Trump is expected to sign an executive order ending U.S. sanctions on Syria
WASHINGTON — U.S. President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order on Monday ending U.S. sanctions on Syria, following through on his earlier promise to do so.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the move was designed to 'promote and support the country's path to stability and peace.' Sanctions will remain in place on former President Bashar Assad, his associates and others, she said.
The U.S. granted Syria sweeping exemptions from sanctions in May, which was a first step toward fulfilling the Republican president's pledge to lift a half-century of penalties on a country shattered by 13 years of civil war.
Trump met with Syria's interim leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, in Saudi Arabia in May and told Al-Sharaa that he would lift sanctions and explore normalizing relations in a major policy shift between the U.S. and Syria.
'This is another promise made and promise kept,' Leavitt said Monday.
The European Union has also followed through with lifting nearly all remaining sanctions on Syria.
By Fatima Hussein And Matthew Lee.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
25 minutes ago
- CBC
Trade tensions overshadow Canada Day celebrations in Washington
Trade tensions between Canada and the U.S. cast a shadow over traditional Canada Day events in Washington, but many expressed hope the relationship between the two countries isn't beyond repair.
Globe and Mail
37 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Republican budget bill dismantles climate law passed by Democrats
WASHINGTON (AP) — The sprawling Republican budget bill approved by the Senate Tuesday removes a proposed tax on solar and wind energy projects but quickly phases out tax credits for wind, solar and other renewable energy. The Senate approved the bill 51-50 as President Donald Trump and GOP lawmakers move to dismantle the 2022 climate law passed by Democrats under former President Joe Biden. Vice President JD Vance broke a tie after three Republican senators voted no. The bill now moves to the House for final legislative approval. The excise tax on solar and wind generation projects was added to the Senate bill over the weekend, prompting bipartisan pushback from lawmakers as well as clean energy developers and advocates. The final bill removes the tax but mostly sticks with legislative language released late Friday night and would end incentives for clean energy sooner than a draft version unveiled two weeks ago. Some warn of spike in utility bills Democrats and environmental groups said the GOP plan would crush growth in the wind and solar industry and lead to a spike in Americans' utility bills. The measure jeopardizes hundreds of renewable energy projects slated to boost the nation's electric grid, they said. 'Despite limited improvements, this legislation undermines the very foundation of America's manufacturing comeback and global energy leadership,' said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association. If the bill becomes law, 'families will face higher electric bills, factories will shut down, Americans will lose their jobs, and our electric grid will grow weaker,'' she said. The American Petroleum Institute, the top lobbying group for the oil and gas industry, applauded the bill's passage. 'This historic legislation will help usher in a new era of energy dominance by unlocking opportunities for investment, opening lease sales and expanding access to oil and natural gas development,'' said Mike Sommers, the group's president and CEO. While Democrats complained that the bill would make it harder to get renewable energy to the electric grid, Republicans said the measure represents historic savings for taxpayers and supports production of traditional energy sources such as oil, natural gas and coal, as well as nuclear power, increasing reliability. In a compromise approved overnight, the bill allows wind and solar projects that begin construction within a year of the law's enactment to get a full tax credit without a deadline for when the projects are 'placed in service,'' or plugged into the grid. Wind and solar projects that begin later must be placed in service by the end of 2027 to get a credit. The bill retains incentives for technologies such as advanced nuclear, geothermal and hydropower through 2032. Bill 'could have been worse,' Murkowski says Changes to the renewable energy language — including removal of the excise tax on wind and solar — were negotiated by a group of Republican senators, including Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Iowa Sens. Joni Ernst and Chuck Grassley. Iowa is a top producer of wind power, while Murkowski is a longtime supporter of renewable energy as crucial for achieving energy independence, particularly for isolated rural communities in Alaska. Murkowski, who voted in favor of the final bill, called her decision-making process 'agonizing.' Changes that push back the timeline for terminating wind and solar credits mean that 'a good number' of Alaska projects would still qualify, she said. 'Again, it's not all we wanted. It could have been worse,' she told reporters Tuesday. Murkowski praised provisions calling for more oil lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and other areas in Alaska and increased revenue sharing. Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, the top Democrat on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, called the bill a 'massively destructive piece of legislation' that 'increases costs for everyone by walloping the health care system, making families go hungry and sending utility bills through the roof.' The bill 'saddles our children and grandchildren with trillions and trillions of dollars in debt — all to serve giant corporations, fossil fuel polluters and billionaire Republican megadonors who are already among the richest people on the planet,' Whitehouse said. EV credits eliminated Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, the No. 2 Senate Republican, hailed the bill for rescinding many elements of what he called the Biden administration's 'green new scam,' including electric vehicle tax credits that have allowed car owners to lower the purchase price of EVs by $7,500. The bill also blocks for 10 years a first-ever fee on excess methane emissions from oil and gas production. Industry groups fiercely opposed the methane fee, which was authorized by Democrats in the 2022 climate law but never implemented. The GOP bill also increases oil and gas leases on public lands and revives coal leasing in Wyoming and other states. 'Today, the Senate moved President Trump's agenda forward,'' said West Virginia Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, a Republican who chairs the Senate environment committee. Clean energy advocates were deeply disappointed by the bill, which they argue undoes much of the climate law before it fully takes effect. 'By eliminating a number of clean energy incentives and slashing others, this bill represents a significant step backward for America's energy future,' said Nathaniel Keohane, president of the Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, a nonprofit that seeks to accelerate the global transition to net-zero greenhouse gas emissions. 'Curtailing incentives for electricity generated from wind and solar power is particularly shortsighted'' and will raise energy prices for households and businesses and threaten reliability of the electric grid, Keohane said. ___
Globe and Mail
2 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
What's really in Trump's ‘beautiful' bill?
The One Big, Beautiful Bill Act squeaked through the U.S. Senate by a single vote Tuesday – requiring Vice-President JD Vance to break the tie – bringing the central legislation of President Donald Trump's agenda one step closer to meeting his self-imposed July 4 deadline for passage. The bill would fund mass deportations and tax cuts by taking away health coverage and food stamps from millions of low-income Americans, ending programs to fight climate change, and racking up debt. The Senate version of the prospective law made some changes compared to the earlier legislation passed by the House of Representatives, which means the two chambers must hash out their differences before sending a final version to the White House. With all Democrats vehemently opposed and the Republicans holding only narrow majorities in both houses, the next two days are almost certain to see some down-to-the-wire legislative manoeuvring. Here is what is in the bill. Deportations, the wall and the military The bill would pay for the centrepiece of Mr. Trump's political program by allocating nearly US$30-billion to his effort to round up and deport immigrants and US$46.5-billion to continue construction of the wall on the U.S. border with Mexico. The President is aiming to deport all 11 million people who are in the country without legal status as well as millions more who came legally under immigration programs that he is cancelling. The White House has ordered Immigration and Customs Enforcement to step up deportations with the goal of arresting 3,000 people per day. This has led agents to raid farms, restaurants, factories, warehouses and other workplaces. The bill would also add US$153-billion in military spending, including US$25-billion to start Mr. Trump's promised 'Golden Dome' missile defence system, which Canada is negotiating to join. The spend on taxes The legislation contains a long list of tax changes. At the centre are measures that would make permanent a series of temporary tax cuts Congress passed during Mr. Trump's first term. These include cuts to corporate tax rates, personal income tax rates, a larger standard deduction and a cut to taxes on pass-through entities such as limited liability companies. In addition, the bill would add a new tax deduction of up to US$25,000 for tips and US$12,500 for overtime pay until 2028, increase the child tax credit from US$2,000 to $2,200, with later adjustments for inflation, and raise the cap on the deduction for state and local taxes to US$40,000 from US$10,000. According to modelling by the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, Mr. Trump's alma mater, 70 per cent of the benefits of the tax cuts would flow to the top 10 per cent of income earners. Cutting Medicaid, Obamacare and food stamps To partially offset the cost of the tax cuts, the bill would cut over US$1.3-trillion in spending from the country's social safety net, the largest such reduction in more than a generation. To save US$930-billion, for instance, it envisions adding additional red tape for people applying for Medicaid, a government program that pays for health care for the poorest Americans. In theory, the new rules are designed to press people on Medicaid who are not currently working to find a job or go back to school. In practice, they will likely take away health care from a range of low-income Americans who do not comply with the new paperwork requirements. The bill would also make cuts to Medicare – the program that provides health care to senior citizens and younger people with certain disabilities – and not renew some subsidies for people buying private insurance through the Obamacare system. According to an estimate by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office, these measures combined would take health insurance away from nearly 12 million Americans. Meanwhile, 4.7 million people would lose access to Supplemental Nutrition Assistance (SNAP), colloquially known as food stamps, because of a US$285-billion cut, according to the CBO. Ending climate policy In a partial rollback of former president Joe Biden's signature climate policies, the legislation ends US$488-billion in tax credits for electric vehicles and subsidies for new wind and solar projects that come online after 2027. On the flip side, it offers a subsidy for some coal production. What happens now Even with all of these cuts, the bill would still require a US$3.3-trillion increase in government borrowing and therefore also raises the country's debt ceiling by US$5-trillion. And this is why, despite its centrality to Mr. Trump's agenda, the legislation remains so contentious within his own party. On one side, moderates are balking at the cuts to social spending. On the other, deficit hawks argue the plan is far too expensive. Republican North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis voted against the bill over its Medicaid cuts, as did moderate Mainer Susan Collins. Libertarian Kentuckian Rand Paul opposed it for raising the debt ceiling. Alaska Senator Lisa Murkowski, the final, key vote for the bill, came around after party leaders added money to a rural hospital fund and softened the SNAP cuts for her state. Now, a joint legislative committee will try to merge the Senate and House versions of the bill in a way that the slim majorities in both houses can live with. The Senate, for instance, rewrote a Medicaid tax provision in a way that could put more of the burden of paying for the program onto state governments, something House moderates are likely to be unhappy with. The upper chamber also passed a higher debt-ceiling increase, however, risking the support of the few remaining fiscal conservatives in Congress. Still, Mr. Trump holds an iron grip over his party. He is certain to be squeezing as hard as possible to fulfill his goal of signing the bill by Independence Day on Friday.
