
Man kidnapped by Argentina's military regime as baby is reunited with relatives
The man, 49, whose identity was not disclosed for privacy reasons, was identified after he took a DNA test.
He is the 140th child found by the group Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo, who campaign for their relatives who were murdered and disappeared during political repression and state-sponsored violence in Argentina between 1976 and 1983.
The man is the son of Graciela Alicia Romero and Raul Eugenio Metz, both kidnapped by the military on 16 December 1976 in Cutral Có, a city in Province of Neuquén, and disappeared. Romero was five months pregnant when a taskforce of army personnel raided the home where the couple lived with their one-year-old daughter. Romero was killed after she gave birth.
After the 1976 coup, Argentina's military set about crushing potential opposition and eventually 30,000 people were killed or disappeared, almost all of them civilians. Pregnant prisoners were kept alive until they gave birth and then murdered. At least 500 newborns were taken from their parents while in captivity and given to military couples to raise as their own.
The man, who has not been named, was reunited with his sister, Adriana Metz, who was just a year-and-a-half old when their parents were abducted. Metz, now a member of the Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo's executive committee, was raised by her grandparents and never stopped hoping that her brother might still be alive. Their grandmother died in 1992 without having met her grandson.
During a press conference in Buenos Aires, Metz said that during her first conversation with her brother, she learned that he had been raised as an only child. She celebrated their reunion as the beginning of a new chapter for their family.
'From here on out, everything is a gain for the Metz-Romero family,' she said.
'Thank you to the Grandmothers for teaching us that this search is a collective one, and that we must continue on behalf of the 300 grandchildren who are still missing,' Metz said.
'With the restitution of grandchild 140, we confirm once again that our grandchildren are among us – and that thanks to the perseverance and tireless work of 47 years of struggle, more will continue to appear. This fight cannot be carried out in solitude,' said Estela de Carlotto, 94, president of the Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo.
According to the group, there are still hundreds of people aged between 45 and 49 years old who could be anywhere in the world and who have no idea they were kidnapped as children.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
By 1983, hundreds of these 'adoptions' were coming to light. But it was not until 2021 that large-scale efforts were made to trace the children, when the Argentinian government sent hundreds of DNA testing kits to its consulates around the world in an effort to put names to unidentified victims and to find the children of the disappeared, many of whom are unaware of their true identity.
However, that changed in 2023, when far-right president Javier Milei took office in Argentina, with human rights groups raising the alarm over his attempts to rewrite history and overturn the longstanding consensus over the dictatorship's crimes.
In May, a delegation from the Grandmothers of Plaza de Mayo met EU officials in Brussels to seek support for expanded DNA testing to identify missing children and denounce efforts by Milei to dismantle the search for missing persons.
Since he took power, Milei has ordered the closure of the special investigation unit of the National Commission for the Right to Identity; defunded the national genetic data bank; dissolved the survey and analysis team of the armed forces archives; and restricted access to official documentation at the ministries of defence and security.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Leaving ECHR ‘will stop judges making political decisions'
Britain should leave the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in order to stop judges making political decisions, a Tory grandee has said. Lord Lilley, a former Cabinet minister, said the 'vague' terms in which the ECHR was drafted had enabled courts to extend their reach into the political sphere and override parliamentary decisions. In a report for the Centre for Policy Studies, a think tank, he said the most 'egregious' example was the decision by the European Court of Human Rights to back claims that people should be able to seek redress and compensation if their governments failed to take sufficient measures to protect them from climate change. He said this extended the reach of the court to environmental matters, which did not feature in the ECHR at all. This was a consequence of treating the ECHR as a 'living instrument', which enabled the European Court of Human Rights to create new laws in areas never envisaged by original signatory states to the convention, he said. By giving courts power to interpret vague ECHR rights and override parliamentary decisions, the ECHR transferred law-making authority from elected representatives to unaccountable judges, said Lord Lilley. 'This unavoidably politicises judicial decisions and undermines the rule of law,' he added. He said he believed the option of leaving should be considered because there was no consensus or appetite for reform, noting that quitting the ECHR or some of its specific clauses had been considered by successive prime ministers, irrespective of party affiliations. Despite having written the ECHR into British law in the form of the Human Rights Act, Sir Tony Blair asked John Reid, his then home secretary, to consider 'withdrawing from specific clauses' if they led to court rulings that put community safety at risk. 'During his campaign for Tory leader, David Cameron raised the possibility of leaving the ECHR entirely – possibly temporarily – to provoke a renegotiation that, if successful, would enable Britain to rejoin,' said Lord Lilley. ' Theresa May, as home secretary, faced major problems in deporting suspected terrorists and advocated leaving the ECHR.' Lord Lilley said the UK's withdrawal from the convention would not damage its international reputation or weaken its influence. 'The claim that the UK would become a 'pariah' if we leave the ECHR is a baseless nonsense. No one suggests that Australia, New Zealand and Canada are pariah states, even though they rely on parliamentary sovereignty, common law and domestic courts to maintain their freedoms,' he said. 'On the contrary, they are respected as epitomes of freedom. We would be in the same position as them.' He said countries would be unlikely to refuse to co-operate with the UK in tackling cross border crime or people smuggling if it quit the ECHR. 'The EU currently works on these issues with states who are not members of the ECHR or any equivalent international treaty covering human rights. It is inconceivable that the EU would spurn such mutually beneficial co-operation with us if we left the ECHR,' he said. He argued that it would also give the UK greater freedom to reduce the number successfully claiming asylum or refugee status and increase the number of illegal migrants or foreign criminals who could be deported. 'Undermining respect for rule of law' Home Office data show the proportion of asylum claims resulting in positive approval at first instance in the UK had risen from 25 per cent in 2010 to 67 per cent in 2023. Although this was partly explained by the higher proportion of applicants from countries like Afghanistan and Iran, 'it may also reflect the increasingly generous interpretation of human rights legislation in the UK which has been incorporated in guidance to officials', said Lord Lilley. By the end of last year, 42,000 asylum seekers were awaiting the outcome of their appeals, of which around 40 per cent specifically cited human rights. 'This has given rise to suggestions that human rights claims are being made almost automatically in the hope of striking lucky or to delay the process,' said Lord Lilley. 'It is not the fault of judges themselves, but the role imposed on them by the convention to make inherently political decisions, that is politicising our courts and undermining respect for the rule of law itself. I instinctively prefer reform, but that is inconceivable unless Britain is prepared to withdraw until meaningful change is agreed,' he said. 'Leaving would simply mean the UK joining other respected democracies like Australia and Canada that successfully protect human rights through parliamentary accountability without depending on an international court.'


BreakingNews.ie
5 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Court orders extradition of former priest and serial child abuser Oliver O'Grady
The High Court has ordered the extradition of former priest and prolific child abuser Oliver O'Grady - who was featured in an Oscar-nominated documentary - to serve a one-year prison sentence in Portugal for having more than 9,000 images and 29 videos of child sexual abuse. O'Grady (80) of Rostrevor Court, Mackin Street, Dublin 2 was arrested on January 21st, 2025 on foot of a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) issued by a court in Faro in Portugal. Advertisement The EAW states that O'Grady was tried on a charge of possession of "pornography of minors", convicted and sentenced to one year in prison in his absence by a Portuguese court after he failed to attend his trial on May 7th, 2024. In opposing his surrender to Portugal, O'Grady complained that his fair trial rights were not adequately protected in the process that led to his conviction. He said that he had been unable to contact a lawyer appointed to defend him in Portugal. He further complained that his surrender would be incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights and the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms because of a real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment in the Portuguese prison system. To bolster his claim, he said he spent time in the Prisional de Setubal in Portugal in October, 2019 after he was arrested on foot of an EAW from Ireland. He maintained that while incarcerated there he was not provided with medication, the facilities were unhygienic and, as a segregated prisoner on remand in respect of sexual offences, he was abused and had apples thrown at him. Advertisement However, Mr Justice Patrick McGrath at the High Court in Dublin found O'Grady's evidence relating to the trial process to be "disingenuous and self-serving". The judge found that O'Grady had tried to control the proceedings. Portuguese authorities, through An Garda Siochána, notified O'Grady of his obligation to attend his trial and the consequences of failure to attend, the judge said. There was no impediment to him travelling for his trial and, being a man familiar with the court system, he knew his inability to contact a lawyer did not excuse him from attendance, Mr Justice McGrath said. O'Grady revealed his true mindset in an email he sent to the Portuguese prosecutor on April 11th, 2024, the judge said. In the email, O'Grady showed that he knew of the impending hearing date but suggested he might not attend unless he could be assured of being admitted to bail. Advertisement Mr Justice McGrath said: "This is not the mindset of a person who is unaware of a duty to attend at court and of the possible consequences of non-attendance, but rather shows a person who is trying to control the outcome of proceedings." Mr Justice McGrath added that O'Grady was "clearly trying to manipulate the system to try to secure a certain outcome". Had he attended his trial, as he was required to do, he would have been given proper legal assistance before entering a plea, the judge said. His failure to obtain effective legal assistance flows from his failure to attend, Mr Justice McGrath added. In relation to the risk of inhuman or degrading treatment, Mr Justice McGrath said the conditions at the Carreguiera prison in which O'Grady will be housed in Portugal have not been criticised. Advertisement He said he is satisfied from assurances given by the Portuguese authorities that no such risk exists. O'Grady has a long history of sexual offences against children. Originally from Limerick, O'Grady emigrated to America after joining the priesthood. In 1993 he was convicted in California of lewd acts against children for repeatedly molesting two brothers. He was released after serving seven years in prison before being deported to Ireland in 2001. Advertisement His crimes in California were the subject of a 2006 documentary titled 'Deliver us From Evil', in which O'Grady gave an account of his offending. In January 2012, he was jailed in Ireland for three years for possessing hundreds of thousands of images of child pornography. The images were discovered after he left his computer on an Aer Lingus flight in February 2010 and a staff member who discovered the files on the device alerted gardaí. Some 280,000 images showing children in sexual poses and 1,000 video files of child abuse material, known in law as "child pornography", were discovered on the device. He moved to Amsterdam where he lived for several years before returning to Ireland. It was on this flight back to his home country that he left his laptop behind. In 2020, he was sentenced to 22 months in prison at Waterford Circuit Court for possessing child pornography. He had pleaded not guilty to one charge of possessing a video of an underage girl engaging in a sexual act on a date between December 2015 and March 2016 at St Otteran's Place, South Parade, Waterford city but was convicted by a jury. A former housemate reported O'Grady to gardaí after discovering a sexually explicit video on the computer.


The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
‘There is no water to take a bath': Detainees describe conditions in Florida's ‘Alligator Alcatraz'
Detainees being held at the newly opened ' Alligator Alcatraz ' detention center in Florida say conditions are dire, with scarce food, no water to bathe, and constant bright lights making it difficult to sleep. Leamsy 'La Figura' Izquierdo, a Cuban artist who was arrested in Miami last week, told CBS News he was moved to the detention facility in the Everglades on Friday along with what he claims are more than 400 other detainees. Since then, Izquierdo says, he and other detainees have been treated poorly. 'There's no water to take a bath, it's been four days since I've taken a bath,' Izquierdo said. Izquierdo, who was arrested on battery and assault with a deadly weapon, said detainees are fed once a day with food that has 'maggots' in it and are not provided toothpaste. 'They only brought a meal once a day and it has maggots, he added. 'They never take of the lights for 24 hours. The mosquitoes are as big as elephants.' Another detainee, an unnamed Colombian man, said his mental health was deteriorating without access to his medication and Bible. 'I'm on the edge of losing my mind. I've gone three days without taking my medicine," he told CBS. "It's impossible to sleep with this white light that's on all day." "They took the Bible I had and they said here there is no right to religion. And my Bible is the one thing that keeps my faith, and now I'm losing my faith," he added. Alligator Alcatraz is the recently erected temporary detention facility located deep in the Florida Everglades. It was created quickly to help alleviate pressure from local and state jails that have been directed to detain immigrants. The facility, managed by the Florida Division of Emergency Management, is expected to hold anywhere from 3,000 to 5,000 people rounded up as part of the Trump administration's mass deportation plan. But because of the quick turnaround to turn the former Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport into a detention center, detainees are being housed in metal enclosures inside large tents while utilities are being provided by mobile units. Another detainee, who was not named by CBS, told the news outlet that those running the facility were not respecting 'human rights.' He described being at Alligator Alcatraz as 'a form of torture.' "They're not respecting our human rights. We're human beings; we're not dogs. We're like rats in an experiment,' he said. "I don't know their motive for doing this, if it's a form of torture. A lot of us have our residency documents and we don't understand why we're here,' he added. Izquierdo is among those with permanent residency in the United States, his girlfriend told NBC Miami. But after he was arrested, Immigration and Customs Enforcement detained him to determine whether or not he should be deported. The charges he faces stem from a violent dispute with a tow company worker, wh was trying to repossess a jet ski, according to a police report seen by the outlet. Human rights activists, such as the ACLU, have denounced Alligator Alcatraz and raised concerns about the inhuman conditions detainees could potentially face. 'This project dehumanizes people, strips them of their rights, and diverts public dollars from the services our communities need,' Bacardi Jackson, the executive director of the ACLU of Florida, said. built on sacred land.