As one species disappears from Ontario, Doug Ford weakens protections for the rest
For the first and hopefully last time, in 2024, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) reclassified an endangered terrestrial species as extirpated — the Blanchard's Cricket Frog. The federal government is now consulting on making this status official under the Species at Risk Act.
In a twist of fate, the government of Ontario has just announced parallel plans to scrap the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and create 'special economic zones,' where developers and resource companies are exempt from provincial regulations.
If Premier Ford proceeds with these measures, endangered species in Ontario are going to be more reliant than ever on federal protection.
This sets the stage for some tough discussions between the province and Prime Minister Mark Carney's newly-elected government, which has made important commitments to halting biodiversity loss. Not incidentally, Ontarians are among the most enthusiastic for federal action to preserve nature.
That might be because the underlying causes of the colourful cricket frog's decline remain unaddressed. According to COSEWIC, wetland loss is 'the major factor' in its disappearance, while the runoff of pesticides and fertilizers was a 'major contributing' factor. The government of Ontario even agrees.
This situation has been exacerbated by a series of measures in recent years by the Ontario government to dismantle protections for wetlands — protections which not only conserved habitat for wildlife, but reduced the risk of natural disasters, like floods, for people.
If Ontario Premier Doug Ford scraps the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and creates 'special economic zones,'endangered species like the Blanchard's Cricket Frog will be more reliant on federal protection for their survival, writes Shane Moffatt
Ontario is now increasingly an outlier. After Canada successfully hosted and landed a historic 'Deal for Nature' (The Kunming-Montreal Agreement) in late 2022, hopes were high for a new wave of government actions to halt biodiversity loss and respect Indigenous knowledge, while ensuring local benefits from conservation.
Some provinces stepped up to the plate by committing to new protections, investing in conservation and partnering with Indigenous Peoples. In contrast, Ontario has become a laggard, dragging its heels on new protected areas and enacting ' pay-to-slay ' provisions to benefit heavy industry.
Bulldozing endangered species protections in this manner is out of sync with Canadian values, according to recent EKOS polling. Healthy forests and waters sustain all Ontarians, not just endangered species. We all rely on a healthy environment for the air we breathe and so much more.
Premier Ford should be strengthening the existing legislation and learn from what is working well for other provinces when it comes to halting biodiversity loss. There is a lot of innovation and collaboration happening across the country. Protecting and restoring the natural world so that a diversity of life can thrive around us is a multigenerational national project with deep resonance for most Ontarians.
The key is also deceptively simple, according to an important new study of Canadian recovery strategies for species at risk — identify the cause of a species' decline and stop it. That means ending industrial exemptions to harm critical habitats, whether in 'special economic zones' or otherwise. No matter what Premier Ford plans to replace the ESA with, if anything, the government will be judged by how effectively it prevents actions that imperil vulnerable species.
That doesn't mean stopping all development. Far from it. It just means not building warehouses on the wetlands which we depend on just as much as frogs, turtles and beavers do. It means building strong local economies that are in harmony with nature, not in conflict.
We might be able to clone a dire wolf, but we can't clone the healthy habitats we rely on for our own survival. The sooner we start protecting them, the less work we're leaving for future generations to restore them.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Global News
17 minutes ago
- Global News
Carney says Trump's multiple objectives demand ‘nimble' trade talk strategy
Prime Minister Mark Carney says as he continues to negotiate a new security and trade deal with the U.S., he's staying 'nimble,' as he says Canada's southern neighbour has 'multiple' objectives for its talks with various countries, including what could benefit its revenue and budget. 'When the person you're dealing with, the country you're dealing with has multiple objectives, jumps around a bit and you've got to be nimble,' Carney told Global News' Joel Senick in a one-on-one interview at the Calgary Stampede. Carney said from his perspective, U.S. President Donald Trump is juggling several factors, ranging from China to trade to the country's overall finances. 'Some of it's strategic competition with China. Sometimes it's just whether or not they can have a trade balance,' he said. 'Some of it's about revenue, for their budget, and of course it's jobs for workers, (and) also issues around the border.' Story continues below advertisement The prime minister's comments come only a few days after trade talks restarted between the two countries following Trump's brief termination over Canada's digital services tax, which the federal government announced last Sunday it had been rescinded. On Monday, Carney told reporters rescinding the tax was part of a 'bigger negotiation,' though he did not elaborate or say if Canada had received anything in exchange. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the tax would have been a 'deal breaker' for any trade deal and that he appreciated the removal by Canada. 5:12 How close is Mark Carney to striking a deal on tariffs with U.S. President Donald Trump? Questioned on the removal of the tax on Saturday, Carney said it also happened at 'basically the same time' as a series of other taxes being taken off the table by other countries as part of a broader G7 plan. Story continues below advertisement He did not specify what taxes, but following the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Alta., Canada's Department of Finance announced the G7 had agreed the U.S. would be exempt from applying a 15 per cent minimum corporate tax rate. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy The move appeared to be a counter to U.S. plans to apply a so-called 'revenge' tax on other countries that would impose taxes on companies with foreign owners, as well as investors from countries judged as charging 'unfair foreign taxes' on U.S. companies. Pressed further on how Carney is approaching negotiations with Trump, the prime minister said the 'best thing in a negotiation' is that people know what the other party is trying to achieve. 'We're looking out for the jobs of Canadians not just today, but in the longer term and making it clear to the president, but also Americans that there's tremendous opportunity for us working together,' Carney said. The two countries set a goal at the end of the G7 to reach a deal within 30 days, specifically July 21, a date that remained in place even after the brief disruption earlier this week. 2:13 Canada making progress on lifting interprovincial trade barriers: report But as negotiations continue, it also provides a 'tremendous opportunity' for Canadians to build together — a sentiment Carney has repeated multiple times, including during the federal election campaign. Story continues below advertisement 'Whether it's building conventional energy, pipelines to tidewater, whether it's building SMR (small modular) reactors, building artificial intelligence, life sciences, all these things, we can give ourselves far more than any trading relationship, even a trading relationship with the United States,' he said. Building has been a key element for the federal government, with its major projects bill becoming law last week. Bill C-5, which gives Ottawa the power to fast-track projects intended to boost the national economy by sidestepping environmental protections and other legislation, also includes efforts to reduce federal barriers to internal trade. The goal under the bill is to approve such projects within two years. Trump and Carney's goal of reaching a deal by July 21 is swiftly approaching, and while he spoke about the objectives Trump has with his trade talks, the prime minister said they're looking at two things to help Canadian workers and the economy in those discussions. 'The first is, of course, access to the U.S. market, access we have as closely as possible as we do have today under current trading arrangements. It won't be exactly the same but as close as possible,' he said. 'But also stability; stability and greater certainty. That's worth a lot, because that anchor will help us decide which projects we're going to do as a country and how we're going to move forward.' Story continues below advertisement —with files from Global News' Joel Senick
Edmonton Journal
34 minutes ago
- Edmonton Journal
Alberta and Carney: conflict and collision — Can Alberta survive Carney's net-zero agenda?
It should be evident to Albertans that the province is on a collision course with the federal Liberal government, driven by a fundamental disagreement: will Alberta and Western Canada be allowed to fully develop its hydrocarbon endowment, or will that economic value be lost in pursuit of the climate policy known as 'net zero'? Article content This collision is inevitable and imminent. Net zero is difficult to reconcile with growing, or even sustaining, existing hydrocarbon production in Canada. Article content Article content Article content In April, Prime Minister Mark Carney won a near majority government based on his perceived superior credibility in confronting the tariff threats from the Trump administration. The win was narrow in the popular vote nationally but not in Alberta, where Carney's party gained only 28 per cent of the vote. The outcome was defined by tariffs and not a direct endorsement of net zero imperative for Canada. Article content Article content It's unreasonable for any Canadian prime minister to speak about becoming an 'energy superpower' while placing self-destructive limits on the development of Canada's hydrocarbon endowment. Article content Article content Meanwhile, hydrocarbon demand globally is not declining, nor is it expected to in the foreseeable future. Any global market share for hydrocarbons that Canada relinquishes in its pursuit of net zero will be captured by other nations, creating no real net decrease in global emissions. Article content Carney wasn't elected to explicitly deconstruct the hydrocarbon industry — and with it, much of Alberta's economy. Yet, that would be the consequence if his government materially advances its net zero agenda. Article content If this is not Carney's intention, he should clarify his position to be consistent with the following: Article content • No federal emission caps will apply to hydrocarbon production through at least 2050. Article content • The Impact Assessment Act (Bill C-69), will be repealed and replaced with an expedited review process that ensures irrevocable political sanction for major projects within one year of regulatory application, free of climate tests and explicit statutory guidance on stakeholder consultation and accommodation.
Toronto Sun
4 hours ago
- Toronto Sun
GOLDSTEIN: Canada's retaliatory tariffs having little impact on U.S.
Prime Minister Mark Carney greets U.S. President Donald Trump during an arrival ceremony at the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alta., on June 16, 2025. Photo by STEFAN ROUSSEAU/POOL / AFP via Getty Images The practical problem Prime Minister Mark Carney faces in negotiating a new trade and security deal with President Donald Trump is that Canada is firing blanks with its retaliatory tariffs against the U.S. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account The issue, as Carney noted in explaining why 'dollar-for-dollar' tariffs against the U.S. won't work — after he initially supported them while running for the Liberal leadership — is that the U.S. economy is 10 times the size of Canada's. That means that Canadian counter tariffs on $95.4 billion worth of U.S. goods to date, along with the 'buy Canadian' campaign urged by the federal government, are having little real-world impact on the U.S. economy. Writing in The Hub last month, University of Calgary economics professor Trevor Tombe, said that in April — the latest data available — the total economic decline in the U.S. due to Canada's retaliatory measures, 'represents about $3.8 billion in missed Canadian purchases from U.S. firms. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'While that sounds substantial, the scale of the U.S. economy puts it into perspective: with a nominal GDP of nearly $30 trillion in U.S. dollars — or about $41 trillion in Canadian dollars — this loss amounts to just 0.1% of monthly economic activity' meaning, 'these early signs suggest the impact on the U.S. economy is minimal.' Regarding the voluntary consumer boycotts of American-made products, and buying Canadian ones instead, Tombe wrote: 'While individual choices may have shifted behaviour at the margins, the data reveal no consistent or large-scale changes in imports outside of tariffed goods. 'More data in the months ahead may tell us more. But for now, the conclusion is clear: while retaliatory tariffs had measurable effects on Canadian trade flows, and consumer boycotts — however well-intentioned — reflected genuine public anger with the U.S., neither has yet produced any meaningful economic impact south of the border', which was the Carney government's stated aim. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Similarly, Carleton University economics professor Vivek Dehejia told iPolitics in February that politicians urging Canadians to buy Canadian-made products over U.S. ones was 'tokenism'. 'It's a nice idea and it's nice there's been an uptick in patriotism and nationalism, but I don't think it's realistic. 'We simply can't replace everything that we import from the U.S. because we're a much smaller economy. 'I don't think it's going to cause much damage to the U.S. economy … it's not going to fix our problem.' That's why Carney, criticized by former Liberal cabinet minister Lloyd Axworthy for taking a 'bootlicking' approach to Trump's demands — easy for him to say since he's not on the hot seat — has already made numerous concessions to the U.S. president in order to avoid an all-out economic war which Canada would lose. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The latest was Carney scrapping Canada's digital services tax last Sunday, after Trump threatened to end trade and security negotiations with Canada over the DST last Friday. Carney has also delayed retaliation against Trump doubling tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to 50% last month, pending the outcome of the now-resumed negotiations for a trade and security deal between Canada and the U.S. by July 21. In other measures to appease Trump: Carney introduced the 'Strong Borders Act' to 'keep our borders secure, combat transnational organized crime, stop the flow of illegal fentanyl, and crack down on money laundering' in deference to Trump's demands about border security. He announced Canada would meet its long-neglected NATO target of spending 2% of annual GDP on defence by March 31, 2026, another Trump demand, and said Canada would also comply with Trump's demand to increase spending on defence to 5% of GDP by 2035. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. He suspended counter-tariffs on some U.S. goods for six months on the grounds Canadian industries needed time to adjust. None of this is surprising given that Canada is the smaller economic partner in negotiations with the U.S. It appears to have succeeded — at least temporarily — in avoiding the full range of tariffs that Trump could launch against Canada, which Carney hopes to avoid by reaching a deal with him by July 21. Read More This prior to the launch of negotiations on the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade scheduled for next year. To be fair, Trump launched this trade war against Canada and many other countries, not the reverse, and he thinks nothing of violating existing trade agreements. That said, Carney's actions on this issue since becoming prime minister are fundamentally different from the 'elbows up' rhetoric he campaigned on during the federal election. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Crime Toronto Blue Jays Canada Other Sports Editorials
