Ardern.
Media Insider revealed in March last year that the NZ Film Commission board had agreed to $800,000 in taxpayer funding for Mania.
The film would likely have received a further $1.2 million in public support through the Government's screen production rebate.
According to a synopsis provided by the NZFC at the time, the documentary would explore the 'mania' that propelled Ardern's rise as a young political leader and how that 'later collided with a backlash of hate'.
The movie was neither authorised nor endorsed by Ardern, who threw her support instead behind Prime Minister. 'The producers have not sought or used Film Commission funding and that was important to me.'
Nevertheless, Mania had received 'significant foreign investment and international interest', NZFC chief executive Annie Murray said earlier last year.
At that stage, film bosses did not seem worried about two Ardern movies potentially being in the market at the same time.
'[Production company] Madison Wells appear to be doing an authorised biopic on Dame Jacinda Ardern's political career, while the independent Mania documentary explores quite different social and political issues in New Zealand society arising out of her tenure as Prime Minister,' said Murray last June.
'It will be good for the NZ viewing public to have the contrasting stories available at about the same time. Each work will likely benefit from this as well.
'The success of Mania is not undermined by the Madison Wells' doco; NZFC is not reviewing funding and we remain confident that it can proceed as planned.'
Prime Minister, which featured at the Sundance festival in January, opened in the US last month and will feature at the NZ International Film Festival in Auckland on August 2 and in Wellington on August 16.
The movie Prime Minister featured at the Sundance festival in January - in attendance, from left, Gigi Pritzker, Clarke Gayford, Lindsay Utz, Dame Jacinda Ardern, Michelle Walshe and Rachel Shane. Photo / Getty
It has been produced by New Zealand's Dark Doris and American firms Madison Wells and Divergent Pictures. It has been produced with Ardern's full support, including interviews and behind-the-scenes footage.
The NZFC issued a statement last December saying it was delighted Prime Minister had been accepted at Sundance.
In a footnote to that press release, the commission said the producers of Mania had 'informed the Film Commission that the production is on an indefinite pause, and no Film Commission funding has been drawn down'.
Murray told this week's Media Insider podcast that taxpayer money committed to projects had a deadline. Producers would have to reapply for any funding should they want to resurrect the Ardern project.
'I think the fact that this new film has come out now... that would be a factor that we would take into account,' said Murray.
'But we'd have to look at it on its merits like we do with any other funding decision.'
Original distributor pulled out
The film was promoted at Cannes in 2023, with Auckland-based Ahi Films listed as the distributor in marketing materials.
Ahi later withdrew from the project.
Last July, Murray said a new distributor was now attached, but neither she nor Slade would disclose their name.
'It is not unusual for market partners to change,' said Murray at the time.
'The Film Commission is not party to the commercial negotiations between producers and distributors, but we do require producers to have a distribution partner as a condition of funding.
'The name of that distributor remains confidential for now for commercial reasons.'
She said when commercial negotiations were complete, the distributors would make an announcement.
Slade said at the time: 'We are currently focused on making the film. There is no need for them to be named at this stage.'
Editor-at-Large Shayne Currie is one of New Zealand's most experienced senior journalists and media leaders. He has held executive and senior editorial roles at NZME including Managing Editor, NZ Herald Editor and Herald on Sunday Editor and has a small shareholding in NZME.
Watch Media Insider - The Podcast on YouTube, or listen to it on iHeartRadio, Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara to contest Tāmaki Makaurau by-election for Te Pāti Māori
Oriini Kaipara. Photo: Screenshot / YouTube / Newshub Former broadcaster Oriini Kaipara has been chosen to contest the Tāmaki Makaurau by-election for Te Pāti Māori. Kaipara was selected at a behind-closed-doors hui at Hoani Waititi Marae on Thursday evening. The by-election has been triggered by the death of Te Pāti Māori MP Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp , who died suddenly two weeks ago. Te Pāti Māori said Kaipara (Ngāi Tūhoe, Ngāti Awa, Tūwharetoa, Ngāti Rangitihi) had dedicated decades amplifying the stories of Māori communities, holding prime ministers to account, and chairing nationally televised Māori electorate debates. The party co-leaders said she would bring a lifetime of leadership and advocacy, and that she understood the deep connection between whakapapa and politics. "Her voice is exactly what Tāmaki needs to honour the memory of Takutai Moana and to ensure Māori voices are heard loud and clear in Parliament," said co-leader Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. Kaipara said she was pledging to tackle the cost of living crisis facing Tāmaki whānau, with a focus on housing, youth homelessness, and skyrocketing food bills. "Māori are being attacked left, right and centre for purely existing. It's vile and it's not good enough," she said. "My role now is to move from covering the story to changing it." She said if elected her key priorities would be securing mana whenua first right of refusal on significant private land, driving kaupapa Māori housing solutions to eliminate rangatahi houselessness, and expending investment in kaupapa Māori education models such as Te Aho Matua. Te Kou o Rehua Panapa, a former youth worker at Manurewa Marae had also sought the nomination. Hīkoi leader Eru Kapa-Kingi had earlier ruled out running. Kaipara has most recently worked as Pouwhiringa Māori culture lead for the New Zealand Olympic Committee. In 2021, she became the first wāhine Māori with moko kauae to present a mainstream news bulletin, when she fronted Newshub Live at 6pm. Labour's Peeni Henare previously held the Tāmaki Makaurau seat, before being beaten by Kemp in the 2023 election by a slim margin of 42 votes. Henare had held the seat since 2014. RNZ understands Labour's internal nomination process is underway and will close on Friday. The Prime Minister is yet to announce the date for a by-election. However, the Speaker of the House published the notice of vacancy in the Gazette on Wednesday, meaning the Governor-General will issue a writ within 21 days of July 9th, instructing the Chief Electoral Officer to conduct the by-election.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Homeowners warned weather-event buyouts may cease in 20 years
Nelson Tasman residents are still cleaning up from last week's flooding. Photo: RNZ / Mark Papalii Politicians are grappling with who should pay for damage to homes from future weather-related events - and just how much responsibility is on the government to front up. Those already affected by severe weather events say they'd be in a tight spot, if it wasn't for government support. On Wednesday, an independent reference group set up by the Ministry for the Environment released a suite of recommendations to help the government shape climate adaptation legislation . After a 20-year transition period, homeowners whose houses are flooded or damaged by weather events should not expect buyouts, the group recommended. The group also recommended that funding for adaptation measures, such as flood schemes, sea walls and blue-green infrastructure, should follow a 'beneficiary pays' approach in most cases. "This would mean those who benefit most from these investments contribute more." Central government should only invest in adaptation, if it would protect Crown assets "or where broader national benefits can be realised". "Central government investment or other financing strategies may be appropriate to help overcome challenges in particularly vulnerable areas, where there is less ability to pay." Acting Prime Minister David Seymour said the government would consider the recommendations, but pointed out the balance between the "very Kiwi instinct" to help people when they have misfortune and "subsidising people to buy in dangerous places". He said it was a mistake to tell people who build "in the most dangerous place imaginable" that other people will pick up the tab. "What's important is that we are grappling with this reality. "There are higher costs being put onto councils and onto central government, thanks to weather events. We saw that two-and-a-half years ago in Hawke's Bay and it won't be the last time." He said the government was approaching the issue with information and fairness, working out the balance to not leave people "high and dry". Greens co-leader Chloe Swarbrick hit out at the government, saying climate adaptation conversations couldn't happen in isolation of its policies. "This conversation should not be held in isolation of all the other things this government is doing to throw oil, coal and gas on the climate crisis fire," she said. "You cannot pretend that you are making the bucket more resilient, while you are drilling more holes into it and pouring more water into it." She referenced fast-tracking coalmines and plans to build new roads, which will contribute to greater emissions, making the adaptation challenge harder. When it came to who paid for the weather-related damage in the future, Swarbrick said leaving the future of communities exposed by decades of government inaction up to the market wasn't good enough. "This isn't a market failure. The climate crisis is a consequence of a trickle-down economy. "It's not a bug, it is a feature." The Greens were particularly concerned about the 'beneficiary pays' model. Swarbrick said, in practice, those who could afford to would have the access to move further away from the impact of climate change. Labour leader Chris Hipkins said homeowners couldn't be left alone, and many of the issues raised by the report were due to central and local government decisions. "We do have to accept our share of responsibility for making sure that we're preparing for these sorts of events." When it came to flood protection, he said central government needed to play a role and particularly when it came to making sure homes could still be insured. "That's a tricky balance, because government also doesn't want to end up becoming a default insurer either. We don't want people giving up their insurance, because they think government will just come in and sort that out." He said the correct balance was really important and any adaptation laws needed to have bi-partisan support. Lyall Carter is the chair of West Auckland is Flooding, a group formed after the severe 2023 Auckland Anniversary weekend floods. He was disappointed the reference group seemed to lack input from communities affected by flooding, like Esk Valley, Motueke or Rānui. "There's countless references throughout the last couple of years of communities that have been flooded, and I would have thought that it could have been good to have their voice in in these discussions and decision-making." He also raised the issue of the sense of personal responsibility that came through the recommendations. Carter said people needed good data, open and honest conversations about flood plains, and good governance around allowing developers to build on flood plains, if people were to make informed decisions. "You can have all the personal responsibility in the world, but if you're being let down by poor governance, there's not a heck of a lot you can do about that." Carter explained his property was not on a floodplain, but that changed within seven years of owning it. "When we left the property, when we were brought out, the floodplain had moved to be pretty much all across our property." He said a 20-year timeline was "arbitrary" in a lot of ways, and local and central government needed to have "open and honest" discussions with homeowners. People needed assistance to leave at-risk areas and support to transition, if changes on flood maps occurred. Former Muriwai homeowner Caroline Bell-Booth lost her home during Cyclone Gabrielle and told Morning Report she'd be bankrupt without the council buyout of her property, because of a "multi-faceted" problem. "You've got insurance companies who claim that your home is fully insured, but will find loopholes to climate-change issues. "Those insurances are acquired in order for you to get a mortgage from the bank, both of whom are very happy to take your money, until there's an issue. "Lastly, those are for homes which are being built on land that the council is happy for you to build on." She said "everybody's very happy for you to give them money", but pointed out there was no support, when an unforeseen event took place. "This is why I will forever be grateful to the New Zealand government and to the New Zealand taxpayer, who helped everybody in this perilous situation come through, not unscathed, but not completely financially ruined as a result of a situation in which they were victims." She said, if a government implemented a change with no safety net in 20 years time, it must also look to other parties that theoretically should be there to help. She also questioned whether any government implement these recommendations was also doing everything it could to mitigate against the effects of climate change. Buller District Mayor Jamie Cleine was overseeing a plan to eventually relocate the flood-prone town of Westport . He said he could understand why the government was cautious about setting a precedent around buyouts. "In Buller's case, buyouts for properties right from our 2021 floods were never on the table, but that's a long way short of the government leaving the community on its own." The council adopted a broader approach to how climate change or hazard risk was addressed over time, creating a body of work that included "forward-thinking masterplanning work" around where growth should happen. "Where is it just not the right place to keep building and, if you are going to build in the interim, how do you ensure that you're mitigating that risk by building finished floor heights at appropriate levels and things like that." He said it was most important that the "government walks alongside, particularly smaller communities to help fund those parts of the puzzle" and "buy communities some time to do that adaptation". Hutt City Mayor Campbell Barry was glad to see a level of urgency in the report, but the issue of who paid remained. "We are concerned around the costs that will fall on to local government, without having the funding and financing tools to be able to cater for that. "We're the first to say that councils do need to be at the table in these conversations and how we actually implement climate adaptation, but we will be set up to fail, if we have the same funding and financing framework that we currently operate with." He believed "foundational issues" must be addressed. Barry acknowledged a "line in the sand" must be drawn in the future, when it came to whether the government or private landowners paid for such events. "There probably will need to be a point in time where we say the government won't be stepping in or local councils won't be stepping in." He said most important right now was ensuring buyers and property owners were aware of the current risks, so they could make an informed decision with "where they choose to often make their biggest investment that they'll make in their lives". "That isn't always the case." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Who should pay for damage to homes from future weather events?
Politicians are grappling with who should pay for damage to homes from future weather related events - and just how much responsibility is on the government to front up. n independent reference group set up by the Ministry for the Environment has released a raft of recommendations help the government shape climate adaptation laws. It suggests a phase out of government support for houses that are flooded or damaged by weather events. But those already affected by severe weather events say they'd be in a tight spot if it wasn't for government support. Political reporter Lilian Hanly reports. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
