logo
Green algae found along French coastline responsible for jogger's death, rules court

Green algae found along French coastline responsible for jogger's death, rules court

Local France24-06-2025
The Nantes appeals court found France liable for the death of Jean-Rene Auffray, citing its "negligence" in enforcing environmental regulations to protect its waters and prevent toxic green algae (
algues vertes)
blooms.
For more than five decades, tons of green algae have washed up annually on Brittany's beaches in western France, releasing hydrogen sulphide gas as it rots - a toxin that can prove deadly in high concentrations.
Auffray, a keen trail runner, died of sudden respiratory failure while jogging in the algae-choked Gouessant estuary near the city of Saint-Brieuc.
His lifeless body had been found by his wife and daughters, in September 2016, on the beach at Hillion - 300 meters from the spot where 36 wild boar died in 2011, with their deaths being attributed to algae.
Advertisement
His family sued over his death, but in 2022 a court rejected the claim, ruling there was insufficient evidence to link the toxic algae to Auffray's death.
Tuesday's decision reversed that ruling, marking the first time France has been held liable for the health risks posed by deadly green algae blooms along its coast.
The court "holds the State liable for negligence due to its failure to implement European and national regulations designed to protect waters from agricultural pollution", which is "the main cause of the proliferation of green algae in Brittany", it explained in a statement.
The court found Auffray's death was caused by a rapid pulmonary oedema -- a condition in which there is too much fluid in the lungs -- which could only be explained by fatal poisoning from inhaling hydrogen sulphide at very high concentrations.
"For the first time, a French court has recognised the link between a person's death and the state's negligence in these green algae cases," said the family's lawyer, Francois Lafforgue.
The deceased's family will receive partial compensation, as the court found the state 60 percent liable, noting that he had taken a personal risk by jogging in the estuary.
The state has been ordered to pay €277,343 to the jogger's wife, €15,000 to each of his three children, and €9,000 to his brother.
According to a 2021 report from France's top audit court, around 90 percent of Brittany's algae blooms are caused by agriculture, where the use of nitrogen fertilisers has increased significantly since the 1960s.
Intensive farming — especially pig farming — and the resulting nitrate pollution have been linked to the spread of green algae in the western Cotes-d'Armor region.
Advertisement
It has been the subject of environmental campaigns while local authorities have displayed billboards warning of the potential risks from the algae, especially at low tide.
A board reading "Caution, Danger Nearby - Rotting algae deposit" is pictured in Hillion, near Saint-Brieuc, northwestern France. (Photo by Damien MEYER / AFP)
In 2019 an apparently fit and healthy 18-year-old oyster fisherman was found dead near algae in Morlaix Bay in Brittany, while in 2009, a 48-year-old man died after driving a van full of green algae.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy
France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy

LeMonde

timea day ago

  • LeMonde

France says it cannot save contraceptives US plans to destroy

France said Friday, August 1, it could not seize women's contraception products estimated to be worth $9.7 million that the United States plans to destroy, after media reported the stockpile would be incinerated in the country. The contraceptives – intended for some of the world's poorest countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa – were purchased by the US foreign aid agency USAID under former president Joe Biden. But France's health ministry told Agence France-Presse Friday there was no legal way for it to intervene. The administration of Biden's successor Donald Trump, which has slashed USAID and pursued anti-abortion policies, confirmed last month it planned to destroy the contraceptives, which have been stored in a warehouse in the Belgian city of Geel. According to several media reports, the unexpired products were to be incinerated in France at the end of July by a company that specialises in destroying medical waste. France's government has come under pressure to save the contraceptives, with women's rights groups calling the US decision "insane." The health ministry told AFP that the government had "examined the courses of action available to us, but unfortunately there is no legal basis for intervention by a European health authority, let alone the French national drug safety authority, to recover these medical products. Since contraceptives are not drugs of major therapeutic interest, and in this case we are not facing a supply shortage, we have no means to requisition the stocks." The ministry also said it had no information on where the contraceptives would be destroyed. Leaving Belgian warehouse Sarah Durocher, head of the French women's rights group Family Planning, told AFP that some contraceptives had already left the Belgian warehouse. "We were informed 36 hours ago that the removal of these boxes of contraceptives had begun," Durocher said Thursday. "We do not know where these trucks are now – or whether they have arrived in France," she added. "We call on all incineration companies not to destroy the contraceptives and to oppose this insane decision." French company Veolia confirmed to AFP that it had a contract with the US firm Chemonics, USAID's logistics provider. But Veolia emphasized that the contract concerned "only the management of expired products, which is not the case for the stockpile" in Belgium. The products, mostly long-acting contraceptives such as IUDs and birth control implants, are reportedly up to five years away from expiring. Outrage over decision The US decision has provoked an outcry in France, where rights groups and left-wing politicians have called on their government to stop the plan. "France cannot allow itself to become the stage for such actions. A moratorium is necessary," wrote five NGOs in an op-ed in Le Monde, condemning the "absurdity" of the US decision. Among them was MSI Reproductive Choices, one of several organisations that have offered to purchase and repackage the contraceptives at no cost to the US government. All offers have been rejected. Last week, New Hampshire's Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen pointed to the Trump administration's stated goal of reducing government waste, saying the contraceptives plan "is the epitome of waste, fraud and abuse." A US State Department spokesperson told AFP earlier this week that the destruction of the products would cost $167,000 and "no HIV medications or condoms are being destroyed." The spokesperson pointed to a policy that prohibits providing aid to non-governmental organisations that perform or promote abortions. The Mexico City Policy, which critics call the "global gag rule," was first introduced by President Ronald Reagan in 1984. It has been reinstated under every Republican president since. Last month, the US also incinerated nearly 500 metric tons of high-nutrition biscuits that had been meant to keep malnourished children in Afghanistan and Pakistan alive.

Contraceptives destroyed in silence: 'Can France accept to become the executor of a senseless policy imposed by the US?'
Contraceptives destroyed in silence: 'Can France accept to become the executor of a senseless policy imposed by the US?'

LeMonde

timea day ago

  • LeMonde

Contraceptives destroyed in silence: 'Can France accept to become the executor of a senseless policy imposed by the US?'

A stockpile of several million doses of contraceptives, valued at $9.7 million, financed by USAID and usable until 2031, is currently being incinerated in France. These products, originally intended for women in extreme poverty in countries in the Global South, are being destroyed for purely ideological reasons, at the request of the Trump administration. The service provider tasked with the incineration has not yet been identified. This human and environmental waste must be stopped immediately. Why is this happening? Because the US administration, following a blinkered ideological agenda, ordered their destruction as part of the dismantling of USAID. It even refused to transfer the stock to NGOs who were ready to transport and distribute it. This is not a public health issue or a logistical problem. It is a radical political choice. USAID's logistics program, which is usually operated by the company Chemonics, appears to be linked to this operation. However, this cannot be confirmed, since neither the name of the logistics provider nor the name of the incinerator has been made public. The stock, which was previously stored in Belgium, was transported to France in about 10 trucks at the end of July. The exact location of the incineration is deliberately undisclosed. Despite the scale of the operation, the company responsible for handling the medical waste has not been identified. We contacted four major French waste management companies to ask whether they were involved in this operation. All replied that they were not concerned. An economic and environmental absurdity As NGOs active in several African countries, we know exactly what a contraceptive shortage means: unintended pregnancies, abandoned children, unsafe abortions, and girls forced out of school at age 12. It also means women trapped in unwanted motherhood. Can France accept to become the executor of a senseless policy imposed by the US without reaction? This destruction is also an economic and environmental absurdity. It costs more ($167,000) than it would to redistribute contraceptives to countries experiencing shortages. Eliminating usable products that are urgently needed in empty health centers will also generate metric tons of CO₂. It's a total waste.

Trump officials weigh fate of European contraceptive stockpile
Trump officials weigh fate of European contraceptive stockpile

Euronews

timea day ago

  • Euronews

Trump officials weigh fate of European contraceptive stockpile

The Trump administration says it is weighing what to do with family planning supplies stockpiled in Europe that campaigners and two United States senators are fighting to save from destruction. Concerns that the Trump administration plans to incinerate the stockpile have angered family planning advocates on both sides of the Atlantic. Campaigners say the supplies stored in a US-funded warehouse in Geel, Belgium, include contraceptive pills, contraceptive implants, and IUDs that could spare women in war zones and elsewhere the hardship of unwanted pregnancies. US State Department deputy spokesman Tommy Pigott said Thursday in response to a question about the contraceptives that 'we're still in the process here in terms of determining the way forward'. "When we have an update, we'll provide it," he said. Belgium says it has been talking with US diplomats about trying to spare the supplies from destruction, including possibly moving them out of the warehouse. Foreign Ministry spokesperson Florinda Baleci told The Associated Press that she couldn't comment further 'to avoid influencing the outcome of the discussions'. The Trump administration's dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID), which managed foreign aid programmes, left the supplies' fate uncertain. Pigott didn't detail the types of contraceptives that make up the stockpile. He said some of the supplies, bought by the previous administration, could 'potentially be' drugs designed to induce abortions. Pigott didn't detail how that might impact the Trump administration thinking about how to deal with the drugs or the entire stockpile. Costing more than $9 million (€7.9 million) and funded by US taxpayers, the family planning supplies were intended for women in war zones, refugee camps, and elsewhere, according to a bipartisan letter of protest to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio from US senators Jeanne Shaheen, a New Hampshire Democrat, and Alaska Republican Lisa Murkowski. They said destroying the stockpile 'would be a waste of US taxpayer dollars as well as an abdication of US global leadership in preventing unintended pregnancies, unsafe abortions and maternal deaths – key goals of US foreign assistance'. They urged Rubio to allow another country or partner to distribute the contraceptives. European lawmakers, aid groups voice concerns Concerns voiced by European campaigners and lawmakers that the supplies could be transported to France for incineration have led to mounting pressure on government officials to intervene and save them. The European Commission, through spokesman Guillaume Mercier, said Friday that 'we continue to monitor the situation closely to explore the most effective solutions'. The US branch of family planning aid group MSI Reproductive Choices said it offered to purchase, repackage, and distribute the stock at its own expense but 'these efforts were repeatedly rejected'. The group said the supplies included long-acting IUDs, contraceptive implants, and pills, and that they have long shelf-lives, extending as far as 2031. Aid group Doctors Without Borders said incineration would be 'an intentionally reckless and harmful act against women and girls everywhere'. Charles Dallara, the grandson of a French former lawmaker who was a contraception pioneer in France, urged President Emmanuel Macron to not let France 'become an accomplice to this scandal'. 'Do not allow France to take part in the destruction of essential health tools for millions of women,' Dallara wrote in an appeal to the French leader. 'We have a moral and historical responsibility'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store