Alabama's unlikely role in Bay of Pigs invasion being commemorated at Southern Museum of Flight
The A-26 and close relative B-26 cemented Alabama as a pivotal player in the failed invasion in 1961. At the time of the Bay of Pigs, Alabama's Air National Guard were the only ones who flew B-26's, which were essential to the invasion.
After the invasion spiraled out of control for the U.S, four airmen from the Alabama Air National Guard lost their lives. One of them was Pete Ray, whose body was kept by Castro of proof of U.S involvement in the invasion.
'[Castro] was basically keeping it as a bit of a token and as proof,' said Brian Barsanti, Executive Director of the Southern Museum of Flight.
After being held 'on display' in a morgue, Ray's body was brought home after his daughter Janet pushed for his return, corresponding with Castro over phone calls and letters. This forced the CIA to acknowledge the nature of his death, which up to that point had been classified.
Pete Ray's grave in Forest Hill Cemetery is the beginning site of the commemoration today, which begins at 2 p.m. with a fly over from the A-26. The lives and sacrifice of Ray, Leo Baker, Wade Gray, and Riley Shamburger are being celebrated.
This is followed by the bomber on display and a program with guest speakers and food at 5 p.m. This commemoration is free and open to the public. For more information, click here.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
6 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Fall River firefighters: ‘There are no words for what I've seen'
The Fall River fire, Advertisement Many of the survivors, some of whom have severe medical needs and are on Medicaid, are scattered in assisted-living facilities across Eastern Massachusetts and are unsure what their future holds. The fire has raised questions When the firefighters gathered together this past week, their shared bond was at the forefront of their minds. They greeted each other with handshakes, back slaps, and inside jokes in a firehouse kitchen. But quickly, they shifted to mournful, head-shaking recollections of what each of them had experienced in the worst fire they had fought. Evangelista, 29, recalled that he had been responding to an overdose when the alarm sounded about 9:30 p.m. for a fire at Gabriel House. Immediately, he shifted priorities and rushed to the three-story, horseshoe-shaped building not far from the city center. Advertisement Michael Viveiros, aboard Ladder 2, recalled being startled when he wheeled onto Oliver Street and saw the building engulfed in fire and smoke — but no people. He realized immediately that the situation was dire, and that few people, if any, had yet evacuated. Many of the 69 residents there were dependent on wheelchairs. 'The thought process was we have to get it done and get it done quickly,' said Viveiros, 42. 'Your adrenaline kicks in, and you want to do things you shouldn't.' They found flames spouting from the front of the building, and, knowing people were on all three floors, urgently called for reinforcements. 'I kept thinking we need more help,' said District Chief David Jennings Jr., one of the commanders at the scene. 'For a while, we were dealing with just eight guys.' Eventually, about 35 firefighters responded. Once the residents realized help had arrived, they began shouting from their windows, pleading for their lives as smoke billowed behind them. Another district chief yelled, 'We need 120 percent! This is what we train for,' the firefighters said. Evangelista recalled thinking, 'This isn't what you train for. It was one person and then another person' — unlike many house fires that affect only a few people. Complicating the response at Gabriel House was the large number of residents with medical needs, some of them severe. 'Some guys went in with hoses, and some guys went in to do the rescues,' said C.J. Ponte, a 21-year department veteran who drove Engine 9 to the blaze. Other firefighters grabbed ground ladders and began slapping them against the walls. Advertisement 'Then there's the worst decision: Which one is in the most danger?' Viveiros said. Jose Fletcher, a 33-year-old firefighter, said the scene shifted by the second, with another life to be saved, another challenge, and another snap decision about what to do amid the chaos. 'We started to evacuate people, and it was like Whac-A-Mole,' Fletcher said. One person would be carried down a ladder, and then another would be spotted. On and on. In one rescue, Fletcher dropped his oxygen tank to conserve energy, climbed a ladder, and struggled to extract a large woman from a small window. 'The windows weren't made to pull people out of, and she was fighting me the whole time,' Fletcher recalled. She pushed against his oxygen mask in panic, preventing Fletcher from breathing. He ripped the mask off despite the choking smoke, grabbed her in a bear hug, and slowly carried her down the ladder amid the frenzy. After bringing her to safety, Fletcher slumped to the ground exhausted, only to discover that he couldn't get up. Not until later did Fletcher learn he had dislocated his right knee. 'We got back here at 2:30 [a.m.],' Fletcher said in the firehouse, 'trying to figure out how we just did what we did.' Evangelista said the rescues continued unabated for about an hour. 'It was a grab and go. Bring them out and go back,' he said. 'Some of them were definitely on their last breath. But you ignore what else is around you and just focus on what's happening in front of you.' Advertisement In one rescue, a makeshift pulley was put together to lower a resident estimated to weigh 400 pounds. In others, firefighters laid victims across their outstretched arms as they grabbed the sides of their ladders and descended rung by rung to safety. Some Fire Department drivers left their vehicles, wearing only a department T-shirt, to enter the burning building and search for victims. One such driver was Nathanial Anderson, 43, an Army combat veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan who drove Ladder 2. 'I saw heads popping out windows, and I could hear the screams. You couldn't sit outside and do nothing,' Anderson said. 'Every voice you could hear you knew needed help.' So inside he went, with no oxygen tank or other gear, looking to clear residents from the second and third floors of one wing. He burst through emergency doors with a sledgehammer, scouring the smoke-choked corridors and rooms for victims. 'I kept telling him to leave, but he wouldn't listen,' Evangelista said. When Anderson reached the third floor, he could advance only two rooms down a pitch-black corridor. 'I couldn't take the smoke and the heat there,' said Anderson, who was forced to retreat. In all, Anderson carried six residents to safety — 'some were still vocal, some were fading' — as he returned again and again to join his comrades. Fire Chief Jeffrey Bacon, in a later news conference, choked up with emotion when recalling Anderson's bravery. 'This was the worst-case scenario of what you can possibly expect from a fire,' said Michael O'Reagan, president of Local 1314 of the International Association of Fire Fighters. Advertisement A day after the fire, Edward Kelly, general president of the International Association of Fire Fighters, alleged that Fall River's firetrucks were understaffed. More victims might have lived, he said, had each truck had four firefighters — a claim quickly dismissed by Bacon as 'speculation.' Mayor Paul Coogan said city officials have decided that an additional four trucks will have a minimum of four firefighters. At the time of the fire, two of the 10 fire companies in Fall River were staffed with four firefighters, which is the national safety standard. The city also said it will have 38 firefighters working each shift, an increase from 35. O'Reagan said more staffing is needed for the Fire Department, but on this day, the focus centered on lifesaving drama that unfolded with the personnel available. 'I don't think a single person here thinks of himself as a hero,' Ponte said. 'It's not a job, it's a calling. It's something everyone here wanted to do.' Bacon said the death toll could have been several times higher if not for the quick, efficient, and effective response of Fall River's firefighters, five of whom suffered minor injuries. About 30 residents of Gabriel House were also injured. Following the fire, the crews returned to their stations, processing what they had just witnessed, but prepared to go out again if needed. Jennings said he continues to second-guess whether other decisions could have been made at the fire. 'We beat ourselves up,' Jennings said. 'What could we have done better? Maybe another decision could have gotten to another window.' For these firefighters, the memory of Gabriel House will be indelible. 'I'm still trying to figure out how to deal with it. I feel something's off,' Evangelista said, speaking slowly and carefully. 'I'm not a guy who talks about emotion, who shows emotion, but this goes to show what we saw that night.' Advertisement 'This will forever change the way we operate,' he said. 'The next call, will it be as big as this one?' Brian MacQuarrie can be reached at
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Midults: My girlfriend is always undermining me
Dear A&E, I've been with my girlfriend for two years and we've always got on really well as a couple in social situations, backing each other up and taking one another's side. Lately, though, I've found her starting to undermine me in little ways when we're out with friends – disputing my account of things that happened; contradicting me on little details; always needing to have the last word. I'm not naturally argumentative but it's starting to really bother me. She's really lovely and cosy in private. Should I talk to her, and what should I say? – Downcast Dear Downcast, Some happy, lifelong marriages involve one partner loudly and aggressively criticising the other in public. 'That story is so boring,' she squawks. 'Are you still talking??' he sneers. For many of us – as observers – this is both baffling and extremely unpleasant to be around but, hey, the heart wants what the heart wants and it's a dynamic that works for them. It is not, however, a dynamic that is working for you. At the moment it only bothers you but who's to say that, further down the line, it won't distress you. If you do not like this dynamic then you should address it as it is unlikely to go away by itself. Unfortunately, these things, left unchecked, will have a habit of either bedding in or intensifying and that has the potential to make you very unhappy. Unhappy people who actively avoid confrontation risk withdrawing, proving their point – or demonstrating their hurt – through action (or inaction), which could start to meaningfully alienate you from each other. Scary, right? If you bring this up, you might start a huge row or hear something you don't want to hear. It's only when you begin to understand what's happening, you can work out what to do. At the moment you are a bit hurt and a bit baffled – understandable but rendering you powerless. It is often at this stage of the relationship that you need to find courage. It is important to feel able to talk to the person you are with about what is going in between you. We know that sounds as though we're stating the bleeding obvious but it can feel frightening. Or exhausting. And lots of us duck it where possible. Be brave, Downcast. It will give the relationship the best chance of growing or, failing that, it will give you the best chance of growing. Right at the beginning of love affairs, we tend to find it sweet when our new and adored person gets things wrong. Or we don't even see it. Later, we may start to find it annoying but, hopefully, we make a decision – based on the bigger scheme of things – to right-size our responses; to look beyond. This is not denial. It is love. There is a chance that she may not know she is behaving in this way; that she had some kind of combative/judgmental elements to her early life. A fighty or one-upmanship-y childhood. Even a puritanical education may have nudged her towards becoming a kind of fact-checker. It doesn't really matter if an amusing anecdote is 'right', does it? The listener doesn't care whether it was Whitstable or Brixham; whether it was raining or snowing. How much does it matter to her that she is right? Would she rather be right or happy? You have various courses of action open to you. You could tell her that it is deeply uncomfortable for everyone when she does this – but that is actively shaming and makes it about the audience rather than your connection. 'Everyone thinks so…' is always a bastard thing to say unless it's around a compliment. You could try a bit of a shock approach and respond in the moment, in public, by saying something like 'I find it very difficult when you talk to me like that.' However, seeing as you have established, in your letter, that this is a kind of performative feistiness that rises in her only when you are among other people, that could cause trouble. We would think that a quiet moment, when you are alone and all is calm, might be a productive time to say something like, 'When you criticise me in public – which I feel is happening more often – what are you trying to tell me? I find it difficult, in the moment but, if there is something you need me to know, I would really like to hear it now. I don't love those public moments, which hurt my feelings, but I do love you and I'd like to understand why it happens and also look at my part in it.' What a man, Downcast! We obviously have no idea how this will go. But for both your own personal development and the future of this romance, it feels crucial that you are able to have the conversation. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Plan for 'poor quality' HMO for up to 17 people on family road kicked out
A planning application for an HMO which would have been occupied by up to 17 people has been refused. City planners issued a scathing report as they turned down a proposal to convert a property on Etwall Road, a five-bedroom family home in Hall Green, into a nine-bed HMO. Dozens of neighbours objected, with concerns ranging from anti-social behaviour, noise, overlooking and the loss of privacy to parking and traffic concerns. READ MORE: UK households risk £200 fine for binning toothpaste tubes ahead of new bin rules READ MORE: England fans face £500 fine for wearing Lionesses shirts for Euro 2025 READ MORE: Birmingham bin strike latest as solidarity 'megapicket' halts waste wagons Backed by Coun Timothy Huxtable, locals also worried about the loss of a family home, the close proximity to a nursery and the overdevelopment of the site. The council agreed with their complaints and refused the application citing lack of parking and that development would be "poor quality living accommodation." Get breaking news on BirminghamLive WhatsApp, click the link to join The decision read: "The proposed change of use of the property would result in the loss of a five-bedroom family dwelling house, and insufficient justification has been provided to demonstrate that the need for a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) in this location outweighs the important contribution this dwelling makes to the council's objectives, strategies and policies relating to housing provision." The report went on: "The occupation of the property as an HMO by up to 17 people would result in a demonstrable increase in the numbers of comings and goings from the site and a greater level of noise and disturbance in comparison to the existing use as a family dwelling house. "The proposed HMO would not, therefore, be appropriate to this location as it would result in unacceptable adverse impacts on the amenity of neighbouring occupiers." Coun Huxtable said: "I'm really pleased this application has been refused as it would have detrimentally changed the whole character of the area and caused additional traffic problems to those already faced by local residents." We have a suite of newsletters, tailored to your needs. They include Birmingham Politics, Nostalgia, Court and Crime Updates and, of course, BirminghamLive Daily - the biggest stories of the day sent at morning, lunch and evening. There are also local ones like Black Country News, MySolihull and MySuttonColdfield. Choose which newsletters best suit you. You can also get all your favourite content from BirminghamLive on WhatsApp. Click here to sign up for breaking updates about the biggest stories in the region. And finally, if there is a story you think our journalists should be looking into, we want to hear from you. Email us on newsdesk@
