Beyond language barriers: Building culturally intelligent AI for progress
Current AI systems, despite their impressive capabilities, operate predominantly through the lens of English-speaking cultures. While this approach has delivered remarkable results, it represents only the beginning of what artificial intelligence can become when it embraces the full spectrum of human cultural intelligence. The question isn't whether AI will become more culturally aware - it's how quickly we can guide that transformation to unlock technology's complete potential for global progress.
Rather than viewing cultural diversity as a technical challenge to overcome, we have an unprecedented opportunity to build AI systems that are enriched by the wisdom embedded in different ways of thinking. This represents a fundamental evolution from pattern-matching to true cultural intelligence -and the benefits extend far beyond translation accuracy.
Cultural Intelligence Gap
Today's AI systems excel at processing vast amounts of data, but they struggle with something far more nuanced: understanding how different cultures conceptualize and express ideas. Consider the rich linguistic landscape of India, where an Assamese speaker's thought patterns reflect centuries of cultural evolution, philosophical traditions, and unique ways of understanding relationships, time, and community.
When AI systems encounter Assamese cultural concepts - from the community-centered approach to problem-solving to the cyclical understanding of time that influences decision-making—they often default to Western frameworks that miss essential nuances. This isn't simply a translation issue; it's a fundamental gap in cultural comprehension that limits AI's effectiveness across diverse communities. The same challenge exists worldwide. Māori concepts of collective responsibility, Chinese philosophical approaches to harmony and balance, and African Ubuntu principles of interconnectedness represent sophisticated frameworks for understanding the world. When AI systems can't process these cultural intelligences, they can't fully serve the communities that rely on them.
Opportunity for True Intelligence
However, this limitation reveals AI's most exciting frontier. Imagine AI systems that don't just translate languages but truly understand cultural contexts - systems that recognize when an Assamese speaker's indirect communication style conveys respect, or when silence in a conversation carries profound meaning in certain cultural contexts.
This evolution toward culturally intelligent AI promises transformative benefits across sectors. Healthcare AI that understands cultural approaches to wellness and family decision-making can provide more effective care. Educational AI that recognizes different learning styles rooted in cultural traditions can adapt to diverse student needs. Business AI that comprehends cultural communication patterns can facilitate more effective global collaboration. The path forward isn't about adding more languages to existing systems - it's about fundamentally reimagining how AI processes and responds to human diversity. This represents the next major leap in artificial intelligence development - moving from data processing to genuine cultural understanding.
Building Bridges, Not Barriers
Forward-thinking organizations are already pioneering this cultural transformation. Google's 1000 Languages Initiative announced in 2022 has led to significant progress, with Google Translate now supporting 244 languages as of late 2024 after adding 110 new languages in their largest expansion ever. Meanwhile, community-driven projects demonstrate how locally-developed AI can achieve remarkable accuracy by embracing rather than fighting cultural nuances.
The key insight emerging from these efforts is that cultural diversity strengthens rather than complicates AI systems. When AI learns from multiple cultural perspectives, it develops more robust reasoning capabilities, better problem-solving approaches, and more creative solutions. Te Hiku Media in New Zealand exemplifies this approach, achieving 92 per cent accuracy transcribing te reo Māori language through community-led, Indigenous-controlled development that outperforms major tech companies' attempts at the same language. A system trained on diverse cultural data doesn't just serve more communities - it becomes more intelligent for everyone.
This collaborative approach recognizes that different cultures have developed sophisticated solutions to universal human challenges. Incorporating these diverse problem-solving frameworks makes AI more capable of addressing complex global issues, from climate adaptation to social coordination. Recent initiatives like AI4Bharat's Indic-Parler TTS system, supporting 21 Indian languages including Assamese, and Pleias' Common Corpus with over two trillion tokens across dozens of languages, demonstrate the growing momentum toward inclusive AI development.
The Technical Evolution
The shift toward culturally intelligent AI requires fundamental changes in how we approach system development. Rather than starting with English-dominant datasets and attempting to add other languages, new development frameworks begin with multilingual, multicultural foundations. This involves partnering directly with communities to understand not just their languages but their thought processes, values, and approaches to reasoning. The most successful projects emerge from genuine collaboration where communities maintain control over how their cultural knowledge is represented and used.
Advanced techniques like federated learning allow AI systems to learn from diverse cultural contexts while respecting privacy and community autonomy. Recent research from 2024 demonstrates how federated approaches can effectively handle multilingual AI development, with systems like MultiFED showing improved performance for low-resource languages while maintaining data sovereignty. These approaches demonstrate that technical excellence and cultural sensitivity aren't competing priorities - they're mutually reinforcing aspects of truly intelligent systems.
Economic and Social Benefits
The economic case for culturally intelligent AI is compelling. As global markets become increasingly interconnected, organizations need AI systems that can navigate cultural complexity with sophistication and sensitivity. AI that understands cultural communication patterns, business practices, and social dynamics provides significant competitive advantages in diverse markets.
More importantly, culturally intelligent AI democratizes access to advanced technology benefits. When AI systems can genuinely understand and respond to diverse cultural contexts, they become genuinely useful tools for communities worldwide rather than technologies that impose external frameworks on local practices.
Culturally intelligent AI
The transformation toward culturally intelligent AI requires coordinated effort across multiple dimensions. Technology companies must prioritize genuine cultural partnership over superficial language addition. Educational institutions need to prepare AI developers who understand both technical capabilities and cultural sensitivity. Policy frameworks should encourage rather than merely permit inclusive AI development.
Most critically, we need recognition that this evolution benefits everyone. AI systems that understand diverse cultural contexts don't just serve those specific communities better—they become more intelligent, creative, and effective for all users. The opportunity before us extends beyond fixing current limitations to creating genuinely superior intelligence. When AI systems learn from the full spectrum of human cultural wisdom, they develop capabilities that no single cultural perspective could achieve alone.
Embracing Global Intelligence
The future of artificial intelligence lies not in creating more powerful versions of culturally limited systems, but in building genuinely global intelligence that draws strength from human diversity. This isn't about political correctness or social obligation—it's about unlocking AI's complete potential by embracing the full range of human intelligence.
As we stand at this technological inflection point, we have the opportunity to ensure that AI development reflects humanity's greatest strength: our ability to approach challenges from multiple perspectives and find solutions that none of us could discover alone. The next generation of AI systems will be defined not by their processing power or data volume, but by their ability to think across cultures, communicate across differences, and solve problems by drawing from the collective wisdom of human civilization.
This represents more than technological advancement—it's an opportunity to build AI that truly serves global progress by understanding and celebrating the rich diversity of human thought and culture. The systems we build today will determine whether AI becomes a tool for cultural homogenization or cultural celebration.
The choice is clear, and the opportunity is unprecedented. By embracing culturally intelligent AI development now, we can create technology that doesn't just process human languages but genuinely understands human wisdom in all its magnificent diversity.
That's the foundation for artificial intelligence that truly enhances our quality of life in all spheres and spaces.
(Krishna Kumar is a Technology Explorer & Strategist based in Austin, Texas, USA. Rakshitha Reddy is AI Engineer based in Atlanta, Georgia, USA)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scroll.in
an hour ago
- Scroll.in
India's embrace of dangerous facial recognition technology is great for AI, terrible for privacy
In February, India, along with France, co-hosted the AI Action Summit held in Paris. At the end, it was announced that the next edition will be held in India. In its naming, priorities, and focus, the summit witnessed a clear shift from 'safety' to 'innovation' as the principal theme in artificial intelligence discourse. This move aligns with India's lax regulatory stance on AI governance, even in high-risk areas like healthcare and surveillance-driven technologies such as facial recognition technology. In the upcoming summit, this shift will enable the Indian government to steer discussions toward innovation, investment and accessibility while avoiding scrutiny over its weak legal protections, which create an environment conducive to unregulated technological experimentation. Shortly after the introduction of Chinese start-up DeepSeek's R1 model – which upended assumptions about large language models and how much it might cost to develop them – the Indian Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology announced plans to develop indigenous foundation models using Indian language data within a year and invited proposals from companies and researchers under its IndiaAI Mission. While local development in these areas is still in the early phase, the domain of AI that has already seen widespread adoption and deployment in India is facial recognition technology. As India contemplates a sustained push toward AI development and will likely seek to leverage its hosting of the next AI Summit for investments, it is instructive to look at how it has deployed and governed facial recognition technology solutions. Understanding Facial Recognition Technology Facial recognition technology is a probabilistic tool developed to automatically identify or verify individuals by analysing their facial features. It enables the comparison of digital facial images, captured via live video cameras (such as CCTV) or photographs, to ascertain whether the images belong to the same person. Facial recognition technology uses algorithms to analyse facial features, such as eye distance and chin shape, creating a unique mathematical 'face template' for identification. This template, similar to a fingerprint, allows facial recognition technology to identify individuals from photos, videos, or real-time feeds using visible or infrared light. Facial recognition technology has two main applications: identifying unknown individuals by comparing their face template to a database (often used by law enforcement) and verifying the identity of a known person, such as unlocking a phone. Modern facial recognition technology utilises deep learning, a machine learning technique. During training, artificial neurons learn to recognise facial features from labeled inputs. New facial scans are processed as pixel matrices, with neurons assigning weights based on features, producing labels with confidence levels. Liveness checks, like blinking, ensure the subject is real. Still, facial recognition technology faces accuracy challenges – balancing false positives (wrong matches) and false negatives (missed matches). Minimising one often increases the other. Factors like lighting, background and expressions also affect accuracy. Over the past seven years, facial recognition technology has seen widespread adoption in India, especially by the government and its agencies. This growth has coincided with debates surrounding Aadhaar (the national biometric ID system), frequent failures of other verification methods, a rise in street surveillance, and government efforts to modernise law enforcement and national security operations. In this review, I have surveyed the range of facial recognition technology deployment across sectors in India, both in public and private service delivery. This adoption tells the story of an exponential rise in the use of FRT in India, with barely any regulatory hurdles despite clear privacy and discrimination harms. Locating India's regulatory approach While efforts toward regulating AI are still in their infancy, with a handful of global regulations and considerable international debate about the appropriate approach, regulatory discussions about facial recognition technology predate them by a few years and are a little more evolved. Facial recognition technology systems can produce inaccurate, discriminatory, and biased outcomes due to flawed design and training data. A Georgetown Law study on the use of facial recognition technology in the US showed disproportionate impacts on African Americans and tests revealed frequent false positives, particularly affecting people of color. In 2019, the UK's Science and Technology Committee recommended halting facial recognition technology deployment until bias and effectiveness issues are resolved. The UK government countered the report by stating that the existing legal framework already offered sufficient safeguards regarding the application of facial recognition technology. Civil society organisations have been demanding bans or moratoriums on the use and purchase of facial recognition technology for years, most notably after a New York Times investigation in 2019 revealed that more than 600 law enforcement agencies in the US rely on the technology provided by a secretive company known as Clearview AI. An impact assessment commissioned by the European Commission in 2021 observed that facial recognition technology 'bear[s] new and unprecedentedly stark risks for fundamental rights, most significantly the right to privacy and non-discrimination.' The European Union and UK offer regulatory models for facial recognition technology in law enforcement. The EU's Law Enforcement Directive restricts biometric data processing to strictly necessary cases. While initial drafts of the EU's AI Act banned remote biometrics – such as the use of facial recognition technology – the final version has exceptions for law enforcement. In the UK, the Data Protection Act mirrors Europe's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and a landmark court ruling deemed police facial recognition technology use unlawful, citing violations of human rights and data protection, and the technology's mass, covert nature. The EU's AI Act, while not explicitly banning discriminatory facial recognition technology, mandates data governance and bias checks for high-risk AI systems, potentially forcing developers to implement stronger safeguards. The GDPR generally bans processing biometric data for unique identification, but exceptions exist for data made public by the subject or when processing is for substantial public interest. In Europe, non-law enforcement facial recognition technology often falls under these exceptions. As per EU laws, facial recognition technology use may be permitted under strict circumstances in which a legislator can provide a specific legal basis regulating the deployment of facial recognition technology that is compatible with fundamental rights. US Vice President JD Vance's rebuke against ' excessive regulation ' of AI at the Paris Summit in February telegraphed a lack of intent for the current US federal government to regulate AI. However, there are numerous state-level regulations in operation in the US. Canada's Artificial Intelligence and Data Act (AIDA) follows the EU model of risk regulation. Countries like South Korea have taken a more light-touch approach, with Seoul's AI Basic Act including a smaller subset of protections and ethical considerations than those outlined in the EU law. Japan and Singapore have explored self-regulatory codes rather than command and control regulation. The Indian Supreme Court's Puttaswamy judgment, which upheld a right to privacy, outlines a four-part test for proportionality to test whether state actions violate fundamental rights: a legitimate goal, suitable means, necessity (meaning there are no less restrictive alternatives), and balanced impact on rights. Facial recognition technology applications, like those that use the technology to mark attendance and carry out authentication, often have less intrusive alternatives, suggesting they fail the necessity test. Street surveillance using facial recognition technology inherently involves indiscriminate mass surveillance, not targeted monitoring. India's newly legislated Digital Data Protection Act, whose rules are currently being framed, permits the government to process personal data without consent in certain cases. Section 17(2) grants a broad exemption from its provisions for personal data processing, exempting state entities designated by the Indian government for reasons as broad as sovereignty, security, foreign relations, public order, or preventing incitement to certain offenses. In India, the primary policy document on facial recognition technology is a Niti Aayog paper, ' Responsible AI for All,' which anticipates that India's data protection law will handle facial recognition technology privacy concerns. However, it lacks detailed recommendations for ethical facial recognition technology use. It suggests the government should not exempt law enforcement from data protection oversight. It remains to be seen whether this recommendation will be followed, but this alone would be insufficient protection. Data minimisation, a key data protection principle that recommends the collection only of such information as is strictly necessary, restricts facial recognition technology by preventing the merging of captured images with other databases to form comprehensive citizen profiles. Yet, tenders for Automated Facial Recognition Systems (AFRS), to be used by law enforcement agencies, explicitly called for database integration, contradicting data minimisation principles. India's lenient approach toward facial recognition technology regulation, even as there is widespread adoption of the technology by both public and private bodies, suggests a pattern of regulatory restraint when it comes to emerging digital technologies. Rest of World recently reported on an open-arms approach that India has taken to AI, with a focus on 'courting large AI companies to make massive investments.' As a prime example, both Meta and OpenAI are seeking partnerships with Reliance Industries in India to offer their AI products to Indian consumers, which would be hosted at a new three-gigawatt data center in Jamnagar, Gujarat. These investments in India need to be seen in the context of a number of geopolitical and geoeconomic factors: data localisation regulations under India's new data protection law, the negotiating power that the Indian government and the companies close to it possess by leveraging the size of its emerging data market, how these factors facilitate the emergence of domestic BigTech players like Reliance, and most importantly, the Indian government's overall approach toward AI development and regulation. It was earlier reported that the much-awaited Digital India Act would have elements of AI regulation. However, the fate of both the legislation or any other form of regulation is, for the moment, uncertain. As recently as December 2024, Ashwini Vaishnav, the Indian minister of electronics and information technology, stated in the Indian Parliament that a lot more consensus was needed before a law on AI can be formulated. This suggests that the Indian government currently has no concrete plans to begin work toward any form of AI regulation, and despite the widespread use of AI and well documented risks, will stay out of the first wave of global AI regulations.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Chinese scientists propose radical upgrade to PLA drones after drawing lessons from Ukraine war
A team of Chinese aerospace engineers and defence researchers has proposed a groundbreaking technological change that could drastically improve drone survivability read more In the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, drones have become indispensable tools for reconnaissance and aerial combat. Ukrainian air defences have proven highly effective. Data from the Ukrainian Air Force indicates that between April and June, approximately 15 per cent of Russian drones breached defences, up from just 5 per cent previously. However, a team of Chinese aerospace engineers and defence researchers has proposed a groundbreaking technological change that could drastically improve drone survivability, potentially increasing their success rate to nearly 90 per cent. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Chinese team suggests innovative proposal The innovative proposal centres on equipping small to medium-sized drones with compact, side-mounted rocket boosters. These boosters enable drones to execute instantaneous, high-G (accelerated) manoeuvres in the final moments before being intercepted by a missile midway. This 'terminal evasion' system allows drones to make abrupt, unpredictable course changes that even the most advanced missiles struggle to track. According to a study published last month in the Chinese defence journal Acta Armamentarii, extensive digital simulations demonstrated a remarkable 87 per cent survival rate for drones equipped with this system. In many cases, the drones caused missiles to detonate harmlessly in empty space. The research team, led by Bi Wenhao, an associate researcher at the National Key Laboratory of Aircraft Configuration Design at Northwestern Polytechnical University in Xian, was quoted by South China Morning Post as saying that drones are getting more important in modern warfare. 'Extensively employed drones for reconnaissance and aerial combat, making [them] increasingly crucial on the battlefield,' the team wrote. After analysing conflicts like the war in Ukraine, Chinese military analysts noted that there are 'higher demands on the evasion capability and survivability of unmanned combat aircraft.' Three key principles of this technology Traditionally, drones attempt evasive manoeuvres well before a missile impact, often forcing them to abort their missions. Bi's team, however, proposed a radical alternative: executing evasive actions at the last possible moment. This approach relies on three key principles. First, precise timing is critical—the rocket boosters must ignite within a one- to two-second window before impact, early enough to alter the drone's trajectory but late enough to prevent the missile from adjusting its course. Second, the system requires directional intelligence to decide whether the drone should climb, dive, or veer laterally based on the missile's approach vector. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Finally, the boosters must deliver at least 16Gs of acceleration—far exceeding the capabilities of conventional aerodynamic control surfaces—to achieve a sudden, disorienting shift in flight path. Integrating these rocket boosters into a drone's airframe presents significant challenges.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
China's Largest Aircraft Carrier Hits The Sea; J-15T, J-35 Jets To Be Deployed – A Threat From Taiwan To The Indian Ocean?
Beijing: China has moved its most powerful aircraft carrier, the Fujian Type 003, into open waters. This step marks a milestone for China's naval development. The ship was built entirely by Chinese engineers. The launch system on the carrier uses electromagnetic catapults, similar to the technology used by the United States. Only two countries have this capability now: the United States and China. Beijing's state broadcaster, CCTV, released footage of the aircraft carrier at sea. The video showed flight tests involving the J-15T fighter jet. This aircraft is a newer version of the J-15, which itself is based on the Russian Su-33 design. The J-15T, along with other aircraft such as the stealth J-35, may soon be a regular feature on the carrier. The navy plans to test different types of aircraft onboard, including training planes and surveillance aircraft. China has two other carriers already: Liaoning and Shandong. With the Fujian, the total rises to three. Another carrier, the Type 004, is under construction. China wants to have at least six carriers in service by 2035. The Fujian, which displaces around 80,000 tons, is heavier than its predecessors but still lighter than the US Navy's largest carriers. The USS Gerald R. Ford, for instance, displaces over 100,000 tons. The Fujian's design has a few unique features. Its island structure is shaped to reduce radar detection. The deck supports advanced radar and electronic systems. China says the Fujian can carry 50 to 60 fighter jets. This could reduce the time it takes for China to respond in a crisis. India, in contrast, is moving more slowly. It operates two carriers: INS Vikramaditya and INS Vikrant. Plans for a third carrier remain uncertain. Some military leaders question the value of large ships in an age of long-range missiles. Former Chief of Defence Staff General Bipin Rawat supported more submarines instead. India is currently working on six submarines under Project 76. The IAC-3 or INS Vishal was once considered the next step for India. But the project faced delays. Costs are high. The technology is complex. India has not so far committed to building it. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh did say in 2024 that a new carrier would be built. But this may refer to replacing an older ship, not adding a third. The Chinese navy is moving in a different direction. Officials say the Fujian could enter full service by the end of 2025. Once that happens, China will usually have two active carriers at sea. The third can rotate for repairs. The Fujian's launch shows how China plans to expand its presence across oceans. The ship is not limited to nearby waters. It could operate across the Indo-Pacific. Future carriers, including the Type 004, may be nuclear-powered. China also plans to use drones, helicopters and early-warning aircraft alongside its fighters. The goal is China wants to build a navy that can operate anywhere in the world. The Fujian is a major step toward that future.
