Cancer could be detected 3 years before symptoms appear with a simple blood test; new study reveals
One of the leading causes of death in recent years, cancer, is claiming to take millions of lives each year. Despite the significant advancements in the treatment, the biggest challenge in fighting cancer is that the detection is often too late.
Detecting cancer earlier may dramatically improve survival rates and offer more treatment options. But, this is yet harder to diagnose at the earliest stage and is one of the crucial reasons for rising deaths worldwide. Now, a new study by Johns Hopkins University researchers suggests that a simple blood test could help identify cancer years before symptoms even begin to show, potentially transforming the future of early diagnosis and prevention.
According to the study published in the peer-reviewed journal
Cancer Discovery
, this breakthrough might be a push in early diagnosis of cancer.
A simple blood test may detect cancer early, before any symptoms start
Cancer outcomes are heavily dependent on how early the disease is detected. When tumours are caught in their initial stages, they tend to be smaller, less aggressive, and more responsive to treatment. As researcher Yuxuan Wang from Johns Hopkins explains, 'Three years earlier provides time for intervention.
The tumours are likely to be much less advanced and more likely to be curable.'
This time advantage could make the difference between curable and life-threatening cancer, especially in aggressive forms of the disease.
At the heart of the research is a type of genetic material called circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Tumours naturally shed fragments of their DNA into the bloodstream, but these traces are extremely minute and hard to detect, especially in the early stages.
Science behind detecting cancer in blood
To identify these fragments, scientists used multi-step algorithms and cross-checks to scan blood samples for modifications in DNA patterns that are commonly linked to tumours. The technique forms the basis of a Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) test, designed to look for cancer-specific genetic changes in the blood.
The research team analysed blood samples from 52 individuals, split into two groups:
26 people who were later diagnosed with cancer within six months of sample collection.
26 people who remained cancer-free.
When subjected to the
MCED test
, eight cancer cases were flagged, indicating a 31% detection rate.
While not perfect, this detection occurred before any formal diagnosis or visible symptoms appeared.
Testing the method: What the study revealed
What makes the findings even more groundbreaking is the analysis of older blood samples from some of the participants. Six of the eight individuals who were detected by the MCED test had blood samples available from 3.1 to 3.5 years before their diagnosis.
Amazingly, cancer signals were found in four of those six samples.
The ctDNA was present, although at levels up to 80 times lower than what the current test threshold requires. This suggests that tumours begin shedding DNA into the blood long before symptoms arise. if the tests are sensitive enough, these early signs could be caught. While the results are promising, they also highlight a key hurdle that the current technology needs to improve its sensitivity.
The earlier the stage of cancer, the lower the ctDNA levels, making detection difficult.
'This study shows the promise of MCED tests in detecting cancers very early,' says Dr. Bert Vogelstein, a senior cancer researcher involved in the project. 'But it also sets the benchmark sensitivities required for these tests to succeed.' In simpler terms, we now know what we should aim for—but we're not quite there yet.
What happens after a positive cancer blood test
Even though the science is encouraging, moving from lab to the clinic is not straightforward. Blood-based cancer screening tests must undergo rigorous clinical trials to prove their reliability and safety.
Once proven effective, they still require regulatory approvals before being adopted into regular medical practice. There's also the question of what comes after a positive test. Dr. Nickolas Papadopoulos from the Ludwig Centre notes, 'We need to determine the appropriate clinical follow-up after a positive test result.
That includes further scans, biopsies, or even preventive treatments.'
Despite the current limitations, this research represents a hopeful shift in cancer diagnostics. Combined with ongoing advances in treatment, especially therapies targeting multiple cancer types, the future holds the potential for significantly improved survival rates.
This could mark a revolutionary step forward in how cancer is screened and treated.
Also Read |
10 common monsoon diseases that might cause serious health problems; know symptoms and how to protect yourself
One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
4 days ago
- India.com
Must Have Pore Extractor Tools for Clearer, Healthier Skin at Home
When it comes to skincare, sometimes your fingertips just aren't enough. A pore extractor tool gives you a more precise and hygienic way to remove blackheads, whiteheads, and built-up debris without damaging your skin. Amazon offers dermatologist-inspired tools designed to be gentle, effective, and easy to use at home. Whether you're dealing with stubborn clogged pores or just adding an extra step to your skincare routine, these tools make a noticeable difference in clarity and texture. Adiguru 5-in-1 Blackhead Remover Machine Image Source: Order Now This electric blackhead remover by Adiguru offers deep pore cleansing and multi-mode suction to effectively remove blackheads, whiteheads, and oil buildup. Ideal for regular skincare, it suits all skin types and comes with a USB rechargeable feature for effortless portability. Key Features: 5-in-1 functionality for tackling blackheads, whiteheads, pimples, and excess oil Powerful yet skin-safe suction modes suited for multiple facial zones USB rechargeable with cordless convenience for use at home or on the go Helps reduce acne formation and improves overall skin clarity with continued use May need careful use on sensitive skin to avoid temporary redness PURE NEST 4-in-1 Blackhead Remover Image Source: Order Now The PURE NEST vacuum suction tool offers four-in-one functionality to help unclog pores, extract blackheads, and cleanse skin thoroughly. Lightweight and easy to hold, it fits well into a weekly skincare routine for men and women alike. Key Features: 4-in-1 skin care tool offering pore cleaning, acne extraction, and exfoliation Adjustable suction levels make it gentle and safe for most skin types Compact and ergonomic design allows easy grip and precise facial targeting Can visibly smoothen skin texture with consistent usage over time Might require regular cleaning of filters for optimal hygiene and suction power Winston Electric Blackhead Remover Image Source: Order Now Winston's rechargeable blackhead remover delivers professional-quality results with five interchangeable suction heads. It offers up to 60 minutes of runtime and is suitable for all skin types, from oily to sensitive, making it perfect for home facials. Key Features: Long 60-minute battery life supports uninterrupted skin treatment sessions Comes with 5 suction heads tailored for different areas and concerns Efficient pore cleansing helps reduce blackheads, whiteheads, and excess sebum buildup Supports skin rejuvenation and improved tone with repeated use Should be used on clean skin to avoid irritation or overstimulation NexLev Multi-Function Blackhead Remover Image Source: Order Now NexLev brings a sleek hydro facial suction device designed for deep facial cleansing and blackhead removal. With its multifunctional settings, it acts as a pore vacuum, acne extractor, and skin purifier, offering a spa-like experience from home. Key Features: Combines pore vacuum, exfoliation, and deep cleaning in one compact tool Designed for men and women, safe on nose, chin, and T-zone areas Hydro facial feature boosts skin hydration while purifying pores Boosts glow by eliminating dead skin cells and improving absorption of skincare Initial suction might feel intense for first-time users or sensitive skin types Clear skin starts with clear pores, and a good extractor tool helps you get there more safely. These tools take the guesswork out of blackhead removal and reduce the chances of skin irritation. Whether you're managing acne-prone skin or just want a deeper cleanse, Amazon's range of extractor tools can support your goals. With sturdy, stainless steel designs and user-friendly tips, they're a practical and affordable skincare investment. Explore the collection and give your skin the targeted care it needs. Disclaimer: At IDPL, we help you stay up-to-date with the latest trends and products. It should not be construed as an endorsement to buy. IDPL may make a very small commission from its sale if one chooses to buy the product from any of the links in this article.
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Why Johns Hopkins, the top-funded US university, is now losing billions in research aid
Johns Hopkins University, the top recipient of federal research funding in the United States, is facing an unprecedented financial crisis as the Trump administration aggressively cuts billions in aid flowing to American higher education institutions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now While not directly named in official government actions, Johns Hopkins is reeling from a political wave aimed at defunding universities that conservatives claim have become ideologically biased and fiscally bloated. The institution, which receives roughly $4.2 billion annually in federal research support, has already lost $800 million in funding and laid off over 2,000 employees. According to The New York Times, these cuts have impacted both international and domestic research, jeopardizing critical public health and scientific projects worldwide. The political rationale behind the cuts The Trump administration has framed the move as a response to what it calls the ideological drift of elite universities. As reported by The New York Times, administration officials argue that major research institutions have evolved into "bastions of leftism hostile to conservative thought," using taxpayer money to promote what they label as radical agendas. Russell T. Vought, Director of the Office of Management and Budget, stated that current government spending was "contrary to the needs of ordinary working Americans" and too heavily tilted toward institutions aligned with gender and climate ideologies, which he called "antithetical to the American way of life. " This broad criticism has translated into sweeping budget proposals. A Trump-backed initiative could cut the National Institutes of Health (NIH) budget by nearly 40%, directly impacting Johns Hopkins, which received over $1 billion in NIH grants this year alone. The National Science Foundation and other federal bodies have also reduced or canceled grants—around 90 totaling $50 million, according to The New York Times. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Massive losses in international and domestic programs Johns Hopkins has long been a global leader in international health and development. But the US Agency for International Development, which had partnered closely with the university, saw its funding gutted. The school lost 2,200 jobs, including 250 in the US. Programs to prevent cervical cancer in Madagascar, diagnose tuberculosis in Uganda, and build healthcare systems in Bangladesh were either paused or terminated. Domestically, the impact is equally severe. Canceled NIH grants had supported projects to reduce HIV among transgender women, enhance STEM education for autistic high schoolers, and improve Covid vaccination rates among low-income Latino populations. Endowment, overhead, and local impact under pressure Despite having a $13 billion endowment, Johns Hopkins officials argue that those funds are largely restricted and cannot fill the gap. Still, under current proposals, the university may face a 7% tax on endowment income under the House plan, or 4% under the Senate version. Ronald J. Daniels, president of Johns Hopkins, has expressed concern that such taxes would undermine student financial aid—especially generous donations like the $1.8 billion gift from Michael Bloomberg. In addition, proposed federal reductions to indirect cost reimbursements—funds that help cover lab space, staff, and infrastructure—could drain another $300 million from the university. As The New York Times reported, the Heritage Foundation called these reimbursements a way universities "bilk taxpayers." A threat to America"s research leadership Faculty members have warned that the disruption could unravel decades of scientific progress. "We had these shining institutions that contributed so much to human knowledge, and there are explicit steps being taken to undermine them," said physics professor N. Peter Armitage, as quoted by The New York Times . Beyond the university, the consequences are rippling through Baltimore. The school has spent more than $1 billion on local business partnerships since 2016. Alicia Wilson, vice president for civic engagement, told The New York Times , "As goes Hopkins, so goes Baltimore." Daniels, who once warned in his 2021 book What Universities Owe Democracy that authoritarian regimes often target universities, has acknowledged the institution must adapt. In a campus-wide message, he revealed that new federal awards were down by nearly two-thirds and announced hiring freezes, delayed raises, and construction pauses. Even with its storied past and groundbreaking achievements in science and medicine, Johns Hopkins now stands as a symbol of what is at stake in a national shift away from funding academic research.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
4 days ago
- First Post
2,000 jobs cut, India projects jeopardised: Johns Hopkins reels from US funding halt
US President Donald Trump's cuts in the funding to the tune of $800 million to Johns Hopkins University have led to 2,200 people being laid off and several healthcare programmes in many countries, including in India, compromised. read more US President Donald Trump has not gone after Johns Hopkins University the way he has gone after Columbia, but the consequences are already visible. The Trump administration has so far cut $800 million from the $4.2 billion annual funds to Johns Hopkins and 2,200 jobs at the university has been axed and several public health programmes and research programmes have been hit, according to The New York Times. The unpublicised crackdown on Johns Hopkins is the latest in the Trump administration's campaign to use federal grants as a tool to bend the nation's public education system to its will and make university, their courses, and their graduates in the president's image. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For more than a century, Johns Hopkins has been a pioneer in several fields, including in medicine and public health. In 1889-1999, Dr William Stewart Halsted of Johns Hopkins made the rubber glove that massively reduced infections during surgery and are integral to surgeries and medical practice today. The university also developed the world's rechargeable cardiac pacemaker, the first effective treatment for sickle cell anemia, and helped develop a spacecraft that smashed into an asteroid that was hailed as the 'humanity's first planetary defense test'. Trump's assault on Johns Hopkins' goes beyond US So far, Trump has cut $800 million of the $4.2 billion federal grant to Johns Hopkins. The Times reported that officials at the university are expecting more cuts. The newspaper listed the following programmes as being hit from budget cuts: International research: The Trump administration's cuts to the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health have affected programmes in more than 100 countries and led to losses of more than 2,200 jobs. More than 1,900 of those jobs were outside of the United States. Judd Walson, the Chair in International Health, told the newspaper that these programmes covered the prevention of cervical cancer in Madagascar, diagnosing tuberculosis (TB) in Uganda, and building health systems in Bangladesh. He warned that millions of people were at the risk of dying from cuts. Johns Hopkins also ran programmes related to TB, maternal and child health, and primary health management in India. These programmes are also expected to be affected from cuts. Domestic research: Around 90 research programmes have been cancelled. These programmes addressed autism in children, reduction of HIV's spread among transwomen, and improving Covid-19 vaccination among low-income groups. Other support: The Trump administration has also cut grants to support laboratories and administrative costs to the tune of $300 million. New taxes: The Trump administration might slap Johns Hopkins with a new increased 'endowment tax'. 'Perplexing & distressing': Johns Hopkins president on Trump's cuts Johns Hopkins President Ronald J Daniels has described Trump's cuts as 'perplexing and distressing'. Daniels said that what started as threats have now turned into a campaign of 'cancellations and terminations'. Daniels said, 'Over the past six weeks, we have experienced a fast and far-reaching cascade of executive orders and agency actions affecting higher education and federally sponsored research. What began as stop work orders or pauses in grant funding allocations has morphed into cancellations and terminations.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The university had little choice other than reducing the university's activities, according to Daniels.
