Ramaphosa's words flatter, his actions offend
The controversy surrounding America's refusal of Mcebisi Jonas's application for a diplomatic visa is both surprising and troubling. Three months after his appointment, the public still does not know what he has done – if anything – in executing his mandate.
When President Cyril Ramaphosa announced Jonas's appointment as his special envoy on 14 April 2025, he made his responsibilities clear in a press release: 'I hereby announce the appointment of Mr Mcebisi Jonas as my Special Envoy to the United States of America, serving as the official representative of the President and the government of the Republic of South Africa.'
'In this capacity, Mr Jonas is entrusted with the responsibility to advance South Africa's diplomatic, trade and bilateral priorities. He will lead negotiations, foster strategic partnerships and engage with US government officials and private-sector leaders to promote our nation's interests,' the president said.
ALSO READ: 'Right-wing nexus': Presidency cautions South Africans against the DA [VIDEO]
The mandate could not be more explicit. The role entails direct, high-level engagement with the Trump administration, particularly as SA faces steep US trade tariffs that take effect from 1 August.
Read more Police scandal: Justice must now be served
However, the Democratic Alliance revealed on Monday that Jonas' application for a diplomatic visa was denied, his credentials were formally rejected and that the South African government was 'explicitly' advised on multiple occasions that Jonas 'was not acceptable to Washington' and was urged to appoint an alternative envoy.
The Presidency hit back yesterday in a strongly worded statement by spokesperson Vincent Magwenya. He came out swinging against the DA, labelling the revelation as an effort to 'embarrass the President' and that the 'DA has positioned itself as part of a right-wing nexus that seeks to use a foreign state to effect changes to democratically developed national policies in our own country'.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa 'satisfied' with Mcebisi Jonas's work despite being snubbed by Trump
But he didn't dispute the facts the DA put on the table. Instead, Magwenya suggested that Jonas didn't need one to fulfil his responsibilities and downplayed his role.
'The facts around this matter include the reality that Special Envoys do not present diplomatic credentials to host countries in the way designated Heads of Mission or other diplomats are.'
Magwenya continued: 'Mr Jonas has, however, played an important role in working with the DTIC [Department of Trade, Industry and Competition] to develop the trade proposals in which South Africa is currently engaging the United States in good faith and with the expectation of mutually beneficial terms.
'Similarly, he has been assisting Dirco [Department of International Relations and Cooperation] in Government's efforts to reset diplomatic relations and all areas of cooperation between South Africa and the United States.'
'While these processes are underway and in view of President Ramaphosa's telephonic contact with President Trump as well as his Working Visit to Washington in May 2025, President Ramaphosa has not had a need for Mr Jonas to visit the United States on urgent business.'
This is a notable shift. The original mandate stated that Jonas would lead negotiations. Now, he is merely assisting departments that lead.
ALSO READ: Presidency clarifies Mcebisi Jonas' absence from Ramaphosa's meeting with Trump
These developments also followed Magwenya's statement to Dawie Boonzaair, a reporter at Rapport/City Press over the weekend, that the President was 'satisfied' with Jona's work. However, he declined to comment on what Jonas has achieved.
This lack of clarity undermines the seriousness of the appointment, casting doubt on the Presidency's efforts to resolve the diplomatic fallout between the country, which has resulted in the implementation of 30% tariffs.
Seen in the context that Jonas was appointed after Washington removed Ebrahim Rasool as ambassador (which was not replaced), it suggests his appointment was to lobby the Trump administration to repair the relationship.
However, Ramaphosa did not fire and replace Jonas, despite being aware that Jonas was persona non grata in Washington. He even visited the White House after being informed of this.
ALSO READ: Is Mcebisi Jonas the right man as SA's US rep?
We have seen Ramaphosa's 'do-nothing' approach throughout his time in the Union Buildings.
If Jonas had even been somewhat successful, resulting in a reduced tariff of 30%, his appointment would have been considered a success.
I am not sure if this is a scandal, but it is indicative of the President's unwillingness to take South Africa into his confidence and be transparent.
Numerous qualified individuals in the country can represent South Africa with authority and credibility in Washington and be taken seriously.
President Ramaphosa's handling of the Jonas matter reflects a troubling pattern that he is not putting South Africa first and failing to take South Africans into his confidence. Unfortunately, the public has become accustomed to this evasiveness. However, the current fallout with the United States – our second-largest trading partner – marks a serious escalation with real economic consequences. This includes export industries, investor relations, and trade diplomacy.
ALSO READ: Ramaphosa appoints Mcebisi Jonas as special envoy to US
What makes this even more concerning is the apparent hypocrisy. Just two years ago, South Africa aggressively pushed for the expulsion of US Ambassador Reuben Brigety after he alleged that arms had been loaded onto the Russian ship Lady R, endangering South Africa's relationship with Washington.
At the time, the government accused Brigety of misconduct and demanded accountability. Brigety resigned a year later.
Yet now, the Presidency appears comfortable sending a representative to the US who the Trump administration sees as diplomatically unacceptable. This is not surprising as Jonas publicly stated in 2020 that Trump is a 'racist, homophobic, narcissistic right-winger'. It may be true, but you don't send someone to stand with a cap in his hand to negotiate with someone you have insulted to this extent.
The President has proclaimed in the Oval Office that 'America is a valued partner' and invited Trump to attend the G20 in South Africa, but sending a politically compromised envoy to repair one of South Africa's most important bilateral relationships is not only unwise – it is deeply disrespectful.
And not replacing him after being informed of his undesirability is an even bigger slap in the face.
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
16 minutes ago
- The South African
South Africa to get TWO new significant laws
South Africa's justice system is on the brink of significant reform as two landmark Bills – one targeting international fugitives and the other revolutionising divorce law – make their way through parliament. The Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, under newly appointed Minister Mmamoloko Kubayi, has introduced legislation aimed at aligning South Africa's legal framework with global standards while addressing domestic inequities in family law. At the heart of the reform is the International Co-operation in Criminal Matters Amendment Bill, which will allow South Africa to fully cooperate with international bodies such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) – a gap previously exposed in high-profile cases involving leaders like Omar al-Bashir and Vladimir Putin. The bill introduces audio-visual testimony from foreign witnesses and experts – modernising a system that, since 1996, has relied solely on in-person procedures. This change is expected to speed up investigations, reduce costs, and enhance accessibility. More significantly, the bill gives South African authorities the legal standing to arrest and extradite individuals at the request of international bodies, not just sovereign states. This closes a critical loophole that previously left the country in murky legal waters during global diplomatic stand-offs. Parallel to the international law changes, the General (Family) Laws Amendment Bill, 2025 aims to correct decades of inequality for South Africans – particularly women – trapped in unfair matrimonial regimes. The proposed legislation will allow for a fair redistribution of assets in divorces where couples were married out of community of property and without the accrual system introduced in 1984. It will also allow for redistribution claims when a spouse dies – an option previously unavailable under the law. These changes follow a 2023 Constitutional Court ruling that found the existing marriage laws to be unconstitutional, citing unfair economic consequences for non-working or caregiving spouses. The bill will further amend the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act, expanding the role of the Family Advocate to better protect financially vulnerable individuals during divorce proceedings. This marks a move toward holistic family support, especially in cases involving older women who were unaware of the financial risks associated with their marriage contracts. Both bills are now on a legislative fast track, although public consultations and parliamentary debate are expected in the coming months. Legal experts have hailed the proposals as long-overdue, noting their potential to enhance justice, accountability, and fairness across the board. 'These changes represent a critical step in modernising our legal system,' said one Johannesburg-based family law attorney. 'We are finally giving voice to those previously sidelined – both in global justice and at home.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Mashatile calls for increased Chinese investment as trade deficit with China surges
Deputy President Shipokosa Paulus Mashatile delivers a keynote address at the South Africa-China Investment Forum, as part of his working visit to the People's Republic of China. Banele Ginidza Deputy President Paul Mashatile has issued a compelling invitation to Chinese corporations, advocating for increased investment in South Africa. Speaking at the South Africa-China Investment Forum in Beijing on Thursday, Mashatile highlighted a significant shift in the trade dynamics between the two nations, revealing that the trade deficit with China has escalated dramatically from less than $1 billion in the period between 1988 and 2000 to an alarming $9.71bn by 2023. Mashatile said ddressing these challenges necessitated expanding South Africa's export portfolio, encouraging value-added exports, and establishing a more balanced trade relationship. "We need to develop a more coordinated and strategic approach. We need to address challenges such as access to the Chinese market due to factors like tariff and non-tariff barriers, distance, and competition from other countries," Mashatile said. The essence of this trade imbalance, as Mashatile pointed out, stems from the current nature of the economic relationship where South Africa primarily exports raw materials and minerals while predominantly importing manufactured and capital goods from China. This disparity has raised concerns regarding the sustainability of such a model, particularly as both South Africa and China navigate increasing tariff barriers imposed by the United States. "As South Africa-China relations continue to deepen, new opportunities emerge for Chinese businesses seeking to enter the South African market, particularly in sectors such as renewable energy, green hydrogen, energy storage, infrastructure and logistics, our Special Economic Zones (SEZs), pharmaceuticals and medical devices, and the beneficiation of critical minerals, as well as in the digital economy," he said. Mashatile said South Africa sought to attract investments to increase greenfield investments, infrastructure investments, unlock funding or financial support, partnerships with SOEs, technology transfer and innovation partnerships, investments in SEZs and industrial parks, black industrialist partnerships, as well as capacity and technical assistance for SEZs. "Our SEZs offer an internationally competitive value proposition for the country with an attractive suite of incentives," Mashatile said. "They are located across the country, and each SEZ has unique offerings for investors, some of which could include tax relief, reduced corporate rate taxes and reduced costs for key inputs such as land, water and electricity." Mashatile highlighted the infrastructure investment plan as being in place to drive a range of projects in energy, water and sanitation, transport, digital infrastructure, human settlements, and agriculture and agro-processing. "The plan is supported by an Infrastructure Fund, offering investment opportunities in water development and irrigation projects across nine provinces, a road network expansion, a rehabilitation and maintenance program for construction companies, and high-demand spectrum," he said. Mashatile said South Africa's mineral exports, agricultural commodities, and manufactured items have achieved significant penetration in the Chinese market, aided by a steady flow of investment from Chinese companies since the announcement of President Cyril Ramaphosa's investment mobilisation drive. He said some of the existing partnerships included a major significant investment by the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (ICBC), which purchased a 20% stake in the assets and earnings of Standard Bank for $5.5bn. Another major Chinese electronics manufacturer, Hi-Sense, entered the South African market in 1997. In 2013, the company established an industrial park. Mashatile cited other Chinese flagship companies such as Zhong Xing Communications (ZTE) and Huawei Technologies that were also expanding their presence in South Africa. "Over the last decade, 48 Chinese companies invested in South Africa with a capital investment of over $11.69bn," he said. BUSINESS REPORT
The Herald
an hour ago
- The Herald
Shift in voter support as DA retains Ward 34 with narrow margin
While the DA retained the hotly contested Ward 34 in Nelson Mandela Bay on Wednesday, the result shows a shift in voter dynamics, with the Patriotic Alliance closing the gap and trailing by just 188 votes. The DA secured 2,382 votes (46.56%), with the Patriotic Alliance close behind with 2,194 votes (42.89%). This is according to the IEC website. The by-election was triggered by the death of former ward councillor Johnny Arends in April. Six political parties — the DA, PA, National Alliance, ANC, EFF and PAC — pulled out all the stops in a bid to claim the ward. The National Alliance came in third with 323 votes (6.31%). The ANC followed with 118 votes (2.31%), PAC 64 (1.25%) and EFF 35 (0.68%). In the 2021 local government elections, the DA won the ward with 63.14% of the votes, followed by the National Alliance (17.12%) and PA (2.78%). DA provincial chair Yusuf Cassim said he believed the by-election was not hotly contested. 'This is because the PA brought all its members across SA here. They came out [allegedly] intimidating and bribing the voters with money and alcohol, but they couldn't beat us. 'In next year's elections, they won't be able to do that. 'They are going to have to campaign all over the country. They won't bring all their members into one ward. 'If they couldn't beat us in one ward, how will they stand a chance in an election where they're contesting across the board,' Cassim said. To celebrate the victory, the DA held a motorcade with councillor candidate Annelize Stanley and other supporters to thank the community. Stanley said she was honoured and humbled by the support. 'This is a win for all the residents of Ward 34. We worked so hard for this. 'People in this community know me because I live here. They know my history, and I will serve them well.' Stanley said a pressing issue was broken street lights. 'We are battling with rampant crime, and the sewage leaks take away dignity.‚ PA regional chair Bradley Murray thanked all its members and supporters for showing that their party was the one that could remove the DA in the ward. 'We lost by less than 200 votes, and that speaks volumes about our party considering the DA has ruled there for more than 20 years,' Murray said. 'We are happy with our performance, we're fast eating away at the blue elephant one piece at a time, and they can feel it.' Regarding the allegations of bribery and intimidation, Murray said Cassim was welcome to either report the matter to the police or notify the IEC. 'You must understand that this is very personal for Yusuf. 'The DA lost nine council seats [after the 2021 local government elections] and we are trailing by 188 votes compared to the 1,940 recorded in the 2024 national election — all this happened under his leadership. 'He is fast losing grip because we got the most votes in the Wonderwonings voting station where their candidate is from, and they're not happy about it at all.' National Alliance president Gary van Niekerk said while disappointed with the outcome, it did not come as a surprise considering the conduct of the DA and PA leading to and during the election. 'I don't know if any other party mentioned this, but when [PA president] Gayton [ McKenzie] arrived, PA supporters were giving R100 to voters, which is unacceptable. 'Even before this, he came and revamped a netball court, which was aligned with their campaign. 'On the other hand, the DA minister Dean Macpherson was here last week giving away food parcels, which is a despicable thing to do, buying votes from the poor by providing what they need most. 'They were even campaigning on Wednesday, which is not allowed, but nothing is being done about this.' Van Niekerk said IEC officials were aware of these tactics but did not act. The Herald
