US and China ambassadors clash in Fiji over Trump's tariff policies
Photo:
RNZ Pacific / U.S. Embassy Suva / Chinese Embassy in Fiji
The embassies of the United States and China in Fiji's capital Suva have begun a diplomatic war of words in reaction to Donald Trump's tariff policies.
Earlier this month, President Trump paused the sweeping tariffs he had announced on dozens of countries, except for those on China.
His administration has raised tariffs on Chinese imports to 145 percent. In response, Beijing has slapped retaliatory duties of 125 percent on US goods.
China's Commerce Ministry said it will not back down and "will take countermeasures in a resolute and reciprocal manner", signalling that the trade war between the world's two biggest economies is far from over.
The impact of the diplomatic tussle is being felt thousands of miles from the corridors of power in Washington and Beijing, in the South Pacific, as the two countries' ambassadors take shots at each other over who has the moral high ground.
Beijing's top diplomat in Fiji Zhou Jian held a news conference where he told local reporters that the US's decision to impose "reckless tariffs on its global trading partners" was "absurd, selfish, disastrous, and bullying".
Zhou said China is a major nation and a responsible member of the international community.
"We stand firm against power politics, not only to protect our own sovereignty, security, and development interests, but also to uphold the common interest of all humanity, safeguard international fairness and justice," he said.
"China's position has long been clear: our door remains open for talks, but any dialogue must be conducted on the basis of mutual respect and equality. If confrontation is the path chosen, China will fight to the end.
"China's opposition to US economic bullying is a just cause - and just causes will always win the widespread support of people around the world."
In response, the US Embassy in Suva shared a report by the Fijian state broadcaster FBC, with the headline
China labels US tariffs as 'Economic Bullying'
and quoted the Bible verse 'Matthew 7:3", suggesting that China should focus on its own shortcomings and not place blame on the US.
The US Ambassador to Fiji Marie Damour followed with a statement, saying, "It's puzzling that any country purporting to be a friend to Fiji would try to publicly undermine Fiji's bilateral relationship with one of its partners."
"That's not who the United States is or the kind of partner we strive to be," she was quoted as saying by the Fiji Times.
"Implying that Fiji is incapable of steering its own foreign policy not only insults the country's leadership, but also disrespects its people."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
9 hours ago
- Scoop
ICJ Climate Ruling: Will The World's Top Court Back A Pacific-led Call To Hold Govts Accountable For Climate Change?
By , for RNZ Pacific in The Hague In 2019, a group of students at the University of the South Pacific, frustrated at the slow pace with which the world's governments were moving to address the climate crisis, had an idea: they would take the world's governments to court. They arranged a meeting with government ministers in Vanuatu and convinced them to take a case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations' top court, where they would seek an opinion to clarify countries' legal obligations under international law. Six years after that idea was hatched in a classroom in Port Vila, the court will on Wednesday (early Thursday morning NZT) deliver its verdict in the Dutch city of The Hague. If successful - and those involved are quietly confident they will be - it could have major ramifications for international law, how climate change disputes are litigated, and it could give small Pacific countries greater leverage in arguments around loss and damage. Most significantly, the claimants argue, it could establish legal consequences for countries that have driven climate change and what they owe to people harmed. "Six long years of campaigning have led us to this moment," Vishal Prasad, the president of Pacific Island Students Fighting Climate Change, the organisation formed of those original students, said. "For too long, international responses have fallen short. We expect a clear and authoritative declaration," he said. "[That] climate inaction is not just a failure of policy, but a breach of international law." More than 100 countries - including New Zealand, Australia and all the countries of the Pacific - have testified before the court, alongside civil society and intergovernmental organisations. And now, on Wednesday (Thursday NZT), they will gather in the brick palace that sits in ornate gardens in this canal-ringed city, to hear if the judges of the world's top court agree. What is the case? The ICJ adjudicates disputes between nations and issues advisory opinions on big international legal issues. In this case, Vanuatu asked the UN General Assembly to ask the judges to weigh what, exactly, international law requires states to do about climate change, and what the consequences should be for states that harm the climate through actions or omissions. Over its deliberations, the court has heard from more than 100 countries and international organisations hoping to influence its opinion, the highest level of participation in the court's history. That has included the governments of low-lying islands and atolls in the Pacific, who said they are paying the steepest price for a crisis they had little role in creating. These nations have long been frustrated with the current mechanisms for addressing climate change, like the UN COP conferences, and are hoping that, ultimately, the court will provide a yardstick by which to measure other countries' actions. "I choose my words carefully when I say that this may well be the most consequential case in the history of humanity," Vanuatu's minister for climate change Ralph Regenvanu said in his statement to the court last year. "Let us not allow future generations to look back and wonder why the cause of their doom was condoned." But major powers and emitters, like the United States and China, have argued in their testimonies that existing UN agreements, such as the Paris climate accord, are sufficient to address climate change. "We expect this landmark climate ruling, grounded in binding international law, to reflect the critical legal flashpoints raised during the proceedings," Joie Chowdhury, a senior attorney at the US-based Centre for International Environmental Law (which has been involved with the case), said. "Among them: whether States' climate obligations are anchored in multiple legal sources, extending far beyond the Paris Agreement; whether there is a right to remedy for climate harm; and how human rights and the precautionary principle define States' climate obligations." What could this mean? Rulings from the ICJ are non-binding, and there are myriad cases of international law being flouted by countries the world over. Still, the court's opinion - if it falls in Vanuatu's favour - could still have major ramifications, bolstering the case for linking human rights and climate change in legal proceedings - both international and domestic - and potentially opening the floodgates for climate litigation, where individuals, groups, Indigenous Peoples, and even countries, sue governments or private companies for climate harm. An advisory opinion would also be a powerful precedent for legislators and judges to call on as they tackle questions related to the climate crisis, and give small countries a powerful cudgel in negotiations over future COP agreements and other climate mechanisms. "This would empower vulnerable nations and communities to demand accountability, strengthen legal arguments and negotiations and litigation and push for policies that prioritise prevention and redress over delay and denial," Prasad said. In essence, those who have taken the case have asked the court to issue an opinion on whether governments have "legal obligations" to protect people from climate hazards, but also whether a failure to meet those obligations could bring "legal consequences." At the Peace Palace at 3pm on Wednesday, they will find out from the court's 15 judges. "[The advisory opinion] is not just a legal milestone, it is a defining moment in the global climate justice movement and a beacon of hope for present and future generations," Vanuatu Prime Minister Jotham Napat said in a statement ahead of Wednesday's decision. "I am hopeful for a powerful opinion from the ICJ. It could set the world on a meaningful path to accountability and action."
Otago Daily Times
13 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Angry protests in Bangladesh as plane crash toll mounts
Police have used tear gas to disperse angry students in Bangladesh who demanded answers from the interim government after an air force fighter jet crashed into a Dhaka school and killed 31 people, at least 25 of them children. The children, many aged under 12, were about to return home from class on Monday when the Chinese-manufactured F-7 BGI Bangladesh Air Force jet ploughed into their school and burst into flames, trapping pupils in the fire and debris. The military said it had suffered mechanical failure. Students from the school and others from nearby colleges protested as two government officials visited the crash site, demanding an accurate death toll and shouting, "Why did our brothers die? We demand answers!" Elsewhere in the capital, hundreds of protesting students, some of them waving sticks, broke through the main gate of the federal government secretariat, demanding the resignation of the education adviser, according to local TV footage. Police baton-charged them, fired tear gas and used sound grenades to disperse the crowd, leaving dozens injured, witnesses said. Dhaka Metropolitan Police Deputy Commissioner Talebur Rahman said they had to use tear gas to disperse the protesters. He said he did not have information on the number of injured. Rescue workers continued to scour the charred buildings for debris on Tuesday as distressed residents of the area looked on. Some parents were inconsolable. Abul Hossain broke down as he spoke about his nine-year-old daughter, Nusrat Jahan Anika, killed in the crash. "I took her to school yesterday morning like every day. I had no idea it would be the last time I would be seeing her," he said. She was buried on Monday night. Rubina Akter said her son Raiyan Toufiq had a miraculous escape after his shirt caught fire when he was on a staircase. "He sprinted to the ground floor and jumped on the grass to douse it," she said. "He tore his shirt and vest inside, which saved him from severe burns." The jet had taken off from a nearby air base on a routine training mission, the military said. After experiencing mechanical failure the pilot tried to divert the aircraft away from populated areas, but it crashed into the campus. The pilot was among those killed. On Tuesday, the military said in a statement that 31 people had died and 165 had been admitted to hospitals in the city. The health ministry said 68 remained in hospital and the condition of 10 of them was critical. STUDENT DEMANDS The government announced a day of mourning, with flags at half-mast and special prayers at all places of worship. Pope Leo said he was deeply saddened to learn of the loss of life in the crash and prayed that families and friends may be consoled in their grief, and for the healing and comfort of the injured, according to a Vatican statement. The protesting students called for those killed and injured to be named, the decommissioning of what they said were old and risky jets, and a change in air force training procedures. A statement from the press office of Muhammad Yunus, the country's interim administrator, said that the government, the military, school and hospital authorities were working together to publish a list of victims. It also said the air force will be told not to operate training aircraft in populated areas. The F-7 BGI is the final and most advanced variant in China's Chengdu J-7/F-7 aircraft family, according to Jane's Information Group. Bangladesh signed a contract for 16 aircraft in 2011 and deliveries were completed by 2013. The Chengdu F-7 is the licence-built version of the Soviet era MiG-21. The incident comes as neighbour India is still grappling with the world's worst aviation disaster in a decade after an Air India plane crashed into a medical college hostel in Ahmedabad last month, killing 241 of the 242 people on board and 19 on the ground. Bangladesh has faced months of political uncertainty after then Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was forced to flee the country last August following weeks of deadly student protests. The interim government of Nobel laureate Yunus has promised to hold elections next year amid mounting demands from political parties to advance them.
Newsroom
21 hours ago
- Newsroom
Want better career prospects? Learn three languages, says Zespri
Zespri's China corporate affairs manager says learning te reo Māori and a third language alongside a student's native tongue should be mandated in New Zealand's curriculum. Ivan Kinsella, the only New Zealander based in the kiwifruit marketer's Shanghai office, says proficiency in Chinese has propelled his career and that uptake of the language, along with others, makes young people more competent going out into the world.
