2,000 NI jobs in limbo as potential owners for non-Airbus parts of Spirit AeroSystems stay silent
Fears for 2,000 jobs as Airbus confirms 'definitive' deal breaking up the business
Possible suitors for the non-Airbus parts of Spirit AeroSystems in Belfast are remaining tight-lipped while uncertainty remains over the future of 2,000 jobs at the business.
European manufacturer Airbus confirmed on Monday that it had reached 'definitive' agreement to acquire parts of the Spirit aerospace business which manufacture wings and the mid-fuselage for its A220.
That will maintain the jobs of 1,400 people at Spirit in east Belfast, formerly Bombardier – but there is no confirmation of a buyer for other parts of the business, employing 2,000 people.
Earlier this year, a US source identified Swiss company Montana Aerospace as a possible player.
On Monday, a spokesperson said that as a listed company, it 'generally does not comment on rumours of possible acquisitions'.
Last week, company accounts for Spirit AeroSystems in Belfast said that Boeing, which is taking over most of Spirit in a separate deal, would take over the remainder of the Belfast operation if no other buyer is found.
But it did not return a request for comment on Monday when asked if it would soon confirm its intentions.
Bombardier, the Canadian company which owned the former Shorts business before Spirit, was previously linked to a deal but referred on Monday to comments made by its CEO Éric Martel in February.
At that time, he said: 'There's a possibility we could be part of that transaction but also have the option that if there's a credible buyer that would guarantee the delivery of our fuselages for the life of our programme, we are going to be comfortable with that solution also. Both scenarios remain on the table.'
Stephen Kelly, chief executive of Manufacturing NI, said close integration of the sites was still possible, even if there is more than one buyer.
'There's no doubt about it that the business is going to be broken up in some form but that doesn't mean it can't continue to be significantly integrated….
'Whether there will be two or multiple future owners it makes a lot of sense for integration to be maintained.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fashion United
2 hours ago
- Fashion United
Canada Goose share analysis: up 50% after all-time low
With Bain Capital holding a controlling stake and reports suggesting it is considering a sale of its shares, the company's future direction and stock performance are of particular interest to the market. Canada Goose was founded in 1957 in Toronto by Sam Tick under the name Metro Sportswear Ltd. Initially, the company focused on producing woolen vests, raincoats, and snowmobile suits. In the 1970s, Tick's son-in-law, David Reiss, joined the business and developed the down-filled parka, a product designed for extreme weather conditions that would become the brand's cornerstone. Dani Reiss, David's son, took over as chief executive officer in the 1990s and was instrumental in rebranding the company as a luxury label and expanding its global presence. In 2013, the majority stake was acquired by Bain Capital, which provided the capital for international expansion and an initial public offering (IPO) in 2017. Canada Goose has a significant global presence with a direct-to-consumer (D2C) model, alongside its wholesale operations. As of July 2025, the company has 76 permanent stores worldwide. Its products are known for their high price point and premium quality. For example, a men's 'Chilliwack bomber' jacket can cost around 1,500 dollars, a women's 'Shelburne' parka is priced at approximately 1,700 dollars, and a 'Crofton' down jacket can sell for about 1,000 dollars. The company manufactures its core, down-filled products at seven facilities in Canada. (all prices in CAD. 1 CAD = 0,73 USD or 0,63 Euro) Become a year-round luxury lifestyle brand In the past two years, Canada Goose has made a concerted effort to diversify its product portfolio beyond seasonal winter wear to become a year-round luxury lifestyle brand. This strategy is highlighted by the appointment of Paris-based creative director Haider Ackermann in 2024 to lead the 'Snow Goose' seasonal capsule collection and the brand's mainline collections starting with SS26. The company's expansion into lighter outerwear and apparel is a key initiative to achieve this year-round relevance, a move seen as a response to the impact of climate change on winter seasons. Furthermore, the company has also launched a resale channel, Canada Goose Generations, to keep its products in circulation longer. Performance and financial outlook The share price of Canada Goose has shown volatility. The all-time high was approximately 72.00 Canadian dollars in November 2018. At the start of 2025, the stock was priced at 14.33 Canadian dollars, while the all-time low was 9.79 Canadian dollars, reached in April of this year. The company's revenue is on a rise. In fiscal year 2022, revenue was 1.217 million CAD, increasing to 1.333 million CAD in fiscal year 2023, and further to 1.348 million CAD in fiscal year 2024. For the trailing twelve months (TTM) to the first quarter of fiscal year 2025, revenue was 1.368 million CAD. The primary drivers of growth have been the expansion of its D2C channel and its geographic footprint, particularly in Asia. Inhibitors to growth have included a slowdown in consumer spending and the seasonal nature of its core products. In terms of profitability, Canada Goose's EBITDA was 234,7 million CAD in fiscal year 2022, 243,1 million CAD in 2023, and 299,8 million euros in fiscal year 2024. Canada Goose does not currently pay a dividend. Free cash flow has also shown variability. Competitor comparison When compared to its competitors, Canada Goose operates in a competitive luxury performance outerwear market with brands like Moncler and Lululemon. Moncler, an Italian luxury brand, has consistently delivered strong financial performance with a higher brand prestige and a diverse product range beyond outerwear. Its parent company surpassed one billion euros in revenue in the first half of 2023. Lululemon, a Canadian athletic apparel company, while not a direct competitor in the same outerwear niche, is a comparable lifestyle brand with high-performance products. It has a significantly larger market capitalization and EBITDA, demonstrating strong growth and brand loyalty in its segment. These companies generally exhibit higher gross and operating margins, indicating more efficient cost structures and brand pricing power compared to Canada Goose. SWOT analysis Strengths Brand recognition and premium positioning: Canada Goose has established itself as a luxury brand synonymous with high-quality and high-performance outerwear. Direct-to-consumer strategy: The expansion of its D2C channel, including physical stores and e-commerce, allows for greater control over the brand image, customer experience, and profit margins. Product quality and craftsmanship: The brand's reputation for durable products, many of which are manufactured in Canada, is a key selling point for consumers. Weaknesses High dependence on seasonal products: A significant portion of the company's revenue is generated during the winter months, making it vulnerable to warmer seasons and limiting year-round sales. High price point: The premium pricing strategy, while a strength for brand image, limits market accessibility to a niche consumer segment. Past controversies: The brand has faced criticism and campaigns from animal rights groups regarding its use of coyote fur and down, which can impact its reputation and consumer perception. Opportunities Year-round product expansion: The company's strategic push into non-winter apparel, footwear, and accessories can help mitigate seasonal risks and create a more diversified revenue stream. Expansion in emerging markets: There is potential for growth in new markets where the luxury outerwear segment is developing, particularly in Asia. Sustainability initiatives: By further investing in sustainable materials and ethical practices, the brand can appeal to a growing segment of environmentally and socially conscious consumers. Threats Economic downturn: A weakening global economy and reduced consumer spending could negatively impact sales of its high-priced luxury goods. Intense competition: Canada Goose faces stiff competition from established luxury players like Moncler and other performance brands like The North Face, each with their own loyal customer base and brand proposition. Fluctuating raw material prices: The cost of raw materials, such as down and technical fabrics, can impact the company's profitability and margins. Sustainability and ESG Canada Goose has committed to a 'Sustainable Impact Strategy' to address environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors. The company went fur-free in 2022, ceasing all fur production. It has also made progress on its goal to use bluesign approved fabrics and has invested in renewable energy projects. The brand's sustainability efforts include its 'Kind Fleece,' which is primarily made from recycled wool, and its 'Regeneration' collection, which repurposes leftover materials. The company's new resale platform, Canada Goose Generations, is another initiative designed to promote circularity and extend the lifespan of its products. Despite these efforts, the company has faced criticism from animal welfare organizations regarding its historical use of fur and its continued use of down. While the brand has transitioned to the Responsible Down Standard (RDS), this has not entirely appeased all critics. For investors, ESG factors are increasingly important, and the company's ability to navigate these issues will be a key determinant of its long-term reputation and appeal to conscious consumers. Credits: Reuters Conclusion and perspective Canada Goose is a company with a strong brand identity and a history of quality craftsmanship, but it is at a transitional point. The company is actively working to overcome its seasonal limitations and address past controversies. While its financial performance has been subject to market pressures, its strategic shift towards year-round product offerings and D2C expansion offers potential for future growth. In the first two years after the IPO it was considered a high-growth stock. The share might be suitable for a growth investor who believes in the company's long-term strategy to diversify its product line and expand its global footprint. However, this investment comes with risks, including potential economic headwinds that could impact luxury spending, stiff competition, and the ongoing challenge of transitioning its brand perception. Disclaimer: This analysis is based on publicly available information and reflects the current financial and industry landscape. It is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Investors should conduct their own thorough research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Arsenal's stance on Eberechi Eze transfer revealed as date release clause expires is confirmed
Arsenal have been heavily linked with a move for Crystal Palace star Eberechi Eze this summer, but it remains to be seen if the Gunners can strike a deal for the 27-year-old Arsenal are interested in Crystal Palace star Eberechi Eze, but want to offload a forward before making a formal approach. The Gunners have made six new signings so far this summer, with Viktor Gyokeres, Martin Zubimendi, Noni Madueke, Cristhian Mosquera, Christian Norgaard and Kepa Arrizabalaga all joining the club. Eze is another player that has been heavily linked with a move to the Emirates and he does have a £68million release clause in his contract. However, multiple reports have stated that the clause expires on Friday. And BBC Sport are reporting that Arsenal have 'shown no inclination of triggering the forward's release fee', with the Gunners looking to sell before they make any more new signings. The report adds that Arsenal value Eze at less than £68m and 'want to negotiate a deal beneath the agreement'. Palace have so far been unwilling to negotiate a lower fee, but it is claimed that may change later in the window. When asked about Eze's future back in May, Palace boss Oliver Glasner said: "I don't want to comment on individual players. "We could talk about Marc Guehi, we could talk about Dean Henderson, we could talk about Adam Wharton, we could talk about Jean-Philippe Mateta, Daniel Munoz, Ismaila Sarr who played an incredible, outstanding season for us. We won't sell all of them." And Glasner has been left frustrated with Palace's lack of business so far this summer, having only spent £3m on a backup goalkeeper and a left-back. "Even though all the players are still here, we haven't made the most of the transfer window so far," Glasner admitted. "I was promised that we would be more active and bring in the new players earlier this year. As of now, I have 17 outfield players. "I hope we don't lose any more. If that happens and we get four new ones on deadline day like last year, another false start is possible." Palace's business has been complicated by the fact that they are still waiting to find out which European competition they will be playing in next season. Palace qualified for the Europa League after winning the FA Cup last season, but have been demoted to the Conference League by UEFA. UEFA ruled that they had breached their multi-club ownership rules, but Palace have lodged an appeal with the Court of Arbitration for Sport and a decision is expected before August 11.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
EU banks can weather recession driven by global trade war, stress test shows
MILAN, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Banks across the European Union are strong enough to weather an economic shock driven by geopolitical and trade tensions, the European Banking Authority said on Friday as it presented the outcome of its latest health check of the sector. The EBA tested how 64 European banks, including 51 euro zone lenders, would react to a prolonged recession across the EU and other advanced economies, finding none would breach their core capital requirement, and only one would breach its leverage requirement. "The results indicate that the EU banking system could withstand a severe but plausible macroeconomic scenario, reflecting the resilience built up by banks in recent years," the EBA said, urging lenders to maintain adequate capital. European and U.S. banking authorities introduced formal, comprehensive stress tests after the global financial crisis of 2008 led to costly state bailouts of banks. Some elements of this year's adverse scenario had begun to materialise, the EBA said, pointing to U.S. trade tariffs and escalating tension in the Middle East. Lenders accounting for three quarters of EU banks' total assets took part in the exercise, which simulates the losses banks would incur by analysing their performance over a three-year period under a baseline and an adverse scenario. Under the adverse scenario, worsening geopolitical tensions and protectionist trade policies lift energy and commodity prices, disrupt supply chains and hurt consumption and investment, driving a cumulative 6.3% contraction in EU economic output over 2025-2027. That would translate into combined losses of 547 billion euros for the sampled banks, the EBA said, higher than the 496 billion euros envisaged in its 2023 stress test. While the hit to capital reserves is particularly severe for some European subsidiaries of major U.S. banks, all the lenders remained able to meet core capital requirements, the EBA said, although one would breach the requirement on the leverage ratio. For 17 lenders, the adverse scenario would entail limits or adjustments to bonus and dividend payments for at least one of the three years. In terms of capital reserves - calculated using the current 'transitional' regime that tightens progressively through 2033 - the adverse scenario would knock 3.7 percentage points off the sample's aggregate core capital ratio, pushing it to 12.1% in 2027 from 15.8%. When looking at individual countries, Irish, Danish, French, German and Belgian banks experienced the biggest capital impact, EBA data showed. For individual banks, Landesbank Baden-Wuerttemberg and two other German regional banks, as well France's Credit Agricole and La Banque Postale, saw the largest capital depletion effect. While there is no pass/fail threshold in the EU-wide stress test, its outcome feeds into the risk assessment of lenders carried out by supervisors every year, setting bank-specific capital requirements and guidance known as 'Pillar 2'.
