Columbia protesters are a no-show after plans for new encampments were revealed
NBC News reported Wednesday that a group planned to set up tent encampments on the New York City school's main campus Thursday afternoon.
The encampments would have been likely to inflame tension at the Ivy League school, which for weeks has been at the center of a tug-of-war between the federal government and its students.
They would have been the first tent cities at the university since students took over a building last year and since the Trump administration embraced an aggressive approach to target what it describes as a failure to deal with antisemitism on college campuses.
More than 100 protesters met Tuesday at a community center in Brooklyn's Bushwick neighborhood to coordinate tent encampments at Columbia for this week. Organizers, whose identities remain unknown, went to extreme lengths to conceal their plans.
NBC News obtained a recording of the meeting, which revealed that students were planning an encampment Thursday at the university's main campus in Manhattan's Morningside Heights neighborhood and a second encampment Friday at the nearby Manhattanville campus.
It is unclear whether the encampment planned for Friday will proceed.
Instead of protests Thursday, the scene on campus included students enjoying one of the first warm days in New York City this spring. Dozens of students lay out beach towels, snapped selfies under the sun and tossed around Frisbees.
There were, however, signs of what the day was expected to bring.
Outside the university gates on 116th Street and Broadway, several New York police officers gathered — but they were gone by 2 p.m., an hour after the protests had been expected to begin.
A handful of people who appeared to be security guards in plainclothes circled the planned site of Thursday's protest before it was expected to begin.
Donovan Cole, 27, a Ph.D. student studying philosophy and education, said the student body's attitude toward protests seems to have changed since the encampments a year ago. Gone are the days when students felt free to set up tents, take over academic buildings and march for days, as they did last spring, he said.
"There was obviously an antagonistic relationship between the student body and the institution last year. But at the core of that was a kind of faith ... that they were both engaging in at least some degree of good faith," he said. "The student body has sort of felt that's no longer the case and, rather than producing a sort of stronger outcry of protest, has produced actual legitimate fear in the student body."
Last month, the Trump administration began terminating federal research grants at several of the country's most prestigious universities, demanding significant changes to how schools operate. The administration has argued that the universities failed to protect Jewish students amid war protests.
Columbia was the first university the administration targeted. It conceded to a number of the government's requests, including that it adjust its admissions process, implement "greater institutional neutrality" and hire three dozen new security officers.
The administration similarly challenged Harvard University, which rejected its proposals and sued the federal government.
On Wednesday, President Donald Trump signed a series of executive actions that would enforce stricter oversight of foreign donations to universities and change how they are accredited.
Immigration authorities have apprehended at least three Columbia students in recent weeks. Among them was graduate student Mahmoud Khalil, who helped lead student protests last year.
About 45 minutes after the protest at Columbia was expected to start, pro-Palestinian student advocates affiliated with City College of New York announced on social media that they were staging a protest at the nearby public college.
It is unclear whether protesters who had intended to be part of the planned Columbia encampment were among the roughly 50 people who gathered outside CCNY's gates Thursday afternoon, wearing masks and Palestinian keffiyehs.
However, a student protest group affiliated with Columbia shared the CCNY group's post on social media.
CCNY closed its gates and appeared to start barring students from entering campus while the protest ensued.
On Tuesday, a crowd of protesters at Yale University set up a handful of tents on campus before they disbanded a few hours later.
This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
15 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump To Release Billions In Frozen Funds: What To Know
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. More than $5 billion in frozen education grant funding to the states will be released in the coming weeks, according to the Department of Education. The money, which was used to found a range of initiatives including teacher training and English language programs, was suspended by the Trump administration on June 30 pending a review by the federal Office of Management and Budget. Newsweek contacted the Department of Education for comment on Saturday via email outside of regular office hours. The Context The announcement follows weeks of lobbying from both Democratic and Republican lawmakers concerned about the impact the funding suspension would have on their districts. Lawsuits aiming to get the money unfrozen had been submitted by 24 states and the District of Columbia along with a separate group of teaching unions, school districts and parents. What To Know On Friday, the Department of Education spokesperson Madi Biedermann said the funding had been unfrozen and would begin being paid out next week. The money was part of a larger sum of nearly $7 billion that had been approved by Congress for education spending and was due to be released on July 1, but that the Trump administration announced it had placed a block the previous day. On June 30, the Education Department announced the spending was under review with the Office of Management and Budget saying it would investigate whether it had previously been spent supporting a "radical left-wing agenda." President Donald Trump speaks to the media as he arrives at Glasgow Prestwick Airport on July 25, 2025 in Prestwick, Scotland, UK. President Donald Trump speaks to the media as he arrives at Glasgow Prestwick Airport on July 25, 2025 in Prestwick, Scotland, UK. Andrew Harnik/GETTY The money had been earmarked for a number of services including migrant education, English language programs and adult education with $2.2 billion committed to teachers' professional development. On Friday the administration said there would be "guardrails" in place to ensure the released money wasn't spent "in violation of executive orders or administration policy." Earlier this month the Supreme Court ruled the Department of Education can go ahead with its plan to lay off nearly 1,400 workers. The Trump administration reportedly considered abolishing the Department of Education in its entirety earlier this year. What People Are Saying In a post on X, Nebraska House Republican Don Bacon wrote: "Exciting news to announce! All frozen education funding for the upcoming school year have been released." Referring to the payments on Friday at the National Governors Association's summer meeting Education Secretary Linda McMahon said: "I would think now that we've reviewed them … a year from now, we wouldn't find ourselves in the same situation." Addressing The Washington Post Democratic Senator Patty Murray said: "This administration deserves no credit for just barely averting a crisis they themselves set in motion. "You don't thank a burglar for returning your cash after you've spent a month figuring out if you'd have to sell your house to make up the difference." Speaking to Axios Republican Senator Shelley Moore Capito said: "The programs are ones that enjoy long-standing, bipartisan support like after-school and summer programs that provide learning and enrichment opportunities for school aged children, which also enables their parents to work and contribute to local economies, and programs to support adult learners working to gain employment skills, earn workforce certifications, or transition into postsecondary education." Skye Perryman, president of the Democracy Forward campaign group, said: "While this development shows that legal and public pressure can make a difference, school districts, parents, and educators should not have to take the administration to court to secure funds for their students." What Happens Next Payments from the frozen funding should start going out next week according to the Department of Education.


NBC News
15 minutes ago
- NBC News
Why a 'mini Trump' is breaking through in Japan
TOKYO — As President Donald Trump's tariffs add to a sense of uncertainty in Japan, more voters here are embracing an idea inspired by their longtime ally the United States: 'Japanese first.' The nationalist slogan helped the right-wing populist party Sanseito make big gains in Japan's parliamentary elections on Sunday, as it capitalized on economic malaise and concerns about immigration and overtourism. Party leader Sohei Kamiya, who since 2022 had held Sanseito's only seat in the upper house of Japan's parliament, will now be joined by 14 others in the 248-seat chamber. It's a far cry from the party's origin as a fringe anti-vaccination group on YouTube during the Covid-19 pandemic. Though Japan has long had a complex relationship with foreigners and its cultural identity, experts say Sanseito's rise is another indication of the global shift to the right embodied and partly fueled by Trump, with populist figures gaining ground in Europe, Britain, Latin America and elsewhere. Kamiya 'fancies himself a mini-Trump' and 'is one of those who Trump has put wind in his sails,' said Jeff Kingston, a professor of Asian studies and history at Temple University's Japan campus. Speaking at a rally on Saturday at Tokyo's Shiba Park, Kamiya said his calls for greater restrictions on foreign workers and investment were driven not by xenophobia but by 'the workings of globalization.' He criticized mainstream parties' support for boosting immigration in an effort to address the labor shortage facing Japan's aging and shrinking population. 'Japan is still the fourth-largest economy in the world. We have 120 million people. Why do we have to rely on foreign capital?' Kamiya told an enthusiastic crowd. The election results were disastrous for Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, who is facing calls to resign now that his conservative Liberal Democratic Party — which has ruled almost uninterrupted since the end of World War II — has lost its majority in both houses of parliament. The Japanese leader had also been under pressure to reach a trade deal with the Trump administration, which said Tuesday that the two sides had agreed to a 15% U.S. tariff on Japanese goods. On Wednesday, Ishiba denied reports that he planned to step down by the end of August. The message from his party's string of election losses is that 'people are unhappy,' Kingston said. 'A lot of people feel that the status quo is biased against their interests and it advantages the elderly over the young, and the young feel sort of resentful that they're having to carry the heavy burden of the growing aging population on their back,' he said. Kamiya, 47, an energetic speaker with social media savvy, is also a strong contrast to leaders such as Ishiba and the Constitutional Democrats' Yoshihiko Noda, both 68, who 'look like yesterday's men' and the faces of the establishment, Kingston said. With voters concerned about stagnating wages, surging prices and bleak employment prospects, 'the change-makers got a lot of protest votes from people who feel disenfranchised,' he said. Sanseito's platform resonated with voters such as Yuta Kato. 'The number of [foreign immigrants] who don't obey rules is increasing. People don't voice it, but I think they feel that,' the 38-year-old hairdresser told Reuters in Tokyo. 'Also, the burden on citizens including taxes is getting bigger and bigger, so life is getting more difficult.' The biggest reason Sanseito did well in the election, he said, 'is that they are speaking on behalf of us.' Kamiya's party was not the only upstart to benefit from voter discontent, with the center-right Democratic Party for the People increasing its number of seats in the upper house from five to 16. Sanseito, whose name means 'Participate in Politics,' originated in 2020 amid the Covid-19 pandemic, attracting conservatives with YouTube videos promoting conspiracy theories about vaccines and pushing back against mask mandates. Its YouTube channel now has almost 480,000 subscribers. The party has also warned about a 'silent invasion' of foreigners in Japan, where the number of foreign residents rose more than 10% last year to a record of almost 3.8 million, according to the Immigration Services Agency. It remains far lower as a proportion of the population than in the U.S. or Europe, however. Critics say such rhetoric has fueled hate speech and growing hostility toward foreigners in Japan, citing a survey last month by Japanese broadcaster NHK and others in which almost two-thirds of respondents agreed that foreigners received 'preferential treatment.' At the Sanseito rally on Saturday, protesters held up signs that said 'No Hate' and 'Racists Go Home.' Kamiya denies that his party is hostile to foreigners in Japan. 'We have no intention of discriminating against foreigners, nor do we have any intention of inciting division,' he said Monday. 'We're just aiming to firmly rebuild the lives of Japanese people who are currently in trouble.' Despite its electoral advances, Sanseito doesn't have enough members in the upper house to make much impact on its own and has only three seats in the more powerful lower house. The challenge, Kingston said, is whether Kamiya can 'take this anger, the malaise, and bring his show nationwide.'
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Here's what to expect on Boone County's Aug. 5 election ballots
Early no-excuse in-person absentee voting is now underway for the Aug. 5 election. The early voting period kicked off July 22. Any registered voter can visit from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Saturday at the Boone County Government Center, 801 E. Walnut St. in Columbia, to cast a ballot. The clerk's office will hold a weekend no-excuse voting off site 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Aug. 2 at the Parkade Elementary gymnasium, 111 Parkade Blvd. in Columbia, and 11 a.m. to 3 p.m. Aug. 3 at Columbia/Boone County Public Health and Human Services, 1005 W. Worley in Columbia. Excused in-person absentee voting also is possible, which started July 24 and runs through Aug. 4. This includes those who are out of town on Election Day, work in healthcare or as a first responder or as a poll worker, or a person has an illness, injury or disability. The deadline to request a mail-in absentee ballot was July 3 and the deadline to return it was July 23. There are three questions voters may see on ballots in Boone County, depending on where a person lives. Residents who want to check their voter registration, polling location or to see a sample ballot can visit the Boone County Clerk website to search for their respective voter record. The Boone County Clerk's Office already had mailed physical sample ballots to residents. All of Boone County will be asked if they want to exempt senior citizens from increases in the property tax liability to all taxing authorities. The county already approved an exemption solely for Boone County property tax in April 2024, but other taxing entities include school districts, municipalities like Columbia, Boone County Common Road District, Daniel Boone Regional Library and the state. Columbia Ward 2 residents will have have a choice to make for representation on the Columbia City Council. They will have to decide between Pickleman's Gourmet Cafe executive Ken Rice and librarian and community organizer Vera Elwood. Whoever is selected will serve the remaining two-year term on the council after the resignation of Lisa Meyer due to health reasons. More: Who's funding the Columbia Ward 2 special election candidates? A proposition for residents within the Harrisburg R-8 School district could see an increase in its property tax levy, from $4.0783 to $4.5783 per $100 assessed valuation. If approved, this is a full elimination of the Proposition C Sales Tax Rollback in its operating levy. A letter to families by Harrisburg Superintendent Steve Combs notes this will mean an average 7% increase in the property tax bill. He also provided an example. For a person in a house bought at $200,000, it's assessed value is $38,000. Multiplying by the proposed 50-cent increase results in $190,000. Because the tax levy increase is per $100, that is a $190 increase, divided across twelve months is an additional $15.83 per month. "Missouri ranks 47th in the nation in funding for its public schools. Our local tax revenue is a significant portion of our income and the only option we have for increasing our revenue. We are asking the patrons of the Harrisburg School district to increase the operating tax levy, which will enable our district to continue to provide resources to our students, the leaders of tomorrow," Combs wrote in the letter. This article originally appeared on Columbia Daily Tribune: Boone County August 5 election: What's on the ballot Solve the daily Crossword