Three Māori MPs suspended from New Zealand Parliament over protest haka
Opposition MP Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, who initiated the traditional Māori haka, a chanting dance of defiance, after being asked if her party, Te Pāti Māori, supported a controversial bill, has received a seven-day ban. The party's co-leaders, Rawiri Waititi and Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, have been handed 21-day suspensions.
The protest was sparked by the Treaty Principles Bill, which sought to redefine the principles of New Zealand's founding document, the Treaty of Waitangi. The bill, which was widely criticised for potentially undermining Māori rights, was voted down 112 to 11 in April following a committee recommendation against it.
The haka performance in parliament last November drew widespread attention and went viral online. While many saw it as a powerful act of cultural defiance, a parliamentary committee later ruled that the display may have 'intimidated' other lawmakers, leading to the unprecedented suspensions. Previously, the longest ban for any MP in New Zealand had lasted just three days.
Maipi-Clarke delivered an emotional speech in parliament as the suspensions were debated. 'We will never be silenced, and we will never be lost,' she said, as quoted by BBC, holding back tears. 'Are our voices too loud for this house – is that why we are being punished?'
The protest and suspensions have been due to growing tensions between the Māori community and New Zealand's conservative government. During the debate, Foreign Minister Winston Peters called Te Pāti Māori a 'bunch of extremists' and said the country 'has had enough of them,' prompting calls for an apology.
Te Pāti Māori holds six of the 123 seats in parliament. As per BBC, their protest echoed broader nationwide outrage over the Treaty Principles Bill, which sparked demonstrations involving over 40,000 people last year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
4 hours ago
- United News of India
Russia downplays US nuclear sub deployment, dismisses any reports of escalation
Moscow, Aug 4 (UNI) Downplaying US President Donald Trump's deployment of two nuclear submarines after his verbal spat with former Russian President and now Deputy Chairman of the country's Security Council Dmitry Medvedev, the Kremlin said it had no intention of involving itself in polemics, reports BBC. In the first official reaction since the US president's comments last Friday, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov dismissed any kind of nuclear panic, stating that American submarines were on combat duty anyway and there had been no escalation. "Very complex, very sensitive issues are being discussed, which, of course, many perceive very emotionally," Peskov said - though he added that everyone should be "very cautious" with nuclear rhetoric. US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff is set to visit Moscow on August 6, where the deployment is more than likely to be discussed. Trump has been in a long game of verbal spats with Medvedev, with the two leaders having taken pot shots at each other many a time. While Trump had called him a 'failed President', Medvedev in turn belittled the POTUS' deadline on ending Russia's war with Ukraine, accusing him of 'playing the ultimatum game' and scorning him. The spat took a heated turn afterwards, when President Trump last week ordered two nuclear submarines to "be positioned in the appropriate regions" in response to what he called "highly provocative" comments by Medvedev. Russia's response has been rather light and restrained, with neither Medvedev or Putin slamming Trump for the move, or threatening any kind of retaliation. In an indirect reference to the spat between the two leaders, Peskov said today that while "in every country members of the leadership... have different points of view", in Russia foreign policy was dictated by President Vladmir Putin alone. Despite the recent developments, US-Russia relations have improved significantly under the Trump administration, though Trump has recently commented that Putin may not be interested in peace, referencing his further advancements on Ukraine. In response, Trump has threatened further tariffs on Moscow and given the country a deadline of August 8 to come to a settlement with Kyiv, while also acknowledging that further tariffs were unlikely to harm Russia. Russia – already the most tariffed country in the world – has coped well the international sanctions, with its economy not experiencing any major setbacks. Trump has said that Russia is "pretty good at avoiding sanctions', while Moscow has retorted that it has been living too long under Western sanctions and was 'immune' to them. Despite their row, Washington and Moscow remain in contact and Peskov welcomed Witkoff's trip later this week. "We are always happy to see Mr Witkoff in Moscow... We consider such contact important, meaningful and useful," he said, adding that Witkoff and Putin may meet. UNI ANV RN
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
Chinese students at UK universities asked to monitor classmates, report on talks critical of China: report
Chinese students in the UK are being asked by officials to monitor their classmates and report on discussions that may be critical of China, according to a new report by the UK-China Transparency (UKCT) think tank, the BBC reports. The report, based on a survey of academics in China studies, also found that some university staff had been warned by Chinese officials not to speak about certain topics in class. The Chinese embassy in London rejected the findings, telling the BBC the report was 'groundless and absurd'. A spokesperson said China respects freedom of speech in the UK and does not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries. The findings come soon after a new law came into effect in the UK, requiring universities to actively promote academic freedom and free speech, even when they have partnerships with foreign governments. The Office for Students (OfS), the higher education regulator, said freedom of speech and academic freedom are 'fundamental' to universities. OfS chief executive Susan Lapworth has said Confucius Institutes—cultural centres funded by the Chinese government and hosted at UK universities—should be examined under the new law due to concerns about foreign influence. Some universities may hesitate to raise concerns about interference because of the high number of Chinese students and the fees they pay, the UKCT said. According to the report, some students from China told lecturers they had been asked by officials to observe and report on their peers. Other students said they felt uncomfortable discussing topics considered sensitive by the Chinese government, and were reluctant to pursue further study in those areas. Topics seen as sensitive include China's policies in Xinjiang, the origins of Covid-19, and the country's growing tech industry. Some academics also said they had been harassed or intimidated. The report said some researchers were denied visas to China, and others said their families in China were pressured because of their work in the UK. There were also reports of intimidation by visiting Chinese scholars and by staff linked to Confucius Institutes. The OfS said it already has powers to ensure universities protect free speech, including from foreign influence. These powers will be expanded to include a new complaints system where staff and visiting speakers can raise concerns directly with the regulator. Universities that fail to protect academic freedom could face fines, with one already being fined £585,000 earlier this year. Universities UK, a group representing 141 institutions, said: 'Any threats to the freedom of our staff or students are taken very seriously. We work closely with the government to prevent this.' A government spokesperson said, 'Anyone working or studying at our universities should know their rights to personal and academic freedom are protected when they are on British soil.' Skills Minister Jacqui Smith added, 'Academic freedom is non-negotiable in our universities. Any attempt by a foreign state to intimidate or harass people in the UK will not be tolerated.' She said the new law makes universities' responsibilities clear, and that institutions failing to act 'will face the consequences'. (With inputs from BBC)
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
China's plan for biggest European embassy in UK raises fears over security, surveillance
Plans for a large new Chinese embassy in London have caused serious concern among activists, local residents and some politicians, according to a report by the BBC. China bought the historic Royal Mint Court site in 2018 for £255 million and hopes to build its biggest embassy in Europe there. The proposed compound, near the Tower of London and opposite the City's financial centre, would include housing for 200 staff, a cultural centre and other undisclosed facilities. Speaking to the BBC, Carmen Lau, a Hong Kong pro-democracy activist who fled to the UK in 2021, said: 'I've never been this close to the site. It makes me very uncomfortable. The UK should not allow the Chinese government to have such a building here.' Lau said she was followed and harassed in Hong Kong and fears that activists could be targeted or even detained if the embassy is built. She added, 'You know the tactics of the regime. My friends and colleagues were arrested. Even in the UK, I feel I've been targeted.' In recent years, Lau received arrest warrants from Hong Kong authorities and letters offering a reward for information about her. These letters were also sent to her neighbours in the UK. Local residents have also raised concerns. Mark Nygate, who lives next to the proposed site, told the BBC: 'We don't want the embassy here because of demonstrations, security risks and threats to our privacy.' Security experts have pointed to the site's location and past use as reasons for concern. Royal Mint Court used to house Barclays Bank's trading floor and is close to a major fibre optic cable network under the Thames. These cables serve financial firms in the City of London. Professor Periklis Petropoulos, an expert in optoelectronics, said access to a nearby telephone exchange could allow data to be intercepted. A former US security official told the BBC, 'Anything up to half a mile from the embassy could be vulnerable.' However, the Chinese embassy in London told the BBC it 'is committed to promoting understanding and friendship' and that building a new embassy 'would help us better perform such responsibilities'. It said claims of security threats were being used as an excuse to block the application. The UK government rejected the embassy plan in 2022 after safety concerns were raised by Tower Hamlets Council. China later resubmitted the same application in August 2024, shortly after the Labour government came to power. Prime Minister Keir Starmer reportedly discussed the issue with Chinese President Xi Jinping. Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner has now taken control of the decision. Foreign Secretary David Lammy and other ministers have expressed support for the project if some adjustments are made. Some experts say one centralised embassy could make Chinese operations easier to monitor. Prof Steve Tsang from the SOAS China Institute told the BBC, 'It's better if they're all in one place. Right now, their staff are spread across London.' Still, others like MP Iain Duncan Smith believe approving the embassy would be a mistake. 'They're hoping China will invest more. But the risks are too serious,' he said. Rayner's decision may depend on how much weight she gives to the potential threat of surveillance and interference.
