Christian Horner's Red Bull allies sacked at same time as team boss in major clearout at F1 team
Several senior staff at the six-time constructors' champions were told to clear their desks as Horner was suddenly dumped after a 20-year stint at the helm of the Formula 1 giants.
7
7
7
7
The shock move was part of a clear-out by the team's Austrian parent company, with Horner giving an emotional leaving speech to hundreds of his staff at their Milton Keynes HQ earlier today.
It is understood that several senior figures who were close to Red Bull's only ever boss were also given their marching orders.
Many had been appointed to their jobs by the 51-year-old team chief, and a source called the relationships a 'double-edged sword'.
Horner was replaced immediately by Frenchman Laurent Mekies, 48, who has run Red Bull's sister team Racing Bulls since the start of 2024.
They added: "A number of staff had been brought in by Christian, and when he was told to go, they were too.
"Some of them had a very close relationship with Christian, which has proved to be a double-edged sword.
"Laurent has his own people to bring in and his own vision for the team.
"He is far more anonymous."
Earlier today, Horner gave a tearful speech and received a minutes-long standing ovation from staff.
The firebrand team principal admitted his removal was a shock, but told engineers and designers he was proud of their success.
Christian Horner 'in tears' during farewell speech to Red Bull employees as sacked boss admits decision came as 'shock'
He told them: "I was informed by Red Bull that operationally, I would no longer be involved with the business or the team moving forward.
"It came as a shock to myself.
"I've had a chance to reflect over the last 12 hours and wanted to stand in front of all of you to break this news and to express my gratitude to each and every single member of the team that has given so much during the last 20-and-a-half years.
"Watching and being part of this team has been the biggest privilege of my life."
Horner will remain employed by the company, where he is thought to make £9million-a-year, but is effectively on indefinite gardening leave.
The official departure of Red Bull's only ever team principal was announced shortly after he finished saying his goodbyes and left.
Horner was the longest-reigning F1 boss, having taken charge of the Austrian team when it was bought from Jaguar in 2005.
In May, he batted away rumours he would join Ferrari, declaring: "It's always flattering to be associated with other teams, but my commitment is with Red Bull."
HORNER SCANDAL TIMELINE
By Isabelle Barker, Sports Reporter
5 February, 2024 – the bombshell allegations from a female colleague about "inappropriate, controlling behaviour' drop
Red Bull chief exec Oliver Mitzlaff takes seriously and Horner strongly denies accusations.
9 February, 2024 Horner meets lawyer
A lawyer in charge of the investigation begins digging into the case on behalf of Red Bull GmbH in a nine-hour meeting at a secret location.
15 February, 2024 – Horner's first public appearance since allegations
Horner says the team have been 'tremendously supportive'. Verstappen says his relationship with Horner remains 'very good'.
28 February, 2024 – Horner cleared of all charges
A statement from Red Bull GmbH read: 'The independent investigation into the allegations made against Mr Horner is complete, and Red Bull can confirm that the grievance has been dismissed The complainant has a right of appeal.'
29 February, 2024 - Whatsapps leaked
Just 24 hours after he was cleared, WhatsApp texts and pictures were leaked from an anonymous source – to FIA president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, F1 chief executive Stefano Domenicali, the sport's nine other team principals and members of the media.
2 March, 2024 - Horner and Halliwell hand in hand
The former Spice Girls singer puts on a united front with her husband as Verstappen soared to victory in the opener in Bahrain.
Horner declared he is 'absolutely confident' he will stay on as Red Bull boss for the remainder of the season, while Red Bull's majority shareholder, Thai billionaire Chalerm Yoovidhya, also joined the duo on the team's terrace in a public show of support for Horner.
3 March, 2024 - Jos Verstappen takes aim
Verstappen's father, Jos, claimed the team is 'in danger of being torn apart' if Christian Horner remains in his role.
Verstappen Snr, also said the team would 'explode' if Horner remained in his position, and denied being the source of the leak.
8 August, 2024 - Horner cleared for second time as appeal dismissed
During the F1 summer break, the appeal from a female colleague alleging 'inappropriate behaviour' from Horner is dismissed, clearing him for a second time.
The complainant was suspended on full pay before launching an appeal but, on 8 August, her appeal was thrown out following another investigation by a different independent KC – with Red Bull adding that their 'internal process has concluded.'
9 July, 2025 - Horner sacked.
Horner was accused of sending suggestive WhatsApp messages that were later leaked.
The Brit vehemently denied the bombshell claims made by a female colleague about his behaviour.
In February 2024, Horner was cleared of any wrongdoing after multiple probes.
He had spent a tumultuous three weeks fighting for his career after a female colleague alleged controlling and coercive behaviour by the boss.
The probe later investigated him allegedly sending improper messages to a woman.
A KC cleared Horner for a second time in August after the unnamed accuser launched an appeal following the internal probe.
Spice Girl Geri Halliwell stood by Horner despite reportedly being left "in floods of tears" when the scandal broke and was supported by pals, including her fellow Spice Girls.
A source said at the time: "This has been weeks of hell for Christian and his family.
"As he has said all along, these claims are 'nuts'."
7
7
7
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Britain's worst drink driver had enough alcohol in his system to have put him in a COMA
Britain's worst drink driver in the past decade was stopped with a blood-alcohol reading high enough to have put him in a coma and even kill him, new figures reveal. Around 6,800 people die or are injured in drink driving related collisions on Britain's roads each year and the statistics are on the rise, with fatalities recording in 2022 the highest they've been in almost 15 years. Latest figures show drink-driving collisions now represent more than one in six (17 per cent) of all deaths on the road annually, with the Government facing pressure to release its long-awaited 'road safety strategy'. And new DVLA data exclusively shared with This is Money has exposed just how far over the legal drink-drive limit some motorists have been in the past 10 years. The highest reading for someone convicted of drink driving between 2015 and 2024 was recorded last July, when a 39-year-old male registered a reading of 513mg/dL (milligrams per decilitre). That is six-and-a-half times over the legal limit and the equivalent of a 13-stone male consuming 22 pints of beer. Scroll down to see the list of 20 highest drink-drive readings police measured in the last decade. Having this level of alcohol in the blood is considered 'potentially fatal' by medical experts. The team at Kansas State University concluded that readings higher than 400mg/dL can 'depress respiration to the point where it's not sufficient to sustain life', while those above 450mg/dL are 'often associated with coma and death'. Graham Conway, from leading UK vehicle leasing firm Select Car Leasing, who obtained the figures via the Freedom of Information Act, said: 'These numbers are simply incredible - in the worst way possible. 'Drinking any amount of alcohol before driving is strongly advised against, and for good reason. But to drink so much that your level is considered life-threatening, before then getting behind the wheel, is simply beyond comprehension.' Select Car Leasing asked the DVLA for the top 20 highest blood alcohol readings obtained for convicted drivers over the past 10 years. The second highest was in June 2024 - a 62-year-old male who had a level of 471mg/dL - while third was a 37-year-old male who recorded an alcohol-blood reading of 460mg/dL in August 2022. The highest level taken from a female motorist came in October 2017 when a 51-year-old lady was measured having 400mg/dL of alcohol in her system. Of the top 10 worst drink drivers of all, six were women. Nine of the 20 worst offenders were in their 30s at the time of the incident, six were in their 40s, two in their 50s, and three in their 60s. The lowest age was 31 while the two oldest offenders were both 66. TOP 20 BLOOD-ALCOHOL READINGS REGISTERED BY DRIVERS (2015-2024) Date Gender Age Blood-alcohol (mg/dL) July 2024 Male 39 513 June 2023 Male 62 471 August 2022 Male 37 460 September 2019 Male 42 440 December 2024 Male 66 425 February 2024 Male 41 424 February 2015 Male 66 413 December 2016 Male 38 400 October 2017 Female 51 400 March 2018 Male 33 399 August 2020 Female 31 398 June 2016 Male 33 396 May 2018 Male 48 395 February 2024 Female 48 394 March 2022 Female 43 390 June 2015 Female 57 389 April 2015 Male 36 385 May 2017 Female 40 384 November 2017 Male 38 378 November 2015 Male 34 376 Source: Select Car Leasing FOI request to DVLA for 20 highest blood alcohol readings, recorded on GB driving licence holder records, in relation to a drink driving offence between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2024 Mr Conway said: 'Rather worryingly, the stats show that four of the top five highest readings were recorded within the past three years. 'This indicates the well-established message that drink-driving is both dangerous and socially unacceptable has simply not landed with some people. 'We're not talking about the odd drink either - this is consuming well into double figures to reach the levels recorded.' Around 6,800 people die or are injured in drink driving related collisions on Britain's roads each year and the statistics are on the rise, with fatalities recording in 2022 the highest they've been in almost 15 years The legal alcohol limit in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is 80 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood (mg/dL) or 35 micrograms of alcohol per 100 millilitres of breath. The law in Scotland is different, with 50 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood or 22 micrograms of alcohol in 100 millilitres of breath the limit. Being caught over the limit could land you with an unlimited fine, an automatic driving ban of at least a year and up to six months in prison. If you cause death while driving under the influence, the maximum penalty is now life imprisonment. Research conducted by road safety charity Brake! found that the average driver is six times more likely to be involved in a fatal crash if they have 50-80 mg alcohol per 100ml blood, compared to 0ml. They're three times more likely to die on the roads if they have 20-50mg alcohol per 100ml of blood, compared to zero. Almost half (46 per cent) are also found to be more likely at fault in road collisions if having 10mg alcohol per 100ml, compared to nothing at all.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
The Wolseley's global takeover is thriving. Investors and Keir Starmer should take note
There was consternation among London restaurant -goers when their favourite venue, owned by their favourite restaurateur, was acquired three years ago by a Thai-based group. It was feared The Wolseley, adored by many, including Lucian Freud (whose regular corner table was covered with a black cloth and a single candle following his death) and AA Gill, would be no more. It would not be the same without Jeremy King, its co-founder, greeting regulars and attending to every last detail. But fears The Wolseley would lose its cachet have proved groundless. The restaurant and its siblings, including The Delaunay, Colbert and Brasserie Zedel, plus a new Wolseley in the City, are thriving. The Wolseley remains as it was, known far beyond London for its 'Parisian cafe meets Viennese dining room' menu, spectacular but intimate room, and warm ambience. The numbers speak for themselves. Last year, the original Wolseley sold 21,803 schnitzels, 7,542 pancakes, 45,750 afternoon teas and 29,837 oysters. As a group, the restaurants managed 18,358 champagne bottles and 91,306 glasses, 99,013 schnitzels, 15,755 pancakes and 49,104 afternoon teas. Wolseley parent company, Minor International, turned in thumping annual results, including record net profits. Now Minor is taking the business international, and going further still, by opening The Wolseley Hotels. Proof that no single person is bigger than the brand, and evidence that what they created is capable of developing and expanding into a money-making machine Minor is so-called because it was founded by entrepreneur Bill Heinecke when he was underage. American-born Heinecke started in business in Bangkok at the age of just 14, in 1963, while he was still in high school. He persuaded the editor of the Bangkok World newspaper to let him write a column on go-karting, securing advertising space alongside it. This initiative was so successful that he took over the paper's advertising manager position. When Heinecke left school at 17, he decided he wanted to set up on his own. He borrowed $1,200 from a backstreet moneylender to register his first two companies: Inter-Asian Enterprise, which provided office cleaning services, and Inter-Asian Publicity, an advertising company. The holding company was Minor Holdings – for the first year, his mother had to sign the paychecks on his behalf. Over nearly six decades, he grew Minor into a major powerhouse, encompassing hospitality (Minor Hotels), food (Minor Food) and lifestyle retail. Pivotal was the 2018 acquisition of Spain's NH Hotel Group, tripling Minor's hotel portfolio and propelling it to leading world hospitality player. Today, Minor owns 560 properties with 85,000 rooms across 57 countries. They will be joined by four new brands – The Wolseley Hotels, Colbert Collection, Minor Reserve Collection and iStay Hotels – to help Minor achieve its aim of reaching 850 hotels and 4,000 restaurants by the end of 2027. It's all part of Heinecke's bold vision. When asked which was his best decade, he is quick to answer: 'My best decade has yet to come.' Ian Di Tullio, chief commercial officer of Minor Hotels, said the Wolseley Hotels will 'take multiple cues' from the restaurant in Piccadilly. 'Like the restaurant, the hotel will be a place where formality melts away, replaced by friendly familiarity and glamour without pretension. Rituality and attentiveness are at the heart of the guest experience, where every guest will be treated to our effortless balance of class and etiquette, from their welcome by The Wolseley Hotel's door person to the stay rituals delivered by a team passionate about the craft of hospitality.' Minor is looking to open Wolseley Hotels in New York, Paris, Singapore, Hong Kong and Dubai and other key centres. London is also earmarked as 'a fantastic location and a natural fit'. Di Tullio said: 'We will be very particular and deliberate about where we open The Wolseley Hotels properties, growing its footprint slowly with partners who share our vision for the brand experience. This will be a carefully curated rollout, with each new location thoughtfully chosen to be a perfect match for the brand's character and values.' He added: 'Brands are a brilliant way to endorse existing customers and find new ones.' He makes the point, though, that it does not apply to all. 'The Wolseley is an iconic brand with soul and character, and an individual creativity – there are very few of them, which is why we want to start a new hotel portfolio with our existing brands.' Nevertheless, he has a product – Britain has a product – that is internationally transferable, provided standards are maintained. 'There is pure theatre, pleasurable impact for anyone entering The Wolseley and we want to celebrate and to share that special sense of luxury with a new global audience. We will do that respectfully and carefully and with passion.' So, The Wolseley brand sustains and is expanding. Rather than the world taking over a uniquely British label, that British label is taking over the world. It shows what Britain is capable of, with an injection of self-belief and commercial strength and savvy. What began as a car showroom was, through imagination and flair, transformed into an exceptional restaurant, then widened. Now it's to be raised to another level, across the globe, in hotels. Credit to Minor and Heinecke for having the idea and for going where others have not. You realise that a Paris or Brussels restaurant could not make the leap, they just don't have that same internationally-admired British style. We could make so much more out of this as a country, as an economy. It does make you wonder what other loved and homegrown brands could achieve with the application of similar faith and a fair wind. Investors, brand proprietors and Keir Starmer and his teams devoted to exporting British soft power, please note.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
I'm too ill to travel – why won't the hotel refund me?
Q Is it legal or reasonable for a hotel not to offer any sort of refund? I was booked to stay at a well-known hotel chain this coming Saturday night. Unfortunately, I am ill and can't go. The hotel has refused to refund me. It seems quite harsh that it's a flat 'no' like this! A The hotel responded to your polite request for a refund by saying: 'Unfortunately due to the cancellation policy, the amount due is not refundable even if the booking is cancelled or modified.' I checked the conditions for the 'advance saver' you booked; in return for a 15 per cent discount on the regular, flexible rate (refundable until midnight the night before), it makes quite clear you are not getting your money back. Sorry. Yet there is rather more to your case than that. I have tried to make a booking for Saturday night and found the place is full up. The website says: 'Unavailable for the selected dates'. There are two possibilities that I can see: one is that the hotel will have an unoccupied room on Saturday night because you won't be showing up; that would be a shame. The other is that the hotel has deliberately overbooked. Hotels often predict a certain number of no-shows of people who have booked and paid in advance, perhaps selling 102 rooms in a 100-room hotel. (I recently asked at the front desk of a four-star hotel in Brussels if they had any rooms available that night, and was told 'minus two' – ie it was overbooked.) Whichever explanation is correct, I think it would be fairer and commercially smart on a busy night to allow you to change dates for a fee or to allow you to cancel completely for, say, a 50 per cent refund. Then the hotel could resell your room with confidence, and probably price it at significantly more than the £95 you paid due to strong demand. For now, though, I fear all you can do is spend your hard-earned money elsewhere in future. Q What countries have you not been to? Steve Holland A Far too many to mention. While I relish visiting new nations, I am in no sense a 'completist' wanting to visit every country in the world. I am sure the scattering of island nations across the Pacific have their charms, but I won't be putting together a complicated, expensive and time-consuming itinerary to visit them. (I have, though, been to Easter Island, part of Chile, which I wholeheartedly recommend.) My most pressing wish is to explore more of Africa. In the west, I have heard great things about Sierra Leone and Ghana. Congo looks fascinating. And, in the southeast, Malawi and Mozambique are tempting. In the Indian Ocean, Reunion (technically part of France) and Madagascar appeal. In the Middle East, I will be visiting Lebanon for the first time this October, but Syria, Iraq and Iran I will save for later. The main Asian nations I long to visit are Pakistan, Tajikistan and Turkmenistan. I have tried to visit the last of those. The authorities refused to issue a visa. I hope officials in Ashgabat may be more lenient next time. North Korea? I would much prefer to visit when this strange land is freed from tyranny. In South America, my 'missing' nations are the sole Dutch and French representatives on the continent, Suriname and French Guiana. I will reach them one day. Mostly, though, I am desperate to explore more of the countries I have already visited. I am looking forward to returning to Ukraine – as well as Belarus and Russia – when the war ends; tourism is a force for healing after conflict. Large swathes of Turkey look enticing, as do Georgia and Armenia. At the other end of Asia, I have barely done Indonesia justice, and will do so soon. Finally, the more I see of the great European nations – France, Spain, Italy, Germany... – the more I want to return. Q I am going to Belgium in early September. I don't think we have time for Bruges, Ghent and Antwerp. Which two of those would you choose? John Gregory A Without question, Antwerp and Ghent. Bruges is a superbly preserved medieval city with a magnificent, Unesco -listed historic centre. But in summer it is Belgium's strongest contender for overtourism, especially when a big cruise ship docks at nearby Zeebrugge. According to maritime sources, vessels will call at the port on most days in the first half of September. Bruges and Ghent are sometimes portrayed as similar – but in my view, the latter has more to offer. Rivers and canals slice Ghent into a collection of enticing quarters. You can survey them from the top of the 14th-century belfry – accessible by 366 steps. The first cultural highlight is a superb Modern art museum, Smak. Next, a spectacular work of art, The Adoration of the Mystic Lamb by Jan and Hubert Van Eyck, on display in the cathedral; it is also known as the Ghent altarpiece. And Citadelpark has much to offer, including the beautiful University Botanic Gardens, with 10,000 species of plant, and MSK – the Museum of Fine Arts. Antwerp is twice the size of Ghent and more industrialised, but the city centre is eminently walkable. The central station is more than a busy transport hub: it is a palace of mobility and the grandest possible entry point to a city. The impressively refreshed Royal Museum of Fine Arts (also known as KMSKA) is lots of fun. Antwerp's Flemish renaissance Grote Markt feels like a more enjoyable central square than even the Grand-Place in Brussels. Both Antwerp and Ghent offer superb food and drink at reasonable prices – as does everywhere else in Belgium. Just in case you have time en route from Antwerp to Brussels airport or main railway station for your journey home, Mechelen is well worth a lunch stop, too. Q I was booked to fly from the Maldives to Doha and onwards to London on Qatar Airways on the day the Iranians fired their missiles at the Al Udeid Air Base. The flight to Doha was cancelled. Ground staff at the airport could only give me a slip of paper telling me to contact the local Qatar Airways office. That was impossible; two emails only got automated replies. So I bought full-price British Airways tickets home for the following day. Qatar now refuses to pay any compensation or expenses and has only offered a refund of the unused return portion. Of course, I accept the cause was beyond the airline's control. Even though it was a 'non-UK sector' that was cancelled, because the whole journey started and finished in London, that gives me UK rights, I think? Leon D A Your experience mirrors mine last November when Qatar Airways cancelled a flight from Kathmandu to Doha, not in such dramatic circumstances as yours. The carrier washed its hands of the matter, offering a replacement flight a week later. I ended up spending £1,300 to get home via Bangkok. Qatar Airways issued a refund for the return leg promptly, but it didn't cover even half of that cost. You have, I'm afraid, become the latest traveller to learn of the loophole in British and European air passengers' rights rules. They do not apply to a non-European airline flying from outside the UK or the EU. So there is no obligation to find another flight or provide hotels and meals. This is infuriating and should be addressed. Rules notwithstanding, the passenger-friendly course of action for Qatar Airways would have been to rebook you immediately on the British Airways flight for which you ended up paying top whack. But tens of thousands of passengers were stranded in various locations. Many of them, such as those flying out for the UK, were covered by air passengers' rights rules. So it is unsurprising that they were prioritised. If you happen to have been on a package holiday to the Maldives, then the holiday company is required to look after you and should recompense you. Otherwise, I suggest you try your travel insurer.
