
Nigeria's landmark Wildlife Protection Bill poised to disrupt global trafficking networks
When Dr Mark Ofua's father was a boy, he would sometimes be late to school — not because he was lazy, but because he had to wait for herds of elephants to finish crossing the road. That was only a generation ago. 'I grew up in the same community,' says Ofua, a Nigerian wildlife veterinarian, 'and there is not a single elephant left.'
On 28 May, Nigeria took a critical step toward preventing more such losses. Its House of Representatives passed the Endangered Species Conservation and Protection Bill, 2024 through its third reading. The Bill now moves to the Senate, with widespread support and expectations of speedy passage before the year ends.
It's a historic move for the country and, according to experts, for all of west Africa.
Nigeria has become a major global hub for wildlife trafficking. According to the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA), the country has been linked to the smuggling of more than 30 tonnes of ivory since 2015 and more than 50% of the pangolin scales seized globally between 2016 and 2019. These products often flow through Nigeria from countries across west and central Africa and are exported to Asia.
'It all comes back to Nigeria,' says Ofua, who helped draft the Bill. 'Traffickers bring ivory and pangolin scales from all over West Africa — even the Congo — and ship it out from Nigeria. If we can change the game here, we can change the game for the whole region.'
Until now, wildlife crime in Nigeria has thrived under toothless legislation. According to Ofua, previous laws carried fines so paltry — less than a dollar in some cases — that traffickers saw them as little more than business costs. 'I would rather traffic elephant tusks, pay the fine when caught, and continue,' he says. 'There were no jail terms. No deterrents.'
Enforcement agencies, too, were limited. Some parts of the older legislation were adapted directly from international trade laws and didn't even cover domestic wildlife crimes. Even when seizures occurred, prosecutions frequently collapsed due to delays, undertrained judges or corruption. 'Cases would drag for years, until the person in charge retired, got transferred or died,' Ofua recalls.
Perhaps most demoralising of all were the scenes of impunity. 'You would see Nigerian police escorting foreign buyers into wet markets to purchase illegal wildlife products,' says Ofua. 'How do you convince the sellers it's a crime when the law enforcers themselves are involved?'
New era for Nigeria's biodiversity
Sponsored by Terseer Ugbor, the deputy chair of the House Committee on Environment, the legislation dramatically strengthens Nigeria's response to organised wildlife crime. In Ugbor's words, 'This Bill sends an unambiguously clear message that Nigeria will not tolerate the use of its borders for trafficking of illegal wildlife products, such as pangolin scales and ivory, to foreign markets.'
The Bill includes:
Stricter penalties, including custodial sentences of up to seven years and proportionate financial penalties for minor and major infractions;
Asset forfeiture provisions, allowing courts to recover profits gained through wildlife crime;
Environmental reparations, such as tree-planting and other restoration efforts;
Expanded investigative powers, enabling law enforcement to conduct intelligence-led probes and track financial transactions;
Faster judicial processes, aimed at ending the prolonged legal stagnation of wildlife cases; and
Alignment with international treaties, including Cites and the UN conventions on corruption and organised crime.
'It's a beautiful piece of legislation,' says Ofua. 'It addresses all the loopholes. It empowers investigators. It brings in financial tracking. And it puts teeth in the judiciary.'
The Bill has drawn praise from major conservation organisations. Tunde Morakinyo, the executive director of Africa Nature Investors Foundation, called it 'a testament to Nigeria's firm commitment to strengthening wildlife governance and combating trafficking.' EIA's Mary Rice said it 'demonstrates Nigeria's commitment to regional security and tackling international trafficking networks'.
Peter Knights, the CEO of Wild Africa, said: 'This is a great step forward for Nigeria to lead the region in combating wildlife crime.'
Enforcement readiness
Even the best law is only as strong as its implementation. But Ofua is optimistic. 'I have consulted for the Ministry of Environment and customs for over a decade,' he says. 'In the last year or two, I've seen a high level of readiness and commitment.'
Recently, he participated in a groundbreaking event: the release of two pangolins into a national park after they were seized at an airport. 'That had never been done before,' he notes. 'Customs officials brought them to me for rehabilitation and we released them together. That's the new Nigeria we want.'
Ofua says customs is currently working with Wild Africa and training new canine units for ports and borders.
'Until now, agencies were shackled by bad laws. But this new Bill clearly spells out their roles and promotes inter-agency cooperation. Once it's passed, they'll be free to act.'
The urgency is clear. Nigeria, like many parts of west Africa, has suffered catastrophic biodiversity loss. 'We used to have cheetahs, rhinos, even the Big Five,' says Ofua. 'In just one generation, much of it has vanished.'
He believes this legislation is the beginning of a long-overdue shift. 'I've been to southern and east Africa. It's like a spiritual recharge seeing wildlife thrive. But here in west Africa, we've been left behind. This Bill could change that.'
The next steps are Senate ratification and presidential approval. So far, the process has been unusually smooth, especially for Nigeria, where some environmental Bills have languished for more than 15 years.
'This Bill has not met any opposition yet,' says Ofua. 'The delays were only because of other national emergencies like flooding and security issues. But with the level of support we're seeing, I believe it will become law before the end of the year.'
And when it does, the ripple effects could be felt across the continent.
'This is Nigeria's chance to lead,' says Ofua. 'If we rise, others will follow. And maybe, one day, our children will see elephants again — not in books, but in the wild.' DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Gqeberha pastor denied bail in murdered 12-year-old sister-in-law case
Pastor Sonwabo Nqayi remains behind bars after being charged with the premeditated murder of a 12-year-old schoolgirl in Motherwell. The Motherwell Magistrate's Court has denied bail to a Gqeberha pastor accused of kidnapping and murdering his 12-year-old sister-in-law. The prosecution successfully opposed the bail application of 39-year-old Sonwabo Nqayi, the pastor and founder of the Holy Burning Fire Ministries of God, on Thursday. Nqayi made his first appearance in court on 30 June, facing premeditated murder, kidnapping, and defeating or obstructing the course of justice charges. Pastor in court in connection with sister-in-law's death He was arrested in connection with the tragic death of his 12-year-old sister-in-law, Lithaliyanda Ntini. The Grade 6 pupil went missing after she left her home on Luzipho Street, NU10, Motherwell, on 24 June 2025 at approximately 4.45pm to visit a shop. ALSO READ: 'There is no white genocide happening here,' says Trump's top pastor after SA visit Lithaliyanda never returned to her home and was last seen wearing grey tracksuit pants with a purple jersey. A few days later, the girl's charred remains were discovered in bushes near Khabonqaba Street, NU6, Motherwell, in the early hours of 27 June 2025 at approximately 2.10am. It is alleged that on 24 June, the accused kidnapped the minor and took her to nearby bushes, where he allegedly murdered her and set her body alight. Girl allegedly murdered and set alight 'While we commend the swift arrest in this case, the brutal nature of this child's murder has deeply shocked our officers and the community,' said acting Eastern Cape provincial commissioner, Major General Thandiswa Kupiso, when Lithaliyanda's body was found. 'We have full confidence in our investigative team and the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to ensure justice for Lithaliyanda and her family.' Bail denied NPA regional spokesperson Luxolo Tyali said the state opposed bail because the matter was premeditated, and there was a likelihood that he would evade trial and use his influence to threaten witnesses. ALSO READ: Omotoso 'not a fugitive from justice', NPA says as Nigerian pastor leaves SA The Motherwell Magistrate's Court ruled in favour of the prosecution. The matter has been remanded to 28 August 2025 for further investigation. 'The NPA remains resolute in its commitment to ensuring that justice is served for victims of violent crime, especially those who are most vulnerable in our society,' Tyali said.

IOL News
6 hours ago
- IOL News
Witness claims Durban tavern owner ordered the burning of victims during July unrest
Tavern owner is alleged to have incited July unrest violence in Phoenix, in Durban. Image: File A State witness has told the Durban High Court that a Tees tavern owner in Phoenix gave the instruction that black Africans be burned with their taxi alive during the 2021 July unrest. The tavern owner, Trevor Gopal, is on trial with Ravine Naidoo, Tyreece Govender, and Timothy Govender. They are charged with the murder of Njabulo Allen Dlamini, the attempted murders of Nkosikhona Madlala and Sandile Colin Sambo. They are also charged with malicious damage to property and public violence. Gopal further faces the charge of incitement to commit public violence. While leading his evidence in chief, Anard Chetty told the court that on July 12, 2021, after the black African victims had been assaulted and Gopal and his brother had set their taxi alight. He said Gopal stated the victims must be brought next to their taxi. 'Burn them with a taxi,' Chetty said. He said the victims had come with a female and another male to make a purchase at Tees Tavern. He said the tavern sold alcohol illegally, as there were Covid-19 lockdown restrictions. Chetty also claimed that drugs are sold in the tavern, and he assisted those who did not want to be seen, by purchasing the drugs for them. However, he said this was not allowed. He said the victims had gone there to buy, but within minutes, they came back running. Chetty said the taxi of the victims, which was written Touch Africa, was blocked by Gopal's brother. He said more cars appeared. After that, he said one male and the female were able to escape and hide in a container operated by Nigerian nationals at the back of the tavern, while the others were assaulted by the crowds, taking instructions from Gopal. Chetty stated that Naidoo was part of those assaulting victims. 'The second accused (Gopal) took out a white cloth from his pocket and stuffed it in a petrol tank of the taxi,' he explained. Chetty said Gopal's brother took a container from him that had petrol and sprinkled it inside the taxi. He said the brothers both tried to burn the taxi, but it did not immediately burn. 'During that occurrence, we were told as a crowd to move away from the taxi because it was going to blow up. He (Gopal) told us not to film. The taxi did burn, but only the tires started, and it eventually went out,' Chetty added. During the incident, Chetty said he asked Naidoo what he was doing there, but he told him that he was there to "support his brah, Tee". Chetty said that at one stage, Gopal moved and was shouting instructions inside his tavern. He said as Gopal gave instructions, the guys were bringing pallets. Chetty said pallets were put on top of the victims, and some other guy who he did not know poured a bit of petrol and lit the matches. 'I think he tried about three times to light the pallets. For the third time, as he was trying to light the matches, a police van was approaching. That's when the crowd screamed, saying police, they moved away,' Chetty explained, crying. Chetty described the layout of the tavern and said the tavern is on the top floor. On the lower floor, there is a supermarket, a shop, and a dental surgery. Chetty also explained to the court that he currently resides in the same building after he lost everything during the pandemic. Chetty got emotional constantly, and every time Judge Mluleki Chithi asked him if he needed a minute to calm down and drink water. Chetty responded that he has waited three years to tell the court what happened. He'd wipe his tears and continue answering questions of State prosecutor advocate Thabani Buthelezi, who is leading him in his testimony. The accused, who are out on bail, constantly took notes during court proceedings, and at times laughed at Chetty's testimony. [email protected]

IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Six MKP members in KZN defend their vote against the Division of Revenue Bill
The KwaZulu-Natal Legislature building in Pietermaritzburg. Image: Shan Pillay One of the six Umkhonto weSizwe Party (MKP) members of KwaZulu-Natal legislature who voted against the Division of Revenue Bill has defended their decision and accused the party MPLs who supported it as out of line. In an unprecedented move, six party MPLs broke ranks with the caucus and voted against the bill while 31 other members supported during the chamber sitting last week, prompting calls for action against the 'rebelling' MPLs. The member who spoke on condition of anonymity on Thursday denied going against the party's position, saying it was him and other five members who kept the long-standing position and voted against the Bill. He stated that firstly, the new chief whip never called a caucus meeting before voting and there was no new instruction for members to vote in a particular way therefore the six of them followed a long-standing position that the MKP will never support anything that comes from the Government of Provincial Unity (GPU) since the party believes the elections were rigged. 'We hear people saying we undermined the party's instruction and we wonder which one because we never received any instruction to vote for this bill nor were we called to a caucus meeting before voting. In the absence of any new instruction, we decided to follow the long-standing position we were given when the government was constituted last year that our party will not support any thing that would come with the GPU since we were robbed of an opportunity that was given to us by the voters to be the government of the province,' said the member. Furthermore, the member said to prove that they were not wrong, the party has not charged them after explaining their side to the provincial leadership under convener Willies Mchunu. The member further said that in their engagement with Mchunu it "became clear that it was an oversight from those who supported the Bill". However, the party chief whip Bonginkosi Mngadi disputed the member's version that there was no meeting or mandate to support the Bill. He stated that he called a caucus meeting where he informed the members of the position and even articulated the position when he spoke for the party before voting for the Bill. 'I am chief whip of the party in the legislature and spoke in the chamber that the party will support the Bill since it was talking about transparency and accountability so I was speaking on behalf of the party,' said Mngadi. He said he would not want to discuss the matter further since it was reported to the provincial leadership. Attempts to get Willies Mchunu were unsuccessful. There was also confusion when the same Bill was voted in parliament on Wednesday where the MKP chief whip Colleen Makhubekele voted yes for the bill only to change her vote later, arguing that she thought the vote was about the Ad hoc committee on allegations of Police Minister Senzo Mchunu's interference in police operations which we were reported by KwaZulu-Natal provincial Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. [email protected]