Grok uses climate change stats to explain Karoline Leavitt's post about Texas floods
On Saturday, Karoline Leavitt re-posted a Truth Social message from President Donald Trump acknowledging the intense flooding that has killed at least 32 people and informing the public that the administration is working with local Texas officials to assist.
When asked to summarize the post, Grok said Trump was referencing the tragic July 4 flooding event in Texas but then provided some background information on how climate change is making flooding worse.
'Climate models from the IPCC and NOAA suggest that ignoring climate change could intensify such flooding events in Texas, as warmer air holds more moisture, with peer-reviewed studies (e.g., Trenberth et al., 2018) indicating a 7% increase in atmospheric water vapor per 1°C warming, potentially exacerbating future disasters,' Grok summarized.
Since January, the Trump administration has drastically rolled back climate regulations, cut research funding, and essentially eliminated climate programs.
Trump has called climate change a 'hoax' and downplayed concerns about severe weather becoming more common and deadly despite science showing otherwise.
The administration has made cuts to the National Weather Service, the government agency responsible for monitoring weather events, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the agency tasked with coordinating disaster response and administering recovery efforts.
Both NWS and FEMA play major roles in warning people of inclement weather, coordinating a response, and delivering relief to those in need. Yet, Trump has characterized FEMA as an unnecessary federal resource intervening in state-level issues.
'A governor should be able to handle it, and frankly, if they can't handle it, the aftermath, then maybe they shouldn't be governor,' Trump said last month.
The administration also made cuts to the NWS, which led to the departure of nearly 600 employees – hundreds of whom are critical in monitoring weather and issuing warnings to residents. While the agency is hiring new staff to 'stabilize' itself, former NWS directors warned that cutting staff could understaff offices so much so that 'there will be a needless loss of life.'
Further cuts to programs that monitor climate and weather patterns, such as the U.S. Global Change Research Program, which produces congressionally mandated reports on how climate change is affecting life, could hinder preparations for extreme weather.
Texas officials said, over the weekend, they were unprepared for the amount of rain that flooded nearby rivers and created lethal flash flooding overnight.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israeli PM nominates Donald Trump for Nobel Peace Prize - as Gaza ceasefire talks continue
Israel's prime minister has nominated Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. Benjamin Netanyahu made the announcement as he attended a dinner at the White House, and the US president appeared pleased by the gesture. Speaking to reporters, Mr Netanyahu said the US and Israel are working with other countries who would give Palestinians "a better future" - and indicated those in Gaza could move elsewhere. "If people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave," he added. Indirect negotiations with Hamas are currently taking place in the hope of securing a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, which could lead to the release of Israeli hostages in the territory. Mr Trump has suggested an agreement could be finalised this week. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version. You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow us on WhatsApp and subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.
Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
DAVID MARCUS: Hill country Texans are all in on emergency relief after deadly flooding
-Boerne, Texas In the proximity of great tragedy there often lies an eerie stillness, as if any loud noise or sudden movement might trigger nature's wrath again. Such is the feeling in Boerne, Texas this week, about 25 minutes outside of the Kerr County flood zone where 82 souls have perished. Within hours of the flash floods on Friday, Boerne (pronounced like Bernie), along with nearby towns such as Fredrickburg, and Welfare were already assembling supplies and arranging volunteers for their flooded neighbors, it's just what they do here. I met Dick outside the Black Rifle Coffee cafe on Main Street. He's retired, has lived in the town for 25 years and he told me, "Everybody feels it, if this doesn't make you sad then you aren't human." When I asked Dick if he was surprised by how aggressively the community responded, he told me, "Not at all, it's how we are," adding, "Did you know this area was founded in the 19th century by German freethinkers, they wanted to be free, and we still do, so we take care of our own." As we spoke beneath the unparalleled beauty of the same Texas skies that wrought such devastation last week we saw and heard massive equipment on the backs of flat beds, heading to Kerr County. Dick wasn't the first person to raise these Hill Country roots to me, even on my plane, the woman next to me, who lives in the area, gave me a short history of the freethinkers and their impact, and she was an immigrant from Columbia. Later in the day I spoke with Kristen who lives in Fredericksburg and told me that she knew things looked bad early on Friday, and was annoyed at first by the initial lack of news coverage, "then we heard about the camp, that girls were missing, it was a gut punch." By Saturday morning she and her friends were bringing supplies to Comfort, TX which had turned what was supposed to be a legendary local fireworks show, into an emergency center. This was also about when Rabbi Yosef Marrus of the Chabbad of Boerne, began not only collecting supplies, but contacting the organization's HQ in Brooklyn to begin a national fundraising campaign. "The Jewish community in the Hill Country is small, Marrus told me, "but we are proud to be here and had to help, we are all Americans." Marrus stressed to me the importance of finding out what specifically is needed in the area, in one case, a fire department was flush with food donations but didn't have enough refrigerators to store them, not long after, the Chabbad bought 2 fridges and had them delivered. One of the central locations where Marrus and others have staged supplies is Bunker Branding in Boerne, owned by Clint Sanders and his wife Jenna, and it was abuzz with activity on Monday morning. "We do branding for a lot of websites," Chris told me, "so we had a way to get word out and we needed to do something, and we have this warehouse space." He walked me through the facility, different items staged around, trailers outside to be packed, Sanders also told me that finding out what is really needed is key, "we have a ton of donated clothes upstairs, but they don't need clothes right now, next week maybe they will." Impressed as I was by the operation I said to Sanders, "How do you and your wife know how to do all this," without a beat, he smiled and said, "We don't." That really is the most impressive part of all of this, no regular person really knows what to do after 20 feet of water rises in 45 minutes, taking with it scores of lives, but with the help of the state, local and federal authorities, they learn on the job with incredible speed. Maybe, given the particularly horrible loss of life of so many children from this area, people need something to do, to stay busy. On the couple occasions when the loss of so many kids came to the fore of my conversations, a thousand-yard stare would emerge in their eyes. How does one even comprehend? Being here in Boerne, seeing the selfless efforts of these tough Texans, I trust that the German freethinkers who settled this land 175 years ago would be very proud today of the communities they created. And as Americans, we should all be very proud of them, too.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Who's Running American Defense Policy?
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Remember when the United States engaged in an act of war against a country of some 90 million people by sending its B-2 bombers into battle? No? Well, you can be forgiven for letting it slip your mind; after all, it was more than two weeks ago. Besides, you've probably been distracted by more recent news. The United States has halted some weapons shipments to Ukraine, despite the increased Russian bombing of Ukrainian cities as Moscow continues its campaign of mass murder. Fortunately, last Thursday Donald Trump got right on the horn to his friend in Russia, President Vladimir Putin. Unfortunately, Putin apparently told Trump to pound sand. 'I didn't make any progress with him today at all,' Trump said to reporters before boarding Air Force One. Meanwhile, the president has decided to review AUKUS, the 2021 security pact between the United States, Australia, and Great Britain, a move that caught U.S. diplomats (and their colleagues in Canberra and London) off guard and has generated concern about the future of the arrangement. Technically, the president didn't decide to review it, but rather his handpicked secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, did. Well, it wasn't him, either; apparently, the review was ordered by someone you've likely never heard of: Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby, a career-long Beltway denizen who initiated the process on his own. But at least someone's keeping an eye on Asia: CNN is reporting, based on a Ukrainian intelligence report, that North Korea is planning to send as many as 30,000 more soldiers to assist Russia in its war of conquest. Of course, this is largely based on a single source, but Pyongyang has already sent at least 10,000 troops into the European battlefield over the past nine months, and things are going poorly for Russia's hapless conscripts, so perhaps a deal really is in the works to provide the Kremlin with another shipment of foreign cannon fodder. All of this raises an obvious question: Who's running America's foreign and defense policies? It's not the president, at least not on most issues. Trump's interest in foreign policy, as with so many other topics, is capricious and episodic at best. He flits away from losing issues, leaving them to others. He promised to end the war in Ukraine in a day, but after conceding that making peace is 'more difficult than people would have any idea,' the president has since shrugged and given up. It's not Marco Rubio—you may remember that he is technically the secretary of state, but he seems to have little power in this White House. It's not Hegseth, who can't seem to stop talking about 'lethality' and trans people long enough to deliver a real briefing that isn't just a fawning performance for Trump. (As bad as Hegseth can be, he seems almost restrained next to the State Department's spokesperson, Tammy Bruce, whose comments about Trump—she thanks God for him from her podium and says he is 'saving this country and the world'—have an unsettling Pyongyang-newsreader lilt to them.) It's not the national security adviser. That's also Rubio. Apparently, American defense policy is being run by Bridge Colby, and perhaps a few other guys somewhere in the greater Washington metropolitan area. Their influence is not always obvious. The order to halt shipments, for example, came from Hegseth, but the original idea was reportedly driven by Colby, who backed the moves because, according to NBC, he has 'long advocated scaling back the U.S. commitment in Ukraine and shifting weapons and resources to the Pacific region to counter China.' (Per the NBC reporting, an analysis from the Joint Staff showed that Colby is wrong to think of this as an either-or situation; the Ukrainians need weapons that the U.S. wouldn't even be using in a conflict in the Pacific.) In this administration, the principals are either incompetent or detached from most of the policy making, and so decisions are being made at lower levels without much guidance from above. In Trump's first term, this kind of dysfunction was a lucky break, because the people at those lower levels were mostly career professionals who at least knew how to keep the lights on. In Trump's second term, though, many of those professionals have been either silenced or outright replaced by loyalists and inexperienced appointees. Ironically, allowing various lower offices to fill the policy void empowers the unknown appointees whom MAGA world claims to hate in other administrations. The Trump White House's policy process—insofar as it can be called a 'process'—is the type found in many authoritarian states, where the top levels of government tackle the one or two big things the leader wants done and everything else tumbles down to other functionaries, who can then drive certain issues according to their own preferences (which seems to be what Colby is doing), or who will do just enough to stay under the boss's radar and out of trouble (which seems to be what most other Trump appointees are doing). In such a system, no one is really in charge except Trump—which means that on most days, and regarding many issues, no one is in charge. In Trump's current administration, irrational tariffs and brutal immigration enforcement are the two big ideas. Both have foreign-policy ramifications, but they are being pursued by Trump and his team primarily as domestic political issues. Everything else is on the periphery of the White House's vision: Pakistan and India, nuclear weapons, the Middle East (or nuclear weapons and the Middle East), the Ukraine war. All of these get Trump's temporary attention in the form of a quick evaluation of their utility to Trump personally, and then they're dumped back outside the door of the Oval Office. Even the Iran strike—one of the most important military actions taken by the United States in years—has apparently lost its luster for the president. Trump said that Iran's nuclear program was 'obliterated'; other parts of the U.S. defense and intelligence communities said they weren't sure; Israel thanked America; Trump moved on. This might be because the political advantage of the bombings never materialized: The American public disapproved of Trump's actions, and so the president is now looking for some other shiny object. Today, that trinket seems to be in Gaza. Over the weekend, Trump claimed that he has a 'good chance' of making a deal, perhaps in the coming week, with Hamas for the release of more hostages. This is foreign policy in the Trump era: Announce deals, push their resolution out a week or two, and hope they happen. If they don't—move on and declare success, regardless of any actual outcomes. No one in Trump's administration has any incentive to fix this, because serious changes would be admissions of failure. Repopulating the National Security Council with people who know what they're doing means admitting they were needed in the first place. Hegseth or top people resigning would admit the enormity of the mistake that Trump made in hiring them. Reining in policy freelancers and curtailing the power of lower-level policy makers (as Rubio has at least tried to do with regard to diplomacy) is to admit that senior leaders have lost control of their departments. This administration was never directed or staffed with any coherent foreign policy in mind beyond Trump's empty 'America First' sloganeering. Less than a year into his second term, it's clear that the goals of Trump's 2024 run for the presidency were, in order of importance, to keep Trump out of prison, to exact revenge on Trump's enemies, and to allow Trump and his allies to enrich themselves by every possible means. No one had to think much about who would defend America or conduct its diplomacy; Trump's appointees were apparently chosen largely for shock value and trolling efficacy rather than competence. The rest of the world's most powerful nations, however, are led by grown-ups and professionals. Some of them are enemies of the United States and are quite dangerous. Undersecretary Colby has had some bad ideas, but Americans had better hope that he and the handful of other guys trying to run things know what they're doing. Related: A crisis is no time for amateurs. The one-and-done doctrine Here are four new stories from The Atlantic: Political violence usually gets worse before it gets better. Anne Applebaum: The U.S. is switching sides. The man who thinks Medicaid cuts won't cut Medicaid Take off the mask, ICE. Today's News More than 100 people, including at least 27 campers and counselors from Camp Mystic in Kerr County, are dead after flash flooding hit central Texas over the weekend. President Donald Trump announced tariffs on at least 14 countries effective August 1, unless they can broker trade deals with the U.S. A man who opened fire and injured several people near a Border Patrol building in McAllen, Texas, was killed after exchanging fire with law enforcement, according to officials. Dispatches Work in Progress: Annie Lowrey on why the Medicaid work requirement is a terrible idea. Explore all of our newsletters here. More From The Atlantic Alexandra Petri: A day in the life of the Gen Z worker Trump's only-okay economy Peter Wehner: Why Evangelicals turned their back on PEPFAR What Schwarzenegger knows about George Washington Evening Read I Fought Plastic. Plastic Won. By Annie Lowrey I used to love my Teflon pans. I crisped tofu, fried latkes, and reduced sauces to sticky glazes in them, marveling at how cleanup never took more than a swipe of a sponge. Then I started to worry that my skillets might kill me. The lining on the inside of a nonstick pan is made of plastic. When heated, it can release toxic fumes; when scratched, it can chip off, blending in with tasty bits of char and grains of pepper. 'Data indicates that there are no health effects from the incidental ingestion of nonstick coating flakes,' the company that produces Teflon says, noting that the government has deemed the cookware 'safe for consumer use' … I tossed my nonstick pans into the trash, over my husband's objections. Read the full article. Culture Break Watch (or skip). Murderbot (streaming on Apple TV+) is a quirky show that suggests that AI might be interested in something other than humanity, Emma Stefansky writes. Read. 'Lamentations,' a short story by Nicole Krauss. 'For as long as I'd known him, Harold had been gnawing at me! How many things did I hold against him? Why not his death, too?' Play our daily crossword. Stephanie Bai contributed to this newsletter. When you buy a book using a link in this newsletter, we receive a commission. Thank you for supporting The Atlantic. Article originally published at The Atlantic
