Indeed deletes millions of listings every month to reduce number of 'ghost jobs'
Ghost jobs refer to open adverts for applications to positions that do not immediately exist or that have already been filled.
A survey of 1,000 American employers by US-group Clarify Capital found that
a third of job listings
are for opportunities at companies that are not actively hiring.
Compared to the results of the survey in 2022, the number of ghost jobs has
halved in recent years
. It is still a scourge for job sites like Indeed, however.
The firm was not able to provide exact data on the number of listings removed in Ireland, but did confirm that it removes 'millions of job posts that don't meet our strict quality standards' every month.
Employers who responded to the American survey said that although they are not actively recruiting, they will keep positions online for a variety of reasons. Most, 57%, said they do so to collect an active pool of candidates for future positions.
Notably, 6% of US employers claimed that job listings are kept online to 'give the impression that the company is growing'.
Indeed told
The Journal
that the website has a dedicated team which assesses the legitimacy of listings to ensure they meet the website's criteria. That includes the need for a job description, location, title and application methods.
Advertisement
It added: 'Our policies do not allow ghost jobs – job postings on Indeed should be connected to a real employer that is actively hiring for a particular role.'
'Advertising or window-shopping?'
Founder of Clearview Career Coaching Jane Downes told
The Journal
that jobseekers can find ghost jobs particularly frustrating.
'This is what is complicated with job websites,' she said. 'Is it an advertising space or a chance for companies to window-shop?'
Downes added: 'From a job hunter's point of view, it's a real issue. [The applications] wastes people's time, particularly when there is no live role there.'
A quick scroll of posts uploaded to the Reddit thread
RecruitingHell
will show that many users have often not received interview or job offers, despite filing dozens of applications.
In some circumstances, recruiters are waiting for the ideal candidate to apply for a job, Downes said. In 'less than ideal' scenarios, however, managers await an application from a good candidate in order to expand their team's budget, she added.
Asked about companies that list positions to give the impression of growth, Downes said that it is a 'very unfair practice'. She recommended that all jobseekers frequently track the status of every application they send.
A blog post from Indeed
earlier this year
acknowledged that ghost jobs can be 'frustrating' for jobseekers, particularly as application processes can be stressful and time-consuming.
It warned jobseekers to make sure that listings have detailed job descriptions, application deadlines and to cross-reference the adverts with the company's social media posts or own website.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
AstraZeneca's potential exit raises alarm for UK markets
AstraZeneca chief executive Pascal Soriot isn't confirming or denying reports that the UK's largest listed company is considering moving its primary stock market listing from London to New York. Yet recent remarks reveal where the company's future may lie. At AstraZeneca's half-year results press conference, Soriot gushed about the US, 'the country in our industry where innovation is taking place'. AstraZeneca is 'a very American company'. Soriot 'always believed in the great future of America' and, just to be sure no one missed the message, added: 'I definitely love America.' It plans to invest $50 billion in the US over five years, including building its largest-ever manufacturing facility in Virginia, and expects half its sales to come from the US by 2030. READ MORE While reaffirming its commitment to UK research sites such as Cambridge, Soriot stopped short of endorsing the London listing. His critique of Europe's low pharmaceutical investment and NHS pricing controls hints at wider tensions. The UK market has seen multiple major departures: CRH, Flutter, Arm and BHP. Pharmaceutical company Indivior left in July. Payment firm Wise is also saying farewell. In the past year 88 companies left the UK market, with another 70 already exiting in 2025, seeking higher valuations and liquidity in the US. AstraZeneca's exit would deal the biggest blow yet to the London Stock Exchange, so expect renewed calls for tax reform – especially 0.5 per cent stamp duty on shares – and regulatory easing. Otherwise, the argument goes, the Square Mile risks losing more ground to Wall Street.
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Is Trump's tariff plan working or is this the quiet before the storm?
Donald Trump and his economic advisers are said to feel vindicated. Bilateral trade deals are rolling in and, in the main, on more favourable terms for the US . Tariff revenue is soaring. Financial markets are fluctuating near record highs and predictions that inflation would soar have not yet materialised. Is this the quiet before the storm or is Trump's tariff plan, which nearly every mainstream economist says is destined to fail, succeeding? In truth no one knows but every data point is being picked over for clues. READ MORE The latest job figures from the US for July were weak and contained downward revisions from a previously announced levels, suggesting companies might 'already been pre-emptively slowing their hiring amid the uncertainty created by months of tariff threats and pauses from the White House', according to one report. US inflation, meanwhile, accelerated to 2.7 per cent in June without a commensurate increase in consumer spending, suggesting higher import prices from tariffs maybe fuelling prices. Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell has so far resisted lowering interest rates like the European Central Bank because of the US's strong labour market and the upside risks to inflation from tariffs, much to Trump's annoyance. Though concerning, the economic data don't exactly point to a big pivot in underlying performance and aren't likely to spook the White House just yet. But they do represent turbulence and remember much of the tariff impact has yet to play out. [ US tariffs will mean 70,000 fewer jobs created in Irish economy, Department of Finance warns Opens in new window ] There's a lag time before higher prices get passed on to businesses and consumers because of front-loading and other dynamics. Trump's first term in office did feature tariff threats but ones that met resistance from within the White House and which were eventually moderated. This time, it's different. Easy wins in trade negotiations with Britain, Europe and Japan has emboldened the president. Explaining the EU's quick capitulation, one insider said Germany, after enduring a gruelling energy price shock, 'wanted stability and didn't care what the price'. The average effective tariff rate on US imports is now at its highest level in nearly a century. Will it send the US economy into reverse or will Trump and Maga operatives muddle through?
Irish Independent
16 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Trump fires official overseeing jobs data after dismal employment report
Trump, in a post on his social media platform, alleged that the figures were manipulated for political reasons and said that Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden, should be fired. He provided no evidence for the charge. 'I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY,' Trump said on Truth Social. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified.' Trump later posted: 'In my opinion, today's Jobs Numbers were RIGGED in order to make the Republicans, and ME, look bad.' The charge that the data was faked is an explosive one that threatens to undercut the political legitimacy of the U.S. government's economic data, which has long been seen as the 'gold standard' of economic measurement globally. Economists and Wall Street investors have for decades generally accepted the data as free from political bias. Trump's move to fire McEntarfer represented another extraordinary assertion of presidential power. He has wielded the authority of the White House to try to control the world's international trade system, media companies, America's top universities and Congress' constitutional power of the purse, among other institutions. McEntarfer's firing was roundly condemned by a group that included two former BLS commissioners, including William Beach, who was appointed by Trump to the position. They particularly objected to the charge that the data was altered for political reasons. 'This rationale for firing Dr. McEntarfer is without merit and undermines the credibility of federal economic statistics that are a cornerstone of intelligent economic decision-making by businesses, families, and policymakers,' the statement from the group, the Friends of BLS, said. In addition to Beach, the statement was signed by Erica Groshen, BLS commissioner under former President Barack Obama. 'Firing the Commissioner ... when the BLS revises jobs numbers down (as it routinely does) threatens to destroy trust in core American institutions, and all government statistics,' Arin Dube, an economist at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, said on X. 'I can't stress how damaging this is.' After Trump's initial post, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer said on X that McEntarfer was no longer leading the bureau and that William Wiatrowski, the deputy commissioner, would serve as the acting director. ADVERTISEMENT Learn more 'I support the President's decision to replace Biden's Commissioner and ensure the American People can trust the important and influential data coming from BLS,' Chavez-DeRemer said. Friday's jobs report showed that just 73,000 jobs were added last month and that 258,000 fewer jobs were created in May and June than previously estimated. The report suggested that the economy has sharply weakened during Trump's tenure, a pattern consistent with a slowdown in economic growth during the first half of the year and an increase in inflation during June that appeared to reflect the price pressures created by the president's tariffs. 'What does a bad leader do when they get bad news? Shoot the messenger,' Democratic Senate Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said in a Friday speech. McEntarfer was nominated by Biden in 2023 and became the Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics in January 2024. Commissioners typically serve four-year terms but since they are political appointees can be fired. The commissioner is the only political appointee of the agency, which has hundreds of career civil servants. The Senate confirmed McEntarfer to her post 86-8, with now Vice President JD Vance among the yea votes. Trump focused much of his ire on the revisions the agency made to previous hiring data. Job gains in May were revised down to just 19,000 from a previously revised 125,000, and for June they were cut to 14,000 from 147,000. In July, only 73,000 positions were added. The unemployment rate ticked up to a still-low 4.2% from 4.1%. 'No one can be that wrong? We need accurate Jobs Numbers,' Trump wrote. 'She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes.' Trump has not always been so suspicious of the monthly jobs report and responded enthusiastically after the initial May figures came out on June 6, when it was initially reported that the economy added 139,000 jobs. 'GREAT JOB NUMBERS, STOCK MARKET UP BIG!' Trump posted at the time. That estimate was later revised down to 125,000 jobs, prior to the most recent revision down to just 19,000. During the 2016 campaign, Trump was more critical: He often attacked the jobs figures as they showed the unemployment rate steadily declining while Obama was still president, only to immediately switch to praising the data once he was in office, as steady job gains continued. The monthly employment report is one of the most closely-watched pieces of government economic data and can cause sharp swings in financial markets. The disappointing figure sent U.S. market indexes about 1.5pc lower on Friday. The revisions to the May and June numbers were quite large and surprising to many economists. At the same time, every monthly jobs report includes revisions to the prior two months' figures. Those revisions occur as the government receives more responses from businesses to its survey, which helps provide a more complete picture of employment trends each month. In the past decade, companies have taken longer to respond, which may have contributed to larger monthly revisions. The proportion of companies responding to the surveys has also fallen steadily over the past 10 years, but the survey still gets responses from roughly 200,000 business locations, which can be independent companies or franchises of larger chains. The monthly jobs report has long been closely guarded within the BLS, with early copies held in safes under lock and key to prevent any leaks or early dissemination.
