logo
For Sean 'Diddy' Combs, could a lesser conviction mean a greater public rehabilitation?

For Sean 'Diddy' Combs, could a lesser conviction mean a greater public rehabilitation?

For nearly two years, a nearly nonstop parade of allegations and revelations has ravaged and unraveled Sean 'Diddy' Combs' carefully cultivated reputation as an affable celebrity entrepreneur, A-list party host, Grammy-winning artist and music executive, brand ambassador and reality TV star.
It culminated in a verdict Wednesday that saw Combs acquitted of the most serious sex trafficking charges, though guilty of two lesser ones. The stratospheric heights of his previous life may be impossible to regain, but the question remains whether a partial conviction could mean a partial public rehabilitation, or if too much damage has been done.
'Combs managed to avoid becoming the next R. Kelly,' said Evan Nierman, CEO and president of crisis public relations firm Red Banyan, referring to the R&B superstar convicted of similar sex trafficking charges as those that Combs beat.
Combs, 55, has yet to be sentenced and faces the likelihood of prison time, but he no longer faces the prospect of spending most of the rest of his life behind bars. While the law allows for a prison sentence of up to 10 years, the lawyers in the case said in court filings that guidelines suggest a term that could be as short as 21 months or last more than five years.
'This is a very positive outcome overall for him. And it does give him an opportunity to try to rebuild his life,' Nierman said. 'It won't be the same, but at least he's likely going to be out there in the world and able to move forward.'
Moving on from the jokes that 'will haunt him forever'
The case had a broad reach across media that made Combs a punchline as much as a villain. Talk shows, 'Saturday Night Live' and social media posters milked it for jokes about 'freak-offs' and the voluminous amounts of baby oil he had for the sex marathons.
'There are definitely terms which have now become part of the popular lexicon that never existed pre-Diddy trial, including things like 'freak-off,'' Nierman said. 'The images that were painted in the trial and some of the evidence that was introduced is going to stick with him for a long time.'
Danny Deraney, who has worked in crisis communications for celebrities as CEO of Deraney Public Relations, agreed.
'The jokes will haunt him forever,' Deraney said.
Managing public narratives — something Combs has previously excelled at — will be essential. He could cast himself as a tough survivor who took on the feds and came out ahead, or as a contrite Christian seeking redemption, or both.
'It's a powerful thing for the hip-hop mogul to go public and brag that he beat the rap and that the feds tried to come after him and they failed,' Nierman said. 'I could definitely see him leaning into that.'
Nierman said the fight 'now will become part of the Sean Combs mythology.'
Combs fell to his knees and prayed in the courtroom after he was acquitted Wednesday of sex trafficking and racketeering charges. The moment by all accounts was spontaneous but could also be read as the start of a revival narrative.
'No matter what you're accused of, it's what you do to redeem yourself on the way back,' Deraney said. 'Is he redeemable? Those are still heavy charges he was guilty of. It's tough to say; people have had these charges hanging over their heads and were able to move on.'
The long fall
Combs has been behind bars since his September arrest and will remain jailed while he awaits sentencing.
His long reputational fall began when his former longtime girlfriend and R&B singer Cassie, the criminal trial's key witness, sued him in November 2023, alleging years of sexual and physical abuse. He settled the next day for $20 million, but the lawsuit set off a storm of similar allegations from other women and men. Most of the lawsuits are still pending.
The Associated Press does not typically name people who say they have been sexually abused unless they come forward publicly, as Cassie, born Casandra Ventura, has.
The revelation last year of a major federal sex trafficking investigation on the day of a bicoastal raid of Combs' houses took the allegations to another level of seriousness and public knowledge. The later revelation that feds had seized 1,000 bottles of baby oil and other lubricant entered the popular culture immediately.
Fellow celebrities were called out for past Diddy associations — though no others were implicated in the criminal allegations.
The May 2024 leak of a video of Combs beating Cassie in a Los Angeles hotel hallway eight years earlier was arguably just as damaging, if not more, than the initial wave of allegations. It brought a rare public apology, in an earnestly presented Instagram video two days later.
Nierman called the video, shown at trial, 'something people aren't just going to forget.'
Shortly after Combs' apology, New York City Mayor Eric Adams requested he return a key to the city he'd gotten at a ceremony in 2023. Howard University rescinded an honorary degree it had awarded him and ended a scholarship program in his name. He sold off his stake in Revolt, the media company he'd founded more than a decade earlier.
Combs is not about to get the key, or the degree, back. But he could pick up the pieces of his reputation to salvage something from it.
Deraney said it may require 'some kind of come-to-Jesus moment where he owns up to it.'
'Really what it's going to come down to is if he goes to prison, will it change him?' Deraney said. 'Has he changed at all during this whole processes? I don't know.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump White House calls out Smithsonian for pushing 'one-sided, divisive political narratives'
Trump White House calls out Smithsonian for pushing 'one-sided, divisive political narratives'

Fox News

time31 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Trump White House calls out Smithsonian for pushing 'one-sided, divisive political narratives'

EXCLUSIVE: The Trump administration is turning its attention to the Smithsonian Institution, accusing the taxpayer-funded museum complex of using federal dollars to promote what it calls "one-sided, divisive political narratives" that fail to honor the greatness of the American story. White House official Lindsey Halligan blasted content currently on display at the National Museum of American History's Entertainment Nation exhibit in an exclusive email to Fox News exhibit, which explores American pop culture, has drawn internal and external criticism for what some see as a politically loaded interpretation of cultural milestones. "American taxpayers should not be funding institutions that undermine our country or promote one-sided, divisive political narratives," Halligan said. "The Smithsonian Institution should present history in a way that is accurate, balanced, and consistent with the values that make the United States of America exceptional."DONALD TRUMP FIRES NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY DIRECTOR FOR BEING 'STRONG SUPPORTER' OF DEI The White House statement comes on the heels of several striking examples from the exhibit. One placard, featured alongside a 1923 circus poster, reads: "Under the big top, circuses expressed the colonial impulse to claim dominion over the world." Another, describing early American entertainment, declares: "One of the earliest defining traits of entertainment in the United States was extraordinary violence." The exhibit reframes iconic American characters through a critical, politically-charged lens. On The Lone Ranger, the display states: "The White title character's relationship with Tonto resembled how the U.S. government imagined itself the world's Lone Ranger." Mickey Mouse, a beloved American cultural icon, is not spared either. A display for the 1928 cartoon Steamboat Willie states, "Mickey challenged authority, but not everyone was in on the joke." It continues: "Mickey Mouse debuted as the deckhand 'Steamboat Willie' in 1928, amidst a rising anxiety felt by many that modern living and city life were eroding family and community ties and loosening moral codes… But the new character's outsized facial features, white gloves, and trickster temperament were vestiges of longstanding traditions of blackface minstrelsy." In reference to the Indiana Jones film series, another panel reads: "His character embodied a confident righteousness that, in many ways, captured the essence of the 1980s" above another subhead referencing President Ronald Reagan's famous speech, asking, "Are you better off?"KENT STATE STUDENT'S VIOLENT ANTI-TRUMP ART DISPLAY SPURS OUTRAGE One panel calls Magnum, P.I. a challenge to the "popular perceptions of Vietnam veterans as damaged misfits." A section on Jon Stewart's Daily Show refers to it as "the go-to for viewers who mistrusted politicians and the reporting process." Another panel highlights the late pop star Selena Quintanilla-Pérez and frames her cultural impact through identity politics. "Selena got us talking about identity," with a quote from the late singer reading, "I feel very proud to be Mexican." The text goes on to say her work "cast a light on the longstanding cultural and growing political influence of Mexican American and Latinx communities within the United States." "The examples [Fox News Digital] highlighted from the National Museum of American History are part of the problem the Trump Administration aims to fix," Halligan said. "Framing American culture as inherently violent, imperialist, or racist does not reflect the greatness of our nation or the millions of Americans who have contributed to its progress." Halligan confirmed that a top-to-bottom content review is already underway, with input from senior Smithsonian leaders and the Board of Regents. "We are working with leadership at the Smithsonian to audit and review all content at the museums," she said, "and we are committed to ensuring that such content honors our country's founding principles, tells the stories of American heroes, and does not promote fringe or activist ideologies masquerading as history." She added, "We will provide updates on this audit as our progress unfolds." The Smithsonian Institution responded to Fox News Digital with the following brief written statement: "The museum is committed to continuous and rigorous scholarship and research and unbiased presentation of facts and history. As such, and as previously announced, we are assessing content in Smithsonian museums and will make any necessary changes to ensure our content meets our standards." The Institution did not answer specific questions regarding who authored the Entertainment Nation exhibit, whether outside academic consultants or activist organizations were involved, or who made the decision to present all exhibit text bilingually in English and Spanish. The controversy comes amid a broader push by President Donald Trump to reshape cultural institutions he says have veered too far left. In March, Trump issued an executive order directing the Board of Regents to eliminate "improper, divisive or anti-American ideology" from Smithsonian museums. He accused the institution of embracing what he called "a revisionist movement" aimed at "undermining the remarkable achievements of the United States by casting its founding principles and historical milestones in a negative light." The Board of Regents includes the vice president, the chief justice of the United States, six members of Congress, and nine citizen regents. Vice President J.D. Vance and Congressman Carlos Giménez, both recent appointees, have advocated for an expedited review of Smithsonian content. Giménez, in a prior interview with The Wall Street Journal, confirmed tensions at the board's June meeting over how quickly to proceed, though ultimately a compromise was reached. The Smithsonian receives approximately two-thirds of its $1 billion annual budget from federal appropriations. The Entertainment Nation exhibit opened in December 2022 and was billed as a permanent exhibition to "celebrate the power of popular culture to shape and reflect history." It is housed in a prime space on the museum's west wing and features artifacts and media from movies, television, sports, and music. While the museum's stated goal is to explore how entertainment intersects with American identity, the Trump administration argues that it instead uses culture to smuggle in ideology often at odds with the values most Americans hold. "Americans deserve a Smithsonian that inspires national pride, tells the truth, and reflects the greatness of this country," Halligan said. "Not one that serves as an agent for social change and cultural subversion."

Woman Kicks Sister Out of Baby Shower After She Calls Her Baby Name 'Outdated'
Woman Kicks Sister Out of Baby Shower After She Calls Her Baby Name 'Outdated'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Woman Kicks Sister Out of Baby Shower After She Calls Her Baby Name 'Outdated'

A woman kicked her own sister out of her baby shower after she made fun of the name she chose for her child In a post on Reddit, the woman writes that she and her husband recently settled on a name for their baby girl — and she announced it at her shower But when her sister continually made fun of the name, she kicked her outA woman says she kicked her own sister out of her baby shower after she made fun of the name she chose for her child. In a post shared to Reddit, the anonymous 32-year-old writes that she is currently seven months pregnant and recently learned she's having a girl. "Me and my husband have been thinking of names [and] until we decided on a name we like, we decided to name her 'Audrey,' " she writes. But at her recent baby shower, there was one person who was not a fan of the name — her own sister. "When I told everyone at the baby shower, one of my sisters told me it was an 'outdated name' and that she'd get bullied for having a name like that (which is funny because she wanted to name her daughter 'Ashhliegh' pronounced as 'Ashley' before her husband stopped her)," she adds. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. She continues: "After a while of her making comments about the name we eventually just kicked her out of the shower and I blocked her on all social media's when she kept messaging me telling me to change the name." Now, other Reddit users are weighing in on the situation, with many saying they would have made the same decision. "The way I would have dragged my sister for having any kind of opinion she would have kicked her own self out of the party," wrote one commenter. Added another: "I imagine your sister is still pissed about being told 'Ashhliegh' was stupid and was prepared to criticize any baby name you suggested." Read the original article on People

Furious Aunt Reacts to Niece's Wedding Dress Code: 'No Hats, No Colors, Just Black'
Furious Aunt Reacts to Niece's Wedding Dress Code: 'No Hats, No Colors, Just Black'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Furious Aunt Reacts to Niece's Wedding Dress Code: 'No Hats, No Colors, Just Black'

A woman is debating if it's unreasonable for her to be "shocked" by her niece's wedding dress code In a Mumsnet post, she revealed her niece has chosen a monochrome theme for her fall nuptials 'No hats. No fascinators. No flowers in our hair. No coloured shoes or handbags. And wait for it — no nail polish,' the woman saidA woman is in shock after discovering the dress code her niece has chosen for her upcoming wedding. Describing her niece as a "bridezilla" on Mumsnet, the woman said she understands that it's "her day — her rules" and can therefore choose whatever she desires for her wedding this October. However, that hasn't stopped her from being "shocked" by her niece's strict dress code for the occasion. "We are all to wear black and only black," the woman said as she began listing the rules. is now available in the Apple App Store! Download it now for the most binge-worthy celeb content, exclusive video clips, astrology updates and more! "No hats. No fascinators. No flowers in our hair. No coloured shoes or handbags. And wait for it — no nail polish," she added. The woman said her niece wants a "monochrome wedding." But, she's eager for opinions on whether or not she's being unreasonable for not liking the dress code. A poll shared underneath the June 22 post garnered hundreds of votes, with the majority of people telling the woman that she wasn't unreasonable. "That is really odd. Especially the bit about no nail varnish. I only wear black with a big flash of colour (bright shoes, hair wrap etc). Wearing all black washes me out a bit and doesn't seem very celebratory," one person commented. "Blimey, I went to a funeral last week and the wife of the deceased asked us not to wear black as it would be too depressing. She wanted to celebrate her husband's life. Black at a wedding sounds really miserable," another said. A third chimed in, "Is it bats---? Yes. Is it overstepping to insist on how people have their nails? Yes. But is it only one day out of your life for someone you love and fairly easy to accomplish (charity shops have racks and racks of black clothing)? Yes. But I am with you, I think it's fairly ridiculous." "I'd honestly not go if I were invited to a wedding with a specified colour scheme," another person said. "It's indicative of entirely the wrong priorities and a strong indication that the wedding may well be crap. Because the priority is the look of photos and not the hosting of guests." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. While several commenters said they wouldn't go to the nuptials, other responses to the post said they had seen a similar dress code become trendy on social media. "It's an Instagram trend. The black dresses were all evening dresses in the one I saw and looked very stylish, so quite different from a funeral," one person wrote. They continued, 'I think North American wedding dress code tends to be more evening dress than in the U.K. (my brother's Canadian mil [mother-in-law] wore a beautiful evening gown to their wedding, but looked a bit bridesmaid, but I've since discovered that's normal in North America). It's not what I would choose, but I don't think it's that outrageous a request.' Read the original article on People

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store