Salaries Of Indian PM, President, Vice-President, MPs Revealed
Salary: Rs 5 lakh per month (as per the President's Emoluments and Pension Act of 1951). Exempt from taxes, the President enjoys various allowances, including free travel by train and plane worldwide, free housing, medical care, and Rs 1 lakh annually for office expenses. (File Pic)
Vice-President: The Vice-President is the second highest constitutional position in the country. He primarily presides over the Rajya Sabha and acts as the caretaker President in their absence. The salary and allowances of the Vice President of India are determined under the Salaries and Allowances of Officers of Parliament Act, 1953. (File Pic)
Salary: Rs 4 lakh per month. Other perks and allowances include free accommodation, medical care, train and air travel, a landline connection, mobile phone service, personal security, and staff. (File Pic)
Prime Minister: He is the head of government of India, and holds significant executive authority and responsibility. He is appointed by the President of India, and has to be a member of one of the houses of bicameral Parliament. (File Pic)
Salary: Rs 1.66 lakh per month, including a basic pay of Rs 50,000, an expense allowance of Rs 3,000, a parliamentary allowance of Rs 45,000, and a daily allowance of Rs 2,000. An official residence, Special Protection Group (SPG) security, access to government vehicles and aircraft, and government-paid travel, stay, and food expenses for international trips are the other perks. (File Pic)
7/10
Member of Parliament (MP): An MP represents their constituency in Lok Sabha. The members of Lok Sabha are directly elected by the people through general elections held every five years. Their salary and allowances are to compensate for their role in governance. (File Pic)
Salary: Rs 1 lakh per month, with increases every five years in the form of daily allowances. Their perks and allowances include a basic pay of Rs 50,000 per month, a daily allowance of Rs 2,000 for attending Parliament sessions, committee meetings and a traveling allowance of Rs 16 per km for road travel. MPs also receive a constituency allowance of Rs 45,000 per month and an office expense allowance of Rs 45,000 per month, including Rs 15,000 for stationery and postage. (File Pic)
10/10
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
34 minutes ago
- India Today
Why chase someone who won't fight: Smriti Irani's 'tone shift' on Rahul Gandhi
Union Minister Smriti Irani, once known for her fierce criticism of Rahul Gandhi, now appears markedly more conciliatory toward the Congress leader. In an exclusive interview with India Today Group's Anjana Om Kashyap, Irani was asked why she no longer takes an aggressive stance against Gandhi. Her response was direct and pointed: 'Because the Gandhi family refused to fight me in 2024.'advertisementIrani, who famously defeated Rahul Gandhi in 2019 in his long-held Amethi constituency, said that with Gandhi opting out of contesting from Amethi in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections, there was no political battle to engage in.'If they aren't even stepping into the battlefield, what am I supposed to say? I can't go chasing after them,' Smriti Irani said. During the interview, Smriti Irani also pointed out that the Gandhi family moved to contest from Wayanad due to its favourable social demographics.'No intelligent leader willingly chooses a seat where defeat is certain,' she said. 'If a seat like that is given, it's only out of duty to the party. But in 2019, I turned the impossible into possible.'Irani also reflected on her journey and recalled her defeat in Amethi in 2014. She said that she spent the next five years working tirelessly on the ground.'I cleaned drains myself, brought electricity to villages, built over a lakh homes, set up a medical college, a 200 bed hospital, a collector's office, a police line and even a fire station,' she Anjana Om Kashyap asked whether Irani could have defeated Rahul Gandhi again if he had contested in 2024, Irani responded with a smile, 'Absolutely, that's why he didn't contest.'Irani also spoke about the emotional toll of being removed from Amethi, calling it a place she is deeply connected with. 'If I had not worked and people had said I did not deliver on my promises, that would have hurt more. But I did everything I could,' she asked why she lost, Irani responded, 'Because there's a diference between work and political equations. Those who are in politics understand this – electoral politics isn't the same as national service.'When asked whether stepping away from Amethi and the government left her feeling uprooted, she admitted, 'Maybe.''Because I defeated the national president of Congress, I had to tolerate a few barbs,' she Irani clarified that her return to television does not signal a retirement from politics. Dismissing speculation, she said, 'Who retires at 49? At 49, most people's careers are just beginning and I have already been a Member of Parliament three times,' she added with a Irani is making her comeback on the screen with the same show that made her a household name 25 years ago, Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi.- EndsMust Watch
India Today
34 minutes ago
- India Today
What happens if both Houses pass motion for removal of judge on same day?
On the opening day of the Monsoon Session, members of both the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha submitted notices seeking the removal of Justice Yashwant Varma of the Allahabad High Court, prompting the initiation of a constitutionally mandated inquiry process into the Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar, who has since resigned, acknowledged receipt of the notice in the Upper House, thereby setting in motion the process under the Judges Inquiry Act, 1968. Justice Varma came under scrutiny after large bundles of burnt currency notes were discovered at his residence in Delhi in March this Judges Inquiry Act lays out the process for investigating allegations against a sitting judge. A notice for removal must be signed by at least 100 members in the Lok Sabha or 50 in the Rajya Sabha. In this instance, the motion was submitted in both Houses on the same day — a procedural requirement for joint action under the Act. Under Section 3 of the Act, the presiding officers — the Speaker of the Lok Sabha and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha — must first consult relevant authorities before admitting the motion. If admitted by both Houses, they are then required to jointly constitute a three-member inquiry committee will include a Supreme Court judge (who may also be the Chief Justice of India), a Chief Justice of a High Court, and a distinguished jurist. The committee is tasked with framing definite charges and presenting them to the judge. Justice Varma will be given a reasonable opportunity to respond in cases alleging incapacity, the judge may be directed to undergo a medical examination. The central government may also be asked to appoint an advocate to conduct the case against the judge if requested by the presiding completing its inquiry, the committee must submit a detailed report with findings on each charge. This report is to be laid before both Houses of Parliament at the earliest possible simultaneous submission of notices in both Houses ensures that the process moves forward under strict constitutional guidelines. If the committee finds the judge guilty of misbehaviour or incapacity, and both Houses adopt the motion for removal by a two-thirds majority, the President may remove the judge.- EndsTune InMust Watch
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
Start work in two years, else will take back Pernem land: CM Sawant to Goa Cricket Association
Porvorim: Chief minister Pramod Sawant told the House on Wednesday that the Goa Cricket Association (GCA) is not serious about constructing a stand in Pernem for which 1.89 lakh sqm has been leased to it by govt. He said that eight years have passed, and the GCA hasn't even applied to the PWD for road access. In two more years, at the end of the ten-year lease, the land will be taken back by govt if construction does not begin, he said. Sawant said that last year, a show cause notice was issued to GCA, but the reply it provided was not satisfactory. Sawant said that the land is prime property today, with Manohar International Airport and the Ayush hospital in the vicinity. He also said that another govt department could put the land to better use. The CM also said that GCA has paid only Rs 9.4 crore to govt of the Rs 19 crore it was to pay. 'We issued a show cause notice to them last year, asked why should the lease not be terminated, and why the land should not be diverted for another project. They have not acquired the required permissions needed to create the ground,' he said. Pernem MLA Pravin Arlekar said that the land was given to GCA in 2018 and govt has not pressed for the project's progress. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search Ads Search Now Undo Arlekar said that the land should be taken back by govt and utilised by the state to create sports facilities for Pernem taluka instead. The CM, however, said that this is not an option. 'There are 153 grounds across Goa, but hardly 10-15 are being utilised. In Mencurem, I saw a ground with toilets and all facilities, but which is not being put to use. No other state has such facilities. There is one ground in every taluka. At this rate, in Goa, each panchayat will have a ground or I am afraid it will be two grounds per panchayat,' said Sawant. He said that GCA can identify land elsewhere if they cannot construct the project there for some reason. Leader of opposition Yuri Alemao said that govt has not added any penalty clause in the lease for GCA if it does not execute the project within the ten-year period. Mandrem MLA Jit Arolkar said that GCA has not even objected to high tension power lines going over the land.
