Prominent pundit wonders if left wing 'nuttiness' has damaged Democratic Party beyond repair
Prominent mainstream media journalist and author Joe Klein savaged the Democratic Party, claiming that its recent Democratic National Committee meeting proves the party's "intellectual corrosion is comprehensive."
In a new article for his "Sanity Clause" Substack series, Klein pointed out the various gender rules that the DNC rolled out during its meeting last week as proof that the party may be damaged beyond anything he's ever seen.
"Yes, friends, still crazy after all these years…and the encroaching dementia is not benign. Can this party be saved? I have my doubts," Klein wrote after quoting multiple articles detailing the complex gender rules established at the meeting.
He began with The Atlantic staff writer Jonathan Chait's account of the proceedings. In his article, headlined, The Democrats Show Why They Lost," Chait wrote that "outgoing chair, Jaime Harrison, attempted to explain a point about its rules concerning gender balance for its vice-chair race. 'The rules specify that when we have a gender-nonbinary candidate or officer, the nonbinary individual is counted as neither male nor female, and the remaining six officers must be gender balanced,' Harrison announced."
As Chait's account said, Harrison "labored" over explaining the committee's efforts to provide inclusion to "male, female, and nonbinary candidates."
Klein followed up by quoting Wall Street Journal reporter Molly Ball's account,"Later in the program, an audience member stood up to lament that there was only one at-large seat set aside for a transgender person, and called on the candidates to add another seat and for 'making sure those appointments reflect the gender and ethnic diversity of the transgender community.'"
Klein is best well known for writing for Time magazine and as the author of "Primary Colors," which he wrote anonymously back in 1996.
After sharing these accounts, Klein remarked on how he saw the party as out of touch.
"The intellectual corrosion is comprehensive; it is only matched by the self-righteous arrogance. But what's the alternative?" he said. "I've been through Dems in Disarray syndrome multiple times in the past: in 1972, in 1980, in 1988, in 2016…but, gotta say, this is the worst I've ever seen it."
Further on, the commentator bashed the Democratic Party's descent into its current state for enabling President Trump's rise to power.
"The Democrats have twice now enabled a World-Historic Demagogue to be elected President of the United States. One wonders if Trump's reelection will stand with Julius Caesar crossing the Rubicon," Klein stated, adding that former President Biden's policy alignment with Sen. Bernie Sanders', I-Ver., progressive wing of the party ahead of Biden's election brought in "left-nuttiness below the radar throughout the government."
"Every so often, the nuttiness would surface—as with the chaos at the Southern border—and Biden would do nothing about it," he wrote.
Elsewhere in the column, Klein advocated for a major shakeup to the Democratic Party. He began citing The Free Press' Ruy Teixeira's points for fixing the party, which include, avoiding calling Trump a "fascist," moderating on the border issue, helping Trump with stuff he's "right" about, and embracing "energy abundance."
Klein added his own two cents, stating, "The Democratic Party needs to be challenged—from the outside, by like-minded people, as it was in the early 1990s by the Democratic Leadership Conference." He noted that a similar revival needs to be driven by competent reform movement that is backed by "big-time financial support" as well as "And big-time courage from Dem politicians."
Still, he concluded by admitting such reform seems like a long shot, remarking, "But, yeah, I'm dreaming…."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democrats' push to ban ICE agents' masking shows whose side they're really on
New York's lefty lawmakers just blocked reviving the state's ban on masking by protesters, and now two Manhattan Democrats, Reps. Dan Goldman and Adriano Espaillat, have turned around to push a federal ban on masking by ICE agents, even when nabbing dangerous gangbangers. Their 'No Secret Police Act' would bar Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other Homeland Security officers from concealing their faces during civil immigration enforcement and require them to clearly display official ID and insignia. California Democrats are proposing a similar state ban on any face masks for law enforcement officers; expect other progressive bastions to join in. Advertisement Hmm: Homeland Security recently reported that ICE enforcement officers are facing a 413% increase in assaults against them. Plus, in the aftermath of the LA riots, 'ICE officers' family members have been doxed and targeted as well.' Reprisals against family of law-enforcers are a classic tactic of the cartels and gangs such as Tren de Aragua and MS-13. Advertisement Meanwhile, progressives are dead-set against stopping their allies from masking. Rioters and aggressive 'protesters' have been routinely concealing their faces since at least the 2020 anti-policing demonstrations; it's grown even more common among the 'tentifada' set in demos since Oct. 7, 2023. Anonymity not only makes it easier to get away with violent lawbreaking, it helps intimidate others and may encourage the masked to get out of control. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Advertisement Hence repeated calls for the return of New York's anti-masking law, which then-Gov. Andrew Cuomo agreed to repeal in 2020, in the early days of the pandemic. Gov. Kathy Hochul briefly sought just that this year, but progressives wouldn't let her get more than a symbolic crackdown that generally protects masked demonstrators. People engaged in principled, peaceful protest have no reason to hide their face. Advertisement And we even agree that masking by law enforcement should be strictly limited. But it's pretty strange to focus on outing the identities of officers trying to arrest illegal immigrants with ties to violent gangs even as your political compadres are protecting Antifa radicals and the new wave of antisemitic goons.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Elon Musk calls Trump's spending bill 'utterly insane' as Senate gears up for a vote
Elon Musk is most definitely over. The Tesla CEO, who until recently was the face of the White House DOGE Office and Trump's efforts to cut government spending, had some more choice words for the president's signature spending bill on Saturday. "The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country! Utterly insane and destructive," Musk said on X. "It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future." Senate Republicans managed to push the bill past a key procedural hurdle over the weekend, allowing debate to begin. A final vote could come as early as Monday. Republicans have hoped to get a version of the bill to Trump's desk by the president's requested July 4 deadline. Some lawmakers, however, remain opposed to the bill. Democrats, meanwhile, have remained united in their opposition, and have found a surprise ally in Musk. In his criticisms on Sunday, Musk focused on provisions in the bill that would terminate Biden-era tax credits for renewable energy, such as solar, wind, and battery manufacturing. Tesla, Musk's automotive company, has an energy generation and storage business that earned $2.7 billion in revenue during Q1 2025. The company also uses batteries and solar cells in many of its products. In response to an X post from Michael Thomas — the founder of Cleanview, a company that tracks clean energy development — who said the bill would likely decrease energy capacity in the country, Musk said the bill would be "incredibly destructive" for the United States. In another post, Musk shared a poll about the bill and said it would be "political suicide" for the Republican Party. He also reposted several posts criticizing the bill, including one by Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, a Republican. "'BBB' = our credit rating if this bill becomes law," Massie wrote on X. Trump's mega bill will impact nearly every aspect of American life, including healthcare, student loans, taxes, Social Security, Medicaid, clean energy, defense, immigration, tipping, AI regulation, and more. Musk's X posts echo remarks he made earlier this month when his feud with Trump took a public turn. Musk called the bill a "disgusting abomination" on X before laying into Trump's personal life. At the time, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Business Insider said the situation was "an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted. The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." The tech billionaire later apologized to Trump on X, saying he regretted "some" of his posts and that they "went too far."
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
With Accounting Gimmick, Republicans Upend Senate Norms
Senate Republicans moved on Sunday to upend how the costs of tax cuts are counted, a change they are seeking as part of a broader attempt to expand what lawmakers can pass without a filibuster-proof majority. The gambit concerns how long Republicans' tax cuts can last. Typically, lawmakers cannot pass costly long-term policies through the Senate without bipartisan support. But Republicans want to lock in lower taxes permanently, and they are preparing to smash precedent to do so. To pass their sprawling tax and health care bill, Republicans are using a legislative process called reconciliation that allows them to ignore Democratic opposition in the Senate and approve the bill with a simple majority of 51 votes, rather than the 60 typically needed to overcome a filibuster. But using reconciliation has long imposed additional rules on lawmakers, including that the legislation can only add to the deficit for 10 years. After a decade, a bill cannot create new costs. That limitation has shaped American fiscal policy for a generation. Lawmakers in both parties have set programs that add to the deficit to expire within a decade rather than try to cover their cost in the long term. This time around, Senate Republicans are instead invoking an alternative accounting method that wipes away the cost of extending tax cuts already in place. Republicans argue that the tax cuts they originally passed in 2017, which expire at the end of the year, should be baked into the country's fiscal forecasts even though Congress has not yet actually renewed them. By that logic, the $3.8 trillion cost of extending the 2017 cuts is zero, and those cuts can be extended for decades even though reconciliation's rules prohibit long-term deficit increases. The entire Senate Republican bill relies on this view of the tax cuts' costs. Without this accounting assumption, the legislation would run afoul of Senate rules and require Republicans to rework the entire 940-page project, which President Trump has demanded be ready for his signature by July 4. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
