
Israel takes control of Iran's skies—a feat that still eludes Russia in Ukraine
That is a feat that the giant Russian air force has been unable to achieve in Ukraine in 3½ years of war. This setback is one of the reasons why Moscow's troops have been bogged down in grinding trench warfare, sustaining staggering losses, ever since they failed to rapidly seize Kyiv in February 2022.
On Sunday, Israel was exploiting its advantage, saying it had taken out dozens of surface-to-air missiles in western Iran and killed the intelligence chief of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, along with his deputy.
The two wars are very different in many respects—for one, there is no conventional land component to the Israeli campaign in Iran. But the experience of these two conflicts, closely observed by militaries around the world, reinforces what war planners have known for decades: Control over air is everything, if you can get it.
'The two campaigns are showing the fundamental importance of air superiority in order to succeed in your overall military objectives," said retired U.S. Air Force Lt. Gen. David Deptula, dean of the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, who oversaw allied air operations against the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan in 2001.
'In the case of Russia-Ukraine war, you see what happens when neither side can achieve air superiority: stalemate and devolution to attrition-based warfare," he said. 'In the case of the Israel-Iran war, it allows them unhindered freedom to attack where they possess air superiority over segments of Iran."
The initial Israeli airstrikes were using the fifth-generation stealth F-35 aircraft, enhanced with Israeli modifications. Now that most of Iranian air defenses have been suppressed, older warplanes such as F-15 and F-16 are joining the fight. Israel has also started dropping short-range JDAM and Spice guided bombs, which are cheaper and much more abundant than missiles, to devastating effect.
'Over the past 24 hours, we completed an aerial route to Tehran and conducted an aerial breaching battle. IAF pilots are flying at great risk to their lives, hundreds of kilometers away from Israel, striking hundreds of different targets with precision," said Israeli military Chief of General Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir.
The Israelis now have 'the ability to use the whole suite of their offensive weapons—in greater mass, more efficiently, and spreading them out," said retired British Air Marshal Martin Sampson, who directed British air operations against Islamic State in Syria and Iraq and now heads the Middle East office of the International Institute for Strategic Studies. 'From Israel's side, the campaign objective is to destroy and degrade—and Iran doesn't have that ability."
The Israelis have certainly learned from Russian failures—and Ukrainian successes—as they planned their own campaign against Iran. But, military officials and analysts say, the most obvious lesson so far is that the Israeli air force is intrinsically more capable than the Russians—while Ukraine is much better at defense than Iran.
'Israel achieved surprise and overmatch over Iran's air defenses, which represented a much easier target set than Ukraine's air defenses in almost every respect," said Michael Kofman, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment and an expert on Russian and Ukrainian militaries. 'The asymmetry in qualitative capability between Israel's air force and Russia is also vast and can be easily observed."
Retired British Air Marshal Edward Stringer, who ran the air campaign in Libya in 2011 and headed operations for the British Ministry of Defense, said that the overall culture, sophisticated training and innovation of the Israeli air force, combined with its integration into intelligence and cyber capabilities, is a key reason why the Israelis succeeded where the Russians have failed. 'All the Russians have is pilots. They grow these pilots to drive flying artillery, and that's it," he said.
Just like Ukraine, whose Soviet jet fighters were badly outdated by 2022, Iran doesn't have warplanes capable of surviving air-to-air combat with its foe. Unlike Ukraine, however, Tehran has spectacularly failed to organize ground-based air defenses in ways that could have significantly impeded the ability of enemy aircraft to operate over its territory.
This was, above all, the result of a fatal political miscalculation. Over decades, Tehran underinvested in air defenses and bet instead on the deterrent firepower of its own missile forces and those of its regional proxies.
'Iran never relied on air defenses alone to ward off attacks like this. The idea was always to use deterrence," said Fabian Hinz, a military expert at the International Institute for Strategic Studies.
But the main component of Iranian deterrence—Lebanon's Hezbollah militia—was decimated by Israel last year, and then physically severed from Iran by the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria. Subsequent Israeli bombing of Syrian air-defense installations created a superhighway that Israeli aircraft can use unimpeded on their way to Iran.
Ukrainian air defenses—primarily the Soviet-vintage S-300 and Buk systems—were much more robust and better integrated in 2022 than Iran's turned out to be once Israel attacked. Tehran relies on a mishmash of S-300, Chinese batteries and locally made air-defense systems.
Equally critical was the element of surprise. Thanks to U.S. intelligence warnings about the impending Russian invasion, the Ukrainian military command dispersed and concealed the bulk of its mobile air-defenses in February 2022. After a handful of Russian jets were downed over Ukrainian cities, manned Russian aircraft stopped operating beyond the front line—the situation that remains in place today. To strike targets deep inside Ukraine, Russia must rely on the limited supply of cruise or ballistic missiles, or on drones, which are slow and carry a limited payload. Ukraine is using its own drones to strike back.
Unlike Ukraine in 2022, Iran was caught by surprise—in part because of deceptive Israeli threats to launch the attack should U.S.-Iranian talks scheduled for June 15 fail to produce progress. Instead, the war began two days earlier.
Israeli special-operations teams got into Iran covertly and destroyed key Iranian air-defense assets with short-range drones at the start of the campaign, using a method similar to how Ukrainian intelligence barely two weeks earlier blew up several Russian strategic bombers. At the same time, Israel was able to assassinate much of Iran's military leadership—another operation made possible by superior spywork.
'Basically, what Israel did with Iran is what Russia wanted to do with Ukraine: They thought they could pull off some cloak-and-dagger thing, and infiltrate and decapitate the Ukrainian regime," said Michael Horowitz, an Israeli geopolitical analyst. 'But it turned out that the Ukrainian society has a resilience and cannot be so easily penetrated—whereas when it comes to Iran, the regime is so unpopular that it's easy to find people there who will agree to work with Israel."
Despite Israeli strikes, which resulted in numerous civilian casualties alongside military targets, Iran continues to lob ballistic-missile salvos at Israeli cities, also causing death and destruction. Time, however, now appears to be on Israel's side—at least in the immediate future.
'It's a numbers game, and it seems like Israel has the upper hand because they can now go after the missiles that are shooting at them with direct attack. After all, the best way to shoot a missile is on the ground while it's in a container, and not in the air while it's flying," said retired U.S. Air Force Gen. Timothy Ray, a former U.S. Global Strike Command commander. 'What the Israelis are doing is just steadily leveraging an advantage."
Write to Yaroslav Trofimov at yaroslav.trofimov@wsj.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
35 minutes ago
- India.com
12000 KM range, 40 tonne payload, armed with BrahMos; India's deal with Russia for this bomber is bad news for Pakistan and China due to..., name is…
New Delhi: In view of the aggressive stance of Pakistan and China on the border, India is engaged in strengthening its defense system. For this, India had made a deal with Russia for the most dangerous Tu-160M bomber. However, their delivery is getting delayed. Why is Tu-160M bomber special? India had made a deal with Russia to lease the Tu-160M bomber 'White Swan'. Along with this, there was also an agreement to equip it with Indian BrahMos missile. However, due to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, its delivery is getting delayed. As soon as this bomber joins the Indian fleet, the panic on the border of Pakistan and China will increase because this bomber is very dangerous and neither Pakistan nor China has a bomber to compete with it. What are the features of Tu-160M bomber? The speed of Tu-160M is 2,200 km/hour. Its range is 12,000 kilometers, that too without refueling. Its payload capacity is 40 tonnes and it is used by the Russian army. The most important thing about this deal was that it planned to unify India's BrahMos supersonic cruise missile with the Tu-160M. This would have given India the unique ability to launch the world's fastest cruise missile from a state-of-the-art supersonic aircraft. This deal would also strengthen technology transfer, mission readiness and strategic self-reliance. Why is the deal stuck now? Russia now needs Tu-160M aircraft itself to maintain its strategic capabilities. The Kazan Aviation Plant, where these aircraft are manufactured, are now under extreme pressure due to wartime demands and Western sanctions. Shortages of high-tech components and electronics have slowed production. Recent Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian airbases have shown that the Tu-160M has now become a core asset of Russian national security. Russia is now hesitant to supply these aircraft even to a close partner like India. Strategic balance and Indian Air Force India's global outlook today rests on strategic balance. India maintains decades-old defense ties with Russia, but is also deeply connected with countries like the US, France, Israel and Japan. In such a situation, acquiring a high-profile weapon like the Tu-160M from Russia could increase diplomatic tensions with Western countries. Especially at a time when Russia is struggling with Western pressure and sanctions. The Indian Air Force currently relies mainly on fighter aircraft which are suitable for medium-range strike missions. But, the lack of long-range aerial strike capability is a drawback in strategic balance. Aircraft like the TU-160M can strike deep into another country, without crossing its borders. Countries like the US, Russia and China already have long-term strategic bomber fleets.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
an hour ago
- Business Standard
Ship attacked in Red Sea near Yemen amid ongoing regional tensions
A ship came under attack Sunday in the Red Sea off the coast of Yemen by armed men firing guns and launching rocket-propelled grenades, a group overseen by the British military said. No one immediately claimed responsibility for the attack, which comes as tensions remain high in the Middle East over the Israel-Hamas war and after the Iran-Israel war and airstrikes by the United States targeting Iranian nuclear sites. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations centre said that an armed security team on the ship had returned fire and that the situation is ongoing. Authorities are investigating, it said. Yemen's Houthi rebels have been launching missile and drone attacks against commercial and military ships in the region in what the group's leadership has described as an effort to end Israel's offensive against Hamas in the Gaza Strip. Between November 2023 and January 2025, the Houthis targeted more than 100 merchant vessels with missiles and drones, sinking two of them and killing four sailors. That has greatly reduced the flow of trade through the Red Sea corridor, which typically sees USD 1 trillion of goods move through it annually. The Houthis paused attacks in a self-imposed ceasefire until the US launched a broad assault against the rebels in mid-March. That ended weeks later and the Houthis haven't attacked a vessel, though they have continued occasional missile attacks targeting Israel. Meanwhile, a wider, decadelong war in Yemen between the Houthis and the country's exiled government, backed by a Saudi-led coalition, remains in a stalemate. Pirates from Somalia also have operated in the region, though typically they've sought to capture vessels either to rob or ransom their crews.


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Israel Will Send Mediators to Talks Aimed at Gaza Ceasefire
Israel will send mediators on Sunday to restart talks with Hamas, after the militant group said it was ready to 'immediately' negotiate a proposal by US President Donald Trump for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza. While Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said unspecified changes sought by Hamas were 'unacceptable to Israel,' it added in a statement that an Israeli delegation would go to Doha for 'close talks and to continue negotiations.' Hamas has representatives in Qatar's capital, though the two sides don't negotiate directly. The Trump proposal, which Netanyahu has accepted, will be one of the major topics during his visit to Washington where he will meet with the US president on Monday. Talks toward ending the war that began in October 2023 have been suspended since the spring. A deal on the framework would see Hamas return half of the 50 hostages it still holds and pursue mediated talks with Israel to end the war. About 20 hostages are believed to be alive, and the deal under discussion would return 10 living and 18 dead hostages within those 60 days. 'The Hamas movement has completed its internal consultations and discussions with Palestinian factions and forces regarding the latest proposal put forward by the mediators,' Hamas said in a statement late Friday, adding that it viewed the proposal in 'a positive spirit.' An agreement would pause, if not end, a war between Iran-backed Hamas and Israel that has killed tens of thousands of Palestinians, devastated Gaza and destabilized the wider Middle East. Trump said Friday that 'there could be a Gaza deal next week,' and he was 'very optimistic but it changes day to day.' An Israeli official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Hamas's response to the current proposal seeks changes in three key areas, including redeployment of Israeli troops in Gaza and control over humanitarian aid. The official said Hamas's requested changes were substantial and troubling and wouldn't be easy to overcome. What's needed, the official said, is US pressure on Qatar to get Hamas to back down. While Netanyahu's government weeks ago agreed to the US proposal, Washington and the other main mediators — Qatar and Egypt — couldn't get the sides to overcome key sticking points. Hamas had said any ceasefire must end the war and also refused Israel's demands to disarm and remove itself from power in Gaza. Israel has intensified military operations even as it agreed to talks. The army ordered tens of thousands of people to leave the outskirts of Gaza City since Tuesday and stepped up air strikes and incursions in the northern city, leading to an increase in the number of fatalities. On Saturday, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an organization backed by Israel and the US that is trying to take over aid distribution in Gaza to keep it out of the hands of Hamas, said grenades were thrown at those distributing aid, injuring two Americans. The two are in stable condition. It was part of an ongoing struggle to control aid, which is seen as key to power and influence in Gaza, where hundreds of thousands are without sanitation or a steady source of food. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.