
Some small Alberta villages say voting themselves out of existence may be a path to prosperity
And this tiny community is proud of that history and insists there is a future, even though it may seem a bit murky.
In less than three weeks, residents will vote on whether Delia will remain a village with its own elected council members, or dissolve into a hamlet and become part of the surrounding Starland County, represented by one councillor who oversees a larger area.
The town has seen its struggles over the years.
It's had trouble attracting a chief administrative officer and candidates for the three-member council.
A viability review, released ahead of this month's amalgamation vote, reveals a $9.5 million infrastructure deficit and a number of shortcomings related to meeting municipal benchmarks.
'Significant challenges'
While it has struggled to hire and keep a chief administrator, it has also "faced significant challenges" submitting annual audited financial statements, according to province's Department of Municipal Affairs.
The province appointed an official administrator last year to help get things back on track. The overdue financial reports were all submitted last year.
The viability review's recommendations included holding a vote on the future of the village. The three sitting council members want to maintain the status quo.
"Yes, we want to stay a village," said Jordan Elliott, Delia's mayor.
The three are confident the village can address its infrastructure deficit without dissolving, using provincial grants and tax revenue.
Residents have raised concerns about taxation, garbage collection, recycling and snow clearing if they become a hamlet.
The councillors fear Delia will lose its identity if it's dissolved into the county.
"There's so much to lose, no gain," said councillor Dave Smeyers.
He says there are challenges as the Alberta government cuts back on funding for smaller villages.
"So, we're always fighting to stay alive, but it's like community spirit, you can't put that down and you can't measure it in finances," said Smeyers.
Municipal Affairs Minister Ric McIver said in a statement to CBC News that the province is providing $820 million in funding for municipalities this budget year, an increase of $98 million from last year.
"Municipalities have called for funding that is predictable and tied to provincial revenue growth, and this year's allocation of LGFF (Local Government Funding Framework) answers that call," said McIver.
Delia is set to receive $200,000 in LGFF funding this year and $175,000 in 2026.
Worth fighting for
The councillors say there is a lot to fight for.
A new $14 million school opened a few years ago, there's a library, curling rink and arena. There's a campground, volunteer fire department, cenotaph and museum.
And people here are proud of Delia's history.
Markers are located outside old homes and commercial buildings that tell the stories of the people and businesses that used to call Delia home. There's a plaque that honours Violet Barrs, Canada's first female mayor, appointed in 1920.
The old saloon and eight-room hotel, which is now up for sale, was used in the film Knockaround Guys starring Vin Diesel and John Malkovich,
It's unclear how many people actually live in Delia.
The councillors believe the number is approximately 230.
Last year, the province pegged it at 146.
The government also lists 113 dwelling units and 21 businesses.
The village recently did its own head count, but it hasn't been made public. Population is important in determining how much transition funding will be provided to the county if residents vote to dissolve.
From villages to hamlets: 'There was no choice'
The list of former villages in Alberta is slowly growing.
An hour north of Delia, is the former village of Halkirk, which is now a hamlet within the County of Paintearth.
And two hours west is where you'll find Caroline, which is now a hamlet in Clearwater County. Both villages officially dissolved into hamlets at the beginning of the year.
Caroline is home to just over 500 people. It's where figure skater Kurt Browning grew up. The arena there bears the four-time world champion's name.
"There was no choice, like in terms of long-term viability, there was no choice," said Barbara Gibson, the former village councillor who is now an interim councillor with Clearwater County.
Gibson says with shrinking government grants and rising infrastructure maintenance and renewal costs, village council took a proactive approach and started amalgamation discussions with the county more than a year ago. She believes the dissolution was inevitable given the village's finances and future capital cost obligations. A study that looked into the community's viability several years ago came up with the same conclusion.
"Do you wait and have it happen to you or do you join it and do it the way you would like to have it done?" she said.
Gibson said people were concerned about the future of their library, fire hall and post office, along with snow clearing and garbage collection. Gibson has tried to reassure people that there shouldn't be a noticeable change in service levels.
She said people who live in the county expressed concerns that their tax dollars would be used in Caroline, and people in Caroline felt their tax dollars would go toward county projects.
She said people asked if Caroline would disappear and lose its voice.
"Are we going to be written off the map? You know, and it's not that way."
She says while Caroline will lose it's five councillor positions, the community will still be represented.
"With us being allowed to have one voice on county council, [that] has shown that they are not going to sweep us under the rug and they are going to listen to what we want."
Economic development, prosperity
Reg Dean is a longtime business owner in Caroline who's seen several heated amalgamation debates over the years. He believes amalgamation will spur economic growth.
Dean, who owns a fishing, hunting and camping equipment store, says the county has much deeper pockets and will be able to service new building lots and pave the way for development.
He hopes to see new utility services to develop a long-term care home near the Kurt Browning arena and an industrial business park on the east side of the community.
He says a seniors lodge would attract more people to the community and he believes some people want to see that growth.
"That means 25 brand new residents and that's significant in this community," said Dean.
Five years a hamlet
The former, troubled town of Granum, known for previous viability reviews, sustainability concerns and political upheaval, is marking its fifth year as a hamlet after voting to dissolve and join the Municipal District of Willow Creek in 2020.
Mike Sherman spent nine years as mayor of Granum.
The now 82-year-old was originally against dissolution, he thought the town could turn itself around. But he changed his mind and voted in favour of becoming a hamlet.
He says the town was really struggling back then.
"We were so poor in this town when I was mayor, that we would have enough dollars in our budget to do maybe three ... squares of sidewalk," he said.
Now, Sherman says with the MD, entire blocks are getting done. There's a new park where the grain elevators used to stand and improvements have been made to water and sewer lines, street lighting, the veterans' memorial and cemetery.
He says the MD is chipping away at the community's $15 million infrastructure deficit that existed in 2019.
Sherman says the community has grown by about 100 people over the past few years and now stands at an estimated 500.
The reeve of the MD of Willow Creek says communication has always been a priority to help residents in Granum who weren't in favour of dissolution.
Maryanne Sandberg says there were a series of open houses held during the transition and the annual $235,000 levy that was brought in to help cover infrastructure projects includes a detailed list of which jobs will be completed each year.
"Whether it's storm water management, whether it's sidewalks, whatever we're doing, they're always aware of what we're up to," she said.
She says people who told her they weren't happy with the vote results are coming around.
"Now when you talk to those same people, they don't regret it at all," she said.
Converting the old town hall
Sabina Wurz sees a bright future in Granum.
She's opened a restaurant and purchased the former town hall office, a century-old two-storey brick building that's undergoing renovations and upgrades.
She wants to convert it into a space for artists, possibly a retreat of some kind.
"This is a good investment. It has been for us, there's been some struggles, but for the most part, people are very receptive about what we're doing," said Wurz.
She says she's invested more than a million dollars in the former town.
For her, she doesn't care if it's a town, a village or a hamlet.
"This is where people reside. I don't care what name you put on it."
More funding, support needed
The president of the Rural Municipalities Association of Alberta says the province is not providing enough funding to support small, rural municipalities, which are struggling with less financial support from the province and rising costs.
Kara Westerlund says the association strongly believes in local autonomy and keeping municipalities whole, but in some cases small villages cannot sustain themselves in the face of shrinking grants and rising costs for things such as policing.
And she says those costs don't go away for the absorbing counties.
"When a municipality does go down, it doesn't fix the problem by absorbing it into the larger municipality around it, it actually makes it more complicated and more difficult moving forward," she said.
Westerlund says, while the province provides a transitional fee to help the absorbing municipality, it's often not enough and ends after one or two years.
The municipal affairs minister says dissolutions are generally driven by municipalities and their residents, as they are in the best position to determine if it's "an appropriate option to consider."
"Dissolution may be beneficial to a municipality for a number of reasons. For example, it may be more efficient to have one municipality providing many of the same services, such as emergency services and water infrastructure, to a larger area," he said.
Vote set for Delia
Back in Delia, the vote has been scheduled for April 23 and 24. The question will ask residents if they would like Delia to remain a village "and implement changes to achieve viability," or dissolve and become a hamlet in Starland County.
The councillors want to continue the job they started, growing their community and ensuring Delia has its own voice.
"The town's been around for a long time. It would be a shame to lose it all now," said Jim Adams.
"Delia's really great. We have an awesome volunteer base. We're always running community events. It would be really sad to see some of that stuff change," said Mayor Elliott.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
2 hours ago
Carney tells premiers he's 'only going to accept the best deal for Canada' in U.S. trade talks
Prime Minister Mark Carney kicked off his meeting with Canada's premiers in Huntsville, Ont., promising to battle the Trump administration at the negotiating table to ensure the country gets a good trade deal, while also doing everything he can to strengthen the Canadian economy. We are looking for the best deal for Canada; we are only going to accept the best deal for Canada, Carney said Tuesday. Carney is delivering a detailed briefing about his government's ongoing trade negotiations with the Trump administration as the two countries work toward reaching an agreement by Aug. 1. The prime minister's visit lands in the middle of the three-day first ministers' meeting in the Muskoka region, where the premiers are discussing their own response to the trade war. The central issues to be addressed at this meeting are trade relations and our current trading relationship with the United States, and any steps we can take to build a strong Canadian economy, Carney said. Carney arrived on Monday evening to have dinner with the premiers at Ford's cottage, after spending the day hosting a bipartisan delegation of U.S. senators in Ottawa to discuss trade. The prime minister said Canada's economic response to U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs is built on two tracks: supporting affected industries, such as lumber, steel, auto manufacturing and aluminum production; and ensuring Canada's economy grows by breaking down internal trade barriers and quickly approving major projects. Approving major infrastructure projects like ports, pipelines and mines will be easier now that Bill C-5, or the One Canadian Economy Act, has become law, allowing approvals for projects of national importance to be fast-tracked. With that, Carney said, comes a shift in attitude from the federal government around major new projects, moving from why build, to how to build — and how to work together in order to build. Carney said his new federal projects office will be open by Labour Day, which he said will provide a single point of contact for provinces, companies and communities looking to get major nation-building projects approved. Before going into a closed-door meeting with the premiers, Carney thanked them for their work in signing agreements to take down interprovincial trade barriers so Canadians can work where they want and buy what they want. Ensuring energy security Before the discussions kicked off Tuesday, Ford, Saskatchewan Premier Scott Moe and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith signed a memorandum of understanding to build new energy and trade infrastructure. CBC News asked the premiers if Canada needs to replace Line 5 — the more than 1,000-kilometre-long pipeline carrying 540,000 barrels of oil and natural gas liquids daily across Wisconsin and Michigan to refineries in Sarnia, Ont. — regardless of whether there is a private-sector proponent behind such a plan. I believe so, Ford said. "The governor of Michigan ... constantly threatens to cut off Line 5. That would basically shut down our airports, shut down a big part of Ontario. We can't chance it any longer. We need to be independent, we need a pipeline going to southwestern Ontario to one of the refineries, and be self-reliant. We can't rely on the Americans anymore. Simple as that. Enlarge image (new window) The Line 5 pipeline carries Canadian petroleum from Western Canada and Wisconsin, though Michigan to Sarnia, Ont. Photo: CBC In 2023, a U.S. court ruled (new window) in favour of the Bad River Band of the Lake Superior Chippewa, ordering Enbridge to shut down parts of the pipeline within three years and pay the band $5.2 million US for trespassing on its land after easement rights expired. The Canadian government argued that a shutdown of the line — in operation since 1953 — would violate a 1977 Canada-U.S. pipeline agreement (new window) in which the countries agreed not to block the flow of each other's hydrocarbons. Enbridge wants to build a protective tunnel around a 5.8-kilometre section of the pipeline that runs along the bottom of the Straits of Mackinac, which link Lake Michigan and Lake Huron. Permits in the U.S. are being fast-tracked to see that work done, but opposition to the move remains. Moe said Canada does not want to find itself in the same position as Europe, which recently found out what it means to be heavily reliant on oil and gas from Russia. We shouldn't allow that to happen to us, as Canadians, to be reliant on another country, Moe said. So yes, I think as Canadians, we certainly need to have a very mature discussion about how we can provide Western Canadian oil and gas to Canadians that live in Central and Eastern Canada for our own good … not only our economic security but our energy security. Smith said building a pipeline entirely within Canada is probably something that is long overdue; we probably should have done it decades ago. Peter Zimonjic (new window) · CBC News · Senior writer Peter Zimonjic is a senior writer for CBC News who reports for digital, radio and television. He has worked as a reporter and columnist in London, England, for the Telegraph, Times and Daily Mail, and in Canada for the Ottawa Citizen, Torstar and Sun Media. He is the author of Into The Darkness: An Account of 7/7, published by Vintage.

5 hours ago
Residents want MAGA musician's concert at Parks Canada historic site cancelled
Some residents are calling on Parks Canada to cancel a performance by a U.S. singer and rising star in the MAGA movement at a national historic site near Halifax this week. Christian rocker Sean Feucht has a concert scheduled for Wednesday night at the York Redoubt National Historic Site, a fortification constructed in 1793 to help protect the port city. It sits on a cliff overlooking the harbour. Feucht, who unsuccessfully ran for U.S. congress as a Republican in 2020, is also a missionary and an author who has spoken out against the 2SLGBTQ+ community, abortion rights and critical race theory on his website. What I want to know is how this got approved in the first place, said Larry Stewart, who lives in Fergusons Cove, a small community next to the historical site. Stewart is one of several residents who have voiced opposition to the planned concert, which they said goes against Parks Canada's guiding principles of inclusion and safety for all visitors. Enlarge image (new window) Several residents who live near the York Redoubt National Historic Site outside Halifax say it's inappropriate for Parks Canada to host the singer. Photo: CBC / Galen McRae It's completely inappropriate, said Eleanor Kure, a longtime resident of the area. Feucht has called for government policy in the United States to be based on traditional Christian values in the midst of a spiritual war in that country. His website calls on young people to stand up against the progressive agenda being forced upon America. The concert at the York Redoubt site on Wednesday kicks off a national tour Feucht said marks the Summer of Revival in the nation of Canada. I think it's very upsetting, said resident Nancy Hunter. Feucht did not respond to a request for comment from CBC News. MP urges Parks Canada to cancel The residents who spoke to CBC News said they've never seen a concert being held at York Redoubt National Historic Site before. They said they only learned about the event after Parks Canada sent out an email over the weekend warning residents about potential noise and parking issues. Parks Canada did not respond before deadline to questions about how the concert came to be scheduled. Shannon Miedema, the Liberal MP for the area, did not make herself available for an interview. In an email to a resident that was provided to CBC News, Miedema said she's urging Parks Canada to cancel the concert after hearing from several constituents. I have the utmost respect for the value of free speech, I do not believe this event aligns with Parks Canada's core values of respect for people, equity, diversity and inclusion, or integrity, the email read. The statement said Miedema is working with the appropriate parties to try to ensure the concert doesn't proceed. If it does go ahead, residents said they'll protest the event. I'll be there. Maybe with the Canadian flag. Maybe with a Pride flag, said Stewart. Josh Hoffman (new window) · CBC News · Reporter/Editor Josh Hoffman is a reporter for CBC Nova Scotia. Josh worked as a local radio reporter all over Canada before moving to Nova Scotia in 2018.

a day ago
She's fought for clean water for years and fears proposed Ontario permit changes will hurt First Nations
Makasa Looking Horse Henry remembers the moment she learned some people in her community had never tasted clean tap water. A lot of people have to rely on buying water, not having any hooked-up water, piped-in water and running water in their households, she said. This is a huge stressor on Indigenous women's mental health and Indigenous families' mental health. For the past eight years, Henry has fought for water sovereignty in a place that's been her home her entire life, Six Nations of the Grand River, which is near Brantford and is home to people from all six Haudenosaunee nations. Now, Henry says, a proposed regulation from the Ontario government could roll back years of advocacy and sideline voices of Indigenous communities like hers. It's honestly really, really disappointing and disheartening, she said. It feels as if the proposal is designed to keep Indigenous Peoples out of the decision-making from water extraction, and governing our own waters and governing our own lands, Henry added. Enlarge image (new window) Henry, of Six Nations near Brantford, Ont., has been advocating for Indigenous water rights for the past eight years. Photo: Submitted The proposed regulation Under the province's current regulations, companies that want to extract groundwater must apply for a permit to take water, triggering environmental assessments, public consultation, a review of the purpose for taking water and a duty to consult Indigenous communities. Businesses that might want to take groundwater include agriculture, gravel mining and water-bottling plants. The proposed regulation would allow those permits to be transferred from one company to another without reapplying, so long as the intended use for the water and amount taken stays the same or declines. That means a business could be sold to a new owner who could inherit the water rights with minimal additional review. In an emailed statement from a Ministry of the Environment spokesperson, the province said this streamlines the permit approval process, potentially cutting months off the current approval wait time. The ministry said it would also continue to review all applicants in the streamlined process to ensure requirements are met. But according to critics, such changes to the process would bypass meaningful environmental checks. What's at stake Arlene Slocombe, executive director of Wellington Water Watchers, shares Henry's concerns. The [Premier Doug] Ford government wants to make water-taking permits transferrable, meaning no input, no consent and no accountability if corporate ownership changes hands, she said in a phone interview with CBC News. Enlarge image (new window) Arlene Slocombe of Wellington Water Watchers says the proposed regulation to make water-taking permits transferrable would bypass key environmental assessments. Photo: Submitted This move to change the water-taking permit process is essentially a water-grabbing tactic that would make water-taking permits functionally and potentially eternal once approved. Slocombe warns the regulation could lead to unchecked withdrawals from groundwater systems with unknown limits. It's essentially like writing checks on a bank account that you don't know the balance of, and at some point, you run out, she said. Nobody's really tallying exactly when that 'zero' mark happens. Slocombe said while most municipal wells supplying houses and businesses eventually return water to the watershed, facilities like bottling plants could permanently remove it by shipping it beyond the local ecosystem. Another major concern is the removal of the 30-day public comment period that currently accompanies water-taking applications. Slocombe said that when BlueTriton applied for its permit to run its Aberfoyle water-bottling operation, more than 32,000 people submitted feedback. Under the new rules, a permit transfer would not require any public input. Nor would it require consultation with Indigenous groups. Again, something else that they're trying to push and take our voices out of the entire conversation, said Henry. We're not going anywhere and they need to respect us as sovereign nations. The economics of water-taking Roy Brouwer, executive director of the University of Waterloo's Water Institute and an economics professor, said the province is undervaluing the true cost of its water. Enlarge image (new window) Roy Brouwer, an economics professor at the University of Waterloo and executive director of the university's Water Institute, says the province is undervaluing the true cost of its water. Photo: Submitted He said that when he moved to Waterloo region a decade or so ago, the cost was under $5 for 1,000 cubic metres of water (one million litres). Since then, the cost has increased, but not in a way that reflects limited supply or environmental impact. They just added $500 like a round number, $500 on the permit, he said. It has all the appearances of an administrative fee. And it doesn't necessarily reflect the scarcity costs of the resource now and into the future, benefiting multiple users, said Brouwer. He believes the transfer system, as proposed, ignores the fact that water is limited. Brouwer said he's also concerned about the environmental impact. Over time … what you initially identified as a maybe limited or moderate ecological risk is perhaps a bigger risk because you actually do the pumping and you can actually observe what is happening to the natural environment. The fight in Aberfoyle Henry was a vocal critic of the former Nestlé bottling plant in Aberfoyle, later sold to BlueTriton and now owned by Ice River Springs. Despite it being part of the application process, indigenous consultation was minimal. Nobody knew in my community that water extraction … was happening. And with the lack of consultation, not even the governments knew that that was happening either, she said. Our people had no idea. Over the years, she's held groundwater awareness rallies — sometimes by herself — and delivered cease-and-desist letters on behalf of her band council. She said she secured those by going to meetings at our long house and letting our clan mothers, faith keepers and chiefs know what was happening. And so they said deliver the cease-and-desist to them. And so that's what I did. Ice River Springs, an Ontario-based bottling company and the newest owner of the Aberfoyle water-bottling facility, has yet to apply for its water-taking permit. In an emailed statement to CBC News, executive vice-president and co-owner Sandy Gott said the company supports initiatives that maintain environmental protection and it would do its work with respect for the communities in which [they] operate. Concerns about being cut out The public comment period for Ontario's proposed water permit regulation runs until Aug. 1. After that, it moves to a review and decision stage. There is no fixed timeline for when a final decision will be made. Henry said she's concerned about being cut out of the process entirely. Right now, they're trying to take every single thing that they can and they're trying to take more water, she said. And so we're just trying to fight with everything we have to protect our waters and our lands. They go hand in hand.