Thai health minister reaffirms move to reclassify marijuana as narcotic, blocking Bhumjaithai's bill
In a statement made on 18 June 2025, Somsak reiterated his intention to prohibit recreational cannabis use and criticised the Bhumjaithai Party's cannabis policy as the cause of widespread regulatory and social issues.
He also declared that the party's Cannabis Control Bill, aimed at regulating the plant's use post-decriminalisation, would not be passed under the current government.
According to The Nation, speaking at Government House, Somsak described the Bhumjaithai-led bill as 'a daydream' and said its proposed enactment was unrealistic given the current administration's stance.
According to Somsak, the initial failure to enact proper regulations after cannabis was removed from the narcotics list in 2022 led to a chaotic situation, with over 10,000 cannabis shops operating without clear oversight.
The plant had been removed from Category 5 of the Narcotics Code under the leadership of Anutin Charnvirakul, then Public Health Minister and leader of the Bhumjaithai Party.
Anutin's push was initially justified as promoting medical use and economic growth, but critics argue it inadvertently created a legal grey area that fuelled unregulated access.
Somsak accused Anutin of failing to issue the necessary ministerial regulations to control cannabis use, which he claims undermined public safety and regulatory discipline.
He denied that his current crackdown on cannabis is politically motivated, despite its timing shortly after Bhumjaithai's exit from the ruling coalition.
'This is not political. It's a chronic problem. The government has received a large number of complaints related to cannabis abuse,' Somsak stated.
The Srettha Thavisin administration had previously designated cannabis as a 'controlled herb' under the Traditional Thai Medicine Wisdom Protection Act.
While this allowed cannabis shops to operate, Somsak noted it lacked adequate legal frameworks to restrict usage to medical contexts.
On 17 June 2025, Somsak signed an order requiring anyone seeking to purchase cannabis for medical purposes to present a doctor's prescription and a certified medical condition.
New rules will also be introduced for cannabis shops. These include mandatory on-site doctors, monthly inspections, and a strict two-strike policy under which licences will be revoked if shops are found in breach twice.
The regulation will be enacted via ministerial directive following public consultations, which were held from 22 May to 10 June. According to Somsak, the majority of public opinion supported stricter cannabis controls.
The tightening of cannabis policy has led to renewed tensions with Bhumjaithai. Supachai Jaisamut, a senior figure in the party, has criticised the Ministry of Public Health for failing to establish proper regulation following cannabis's delisting.
He reiterated that Bhumjaithai supported cannabis use solely for medical purposes and had sought to manage its use via the 2021 Cannabis Control Bill.
He further highlighted that the bill had received parliamentary approval, including votes from Pheu Thai MPs, pointing to political inconsistency.
The cannabis issue has exposed deeper rifts within the government. Paetongtarn Shinawatra, who took over as prime minister after Srettha's departure, initially attempted to strike a balance by supporting cannabis for medical and economic purposes.
However, with Bhumjaithai no longer part of the coalition, Somsak has returned to a stricter approach, supported by Prime Minister Paetongtarn, who instructed him to conduct reviews and enforce tighter controls.
Discussions between Somsak and Paetongtarn's advisory team concluded on 14 May 2025 that cannabis should be limited strictly to medical use.
The reclassification of marijuana under Category 5 is expected to proceed in the near future, though no exact timeline has been given.
The announcement signals a full-scale rollback of cannabis liberalisation in Thailand and marks a definitive end to Bhumjaithai's flagship policy, at least under the current administration.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump's call broke deadlock in Cambodia-Thailand border crisis
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Cambodia's Prime Minister Hun Manet (left) and Thailand's Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai (right) agreed to a ceasefire in talks mediated by Malaysia's Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim on July 28. BANGKOK – First came a push from the Malaysian premier, then China reached out, but it was only after US President Donald Trump called Thailand's leader last week that Bangkok agreed to talks with Cambodia to end an escalating military conflict . A flurry of diplomatic efforts over a 20-hour window sealed Thailand's participation in ceasefire negotiations with Cambodia, hosted in Malaysia, halting the heaviest fighting between two South-east Asian countries in over a decade. Reuters interviewed four people on both sides of the border to piece together the most detailed account of how the truce was achieved, including previously unreported Thai conditions for joining the talks and the extent of Chinese involvement in the process. When Mr Trump called Thai Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai on July 26, two days after fighting erupted along a 200km long stretch of the border, Bangkok had not responded to mediation offers from Malaysia and China, said a Thai government source with direct knowledge. 'We told him that we want bilateral talks first before declaring a ceasefire,' the source said, asking not to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. Thailand had already made it clear that it favoured bilateral negotiation and initially did not want third-party mediation to resolve the conflict. On July 27, a day after his initial call, Mr Trump said Cambodia and Thailand had agreed to meet to work out a ceasefire, and that Washington would not move ahead with tariff negotiations with both until the conflict had ended. The source said as the Cambodian and Thai foreign ministries started talking, following Mr Trump's call, Bangkok set out its terms: The meeting must be between the two prime ministers and at a neutral location. 'We proposed Malaysia because we want this to be a regional matter,' the source said. 'The US really pushed for the meeting,' a second Thai source said. 'We want a peaceful solution to the conflict, so we had to show good faith and accept.' Cambodia had accepted the initial Malaysian offer for talks, but it was Thailand that did not move ahead until Mr Trump's intervention, said Mr Lim Menghour, a Cambodian government official working on foreign policy. Prime Minister Hun Manet's government also kept a channel open with China, which had shown interest in joining any peace talks between the neighbours, he said, reflecting Phnom Penh's close ties to Beijing. 'We exchanged regular communication,' Mr Lim Menghour said. Good faith On July 28, Mr Phumtham and Mr Hun Manet went to the Malaysian administrative capital of Putrajaya, where they were hosted by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, also the current chair of the 10-member Association of South-east Asian Nations. At the end of their talks, the two leaders stood on either side of Datuk Seri Anwar, who read out a joint statement that said Thailand and Cambodia would enter into a ceasefire from midnight and continue dialogue. The rapid parleys echoed efforts to diffuse severe border clashes between Cambodia and Thailand in 2011, which took several months, including mediation efforts by Indonesia, then chair of Asean. But those talks had not directly involved the US and China. The fragile ceasefire was holding as of July 31, despite distrust on both sides, and neither military has scaled down troop deployment along the frontier. Cambodia and Thailand have, for decades, quarrelled over undemarcated parts of their 817km land border, which was first mapped by France in 1907 when the latter was its colony. In recent months, tensions began building between the neighbours after the death of a Cambodian soldier in a skirmish in May and escalated into both militaries bolstering border deployments, alongside a full-blown diplomatic crisis. After a second Thai soldier lost a limb last week to a landmine that Thailand alleged Cambodian troops had planted, Bangkok recalled its ambassador to Phnom Penh and expelled Cambodia's envoy. Cambodia has denied the charge. The fighting began soon after. Since the ceasefire deal, Mr Hun Manet and Mr Phumtham have been effusive in their praise for Mr Trump, who had threatened 36 per cent tariffs on goods from both countries coming to the US, their biggest export market. The Thai sources did not say whether tariff talks had been impacted by the border clashes. Mr Lim Menghour said after the 'positive talks, President Donald Trump also showed positive developments' regarding tariffs, without elaborating.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump's call broke deadlock in Thailand-Cambodia border crisis
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Military vehicles are seen on the road, after the leaders of Cambodia and Thailand agreed to a ceasefire on Monday effective midnight, in a bid to bring an end to their deadliest conflict in more than a decade, while Thailand's military accuses Cambodia of second ceasefire violation and waits for Cambodia's invitation for bilateral talks on August 4, in Oddar Meanchey province, Cambodia, July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Tyrone Siu BANGKOK - First came a push from the Malaysian premier, then China reached out, but it was only after U.S. President Donald Trump called Thailand's leader last week that Bangkok agreed to talks with Cambodia to end an escalating military conflict. A flurry of diplomatic efforts over a 20-hour window sealed Thailand's participation in ceasefire negotiations with Cambodia, hosted in Malaysia, halting the heaviest fighting between two Southeast Asian countries in over a decade. Reuters interviewed four people on both sides of the border to piece together the most detailed account of how the truce was achieved, including previously unreported Thai conditions for joining the talks and the extent of Chinese involvement in the process. When Trump called Thai Acting Prime Minister Phumtham Wechayachai on Saturday, two days after fighting erupted along a 200-km-long stretch of the border, Bangkok had not responded to mediation offers from Malaysia and China, said a Thai government source with direct knowledge. "We told him that we want bilateral talks first before declaring a ceasefire," the source said, asking not to be named because of the sensitivity of the issue. Thailand had already made it clear that it favoured bilateral negotiation and initially did not want third-party mediation to resolve the conflict. On Sunday, a day after his initial call, Trump said that Thailand and Cambodia had agreed to meet to work out a ceasefire, and that Washington wouldn't move ahead with tariff negotiations with both until the conflict had ended. The source said as the Thai and Cambodian foreign ministries started talking, following Trump's call, Bangkok set out its terms: the meeting must be between the two prime ministers and at a neutral location. "We proposed Malaysia because we want this to be a regional matter," the source said. "The U.S. really pushed for the meeting," a second Thai source said, "We want a peaceful solution to the conflict so we had to show good faith and accept." A Thai government spokesperson did not immediately respond to questions from Reuters. Cambodia had accepted the initial Malaysian offer for talks but it was Thailand that did not move ahead until Trump's intervention, said Lim Menghour, a Cambodian government official working on foreign policy. Prime Minister Hun Manet's government also kept a channel open with China, which had shown interest in joining any peace talks between the neighbours, he said, reflecting Phnom Penh's close ties to Beijing. "We exchanged regular communication," Lim Menghour said. GOOD FAITH On Monday, Phumtham and Hun Manet went to the Malaysian administrative capital of Putrajaya, where they were hosted by Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, also the current chair of the 10-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations regional bloc. At the end of their talks, the two leaders stood on either side of Anwar, who read out a joint statement that said Thailand and Cambodia would enter into a ceasefire from midnight and continue dialogue. The rapid parleys echoed efforts to diffuse severe border clashes between Thailand and Cambodia in 2011, which took several months including mediation efforts by Indonesia, then chair of ASEAN. But those talks had not directly involved the U.S. and China. The fragile ceasefire was holding as of Thursday, despite distrust on both sides, and neither military has scaled down troop deployment along the frontier. Thailand and Cambodia have, for decades, quarrelled over undemarcated parts of their 817 km (508 miles) land border, which was first mapped by France in 1907 when the latter was its colony. In recent months, tensions began building between the neighbours after the death of a Cambodian soldiers in a skirmish in May and escalated into both militaries bolstering border deployments, alongside a full-blown diplomatic crisis. After a second Thai soldier lost a limb last week to a landmine that Thailand alleged Cambodian troops had planted, Bangkok recalled its ambassador to Phnom Penh and expelled Cambodia's envoy. Cambodia has denied the charge. The fighting began soon after. Since the ceasefire deal, Hun Manet and Phumtham have been effusive in their praise for Trump, who had threatened 36% tariffs on goods from both countries coming to the U.S., their biggest export market. The Thai sources did not say whether tariff talks had been impacted by the border clashes. Lim Menghour said after the "positive talks, President Donald Trump also showed positive developments" regarding tariffs, without elaborating. Trump said tariff negotiations with both countries resumed after the ceasefire agreement. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Wednesday that Washington has made trade deals with Cambodia and Thailand, but they are yet to be announced. REUTERS
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump tariffs face key test at US appeals court
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox U.S. President Donald Trump speaks after signing the VA Home Loan Program Reform Act at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., July 30, 2025. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein A U.S. appeals court on Thursday will review President Donald Trump's power to impose tariffs, after a lower court said he exceeded his authority with sweeping levies on imported goods. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., will consider the legality of "reciprocal" tariffs that Trump imposed on a broad range of U.S. trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. A panel of all of the court's active judges, eight appointed by Democratic presidents and three appointed by former Republican presidents, will hear arguments scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. ET in two cases brought by five small U.S. businesses and 12 Democratic-led U.S. states. The arguments - one day before Trump plans to increase tariff rates on imported goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners - mark the first test before a U.S. appeals court of the scope of his tariff authority. The president has made tariffs a central instrument of his foreign policy, wielding them aggressively in his second term as leverage in trade negotiations and to push back against what he has called unfair practices. The states and businesses challenging the tariffs argued that they are not permissible under emergency presidential powers that Trump cited to justify them. They say the U.S. Constitution grants Congress, and not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. Trump claimed broad authority to set tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets. Trump is the first president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said the April tariffs were a response to persistent U.S. trade imbalances and declining U.S. manufacturing power. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore No entry: ICA to bar high-risk, undesirable travellers from boarding S'pore-bound ships, flights Singapore 5 foreign women suspected of trafficking 27kg of cocaine nabbed in Changi Airport Singapore Over half of job applications by retrenched Jetstar Asia staff led to offers or interviews: CEO Singapore 17-member committee to drive roll-out of autonomous vehicles in Singapore Business Singapore gold investment soars 37% to 2.2 tonnes in Q2 while jewellery demand wanes Singapore Underground pipe leak likely reason for water supply issues during Toa Payoh fire: Town council Multimedia 60 years, 60 items: A National Day game challenge Singapore 'Switching careers just as I became a dad was risky, but I had to do it for my family' He said the tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico were appropriate because those countries were not doing enough to stop illegal fentanyl from crossing U.S. borders. The countries have denied that claim. On May 28, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade sided with the Democratic states and small businesses that challenged Trump. It said that the IEEPA, a law intended to address "unusual and extraordinary" threats during national emergencies, did not authorize tariffs related to longstanding trade deficits. The Federal Circuit has allowed the tariffs to remain in place while it considers the administration's appeal. The timing of the court's decision is uncertain, and the losing side will likely appeal quickly to the U.S. Supreme Court. The case will have no impact on tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminum imports. Trump's on-again, off-again tariff threats have roiled financial markets and disrupted U.S. companies' ability to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The president recently announced trade deals that set tariff rates on goods from the European Union and Japan, following smaller trade agreements with Britain, Indonesia and Vietnam. Trump's Department of Justice has argued that limiting the president's tariff authority could undermine ongoing trade negotiations, while other Trump officials have said that negotiations have continued with little change after the initial setback in court. Trump has set an August 1 date for higher tariffs on countries that don't negotiate new trade deals. There are at least seven other lawsuits challenging Trump's invocation of IEEPA, including cases brought by other small businesses and California. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled against Trump in one of those cases, and no judge has yet backed Trump's claim of unlimited emergency tariff authority. REUTERS
