
‘His daughter has grown up without her father': Families of men acquitted in 2006 Mumbai train blasts case recount years of struggle
The case concerns explosions on seven western suburban coaches in Mumbai, killing 189 commuters and injuring 824 on July 11, 2006. The Bombay High Court Monday overturned a 2015 verdict by a special court under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crimes Act (MCOCA) that awarded death sentences to five men and life terms to seven others.
Dr Tanveer Ansari, who was serving life imprisonment, was arrested by the Maharashtra Anti Terorrist Squad (ATS) in 2006 when his daughter was six months old, said his brother Maqsood. Tanveer, a resident of Agripada, had completed his Unani medicine from Nagpur and was working at a hospital at the time of his arrest, with the ATS claiming that he had surveyed the trains for the blasts.
'He was at a clinic and was picked up by the police without any proof. We were informed two days later, and my father went to meet him and found that he had been brutally assaulted and tortured. My father was deeply affected by it. My mother passed away two years later and Tanveer was permitted to visit only for half an hour. We continued to fight for justice, knowing that he and others booked in the case were innocent,' Maqsood said.
He added that their father also passed away in 2018, awaiting Tanveer's return. 'My father required surgery, but Tanveer was not granted parole. His daughter has grown up without her father,' Maqsood said.
Maqsood stated that over the years, the families of the convicted men have remained each other's hope, staying in touch through a group called Innocent Families.
Besides Tanveer Ansari, the others awarded life imprisonment in 2015 are Mohammed Majid Mohammed Shafi, Shaikh Mohammed Ali Alam Shaikh, Mohammed Sajid Margub Ansari, Muzammil Ataur Rahman Shaikh, Suhail Mehmood Shaikh, and Zameer Ahmed Latifur Rehman Shaikh.
Kamal Ahmed Mohd Vakil Ansari from Bihar, Mohammad Faisal Ataur Rahman Shaikh from Mumbai, Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique from Thane, Naveed Hussain Khan from Secunderabad, and Asif Khan Bashir Khan from Jalgaon in Maharashtra were awarded the death penalty in the case. Kamal Ahmed Mohd Vakil Ansari died in prison in 2021.
One of the accused, Wahid Shaikh, was acquitted by the trial court in 2015 after spending nine years in jail. He continued to advocate for justice on behalf of the others. 'From the first day, we have been saying that the whole case is bogus and that wrong persons were arrested and tortured into giving false confessions. Even after I was acquitted, the fight continued to ensure that the wrongly arrested are released. We have been saying that justice will not be done to the victims till the correct perpetrators are arrested,' Shaikh said.
He also founded an organisation called the Innocence Network, not only for this case, but also to provide legal services and assistance to those who have been wrongly arrested. During a programme organised to mark the 19th anniversary of the blasts, on July 11, Shaikh said families spoke of the impact the wrongful arrests had on their lives, including facing poverty with the sole breadwinner arrested, and loss of loved ones during the pendency of the trial and later the appeal.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
17 hours ago
- India Today
When terror walks free: 7/11 verdict and crisis of India's criminal justice system
Nearly two decades after the deadly 7/11 Mumbai train blasts, which killed over 180 people and injured more than 800, the Bombay High Court's decision to acquit all 12 convicted accused has sent shockwaves across the country. While judicial independence and the rule of law are the pillars of our democracy, the complete collapse of the criminal justice system in a case of this magnitude raises grave questions—not just legal, but also national September 2015, after a nine-year-long investigation led by the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS), a special Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) court convicted 12 of 13 accused in connection with the coordinated bombings. Five were sentenced to death, seven to life imprisonment, and one was acquitted. One of the death-row convicts later died in 2021 in jail due to COVID-19. However, on 21st July 2025, the High Court ruled that the prosecution had 'utterly failed' to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, and acquitted all 12, including the Hurdles Then, Judicial Acquittal NowThe court's observations on the unreliability of eyewitness testimonies, delayed identifications, lack of corroborative material, and doubts over the voluntariness of confessions are rooted in procedural rigour. It is worth noting that the special court found sufficient ground for conviction based on the same evidence. To summarily discard all evidence and confession-based inputs is not only unfair to the victims and the investigation but also potentially dangerous. These were not petty offenders; they were individuals linked to known terrorist organisations. To assume they will peacefully reintegrate into society is nave. On the contrary, there is a very real and chilling possibility that their release could enable them to re-establish ties with militant networks and plot future attacks under the cover of judicial Trust, Empowering TerrorThis verdict impacts more than just victims' families or police credibility; it undermines public trust in the entire criminal justice system. When justice appears denied in major terror cases, people begin to lose faith in due process, leading to calls for media trials or even extrajudicial actions, as seen in the Hyderabad rapists encounter case. This risks pushing India toward a vigilante mindset where emotion overrides judgments also weaken India's global image as a nation tough on terrorism. Actions like the Balakot strikes, Operation Sindoor, and strong declarations such as 'Any act of terror will be considered an act of war' projected strength, but the 7/11 acquittals create an impression, both domestically and abroad, that India remains a 'soft state' on agencies like the ATS and NIA, the outcome is deeply demoralizing. Years of high-risk investigation and sacrifice feel dismissed, potentially deterring future action. At a time of rising global threats, India cannot afford a justice system that weakens morale and signals impunity to its and National Security Must CoexistThis is not an argument for abandoning due process or fair trial, but a call for judicial sensitivity in cases involving national trauma and security threats. A purely procedural lens risks undermining public trust, morale, and the Supreme Court staying the Bombay High Court's acquittal in the 7/11 case on July 24, 2025, it must now re-examine the matter with a security-conscious approach. Mass-casualty terrorism cannot go unpunished, nor can suspects be freed only to rejoin militant acquittals are a wake-up call for systemic reform across investigation, prosecution, and colonial-era criminal justice system, rooted in rigid procedures and outdated evidentiary norms, is ill-equipped for modern terrorism. Terrorists exploit encrypted tools and leave little evidence, yet the system still demands traditional proofs like eyewitnesses years protecting civil liberties remains vital, blind adherence to outdated norms must not compromise justice in high-risk national security Must IntrospectThe recent acquittal compels the judiciary to engage in serious self-reflection. How can two courts, examining the same evidence, arrive at such radically different outcomes—one imposing death sentences, the other granting complete acquittals? This stark divergence raises troubling concerns about the consistency, objectivity and internal coherence of our justice delivery system. Was the evidence so ambiguous that it led to a miscarriage of justice at the trial stage? Or does this contradiction reflect deeper issues, such as subjective judicial interpretation or the sway of elite legal advocacy?The involvement of Dr. S. Muralidhar, former Chief Justice of the Orissa High Court and now Senior Advocate, in representing two terror-accused adds complexity. While fair legal representation is a fundamental right, the participation of a former top judge raises ethical and institutional concerns. His stature could unintentionally influence judicial peers or affect how proceedings are perceived. Even without legal impropriety, such involvement in high-stakes cases calls for regulatory scrutiny toensure judicial processes remain above reproach, both in law and in public perception, especially in matters of national Reforms NeededTo protect India's internal security and ensure justice in terrorism cases, judicial reform and institutional introspection are essential. The criminal justice system comprises of the police, prosecution, and judiciary. While courts often question the competence of investigators and prosecutors, they too must be held accountable, especially in high-stakes terror trials and sensitive criminal investigative agencies like the ATS and state intelligence wings, though rooted in colonial-era policing, have tried to keep pace with changing technology like electronic surveillance, cyber forensics, and multilingual intelligence, the judiciary must now catch up to ensure these technological advances result in effective convictions and timely like the UAPA, MCOCA, and CrPC are evolving to address encrypted data, foreign handlers, and proxy warfare. Yet, judicial delays, inconsistent rulings, and external influences continue to hinder must include specialized training not only for investigators but also for judges and prosecutors in national security law to help balance civil liberties with national interest. Simultaneously strengthening witness protection and forensic protocols is equally crucial. Eyewitnesses mostly succumb to threats even from big criminals, not to mention terrorists having support from our neighbouring country. While the investigative and legal frameworks are adapting, the judiciary must evolve in parallel to preserve coherence, credibility, and integrity in India's fight against isn't about overriding judicial independence, but aligning it with modern security needs. Justice cannot function in isolation, blind to its consequences. The 7/11 acquittals are more than a legal outcome; they test India's institutional the Supreme Court staying the High Court's order, it must now revisit the case not just in legal terms, but in the spirit of national accountability. Can a system that finds no one guilty for Mumbai's deadliest train attack truly claim to have delivered justice?India must ensure its justice system is not only fair and impartial, but alert, modern, and strong enough to face any challenge, including terrorism. The time to introspect is now.(Ashok Kumar is a Retd IPS officer and former DGP of Uttarakhand. He is presently serving as Vice Chancellor of the Sports University of Haryana, Rai, Sonipat, Haryana.)- Ends(Views expressed in this opinion piece are those of the author)Must Watch


Hindustan Times
17 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
'Westarctica' diplomat case: Fake Ghaziabad embassy kingpin tied to godman, arms dealer, ₹300 cr fraud
The investigation against Harsha Vardhan Jain, who has been arrested by the Uttar Pradesh Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) for running a fake embassy in Ghaziabad, has revealed potential links to a ₹300 crore scam. Harshvardhan Jain was found in possession of forged documents, foreign currency, and several other materials, which he probably used to run his hawala racket. During the raid on Jain's fake embassy in Ghaziabad's Kavi Nagar, police recovered pictures of him with controversial 'godman' Chandraswami and Saudi arms dealer Adnan Khashoggi. Chandraswami gained prominence in the 80s and 90s and was considered to be the spiritual adviser of three former prime ministers – PV Narasimha Rao, Chandra Shekhar and VP Singh. However, he was arrested in 1996 in connection with financial irregularities. He was also accused of funding the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. A raid at his ashram also revealed his links to arms dealer Khashoggi. The UP ATS, during the probe, found that Chandraswami had introduced Jain to Khashoggi and Ahsan Ali Sayed in 2000 in London. Sayed allegedly worked with the fake diplomat to open 25 shell companies which were used for brokering deals, UP Police additional director general (ADG), Law and Order, Amitabh Yash, said. Sayed also operated a company called Western Advisory Group, based out of Switzerland, which worked with other companies to help them procure loans in exchange for brokerage. The company allegedly collected brokerage worth nearly ₹300 crore (25 million pounds) and fled from the country, following which Sayed was arrested in London in 2022, NDTV reported. The police are now probing the degree of Jain's involvement in the ₹300 crore scam on Swiss territory. His involvement in arms dealing is also under the scanner given his links to Khashoggi, UP-STF additional superintendent of police Raj Kumar Mishra said. Who is 'Westarctica diplomat' Harshvardhan Jain? Harsha Vardhan Jain is reportedly an MBA graduate from the London College of Applied Science. He had been running a fake embassy for micronations such as 'Westarctica', which are not recognised by any state for seven years. He claimed to be a consul/ambassador for non-existent countries like Saborga, Poulvia, and Lodonia. He is the son of a businessman in Ghaziabad, and his family owned marble mines in Rajasthan. However, after his father's passing away, the family faced financial challenges and Jain met Chandraswami, who helped him move to London and open several companies. After the godman's death, Jain came back to Ghaziabad and began running the fake embassy. During the raid on his premises, the police seized four luxury cars with fake diplomatic number plates, forged documents, foreign currency, and other materials used to run his hawala racket.


India Today
17 hours ago
- India Today
Pak-linked conversion racket busted in Agra, used online games to target Hindu girls
Agra Police on Saturday revealed that they have uncovered a religious conversion racket that has connections extending internationally, with multiple girls reportedly communicating with contacts in people have been arrested in connection with the case and are under interrogation. Investigators revealed that the network used social media, online gaming platforms like LudoStar, encrypted messaging apps and the dark web to operate. advertisementThe investigators also found that money transactions were conducted through crowdfunding and cryptocurrency. Funds were also sent to and received from Gaza. Two Pakistan-based individuals, Tanveer Ahmed and Sahil Adeeb, are identified as the leaders of the network. They reportedly ran several WhatsApp and online groups from Pakistan. These groups shared and discussed religious said that girls who converted from Hinduism to Islam were connected with Pakistan-based individuals who provided religious instruction and guidance. Some Kashmiri girls also played a role by linking others to Pakistan-based groups and promoting of the key accused, Rahman Qureshi, managed financial transactions within the network. He was questioned by Agra police and central found that the network operated under the name 'DAWAH' and aimed to spread Islam in India by 2050. The group targeted individuals facing emotional distress or family to police, DAWAH activities included forming connections with Hindu girls through online games. The group communicated using encrypted platforms such as Signal and the dark web to maintain also approached people in crowded public places like hospitals, courts and police stations, as well as workers in unorganised sectors, offering solutions to personal group referred to converted individuals as 'Revert' and maintained active groups on various social media identified Abdul Rahman from Delhi and Ayesha from Goa as leaders of the group. Abdul Rahman, who converted in 1990, reportedly had links with a jailed ATS suspect. All arrested individuals were found to be connected with Rahman and from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh and Haryana were reportedly targeted by the group and later rescued. According to police, the girls were involved in online discussions that criticised Hinduism and promoted Islamic investigation is ongoing, with central agencies expected to continue the probe into cross-border links, funding sources, and digital operations used by the network.- EndsMust Watch