Former aide who refuted Trump's false 2020 election claims is under federal investigation
Chris Krebs is facing an unspecified government investigation, the DHS spokesperson said. As a result, Krebs was expelled from a U.S. customs program that allows expedited clearance for pre-approved American travelers at airports, known as Global Entry.
'Chris Krebs is under active investigation by law enforcement agencies," the DHS spokesperson told NBC News. "That is a fact disqualifying him for global entry.'
Officials declined to say why Krebs was under investigation or which federal agencies were leading the probe. CNN first reported Krebs' suspension from the Global Entry program.
The White House referred NBC News to the DHS and Justice Department for comment. The Justice Department declined to comment.
Refuting Trump's election fraud claims
Krebs, who served as head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency during Trump's first term, declined to comment. Trump fired Krebs after he said in a statement that the 2020 election was the 'most secure in American history.'
Krebs added, 'There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised.'
The investigation of Krebs comes after President Trump issued a memorandum on April 9 directing the attorney general and the homeland security secretary to 'take all appropriate action to review' Krebs' activities during his time in government. The memo also revoked Krebs' security clearance.
The memo targeting Krebs, and a similar memo naming former senior DHS official Miles Taylor, marked an escalation in President Trump's campaign of retribution against perceived political enemies. It was the first time the president had requested possible government investigations against individuals.
The presidential memorandum accused Krebs of seeking to suppress 'conservative viewpoints' on social media about the 2020 election and the COVID-19 epidemic, by allegedly coercing social media platforms under the 'guise of combatting supposed disinformation.'
The memo claimed Krebs 'falsely and baselessly denied that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen, including by inappropriately and categorically dismissing widespread election malfeasance and serious vulnerabilities with voting machines.'
Trump has repeatedly claimed that the 2020 election was 'stolen' but there is no evidence that the vote was plagued by widespread fraud.
More than 50 lawsuits brought by Trump or his allies alleging fraud and irregularities have been withdrawn, dismissed or denied by state and federal judges.
After Trump signed the memorandum last month cancelling Krebs' security clearance, Krebs stepped down from his role at the cyber security firm SentinelOne to prepare his legal defense. Security clearances are crucial for employees working on federal cyber security contracts.
Over 40 cybersecurity experts signed an open letter on April 29 condemning what they called 'the political persecution' of Krebs.
'By placing Krebs and SentinelOne in the crosshairs, the President is signaling that cybersecurity professionals whose findings do not align with his narrative risk having their businesses and livelihoods subjected to spurious and retaliatory targeting," the letter stated, "the same bullying tactic he has recently used against law firms."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Americans give Trump highest approval rating in months
Advertisement President Donald Trump 's approval rating improved a hair with voters according to a new exclusive Daily Mail/J.L. Partners poll, even as they give him failing grades for his handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Forty-nine percent of voters now approve of Trump's job performance as president, up one point from the tracking survey conducted earlier in July. But he remains underwater as 51 percent disapprove of Trump's job performance, down one point from earlier in the month. The margin of error in the survey of 1,007 registered voters is 3.1 percent. The poll numbers suggest Trump is surviving politically during a punishing news cycle consumed by the Epstein files and his administration's failure to disclose them as he promised during his presidential campaign. The president's job approval is up one percentage point from June and remains his highest rating since May. 'The news saga might have seemed terrible for Trump in the last few days, but it isn't having an impact on his approval rating ,' James Johnson, JL Partners co-founder told the Daily Mail. 'In fact, we think it's going up, from 48 percent to 49 percent, making this his best approval rating since May. His ratings with the base is holding up too, unchanged on 91 percent with Republicans,' Johnson continued. But Trump's strong job approval ratings does not carry over to his handling of the Epstein files. Forty-two percent of voters disapprove of his handling of the issue while just 27 percent approve. A significant number of voters, 20 percent, did not appear to care about the case as they neither approved nor disapproved Trump's handling of the issue. In the Oval Office on Wednesday, Trump referred to the ongoing saga as a 'witch hunt' indicating he was tired of answering questions from the media about it. Despite the president's best efforts to put the issue behind him, few voters believe in the administration's assessment of the case. Only fifteen percent in the poll said they believed the Justice Department's memo released by Attorney General Pam Bondi concluding that Epstein killed himself in prison and that the infamous sexual offender did not have a 'client list' they could release. Forty-seven percent said they did not believe the administration's account of the Epstein case, and that they believed there was more secrets to uncover. Twenty-three percent said they believed the Trump administration memo, but that there was more to uncover in the case. 'This is despite voters disapproving of his handling of the Epstein scandal. What explains the difference? Voters simply do not rate it highly on their list of priorities,' Johnson said. Ninety percent of the Republican voter base continue to grant the president solid approval ratings, despite their misgivings about the Epstein files. The poll was conducted as Trump furiously contested a Wall Street Journal report that he had signed a letter to Epstein for his 50th birthday which concluded: 'Happy Birthday - and may every day be another wonderful secret,' and featured a hand-drawn image of a naked woman as well as his signature. Trump decried the news article as 'fake' and filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the company. 'They are judging Trump on other issues - such as the economy, the southern border, and how he is actually running the country. Their grumbles on the Epstein handling are not enough for them to turn on their man,' Johnson said.
STV News
19 minutes ago
- STV News
English and Northern Irish officers to be deployed in Scotland for Trump's visit
English and Northern Irish police officers will be deployed in Scotland to assist with the policing operation surrounding President Donald Trump's visit. The US President will visit both of his golf courses in Scotland – Turnberry in Ayrshire and Menie in Aberdeenshire – between July 25 and 29. The President will meet with Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer while in Aberdeen, while plans are being put in place for Trump to meet First Minister John Swinney, according to the Scottish Government. The Police Service of Northern Ireland has confirmed 'a number of officers' will be arriving in Scotland, with the cost of deployment being paid for by Police Scotland. A spokesperson from the force said: 'A number of officers from the Police Service of Northern Ireland will travel to Scotland in the coming days to support Police Scotland colleagues in the planning and safe delivery of policing around the US presidential visit. 'The deployment follows a request for mutual aid via the National Police Co-ordination Centre (NPoCC). 'The full cost of the deployment will be recovered from Police Scotland.' Durham and Cheshire constabularies confirmed that they also received a request from Police Scotland and will be providing support during Trump's first visit to the country since being voted in for a second term. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
I was a late-night writer. Colbert's cancellation hurts American comedy – and sanity
Last week – just a few days after Stephen Colbert called out his parent company for paying Donald Trump millions of dollars – CBS canceled the Late Show With Stephen Colbert. Maybe now people will finally stop saying Trump is good for comedy. In this latest Trump administration, I often joke that I'm just not cut out for being this furious all the time. I'm a comedy writer. I'm built for naming dogs Doctor Reginald Pancakes and writing sentences like 'Every woman's deodorant is called Delicate Whisper and every man's deodorant is called Beef Shazam!' I get that there's nothing more annoying than a comedian getting all serious, and yet here we are. So first, let's address the obvious: was the cancellation for political reasons or, as the network claims, for 'purely financial' reasons. My answer? Yes. The problem is we keep treating those like they're separate things. CBS isn't ending the show for 10 months. They could have made the announcement whenever they wanted. But they chose to tell Stephen Colbert, host of the highest-rated network late night show, just 48 hours after he called Paramount's payment to Trump a 'big fat bribe'. They chose to cancel the Peabody award-winning show in the midst of an attempt to sell Paramount to a company called Skydance, a merger that has to be approved by the Trump administration. They chose to tell Colbert they were canceling his show, one day after the CEO of Skydance met with the FCC and discussed 'CBS's editorial decision-making'. Basically, if the decision wasn't political, then Paramount sure is happy to let it look political, and at that point there's no meaningful difference. Whether the network canceled the Late Show to appease Trump or not, they did it knowing he'd think so. CBS wants it both ways. They want the viewers to believe they're an unbiased network and they want Trump to think they'll do anything he wants. So that's what I think as a human being who lives in this world right now. But, as a comedy writer who wrote for late night TV for almost a decade? Well, I can't stop thinking about the jokes. This cancellation is really sad to me because I believe in the power of jokes. True story: once a guy was mugging me and he started punching me in the face. I told a joke and he STOPPED PUNCHING ME. That is the power of jokes. (No, I will not tell you the joke. Because I'd say it and then you'd be all 'C'mon, it's not that funny' and then I'd have to be all: 'No, you had to be there. It's not as funny when you aren't punching me in the face.') The thing about jokes is that they require a shared base of knowledge. A shared reality. If I tell a joke about a commercial and you've never seen that commercial, the joke isn't going to go over very well. Losing late night shows is one more step toward losing a shared reality, and that to me is terrifying. There is a moment every New Yorker knows. It happens when you're on the subway and someone does something particularly insane: an 83-year-old white lady raps, or a man in a three-piece suit publicly clips his toenails. And then you catch the eye of someone across the train – they raise their eyebrows and you raise your eyebrows back. And then you feel a little better. Because someone else saw what you saw and they can confirm that it's something. Late night hosts like Stephen Colbert do that on a larger scale. They're our way of saying: 'Hey, this is crazy, right? RIGHT?' In this world of algorithmic bubbles and blatant lies and deepfakes, late night television is a place you can gather at night and say: 'Yes, this happened and it is fucking weird.' Here's another thing I like about jokes: the basis of jokes is truth. I've written books, speeches, game shows and news articles and I've never been fact-checked as hard as I was when writing late night television. Jokes just don't work if they're not based on something true. And for our leaders? The ability to take a joke matters. If our corporate overlords and representatives in government can't handle being joked about on late night TV, we don't need new shows. We need new leaders. In this current system – with a Congress and a supreme court who want nothing more than to cater to Trump's every whim – we don't have a lot of options to hold our leaders accountable. In a free society, joking about our leaders isn't just helpful or fun, it's vital. For me, this isn't just about Colbert. (I met him once. In 2014, the day Last Week Tonight with John Oliver was set to tape our first show, Colbert came to our office and went from room to room to congratulate each member of the staff and to wish us luck. It was a kind gesture that I'll long remember.) It's not just about his staff – a couple hundred people who in my experience are thoughtful, hilarious, ridiculously competent people at the top of their game. It's not even just about the humiliating weakness the television networks continue to display as the president sues them into silence. It's about the jokes. We need the jokes. Because this country could really use a break from getting punched in the face. Jill Twiss has won multiple Emmys and Peabody awards as a senior writer on HBO's Last Week Tonight with John Oliver and a staff writer on The Amber Ruffin Show
