logo
French Minister Valls Wants All Parties To Own Their Responsibilities Ahead Of Third Trip To New Caledonia

French Minister Valls Wants All Parties To Own Their Responsibilities Ahead Of Third Trip To New Caledonia

Scoop29-04-2025
Manuel Valls, who is visiting New Caledonia for the third time in two months, has again called all sides to live up to their responsibilities.
, Correspondent French Pacific Desk
French Minister for Overseas Manuel Valls, who is visiting New Caledonia this week for the third time in two months, has once again called all parties to live up to their responsibilities in order to make a new political agreement possible.
Failing that, he said a potential civil war was looming.
'We'll take our responsibilities, on our part, and we will put on the table a project that touches New Caledonia's society, economic recovery, including nickel, and the future of the younger generation', he told a panel of French journalists on Sunday.
He said that he hoped a revised version on a draft document – resulting from his previous visits in the French Pacific territory and new proposals from the French government – there existed a 'difficult path' to possibly reconcile radically opposing views expressed so far from the pro-independence parties in New Caledonia and those who want New Caledonia to remain part of France.
The target remains an agreement that would accommodate both 'the right and aspiration to self-determination' and 'the link with France'.
'If there is no agreement, then economic and political uncertainty can lead to a new disaster, to confrontation and to civil war', he told reporters.
'That is why I have appealed several times to all political stakeholders, those for and those against independence,' he warned.
'Everyone must take a step towards each other. An agreement is indispensable.'
Valls said this week he hoped everyone would 'enter a real negotiations phase'.
He said one of the ways to achieve this will be to find 'innovative' solutions and 'a new way of looking at the future'.
This also included relevant amendments to the French Constitution.
Local parties will not sign any agreement 'at all costs'
Local parties are not so enthusiastic.
In fact, each camp remains on their guard, in an atmosphere of defiance.
And on both sides, they agree at least on one thing: they will not sign any agreement 'at all costs'.
Just like has been the case since talks between Valls and local parties began earlier this year, the two main opposing camps remain adamant on their respective pre-conditions and sometimes demands.
The pro-independence liberation front, the FLNKS, largely dominated by the Union Calédonienne, held at the weekend a 'convention' to decide on whether they would be attending this week's new round of talks with Valls.
They eventually resolved that they would attend the new roundtables, but have not yet decided to call this 'negotiations', only 'discussions'.
They said another decision would be made on Thursday 1 May, 2025, after they have examined Valls's new proposals and documents which the French minister is expected to circulate as soon as he hosts the first meeting, on Wednesday 30 April.
During their weekend 'convention', the FLNKS reaffirmed their demands for a 'Kanaky Agreement' to be signed not later than 24 September 2025, to be followed by a five-year transition period.
The official line was to 'maintain the trajectory' to full sovereignty, including in terms of schedule.
On the pro-France side, the main pillar of their stance is the fact that three self-determination referendums have been held between 2018 and 2021, even though the third and last consultation was largely boycotted by the pro-independence camp.
And that all three referendums have resulted in a vote rejecting full sovereignty.
One of their most outspoken leader, Les Loyalistes party and Southern Province President Sonia Backès, told a public rally last week they refuse another date for yet another referendum.
'A new referendum would mean civil war. And we don't want to fix the date for civil war. So we don't want to fix the date for a new referendum', she said.
Backès, however, said they 'still want to believe in an agreement'.
'We're part of all discussions on seeking solutions. In a constructive and creative spirit'.
One of their other proposals was to grant more powers to each of the three provinces of New Caledonia, including on tax collection matters.
'We don't want differences along ethnic lines. We want the provinces to have more powers so that each of them is responsible for their respective society models'.
Under a draft text leaked last week, any new referendum could only be called by at least three-fifths of the Congress and would no longer pose a 'binary' question on yes or no to independence, but would consist in endorsing a 'project' for New Caledonia's future society.
Another prominent pro-France leader, MP Nicolas Metzdorf, repeated this weekend he and his supporters 'remain mobilised to defend New Caledonia within France'.
'We will not budge,' Metzdorf said.
Despite Valls's warnings and urges, another scenario could also be that New Caledonia's political stakeholders could find it more appealing or convenient to agree on no agreement at all, especially as New Caledonia's crucial provincial elections are in the pipeline and scheduled for no later than 30 November this year.
Concerns about security
But during that same interview, Valls repeated that he remained concerned that the situation on the ground remained 'serious'.
'We are walking on a tightrope above embers'.
He said top of his concerns were New Caledonia's economic and financial situation, the tense atmosphere, a resurgence in 'racism, hatred' as well as a fast-deteriorating public health services situation or the rise in poverty caused by an increasing number of jobless.
'So yes, all these risks are there, and that is why it is everyone's responsibility to find an agreement. And I will stay as long as needed and I will put all my energy so that an agreement takes place. Not for me, for them'.
Valls also recalled that since insurrectional riots broke out in May 2024, almost one year ago, French security and law enforcement agencies are still maintaining about twenty squads of French gendarmes (1500 personnel) deployed there.
This is on top of the normally-stationed 550 other gendarmes and another 680 police officers.
Valls said this was necessary because 'any time, it could flare up again'.
Outgoing French High Commissioner Louis Le Franc said in an interview recently that in case of a 'new 13 May' situation, the pre-positioned forces could ensure law enforcement 'for three or four days' 'until reinforcements arrive'.
If fresh violence were to erupt again, reinforcements could be sent again from mainland France and bring the total number to up to six thousand law enforcement personnel, a number similar to the level deployed in 2024 in the weeks following the riots that killed 14 and caused some €2.2 billion in material damage.
Carefully chosen words
Valls said earlier in April the main pillars of future negotiations are articulated around the themes of 'democracy and the rule of law', a 'decolonisation process', the right to self-determination, a future 'fundamental law' that would seal New Caledonia's future status, the powers of New Caledonia's three provinces, and a future New Caledonia citizenship with the associated definition of who meets the requirements to vote at local elections.
Valls already travelled to Nouméa twice this year, in February and March 2025.
He left Paris on Monday afternoon (local time) and is scheduled to touch down in New Caledonia on Tuesday, 29 April in the evening.
Since his last visit that ended on 1 April, discussions have been maintained in visio conference mode between local political stakeholders and Valls, his cabinet, as well as French Prime Minister François Bayrou's special advisor on New Caledonia, constitutionalist Eric Thiers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Violence is flaring again on the Thai-Cambodian border. Why is it so contentious?
Violence is flaring again on the Thai-Cambodian border. Why is it so contentious?

RNZ News

time6 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Violence is flaring again on the Thai-Cambodian border. Why is it so contentious?

By Helen Regan , Jessie Yeung and Kocha Olarn , CNN A Cambodian BM-21 multiple rocket launcher returns in Preah Vihear province from the Cambodia-Thai border as troops from both sides clash on 24 July. Photo: Stringer/AFP/Getty Images via CNN Newsource Explainer - Deadly violence has flared up once again on the contentious border between Thailand and Cambodia, reigniting a long-running but little-known dispute. Thailand deployed fighter jets against Cambodian military targets on Thursday, as forces from both countries clashed along the border. The escalation came after a second Thai soldier in a week lost their leg in a landmine explosion. Diplomatic relations have deteriorated as a full-blown conflict threatens to break out, as both sides accuse each other of aggression. Thailand's health ministry said Thursday that 12 people, including 11 civilians and one Thai soldier, have been killed in clashes with Cambodian troops. A further 31 people have been injured, the ministry said. Cambodian authorities have not yet reported any fatalities on their side. Here's what to know about the disputed border. Tensions worsened in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed during a brief clash between Thai and Cambodian troops in a contested border area of the Emerald Triangle, where Cambodia, Thailand and Laos meet. Thai and Cambodian forces said they were acting in self-defence and blamed the other for the skirmish. Although military leaders from Thailand and Cambodia said they wished to de-escalate, both sides have since engaged in saber-rattling and reinforced troops along the border. Thailand took control of border checkpoints, imposed restrictions on crossings and threatened to cut electricity and internet to Cambodia's border towns. Cambodia in return stopped imports of Thai fruit and vegetables and banned Thai movies and TV dramas. Recent landmine explosions prompted both countries to downgrade relations with each other and recall diplomatic staff. The first soldier lost his leg in a landmine explosion on July 16. The second incident occurred Wednesday, when a blast injured five Thai soldiers, with one losing his leg. Thursday's violence marked a significant escalation. Read more: Thailand and Cambodia have had a complicated relationship of both cooperation and rivalry in recent decades. The two countries share a 508-mile (817-kilometer) land border - largely mapped by the French when they controlled Cambodia as a colony - that has periodically seen military clashes and been the source of political tensions. Cambodia has previously sought a ruling from the UN's International Court of Justice over disputed areas, including the site of the most recent clash. However, Thailand does not recognize the ICJ's jurisdiction and claims that some areas along the border were never fully demarcated, including the sites of several ancient temples. In 2011, Thai and Cambodian troops clashed in a nearby area surrounding the 11th-century Preah Vihear temple, a UNESCO world heritage site, displacing thousands of people on both sides and killing at least 20 people. The flare-up in May has had huge political ramifications in Thailand. Thailand's Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra was suspended from duties in July after the leak of a phone call she had with Cambodia's powerful former leader Hun Sen, in which she appeared to criticize her own army's actions in the dispute. Paetongtarn hails from a powerful dynasty and became Thailand's youngest prime minister last year, at just 38. She could face full dismissal over the 17-minute phone call - in which she appeared to signal there was discord between her government and the powerful Thai military. The scandal and her suspension brought fresh uncertainty to the Southeast Asian kingdom, which has been roiled by years of political turbulence and leadership shake-ups. Both sides' forces accuse each other of opening fire Thursday morning. Cambodia then fired rockets on Thai soil, Thailand said. A Thai fighter jet later dropped two bombs in Cambodian territory, Cambodia said. Cambodia's Defense Ministry condemned what it called "brutal, barbaric, and violent military aggression," accusing Thailand of violating international law. The ministry said a Thai F-16 had dropped two bombs on a road near the ancient Preah Vihear temple, a UNESCO world heritage site. "Cambodia reserves the right to lawful self-defense and will respond decisively to Thailand's violent aggression," the statement said, adding that the armed forces are "fully prepared to defend the kingdom's sovereignty and its people - whatever the cost." CNN has reached out to UNESCO for comment. Thailand's 2nd regional military command in the northeast said that F-16 fighter jets had been deployed in two areas, and it claimed to have "destroyed" two Cambodian regional military support units. Army spokesperson Col. Richa Suksuwanont said the strikes were aimed only at military targets. Thailand's acting caretaker, Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai, said Cambodia fired heavy weapons into Thailand without clear targets, leading to civilian deaths. The acting premier also said the conflict was not spreading into more provinces, according to Reuters. He added that no negotiation with Cambodia can take place until fighting along the border ends. Other countries have also weighed in, urging restraint and warning travellers against approaching the contentious border. At a briefing on Thursday, US State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott told reporters that the US is "gravely concerned" about the violence. "The United States urges an immediate cessation of hostilities, protection of civilians, and a peaceful resolution of the conflicts," Pigott said. Additionally on Thursday, the United Kingdom's Foreign Ministry advised against "all but essential travel" within 50 kilometers of the Cambodia-Thailand border in either country. - CNN

France will recognise State of Palestine, Macron says
France will recognise State of Palestine, Macron says

RNZ News

time13 hours ago

  • RNZ News

France will recognise State of Palestine, Macron says

By Valérie Leroux , AFP Emmanuel Macron. Photo: Ludovic Marin / AFP French President Emmanuel Macron said Thursday his country would formally recognise a Palestinian state during a UN meeting in September, the most powerful European nation to announce such a move. At least 142 countries now recognise or plan to recognise Palestinian statehood, according to an AFP tally - though Israel and the United States strongly oppose the moves. Several countries have announced plans to recognise statehood for the Palestinians since Israel launched a bombardment of Gaza in 2023 in response to the 7 October attacks. Macron's announcement drew immediate anger from Israel, with Deputy Prime Minister Yariv Levin labelling it a "shameless decision" that would be a "direct aid to terrorism". Senior Palestinian Authority official Hussein al-Sheikh welcomed the move, saying it "reflects France's commitment to international law and its support for the Palestinian people's rights to self-determination and the establishment of our independent state". International concern is growing about the plight of the more than 2 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, where the fighting has triggered a dire humanitarian crisis and warnings of mass starvation . Israel has rejected accusations it is responsible for Gaza's deepening hunger crisis, which the World Health Organization has called "man-made" and France blamed on an Israeli "blockade". Palestinian children queue for a portion of hot food distributed by a charity kitchen in Gaza City, on 20 July. The World Food Programme says nearly one in three people in Gaza do not eat for days at a stretch. Photo: Majdi Fathi Macron said the "urgent priority today is to end the war in Gaza and rescue the civilian population". "We must finally build the State of Palestine, ensure its viability and enable it, by accepting its demilitarisation and fully recognising Israel, to contribute to the security of all in the Middle East," he wrote on social media. He said he intended to make the announcement at the UN General Assembly in September. While France would be the most significant European power to recognise a Palestinian state, others have hinted they could do the same. Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced he would hold a call with counterparts in Germany and France on efforts to stop the fighting on Friday, adding that a ceasefire would "put us on a path to the recognition of a Palestinian state". Norway, Spain, Ireland and Slovenia all announced recognition following the outbreak of the Gaza conflict, along with several other non-European countries. Israel's military campaign in Gaza has killed 59,587 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory. Hamas's October 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. - AFP

French president sues podcaster over wife claim
French president sues podcaster over wife claim

Otago Daily Times

timea day ago

  • Otago Daily Times

French president sues podcaster over wife claim

French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte filed a defamation lawsuit in the United States against right-wing influencer and podcaster Candace Owens, centred on her claim that France's first lady is male. The Macrons said in a complaint filed in Delaware Superior Court that Owens has waged a lie-filled "campaign of global humiliation" to promote her podcast and expand her "frenzied" fan base. These lies included that Brigitte Macron, 72, was born under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux, the actual name of her older brother, the Macrons said. "Owens has dissected their appearance, their marriage, their friends, their family, and their personal history - twisting it all into a grotesque narrative designed to inflame and degrade," the complaint said. "The result," the complaint added, "is relentless bullying on a worldwide scale." In her podcast on Wednesday, Owens said, "This lawsuit is littered with factual inaccuracies," and part of an "obvious and desperate public relations strategy" to smear her character. Owens also said she did not know a lawsuit was coming, though lawyers for both sides had been communicating since January this year. A spokesperson for Owens called the lawsuit itself an effort to bully her, after Brigitte Macron rejected Owens' repeated requests for an interview. "This is a foreign government attacking the First Amendment rights of an American independent journalist," the spokesperson said. In a joint statement released by their lawyers, the Macrons said they sued after Owens rejected three demands that she retract defamatory statements. "Ms Owens's campaign of defamation was plainly designed to harass and cause pain to us and our families and to garner attention and notoriety," the Macrons said. "We gave her every opportunity to back away from these claims, but she refused." HIGH LEGAL STANDARD Wednesday's lawsuit is a rare case of a world leader suing for defamation. US President Donald Trump has also turned to the courts, including in a $US10 billion ($NZ16.5 billion) lawsuit accusing The Wall Street Journal of defaming him by claiming he created a lewd birthday greeting for disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. The Journal said it would defend against that case and had full confidence in its reporting. In December, meanwhile, Trump reached a $US15 million settlement with Walt Disney-owned ABC over an inaccurate claim that a jury found him liable for rape, rather than sexual assault, in a civil lawsuit. To prevail in US defamation cases, public figures must show defendants engaged in "actual malice," a tough legal standard requiring proof the defendants knew what they published was false or had reckless disregard for its truth. Owens has more than 6.9 million followers on X and more than 4.5 million YouTube subscribers. TUCKER CARLSON, JOE ROGAN The Macrons' lawsuit focuses on the eight-part podcast "Becoming Brigitte," which has more than 2.3 million views on YouTube, and X posts linked to it. According to the Macrons, the series spread "verifiably false and devastating lies," including that Brigitte Macron stole another person's identity and transitioned to female, and that the Macrons are blood relatives committing incest. The complaint discusses circumstances under which the Macrons met, when the now 47-year-old president was a high school student and Brigitte was a teacher. It said their relationship "remained within the bounds of the law." According to the complaint, baseless speculation about Brigitte Macron's gender began surfacing in 2021, and the topic has been discussed on popular podcasts hosted by Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan, who have many conservative followers. In September, Brigitte won a lawsuit in a French court against two women, including a self-described medium, who contributed to spreading rumours about her gender. An appeals court overturned that decision this month, and Brigitte Macron has appealed to France's highest court.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store