Free or fee? Parking lots stuck in neutral
Now, they say that they are waiting for the finance and contracts committee meeting. Officials said that three sites were declared free for parking and it is unclear whether they will be included in the auction. The current parking contractor was hired for one year in October, 2022, but in the absence of an e-auction, he is still serving.
Before his demise, former MLA of Ludhiana West, Gurpreet Gogi, made Sarabha Nagar market parking free of charge.
When the bypoll was announced, AAP candidate Sanjeev Arora announced the Model Town Extension market and two parking lots as parking fee-free.
This leaves the MC with the parking lot in Feroze Gandhi market, the multi-storey parking lot near Mata Rani Chowk, Bhadhaur House, and the remaining parking lots of BRS Nagar. Sources said that the MC prepared a proposal for auction and floated tenders in December last year but the tenders were withdrawn due to certain reasons.
Officials said that they will flag the issue in the F&CC meeting, after which a decision will be taken.
However, things may not be quite as simple. Members of Feroze Gandhi Market Association also want free parking. Their rationale — If Sarabha Nagar Market and Model Town Extension Market have been declared free for parking, why not them? They claimed to have requested civic authorities to hand over market parking lots to the association, as the lots belong to shopkeepers in the area but the civic body did not act on their requests.
Demanding uniformity in parking policy, they asked the MC to make the parking free of charge.
MC commissioner Aaditya Dachalwal said, "The decision is pending at the level of the mayor, and she has to take a call about the e-auction."
Despite repeated attempts, mayor Inderjit Kaur could not be contacted for comments. Parking is a major issue in the city. With high vehicle density and limited parking space, it is common to see vehicles parked on roadsides.
Also, there have been frequent complaints about overcharging and misbehaviour at parking lots managed by the existing contractor. Questions are being raised on the MC for not cancelling the agreement despite receiving complaints.
Quotes
Parking rates should be genuine so that people park in parking lots but here, people face serious issues. Authorities need to check irregularities
Shifali Kapoor | Resident, Bharat Nagar Chowk
Authorities hardly care about public grievances. They can check such issues only if they visit the field. Contractors do whatever they want to do
Inderpreet Singh | Resident, Sarabha Nagar
2022 auction: 6 parking fetched Rs 3.57 crore
The MC auctioned six parking lots for Rs 3.57 crore in 2022.
Of these, Feroze Gandhi Market and multi-storey parking lots in Zone A were auctioned for Rs 1.29 crore and Rs1.11 crore respectively while Bhadhaur House and Sarabha Nagar parking lots were auctioned for Rs 4.71 lakh and Rs30.4 lakh. The BRS Nagar parking lot was auctioned for Rs 23.01 lakh and the Model Town Extension parking lot was auctioned for Rs 29 lakh.
Failure to adopt a single policy for auction of parking sites may lead to major revenue loss.
Unmet requirements
Before handing over parking sites, the MC fixes certain conditions, including e-ticket machines, uniform with ID cards for employees, display boards showing parking fee, proper marking for parking of two-wheelers and cars and e-pos machines at the entrance of parking site. However, these conditions are rarely fulfilled.
No penalties imposed
Penalties ranging from Rs 1,000 to Rs 5,000 can be imposed for violations. If the contractor repeats the same mistake thrice, then the contract can be terminated. However, this has never happened despite several complaints of overcharging and misbehaviour by staff with people coming to the parking lots.
MSID:: 122250422 413 |
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Mumbai businessman accused in bank fraud and money laundering case denied bail
Mumbai: Observing that the Enforcement Directorate (ED) collected sufficient material to prima facie conclude that the applicant was actively involved in the offence of money laundering, a special PMLA court on Friday rejected the bail plea of businessman Vijay Gupta. He is accused in a Rs 764.44 crore fraud involving the State Bank of India (SBI). Gupta, founder of the Vindhyavasini Group of Companies, which operates in steel manufacturing, real estate development, and infrastructure services, remains in judicial custody. The ED strongly opposed the bail, submitting that Gupta is a "habitual economic offender" actively involved in money laundering. Given the gravity and seriousness of the offences, the court concluded that Gupta is not entitled to bail. While the defence claimed that the accused was in jail for over 12 months, the court noted that he was arrested in the money laundering case only in March this year. The court said that the period of custody in the predicate offence cannot be considered since the offence under section PMLA is a different and distinct offence. The ED's case stems from six FIRs registered by the CBI and EOW, Mumbai, against six companies of the Vindhyavasini Group. It is submitted that these companies, promoted and managed by Gupta, are accused of defrauding the SBI's Eastern Express Highway Branch in Thane of approximately Rs 764.44 crores. According to the ED, the accused used 57 shell entities and 117 bank accounts for the placement, integration, and layering of the proceeds of crime. The ED detailed a systematic scheme of fraud, including the submission of fabricated and inflated Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs), Technical Economic Viability (TEV) reports, and highly inflated valuation reports of mortgaged properties to secure maximum loan sanctions from SBI. It was further alleged that the accused colluded with Vishwas Kadam, a then relationship manager for Medium Enterprises (RMME) at SBI, Thane branch, and loan consultant Vijay Patil, to process and approve loans based on these forged documents. The ED claims Gupta paid a bribe of Rs 59 lakh to Vishwas Kadam. It was further submitted that there was a diversion of approximately Rs 164 crore from cash credit limit accounts of group companies to Gupta's personal accounts and shell entities owned by him and his brothers, Ajay Gupta and Sanjay Gupta. These funds were allegedly routed multiple times for unauthorised purposes. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai The ED also submitted that around Rs 42.77 crore were withdrawn in cash from August 2010 to July 2013 from the bank accounts of the Vindhyavasini Group, shell entities, and personal accounts of family members. Allegations include the purchase of flats in Borivali and Kandivali using illicit funds, with one flat reportedly purchased in the name of his children's caretaker. It was also alleged that Gupta siphoned off a significant portion of Rs 13.20 crore received as compensation from NHAI for land acquisition, some of which was already mortgaged with SBI. Gupta's lawyer argued that he was falsely implicated and that the case was lodged with ulterior motives. It was also contended that the transactions are civil in nature, with recovery proceedings already initiated by SBI pending before civil courts. It was also submitted that sufficient collateral was provided to the bank, and the remaining dues of Rs 321 crores (out of a total loan of Rs 805 crores, with Rs 486 crores already recovered) could be covered by auctioning mortgaged properties, including the Solaris Building at Powai, valued at approximately Rs 400 crore in 2013. The defence highlighted Gupta's incarceration of over 12 months and the unlikelihood of a speedy trial given hundreds of witnesses and over fifty thousand pages of documentary evidence.
Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Come, let us unite': MK Stalin hails Thackeray brothers' anti-Hindi powerplay; vows to 'teach BJP a lesson'
NEW DELHI: Tamil Nadu chief minister MK Stalin on Saturday welcomed the thaw in ties between Thackeray brothers against the "imposition of Hindi" in Maharashtra " by the Bharatiya Janata Party. A critique of the three-language policy under NEP himself, Stalin slammed the Centre for "withholding Rs 2, 152 crore in funds under Samgara Shiksa Abhiyan" and asked what languages are being taught as a third language in Hindi belt schools. "Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam and the people of Tamil Nadu, who have been waging a generational battle for linguistic rights to defeat Hindi imposition, have now transcended state boundaries, stirring a storm of protest in Maharashtra. BJP , which acts unlawfully and anarchically by declaring that funds will only be allocated if Hindi is taught as a third language in Tamil Nadu's schools, has been forced to retreat for the second time in Maharashtra, where it governs, out of fear of the people's uprising. The enthusiasm and oratory of the victory rally held in Mumbai today, led by brother Uddhav Thackeray, against Hindi imposition, is truly exhilarating," Stalin wrote on X. — mkstalin (@mkstalin) "I am well aware that the Union government, which prioritises the promotion of Hindi and Sanskrit full-time, has no answers to the questions raised by Mr. Raj Thackeray: 'What is the third language taught in Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan?' and 'Hindi-speaking states are lagging behind—why impose Hindi on the people of progressive non-Hindi-speaking states?' Will the Union government change its vindictive stance of withholding ₹2,152 crore in funds under the Samagra Shiksha Abhiyan for Tamil Nadu unless it accepts the new education policy that imposes Hindi and Sanskrit under the guise of a three-language policy? Will it immediately release the funds legally due for the education of Tamil Nadu's schoolchildren?" he added. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Grupo Energía Bogotá CFD: Calcula cuánto podrías ganar invirtiendo solo $100 Actualidad Empieza ahora Undo Tamil Nadu chief minister also vowed to teach BJP and its allies "a lesson they will never forget!" "Come, let us unite! Tamil Nadu will fight! Tamil Nadu will win!" Stalin said. This comes after Shiv Sena (UBT) and Maharashtra Navnirman Sena (MNS) chiefs came together at the "Awaz Marathicha" rally to celebrate the rollback on what they called the government's bid to "impose" Hindi over Maharashtra. The Fadnavis government had issued a Government Resolution (GR) on April 16, making Hindi a compulsory third language for students in Classes 1 to 5 studying in English and Marathi medium schools. Since the announcement, both parties had opposed its implementation. Sena (UBT) and MNS called the policy an indirect imposition of Hindi. Uddhav said that the decision was similar to the Emergency, while Raj urged schools not to follow the government order, calling the imposition of Hindi an "anti-Maharashtra activity." The fierce opposition eventually compelled the government to retreat from its decision on June 29. The government also announced the formation of a committee under educationist Dr. Narendra Jadhav to suggest the way forward and oversee the implementation of the language policy. The panel has been given three months to study the issue and prepare a report.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Jane Street defied NSE red flag, kept engaging in manipulative trading actions
US-based Jane Street, which was barred from the securities market by regulator Sebi for making 'unlawful gains' in the stock market, had ignored a prior warning from the National Stock Exchange four months earlier and continued with alleged manipulative trading activities. When concerns regarding allegedly manipulative trading practices by JS Group, a global proprietary trading firm, surfaced in early 2025, the NSE, acting under Sebi's direction, issued a clear and formal warning to JS Group in February 2025. The notice advised them to avoid high-risk activity in index options and refrain from any trading behaviour that could indicate manipulation. In response, JS Group informed NSE in February 2025 of its assurance to fully comply with applicable regulations. However, in May 2025, the group again executed what appeared to be manipulative 'extended marking the close' strategies—entering large, aggressive trades in index and stock markets around expiry closing—to move the index in their favour. These trades, carried out in May 2025, blatantly disregarded the warning letter issued on February 06, 2025, as well as the group's own formal assurance made to NSE that same month, according to the Sebi order. On Thursday, Sebi ordered the impounding of Rs 4,843.57 crore in alleged unlawful gains made by Jane Street through alleged manipulative trading practices and restrained it from accessing the securities market. The net profits booked in the FPIs in the JS Group amounted to Rs 32,681 crore, Sebi had said. The NSE letter noted that the Jane Group had been consistently engaging in trading patterns that raised serious concerns over market integrity, particularly around the expiry of index derivatives. 'It was observed that you along with your related entity, Jane Street Group Investments Pvt Ltd, were running abnormally high delta positions in the index derivatives segment and correspondingly small net sentimental OI (open interest). Such large directional OI (delta) can cause risk to market stability and raises concern for market integrity especially around expiry of contracts wherein your related entity has traded in the cash market to favour large open positions in options,' NSE said. Delta is a measure of how much the price of an option is expected to change based on a change in the price of the underlying stock or index. Jane Street's trading activity, prima-facie, raises concerns for market integrity on account of large delta positions in index derivatives, combined with concurrent act of taking and then reducing positions in the top constituents of the index through cash market / derivatives over a short period, to artificially influence the price of the index, NSE said. It also creates an information asymmetry for other investors / traders in those constituents or derivatives contracts on index, who are not aware about such artifice and repeated occurrences of such instances cannot be considered as coincidence, NSE said. 'The above trading activity prima facie appears to be fraudulent and manipulative in terms of dealing in top constituents of index in cash market / futures segment and taking relatively large size contra position in options expiring on that day on the same index,' NSE said. 'It is further advised to refrain from the aforementioned trading pattern and unwind such positions in a non-disruptive manner and report on a daily basis to us till further notice,' NSE told Jane Street. Despite the NSE letter, JS group has been seen to be running very large net cash-equivalent positions in index options. Disturbingly, on days such as on May 15, 2025 (an expiry day for NIFTY weekly options), JS group was seen not only running very large effective cash-equivalent long positions via NIFTY index options, it was also seen to be intervening heavily in NIFTY futures and NIFTY constituent stock futures at close to expiry. The timing, scale, and construction of Jane Street Group's positions and the trading on May 15, 2025, suggest that it continued deploying a weekly expiry-centric extended marking-the-close strategy even after all the regulatory red flags that had been shown prominently to them, Sebi said. This activity was absent in the cash segment, giving an impression of complying with regulatory caution (issued in February 2025) but actually manipulating the market through futures segment. Jane Street's trading in index futures alongside its stock-level trades appears to be part of a coordinated approach to support the NIFTY index level near expiry. JS, vide its letter to Sebi dated August 30, 2024, suggested that these trades were to 'remove unwanted delta' or to 'manage overall delta'.
