UK banks can increase riskier mortgage lending, BoE says
LONDON, July 9 (Reuters) - British banks and building societies will be able issue more mortgages at high loan-to-income levels, the Bank of England said on Wednesday.
Individual lenders will now be able to have more than 15% of their lending at a high LTI ratio, although the sector as a whole will continue to have a 15% cap, the BoE said.
The BoE said the move should allow more first-time buyers to get a mortgage, although it added that lenders' deposit requirements were a bigger barrier for most borrowers.
The loosening of the cap on lending to riskier borrowers comes after a call by Britain's Labour government for regulators to look for ways to encourage economic growth, without risking the stability of the financial system.
The loan-to-income limit was introduced in 2014 as part of measures to discourage excessively risky mortgage lending by banks which contributed to the 2008 global financial crisis.
Lenders have since become better capitalised and introduced more stringent checks on borrowers.
The regulators' rules define riskier mortgages as those with a loan value above 4.5 times the borrower's income. The BoE said banks' unwillingness to risk a breach of the 15% cap on such loans meant individual lenders had stayed well below the threshold, constraining growth of the mortgage market.
Banks' aggregate share of high loan-to-income lending hit 9.7% in the first quarter, the BoE said, meaning few individual lenders were in any case likely to reach the 15% aggregate sectoral limit.
Allowing some individual lenders to go above that threshold would likely only lead to an overall share of such riskier lending hitting 11% by the end of 2025, the BoE said.
The BoE will also refresh its assessment of banks' overall capital requirements and update the market on that at its next financial stability report in December, it said, the first such review in five years.
However, the BoE noted that it currently judged the overall level of capital in the system to be "broadly appropriate".
(Reporting by Lawrence White and David Milliken)
((david.milliken@thomsonreuters.com, opens new tab; +44 20 7513 4034))
Keywords: BRITAIN BOE/MORTGAGES
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
20 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Parents pay £500m to beat private school VAT raid
Parents at Britain's top private schools have defied Labour's VAT raid by paying fees in advance. Telegraph analysis shows the most expensive private schools received hundreds of millions of pounds in fees upfront last year as parents scrambled to avoid the 20 per cent tax raid, which came into force on Jan 1 2025. The scale of the advance payments has stunned tax experts, who warned it posed a challenge to Labour's revenue-raising plans. Sources suggested that the Chancellor would consider ways to claw back the lost VAT. The top 50 independent schools held £515m last year in advance fee schemes, which are used to pay school costs one or more years before they fall due. This was up from £121m in 2023, according to the latest annual accounts. It means the wealthiest parents alone may have avoided up to £103m in VAT, since they are thought to have handed over the fees before a government-imposed deadline when tax would start to be charged on advance fees. There are more than 2,600 private schools across the UK, meaning the total figure is expected to be significantly higher. The Treasury said that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) factored the use of prepayment schemes into its forecasts for how much money would be raised by the VAT raid. However, the vast sums poured into advance fee schemes are likely to eclipse expectations and will raise serious questions over official predictions. Brighton College, the most expensive private school in the UK, recorded total prepaid fees of £50.1m in last year's accounts – up from £4.1m in 2023. The number of pupils covered by the school's fees in advance scheme jumped from 86 in 2023 to 819 last year. At Eton College, where fees will reach more than £63,000 next year, the total money in its prepayment scheme rose from £16.6m in 2023 to £52.7m last year. Winchester College's fees in advance scheme leapt from £4.4m in 2023 to £19m in 2024, according to its latest accounts. The sums cover parents paying in advance for both one year of school fees and for multiple years. Telegraph analysis shows parents at many schools tried to cover the bill for as many as five years' fees upfront before last summer's deadline, meaning they may avoid Labour's tax raid altogether if it is cancelled by a future Reform or Tory government. Experts said the figures were 'extremely high' and the Government could face expensive legal battles if it tried to recoup the money. Labour confirmed concrete plans to charge VAT on private schools in its election manifesto, triggering a rush by families and schools to prepare. The Government was elected on July 4, but Rachel Reeves did not spell out plans for the policy until July 29. She said that all prepayments from that date would be subject to VAT. Mairéad Warren de Búrca, managing director at Alvarez and Marsal Tax, said: 'It's not surprising that schools would have done this type of thing with parents and maybe encouraged parents to jump on the prepayment bandwagon. 'Only the very rich can afford to make those advance payments, or those with extensive wealth … so I'm not entirely sure they [the Government] have managed to do what they intended to do.' Labour has repeatedly stated that its VAT raid on private schools will target the wealthiest families in Britain and raise more than £1.8bn a year for state schools by the end of the decade. But smaller private schools have said that the policy will hit them the hardest and leave the most prestigious institutions largely unaffected. More than 50 independent schools have shut or announced they are closing since the VAT raid came into effect, with the Government predicting that 100 schools will buckle over the next three years as a direct result of the policy. Most private schools offer pre-payment schemes for parents, which allow them to pay fees in advance and at a discount. Until now, these have typically been leant on by less well-off families, but Telegraph analysis shows an explosion in them being used as a potential loophole at top public schools in the run-up to the VAT raid. Private schools' latest annual accounts, most of which cover the 12 months up to July 31 2024, suggest hundreds of millions of pounds may have flooded into the schemes unscathed. HMRC could go after 'deposits' The Telegraph understands the Government will still try to reclaim VAT on some of these payments by trying to prove they were used illegitimately. For payments to be counted as genuine fees in advance, they must contractually apply to a specific service at a specific price. Dan Neidle, the founder of Tax Policy Associates, said: 'The level of prepaid fees identified by the Telegraph is extremely high. HMRC cannot apply VAT to fees prepaid before July 29 2024. There isn't a matter of discretion on the part of HMRC, and certainly not the Government. It's the law. 'However, we warned last May that many 'prepayment' schemes were not actually prepayments. They looked more like deposits… 'The question is whether HMRC are going to go after the 'deposit' schemes. If they do, it will be a huge financial headache for schools and parents.' Other tax experts said it was highly unlikely HMRC would be able to go down this route, meaning the wealthiest parents at the most expensive schools could avoid paying VAT on fees. North London Collegiate School recorded £19.4m in new contracts in its fees in advance scheme last year – up from £651,000 the year before. Seven in 10 of those payments – amounting to around £13.5m – were for multiple years' fees, according to the school's latest accounts. Paul Ridout, a solicitor at Moore Barlow law firm, said: 'My view is that it is really unlikely that HMRC would have any success in trying to get schools to account for VAT on money paid into these schemes before 29 July 2024. 'The schemes that have been operated by schools pre-date Labour's policy, so they can't really be described as tax avoidance schemes.' The Telegraph understands that many schools opened prepayment schemes when speculation over Labour's VAT policy mounted in the run-up to the general election, while others such as Eton College have had them in place for decades. Ms Warren de Búrca said it meant 'the more sophisticated schools' were more likely to have the right paperwork to fight off challenges from HMRC, while 'the middle ground private schools probably wouldn't have had the wherewithal of getting all of this set up' in time. A government spokesman said: 'The Office for Budget Responsibility has already factored in the increased use of prepayment schemes in its revenue forecasts. 'Removing tax breaks for private schools is expected to raise £1.8bn a year by 2029-30. 'This funding will help us recruit 6,500 new teachers and improve standards in state schools, which educate 94 per cent of children.'
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Raheem Sterling's latest brutal Chelsea snub proves there is no way back for him under Enzo Maresca - with forward training away from first-team squad
Raheem Sterling tops a list of nine Chelsea players who have been brutally banished from Enzo Maresca 's first-team - and from the club's website. Sterling, 30, and his fellow outcasts do not feature in Maresca's plans next season and as such, none of them have a profile or photo in the Blues' first-team section. The forward spent the previous campaign on loan at Arsenal and Chelsea are actively working to ship him out permanently during the summer window. He moved to Stamford Bridge from Manchester City just three years ago in a deal worth a little under £50million, having won four Premier League titles at the Etihad. However, his stint at Chelsea rapidly unfolded into a nightmare, resulting in him making a last-ditch switch to North London, where he scored one goal in 27 matches. Maresca has made it clear that Sterling is not included in his plans and the clock is now ticking as the Blues look to find buyers for their unwanted players. Mail Sport reported that those up for sale, such as Sterling and left back Ben Chilwell, are expected to continue training separately to Maresca's main group. Chelsea have spent big this summer, splashing the cash on forwards Joao Pedro and Jamie Gittens from Brighton and Borussia Dortmund respectively. That resulted in Sterling slipping further away from the first-team picture - and off the website. Two other players who do not have profiles, Armando Broja and Lesley Ugochukwu, are set to join Premier League newcomers Burnley after a day of breakthroughs. Their exact fees have not yet been confirmed but are likely to be around £20m each. Kiernan Dewsbury-Hall is another on his way out. Indeed, as reported by Mail Sport, Everton began talks over a deal worth an inital £25m plus add-ons. The midfielder set Chelsea back £30m when they swooped to bring him in from Leicester City last season, but he made just two top-flight starts under Maresca. Academy graduate Alfie Gilchrist is also missing a first-team profile on the website, joining Axel Disasi, Carney Chukwuemeka, Renato Veiga and David Datro Fofana in the doldrums, and on the edge of Maresca's bloated senior group. Officially, there are 31 players currently listed as first-teamers. However, several big names who have made the cut could also find themselves leaving before the window slams shut on September 1, such as Christopher Nkunku. Mykhailo Mudryk has been given a profile photo despite being charged by the FA for violating its anti-doping rules after failing a drugs test. He faces a four-year ban. Mudryk has not played for Chelsea since November 28 and cannot train.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Banks see share prices rocket after being saved from paying out billions in car finance scandal
BANKS saw rocketing share prices yesterday after being saved from paying out tens of billions of pounds in the car finance scandal. Lloyds saw a jump after the Supreme Court removed the threat of £44billion industry pay-outs. Shares at the banking group rose eight per cent while Close Brothers soared by as much as 34 per cent at one stage after the Friday ruling. Barclays saw a jump of two per cent. Around 14 million drivers could still be entitled to pay worth up to £18billion but only for large commissions seen as unfair, going back to 2007. The case focuses on commissions paid by the lenders to car dealers with some higher interest rates which were not then properly relayed to buyers. But judges found dealers did not owe a 'fiduciary duty' of loyalty to customers. There is now concern over the fact firms might have to keep records from decades ago. John Phillipou of the Finance & Leasing Association said: 'I don't think it's good for investability that the reason for keeping the data is that you might get sued in 15 years time.' Chancellor Rachel Reeves was said to be ready to intervene if the bill hit £44billion — due to the damage it could do to the UK as a place of business. A compensation scheme will be consulted on in October. Drivers are set to see pay-outs of less than £950 from as early as next year, the Financial Conduct Authority said. eBay payment shake-up, Lloyds Bank sets aside £1.2billion for car finance payouts and little-known benefit Lloyds had put aside more than £1billion for the fall-out but said any change is 'unlikely to be material' for the group. 1
