
Britain unites to remember victims of 7/7 bombings on 20th anniversary as Royals, PM and survivors vow never to forget
Survivors, families who lost loved ones, first responders, the Royal Family and senior politicians united to remember those who died in the terror which gripped the capital.
12
12
12
On July 7, 2005, four suicide bombers hit London's transport network, killing 52 people and injuring more than 770 on three London Underground trains and a bus.
The attacks were the first suicide bombings on British soil and changed the country's response to terror forever.
In a statement issued to mark the anniversary, Sir Keir Starmer said: 'Today, the whole country will unite to remember the lives lost in the 7/7 attacks, and all those whose lives were changed forever.
'We honour the courage shown that day — the bravery of the emergency services, the strength of survivors and the unity of Londoners in the face of terror.
My heartfelt thoughts and special prayers remain with all those whose lives were forever changed on that terrible summer's day.
King Charles
'Those who tried to divide us failed. We stood together then, and we stand together now — against hate and for the values that define us of freedom, democracy and the rule of law.'
Prince William met survivors and relatives of victims to lay flowers at the permanent memorial in Hyde Park yesterday afternoon.
William, 43, joined up to 500 survivors of the bombings and families of the victims for a moving service.
He spoke with Thelma Stober, one of the survivors, and Gerald Oppenheim, chairman of the London Emergencies Trust.
Jill Foulkes, sister of victim David Foulkes, said that grief never got easier but that the loss and the pain changed over the years.
Her brother died on his first visit to London on his own.
Inside 7/7 The story behind Britain's worst ever terror attack
His father, Graham, said: 'For many people, nothing was the same again and yet everything was the same — because the good which is in Londoners and the countless visitors whom they host at any given moment is not erased by hatred or threat.
'But rather it is fostered to produce a harvest of hope for each generation.'
June Taylor, whose daughter Carrie died aged 24 at Aldgate station, told those gathered: 'Don't take for granted what you have but treasure every minute.'
Earlier in the day, Sir Keir and London Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan laid wreaths at the memorial at 8.50am, to coincide with the moment that the first bomb went off.
The Prime Minister left on top of white flowers a handwritten note, which read: 'Our thoughts are with all those who lost their lives and to the survivors of 7/7.
"Twenty years on, we grieve and we remember them.'
Officials including Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley and Chief Constable of British Transport Police Lucy D'Orsi also laid floral tributes.
12
12
In a poignant memorial service at St Paul's Cathedral yesterday morning, 52,000 white petals rained down from the ceiling while a list of victims was read out.
Saba Edwards, the daughter of victim Behnaz Mozakka, read out the names of those killed on the Piccadilly line service between King's Cross and Russell Square.
The attack was the deadliest of the four launched that day, with 26 people killed by Germaine Lindsay when he blew himself up by detonating his bomb just after the train left the station at 8.49am.
Ms Edwards' voice cracked slightly as she got to her mother's name among the list of victims.
I remain angry. Laura was denied the opportunity of a life that me and my brother have been lucky enough to have.
Rob Webb
Survivor Ms Stober then read out the names of the seven killed on the Circle Line train between Liverpool Street and Aldgate, the six who died at Edgware Road, and the 13 who lost their lives on a bus at Tavistock Square.
Shehzad Tanweer detonated his bomb on the Circle Line between Liverpool Street and Aldgate at 8.49am, with ringleader Mohammad Sidique Khan doing so on a Circle line train near Edgware Road.
Confusion initially led to the attacks being perceived as a power surge before it became clear that it was a bombing attack, carried out by home-grown terrorists.
The last of the attacks took place on the number 30 bus not far from King's Cross, at about 9.47am.
Edward and Sophie, the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, represented the King during the service yesterday.
Charles issued a statement, highlighting comfort could be taken from the 'spirit of unity' in London and the country, which allowed the nation to heal.
He said: 'My heartfelt thoughts and special prayers remain with all those whose lives were forever changed on that terrible summer's day.
12
"We remember with profound sadness the 52 innocent people who were killed in senseless acts of evil — and the enduring grief of their loved ones.
'We should also remember the countless stories of extraordinary courage and compassion.
"We recall, too, the hundreds more who carry physical and psychological scars, and pray that their suffering may ease as the years pass.
'The selfless bravery of emergency services, transport workers, and citizens who rushed towards danger to help strangers reminds us of the very best of humanity in the face of the very worst.'
Senior politicians in attendance included Leader of the Opposition Kemi Badenoch, Health Secretary Wes Streeting, and former PMs Tony Blair and Theresa May.
Rob Webb, whose younger sister Laura was killed at Edgware Road, called 7/7 'an attack on all of us' that should never be forgotten.
He added: 'I remain angry. Laura was denied the opportunity of a life that me and my brother have been lucky enough to have.'
Bishop of London the Rt Rev Dame Sarah Mullally said the message was one of hope, adding: 'The good that is in Londoners is not erased by hatred or threat.
"Hope presents itself as a survival tool for the tenacity of the spirit that's in us all.'
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper vowed to 'always confront the threats facing this country'.
London Mayor Sir Sadiq said Londoners 'will always choose hope over fear and unity over division'.
He added: 'We remember the 52 people whose lives were stolen and our thoughts and prayers remain with their loved ones, and the more than 700 people injured by these cowardly acts of hatred.'
EDGWARE ROAD
12
TAVISTOCK SQUARE
ALDGATE
KING'S CROSS
12

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
How my beloved Green Party lost the plot
I refuse to accept that the Green Party is a lost cause. But, boy, how we have fallen from grace. I joined 23 years ago, following a stint drafting environmental briefings in the European Parliament. I was feeling positive about how Greens were able to effect change internationally. We didn't do identity politics on steroids back then. During bi-annual conferences and internal debates, we enjoyed discussion on all manner of topics, from peace in the Middle East and our future in Europe to decriminalising prostitution (bad idea). We could debate knowing that even on the most divisive issue – win or lose a conference vote – there was more that united than divided us. My party felt like a university in which impassioned debate and persuasive thinking carried the day, whether on policy or electoral strategy. How things have changed: viewpoint diversity, once embraced, has now become extinct in the Greens. I'd probably mark Autumn 2016 as the point when the identitarian turn really started to take grip of the party. This coincided with the end of my term as Deputy Leader (of course!) and Aimee Challenor (the party's equality spokesperson) successfully moving a motion on trans rights that said: 'Transwomen are women'. I missed the debate, but already sensed a determination by Challenor to win at all costs. A hallmark of authoritarian groupthink is voting a certain way because someone tells you to, not because you've reasoned your way there. That same year Challenor's father David was charged with raping a ten year old child. David Challenor, who had been Aimee's election agent, was sentenced in 2018 for 22 years for child sex offences. Aimee resigned after an investigation was launched into failures of disclosure. I was one of a few people to call out the double standards at the heart of the party's refusal to condemn or criticise the Challenors. But as a party we couldn't bring ourselves to properly reflect on how we had left ourselves so vulnerable to entryism from gender ideology extremists. Fast forward to today. Gender ideological insanity has accelerated to such a degree that, year on year, scores of gender critical activists have now been persecuted or purged out of the party for wrongthink. Four successive co-chairs of Green Party Women – Emma Bateman, Zoe Hatch, Dawn Furness and Amanda Stones – have been suspended or expelled. Darren Johnson, a London Assembly member for 16 years, was suspended. Eric Walker, a 100-year-old D-Day veteran, was suspended. Not content with unlawfully removing me as a spokesperson, the party now faces a second court case after revoking my membership. This is the first leadership bid I've been debarred from contesting. It is with sadness that I witness the descent of my party into the entrenched identity politics so typical of the hard Left. Out of the candidates for leader or deputy, not one is openly gender critical. None unequivocally supports the Supreme Court ruling on the meaning of sex in the Equality Act or commends the Cass review for safeguarding youth from 'gender affirming' medical malpractice. Zack Polanski, famed for allegedly offering a breast-enlargement hypnosis service, has been insistent on getting rid of single-sex spaces. On the LBC leadership debate, he repeatedly affirmed the right of people with penises, however they identified, to be welcomed into refuges for women seeking support and protection from abusive men. Polanski's views are abhorrent and directly contrary to any rational extension of our commitment to single-sex provision in hospital wards. It is not just over gender that the Green Party has lost its way. It has also done so over ethnicity and religion. The fear of religious fundamentalism in society is rising. Yet the Green Party are shamelessly exploiting the conflict in Gaza to court the Muslim vote. This is cynical and divisive. Like Polanski, I despair about the unconscionable war crimes being perpetrated by Israel upon Gazans, but Hamas should not escape our condemnation for their ongoing crimes committed against innocent Israeli hostages. Years after I locked horns with him on how not to define anti-Semitism, Polanski now rides roughshod over Jewish sensitivities in an effort to rebrand himself as the saviour of the Palestinians and ally of Corbyn. This is a striking development because in 2018 he tweeted that he 'was a pro-European Jew' and that these were 'two reasons I couldn't vote for Labour under Jeremy Corbyn'. His outpourings on the conflict have become so tribal that, not only would we be poorly placed to broker peace with his stated genocidal enemy; but we risk alienating the Jewish community in the UK by fuelling the rise of anti-Semitic sentiment itself. Councillor Mothin Ali, our latest Muslim poster boy and deputy candidate, has also defended his focus on Palestine after being criticised for crying 'Allahu Akbar' upon election. Mothin is no fundamentalist, but nor have his pronouncements to date given me confidence that he's a politician poised for all people. Has he nothing to say about the early morning Muslim call to prayer (Adhan) disrupting the sleep of keyworkers in Leicester? Would he defend the promotion of Zakat (charities for Muslims only), using Council-owned lampposts, along the length and breadth of Mile End Road? Does he not recognise as valid that many people are affronted by having their neighbourhoods increasingly populated by women in burkas? I despise the medieval expression of patriarchy which the burka represents in modern Britain, and find it deeply antithetical to our values. Mothin, by contrast, remains silent on these matters. To do otherwise, he would need to park his faith when doing politics and prioritise liberalism over religion. It seems that liberalism for Lefties is a one-way street with all the rights but none of the obligations.


Reuters
29 minutes ago
- Reuters
OPEC+ agrees in principle another large oil output hike, sources say
LONDON, Aug 3 (Reuters) - OPEC+ agreed in principle to boost oil output by 548,000 barrels per day in September, two OPEC+ sources said on Sunday as the group finishes unwinding its biggest tranche of production cuts amid fears of further supply disruptions from Russia. A decision is expected at a meeting scheduled to begin at 1100 GMT, amid fresh U.S. demands for India to stop buying Russian oil as Washington seeks ways to push Moscow for a peace deal with Ukraine. Fresh EU sanctions have also pushed Indian state refiners to suspend Russian oil purchases. OPEC+, which pumps about half of the world's oil, had been curtailing production for several years to support the market. But it reversed course this year to regain market share, and as U.S. President Donald Trump demanded OPEC pump more oil. OPEC+ began output increases in April with a modest hike of 138,000 bpd, followed by larger hikes of 411,000 bpd in May, June and July and 548,000 bpd in August. If the group agrees to the 548,000-bpd September increase, it will have fully unwound its previous production cut of 2.2 million bpd, while allowing the United Arab Emirates to raise output by 300,000 bpd. OPEC+ still has in place a separate, voluntary cut of about 1.65 million bpd from eight members and a 2-million-bpd cut across all members, which expire at the end of 2026. Sources have said previously the group had no plans to discuss other tranches of cuts on Sunday.


Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump is wrong to pick a fight with Powell – but is right about interest rates
Visiting Scotland last week, Donald Trump used a joint press conference to mock Keir Starmer. He castigated Labour's policies on immigration, energy and much else. The Prime Minister sat awkwardly, sporting his trademark rictus grin. Trump has lately dished out plenty of public humiliation – not least aimed at Jerome Powell, chairman of the Federal Reserve. The president has put huge pressure on the Fed to lower interest rates, to boost US growth and ease interest payments on America's massive $36trn (£27.6trn) national debt. This jars badly with the conventional wisdom that central banks should be independent, allowing technocrat economists to set interest rates to bear down on inflation. That's far better for the economy in the long-run, but this precious independence is jeopardised when vote-hungry politicians seek to keep borrowing costs too low. Such independence has become an almost sacred policy concept over the last half century. And no central bank matters more than the Fed, which sets the course for monetary policy across the globe. Yet Trump, astonishingly, has lately called Powell a 'numbskull', a 'stubborn mule' and worse. On a recent Fed visit, he rebuked him over the cost of a refurbishment project – a potential pretext to sack Powell, which may not be legally possible, but which Trump often floats regardless. Between September and December last year, the Fed's committee of twelve rate-setters voted to lower the US benchmark interest rate three times from its post-Covid-peak of 5.25pc-5.5pc, in increments down to 4.25pc-4.5pc. But much to the president's frustration, rates have since stayed put. The Bank of England, meanwhile, has cut rates four times since last summer, including as recently as May, while the European Central Bank has enacted no less than eight eurozone rate reductions over the same period, the latest in June. Having held rates since the start of 2025, the Fed just did so again when governors met last Wednesday (although two Trump-appointees voted against, the biggest intra-Fed rate disagreement in thirty years). Fed policymakers are rightly worried about price pressures, with headline inflation hitting 3.7pc during the year to June, up from 2.4pc the previous month and well above the 2pc target. And Trump's era-defining slew of tariffs – taxes on imports into the US – means we could see a lot more inflation yet. With the President's three-month moratorium expiring this weekend, and tariffs now set to bite on some of America's largest trading partners, the Fed is understandably concerned. Powell insists the US economy is strong enough for the Fed to wait before further rate cuts, as we see if Trump's tariffs really do aggravate inflation. And last week's GDP numbers – a 3pc expansion from April to June – was certainly way above consensus forecasts, reversing a 0.5pc contraction during the first three months of the year, the worst quarterly performance since early 2022. This January to March shrinkage, though, was largely due to the huge rise in US imports as buyers sought to get ahead of Trump's expected tariff onslaught. And since 'liberation day' in April, when the President unveiled his tariffs on the White House lawn, imports into the US have plunged. This artificially boosted April to June GDP growth as the first-quarter trend unwound. Yes, consumer spending rose 1.4pc during the second quarter, outpacing the 0.5pc increase over the previous three months, supporting Powell's argument the economy is coping without further rate cuts. But 'final sales to private domestic purchasers', a key demand metric that the Fed watches closely, grew just 1.2pc over the latest quarter, slower than the 1.9pc increase between January and March. High mortgage rates are also holding back the housing market and related construction, as Trump relentlessly points out, with residential investment down 4.6pc during the second quarter. But that's part of a broader investment slump as business leaders look to see how the president's tariffs play out. For now, the market consensus is that the US economy is showing resilience, but more rate cuts may be justified as long as inflation isn't further provoked. So Trump's attacks on Powell are based on legitimate economic analysis. Yet his language is way over the top. Some say the president is picking headline-grabbing fights with the Fed chair to detract from mounting criticism over his handling of the Epstein files. I suspect he simply wants lower rates and, for now at least, Powell stands in his way. Ironically, it was Trump who appointed Powell in 2017. But having repeatedly called for him to resign, the president seems certain to replace him when Powell's term expires next May. In the meantime, Trump's ceaseless undermining of central bank independence is deeply damaging. Yes, the Fed has a 'dual mandate' to pursue both price stability and full employment, unlike the solely inflation-focussed aims of most other central banks. But while Trump's arguments may be technically valid, it should absolutely not be him making them, nor anyone else near the top of government. Given the tone he has set, though, Powell's successor will be seen as the president's lackey. And with US and global inflation far from tamed, that could end up being a serious problem. My general view is that central bank independence is far more important than any individual central banker. Andrew Bailey, for instance, has shown seriously bad judgement at the Bank of England – endlessly insisting post-Covid inflation would be 'transitory', for instance, while deriding those of us who correctly predicted otherwise. His appointment was a mistake, but he should stay, free from the threat politicians might remove him, until his term expires in March 2028. The same applies to Powell and far more so – he should serve his full term.