The AeroPress Premium Finally Offers Great Plastic-Free Brewing
AeroPress people are among the quirkiest lots on the farm. Invented by the same guy who invented the Aerobie flying ring, the AeroPress is a unique single-serve coffeemaker that uses pressure applied by hand to extract a smooth but richly flavorful cup of coffee. A well-made AeroPress brew resembles espresso in its lack of bitterness but comes by the cup instead of a shot. Best of all, the plastic device will last a decade and cost only as much as five Starbucks mochas. The WIRED team has long admired AeroPress; columnist Steven Levy profiled the inventor in his Palo Alto office a decade ago and contributor Joe Ray is on the record calling the AeroPress 'ingenious.'
The one obvious downside—and sensitivity to this issue will vary widely by person—is that the device is made of plastic. That plastic is repeatedly exposed to near-boiling water and a half-bar of pressure. It is worth mentioning that the plastic AeroPress uses is free of BPA, free of phthalates, and has approval for food contact from the FDA and EU. But … well, you know. Heart of Glass
Back in 2021, the flying-ring guy sold a stake in AeroPress to a Canadian holding company that has been capitalizing on the venture by rolling out a much wider suite of products including big Aeropresses, green Aeropresses, clear Aeropresses, and its own branded metal filter to rival the ones created by cottage brands that made all the accessories the company itself declined to offer. (The AeroPress brand metal filter is great and a clutch addition to the Premium, as will be discussed below.)
Photograph: Martin Cizmar
The most anticipated of those products is the AeroPress Premium. At last, AeroPress offered a brewing system that's totally free of plastic. The chamber that holds the water is heat-proof clear borosilicate glass, like European Pyrex. The tube you use to apply pressure is made of aluminum. The cap that holds the filter (paper or metal) is stainless steel. The plunger cap that forms a seal with the glass chamber is made of silicone.
The first run of the Premium debuted back in October and sold out fast. After months of backorders, it's now readily available directly from the company or from Williams-Sonoma. The Premium's price has sparked heated debates among AeroPress fans—a small tribe may be splitting into two even smaller tribes—but after three weeks of testing I've relegated my old trusty brown plastic AeroPress to a crate full of camping gear. Metal Militia
It's worth stating clearly up top that I really like AeroPress coffee. I tend to alternate between a few different brewing methods (Chemex, Hario, French Press, AeroPress … Keurig) for a few months at a time but always find myself coming back to AeroPress because of the uniquely clean espresso-ish flavor, the ease of use and cleanup, and the fact you can brew a cup at a time, meaning your second cup of coffee isn't sitting around getting cold when your colleague in London schedules a 7 am meeting. But AeroPress brew is uniquely rich and robust and may not be for everyone—it's less crisp and more bitter than proper espresso made using much more pressure, and it has a thicker mouthfeel than regular drip or pour-over coffee.
Photograph: Martin Cizmar
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
40 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
FLYW LEGAL ALERT: Lose Money on Your Flywire Corporation Investment? Contact BFA Law by September 23 Class Action Deadline (NASDAQ:FLYW)
NEW YORK, Aug. 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Leading securities law firm Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP announces that a lawsuit has been filed against Flywire Corporation (NASDAQ: FLYW) and certain of the Company's senior executives for potential violations of the federal securities laws. If you invested in Flywire, you are encouraged to obtain additional information by visiting: Investors have until September 23, 2025, to ask the Court to be appointed to lead the case. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on behalf of investors who purchased Flywire securities. The case is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York and is captioned Hickman v. Flywire Corp., et al. , No. 1:25-cv-04110. Why Was Flywire Sued for Securities Fraud? Flywire operates as a payments-enablement, and software company. Its largest client vertical is education, the volumes and revenue from which rely on international enrollments and student school preferences. In and around late 2023 and early 2024, the Canadian and Australian governments began to tighten student visa and permitting rules. Despite these headwinds, Flywire consistently touted the sustainability of its revenue growth and financial condition, while downplaying the negative impacts of permit- and visa-related headwinds on the Company's business. In truth, it is alleged that Flywire overstated the strength and sustainability of its revenue growth while understating the negative impacts that the permit- and visa-related restrictions had and were likely to have on Flywire's business. The Stock Declines as the Truth Is Revealed On February 25, 2025, Flywire announced that its business in the education sector had significantly deteriorated due to worsening permit- and visa-related headwinds, including 'double digit declines in student visa issuance in our big four geographic markets,' with 'continued visa policy restrictions' anticipated in 2025. On this news, the price of Flywire stock declined roughly 37%, from $17.64 per share on February 25, 2025, to $11.05 per share on February 26, 2025. Click here for more information: What Can You Do? If you invested in Flywire you may have legal options and are encouraged to submit your information to the firm. All representation is on a contingency fee basis, there is no cost to you. Shareholders are not responsible for any court costs or expenses of litigation. The firm will seek court approval for any potential fees and expenses. Submit your information by visiting: Or contact:Ross Shikowitz [email protected] 212.789.3619
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mismatched financial expectations? How to cope in a relationship where one partner out-earns the other
For some, the road to marriage can look financially lopsided. Those in their 30s earning their fair share — say, more than $100,000 a year — may be used to covering 100% of their individual household expenses. However, it doesn't typically feel good when a fiancé refuses to contribute, claiming their money is only for 'fun,' not 'responsibilities.' This is particularly troubling given cost of living increases and how those are reflected in the cost of non-negotiable spending. According to Statistics Canada, the average household spent about $76,750 annually on expenses in 2023, including housing, transportation and food, the three largest categories. In a two-person household, those costs can quickly add up. And when only one person is footing the bill, the financial and emotional burden becomes even heavier. Don't Miss Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich — and 'anyone' can do it The Canadian economy is showing signs of softening amid Trump's tariffs — protect your wallet with these 5 essential money moves (most of which you can complete in just minutes) I'm almost 50 and don't have enough retirement savings. What should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 solid ways you can catch up The red flags of an unequal dynamic While differences in income are normal, refusing to contribute entirely can trigger long-term problems. When one partner sacrifices and handles 100% of the financial responsibilities, their personal finances may suffer down the road, while the other partner gains. This creates several challenges: Budget strain: Even with a six-figure salary, carrying the full weight of household costs limits your ability to save, invest or spend on yourself. Lifestyle imbalance and negative emotions: When one person is financially constrained while the other uses their full income for leisure, it can foster resentment. Power imbalance: Financial inequality can also seep into decision-making. The partner who pays for everything may feel overburdened and unheard, while the non-contributing partner may avoid accountability. Future financial insecurity: Without shared financial planning, big goals — from buying a home to starting a family — may be delayed or derailed entirely. It's about more than just paying the bills: Aligning your values, goals and decisions is important in a successful relationship. How to address it before saying 'I do' Before walking down the aisle, a couple in this situation needs to have a candid conversation in a productive, structured way. If you see yourself as the "giving" half of your relationship, here are a few practical steps to take to hopefully see change. 1. Have a values-based conversation Frame the conversation not as a confrontation, but as a shared planning session for your future. You can try something like: 'I want us to feel like we're building something together. Can we talk about how we want to manage money as a team?' Focus on shared goals, like housing, travel, kids and retirement, and how to achieve them together. Read more: 'You're going to live on beans and rice': This senior told Dave Ramsey she has debt and zero savings — 2. Consider financial counseling If emotions are running high, a third party can help. Premarital or financial counselling can uncover deeper money beliefs and create shared understanding. Resources, like the Canadian Association for Financial Empowerment, can help you locate professionals near you. You can also seek help from a financial advisor, who can look at you and your partner's financial health and find ways to be more reasonable with your money, like finding ways to save for the future, while also finding avenues for realistic, personal indulgences. 3. Propose a fair cost-sharing model A practical approach is using a cost-sharing model like a proportional contribution one. Under this, you'd figure out the proportion of total household income you each bring in. This system keeps contributions equitable while acknowledging income disparities. For example, say you earn 70% of your combined income and your partner earns 30%. You'd each contribute these proportions toward shared costs. So, if those costs are $65,000 annually, you'd pay $45,500 per year, while your partner would pay $19,500 per year. You can also look into a budgeting app, which can help bolster more thoughtful money management and create an actionable and trackable plan moving forward. 4. Set boundaries and deadlines If your partner continues to resist contributing, it's worth asking yourself if this is a difference in values or a refusal to partner in life. Marriage is a financial partnership as much as an emotional one. Put yourself first by setting a deadline to revisit the conversation and being honest with yourself about your limits. What To Read Next Here's how to retire in 10 short years no matter where you live in Canada — even if you're starting with $0 savings Here are 5 expenses that Canadians (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Are you rich enough to join the top 1%? Here's the net worth you need to rank among Canada's wealthiest — plus a few strategies to build that first-class portfolio Pet owners, here's how you can get up to 90% cashback on expensive emergency veterinary bills — and you can even get a free quote in 30 seconds 1. Statistics Canada: Survey of Household Spending, 2023 (May 21, 2025) This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Starbucks must start delivering big-time
I have had a checkered history with Starbucks (SBUX). As an analyst during the Howard Schultz CEO era, I would camp out in stores for days studying everything the chain was doing wrong (and right). The stock was always priced for perfection, and I was trying to ensure that clients wouldn't be left holding the bag. My ensuing critical research reports weren't well-received by Starbucks. I still remember Schultz telling me to f*** off at an analyst day. I wasn't amused in the moment by a billionaire's lack of verbal control, but the next morning, I was back to my chipper self. You can't take this stuff personally. More than a decade later, I'm now a journalist with no bones to pick with Starbucks — just one providing context on this important stock. Current Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol is hard to root against. I originally met him at a Taco Bell investor day in New York City, maybe nine years ago. He was a good leader then and a better one today with a successful Chipotle (CMG) turnaround under his belt. The problem is that Starbucks' business isn't yet showing the Niccol magic. You can see the seeds he planted beginning to sprout — service times improving, sales not falling off a cliff, menus streamlining. In the quarter announced this week, the company teased a "wave" of innovation such as protein cold foam coffee, shorter mobile order pickup times, and a potential sale of part of the struggling China business. But again, Niccol's magic beans have barely sprouted green shoots, with Niccol almost one full year into the job. What Starbucks delivered in the quarter: Operating profit margins crashed in every business segment year over year. Overall operating margins plunged 660 basis points from a year ago. US same-store sales fell 2% on the back of a 4% traffic drop. Earnings per share tanked 46% from a year ago. No guidance provided. "Unfortunately, I think there were some choices made before me that really set us back on our ability to create that great customer connection between our barista and customer and provide the type of customer service that the Starbucks brand, frankly, is known for," Niccol told me on Yahoo Finance's Opening Bid (watch above). Some investors are clinging to the positives Niccol noted during the earnings call. They include low double-digit percentage same-store sales growth at college locations, improved transaction trends in the US toward the end of the quarter, and the aforementioned "wave" of menu innovation. Starbucks will also spend $500 million during the next year on increased labor investments — shy of Street whispers of about $1 billion. The company even teased the potential to reach peak operating margins again. But at this point, investors should be questioning when the inflection moment is in Starbucks' business, and what that inflection actually looks like. The turnaround wasn't in the just-completed quarter. It is unlikely to be the current quarter. Then, mix in high tariffs on coffee beans (including a 50% rate on Brazilian imports) and cautious US consumers. The stock has dropped 9% over the past week. But the valuation may still be too caffeinated. Shares trade on a price-to-earnings multiple of 31x forward earnings estimates as investors price in a Niccol-led comeback. That's asking a lot in the economic climate and against the backdrop of competitors like Dutch Bros. (BROS), Luckin (LKNCY), and countless others serving premium coffee. "More questions than answers ahead as investments into the biz stacking up and only some early signs of progress being made so far; we think downside risk is under-appreciated and rate the stock Underperform," Jefferies analyst Andy Barish wrote in a note. I worry Niccol has set the bar too high for short-term results, risking a letdown for hopeful investors if there isn't a clear inflection next quarter. Yahoo Finance's Invest Conference is coming up! Join me and the Yahoo Finance newsroom for our annual Invest conference, taking place in New York City, November 12-13. We just added a couple of new speakers to an already awesome lineup, with more on the way. Learn more about the conference and register today! Trust me, you will want to be in this room ahead of 2026. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email
