logo
Sindh turns battlefield over Pak Army's Indus canals, 2 shot dead

Sindh turns battlefield over Pak Army's Indus canals, 2 shot dead

India Today21-05-2025
The agitation in Pakistan's Sindh province against the controversial, army-backed canal project on the Indus River System has gained fresh momentum. Two activists were shot dead on Tuesday as protests intensified after having subsided last month following the shelving of the project. Blaming Punjab's domination for their water woes, Sindh protesters attacked the house of a minister belonging to the Pakistan People's Party (PPP).advertisementSindh and Punjab are two of Pakistan's four provinces. Inhabitants of Sindh have held Punjab, which is the power centre of both the civilian and military establishments, responsible for putting it lower on the priority list.While protests and police action turned northern Sindh into a "virtual battlefield", Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, chairperson of the PPP, came in for sharp criticism for its shaky stance on the canal protests from Sindhi nationalist party Jeay Sindh Muttahida Mahaz (JSMM).
The Sindh-based PPP is part of Shahbaz Sharif's ruling coalition in Islamabad and holds power in Sindh.JSMM Chairperson Shafi Burfat accused Pakistan's military establishment of using an "immature, power-hungry, and unserious" Bilawal to advance its own geopolitical objectives and suppress the canal protests.HOW NORTHERN SINDH TURNED INTO A BATTLEFIELDTensions escalated on Tuesday after Zahid Laghari, an activist of the Sindhi nationalist party Jeay Sindh Muttahida Mahaz (JSMM), was shot dead by police. In response, protests turned violent in Naushahro Feroze district of northern Sindh, turning it into a "virtual battlefield".advertisementDemonstrators blocked a national highway and set a couple of oil tankers on fire.The unrest in Sindh intensified further as protesters stormed the residence of Sindh's Interior Minister, Ziaul Hassan Lanjar. They vandalised the Pakistan People's Party (PPP) leader's house and set parts of it, including the drawing room, on fire.Apart from JSMM activist Laghari, another unnamed protester died as a result of indiscriminate police firing, reported the Karachi-based The News International.More than 15 protesters were injured, at least five of them critically, after police opened fire on protesters in Moro town of Naushahro Feroze district, according to the Karachi-based independent media outlet The Rise News.Protests had died out after the federal government claimed to have shelved the Indus canals project, but the protesters never left the agitation sites, alleging that construction activities continued secretly. Many also saw the shelving as a tactical move by the army-led regime to defuse backlash without actually abandoning the plan.Fresh aggressive protests began on May 19, marked by violence.Protestors, mostly affiliated with the Sindh Saba Party led by Ashfaq Malik, blocked the Moro bypass road to protest against corporate farming and the proposed construction of canals, reported Dawn, a Karachi-based newspaper.advertisementArmed with rods and sticks, protesters chanted slogans as police tried to disperse them.The situation escalated quickly, with police resorting to baton charges and aerial firing. Over a dozen people, including a DSP and six police officers, were injured in the chaos and a police van was damaged.Shops were shut down and roads were deserted as the area turned into a "virtual battlefield", noted the Dawn report. In response, policemen from multiple districts of northern Sindh were deployed to restore order.Apart from the protests in Moro, similar demonstrations erupted in nearby towns, including Kandiaro and Faiz Ganj, reported Samaa TV.Meanwhile, a similar protest planned in Hyderabad was thwarted by police, who cordoned off the area and detained two Sindh Saba activists, according to Dawn.$3.3-BILLION ARMY-BACKED CANAL PLAN DREW SINDH IREThe $3.3-billion canal project, officially known as the Green Pakistan Initiative, was launched in February 2025 by Army Chief Asim Munir and Punjab Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz. They said the project in the Indus River system would irrigate millions of acres of previously uncultivable land in Punjab and parts of Sindh.Proponents, including the military and Shahbaz Sharif's federal government, touted it as a solution to Pakistan's food security crisis.advertisementHowever, the project sparked outrage in Sindh in April, where it was perceived as a move to divert water from the Indus River, critical to the province's agriculture and identity.Critics, including Sindhi nationalists, argued that the canals would primarily benefit Punjab's feudal landlords and corporate farming interests, exacerbating water scarcity in Sindh.The project also revived the long-standing provincial rivalry between Sindh and Punjab. The unrest was compounded by India's suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty after the Pakistani deep-state-sponsored Pahalgam attack, which heightened fears of water shortages in already-parched Sindh.The hybrid Islamabad-Rawalpindi regime faced widespread opposition from Sindh's political parties, nationalist groups, and civil society.Following weeks of protests in April, including highway blockades that disrupted transport to Karachi Port, the Pakistani government announced on April 24, 2025, that the project would be shelved until a consensus could be reached at the Council of Common Interests (CCI) meeting.Despite this, protests continued, demanding a permanent cancellation of the project.However, several prominent voices, including Sindhi writer-activist Ustad Rahi Soomro, alleged that despite official claims of halting the canal project, work on it had quietly continued."The canal project has not stopped. With modern machinery, work is going on. The project has added three more canals to six controversial canals, making them nine," said Soomro on May 18.advertisementPPP AND BILAWAL BHUTTO FACE BACKLASH OVER INDUS CANALS PROJECTBilawal Bhutto Zardari, chairperson of the Sindh-based PPP and son of Pakistan's President Asif Ali Zardari, has come under fire for his and his party's stance on the canal project, as well as for consistently "failing to represent the genuine interests of Sindh and its people".Bilawal had initially endorsed the army-backed canal project, describing it as "vital" for Pakistan's interests. However, as public outrage grew, he shifted his position and criticised the federal government's handling of the issue, saying, "The people of Sindh have rejected the canal projects, yet those in Islamabad remain blind and deaf to our voices".After the project was "shelved" by the federal government, Bilawal also played the India card, saying, "India's announcement on the Indus Waters Treaty was not illegal, but against humanity... As long as the PPP exists, not a single drop of Sindh's water will be given away".Bilawal tried to use the India card and New Delhi's move to the IWT, where his stance remained shaky.advertisementThis shaky stance did not shield him from fierce criticism from the chief of JSMM, whose activist was killed by police firing on Friday.Shafi Burfat, the chairman of the Sindhi nationalist party JSMM, accused Bilawal of being a pawn of the "Punjabi military establishment".He further labelled Bilawal as "immature, power-hungry, and unserious", accusing the PPP of abandoning Sindh's interests to serve Punjab's feudal elite rather than standing up for Sindhi rights or autonomy.Burfat also alleged that the military was manipulating Bilawal to spearhead Rawalpindi's objectives, including its anti-India campaign, promising him political power in return.While the Indus canal protests have exposed fault lines in Pakistan's federal structure, Sindh's resentment against the Punjab-dominated establishment has now reached a boiling point. Even as Islamabad tries to fire-fight, the continued unrest signals that trust has eroded far beyond repair.Tune InMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Melania and Einstein visa: Why some Americans want FLOTUS deported
Melania and Einstein visa: Why some Americans want FLOTUS deported

India Today

time4 minutes ago

  • India Today

Melania and Einstein visa: Why some Americans want FLOTUS deported

Amid intensified immigration enforcement and the Trump administration's attempt to revoke the citizenship of naturalised Americans, a viral petition on MoveOn – a public policy advocacy group – has ignited a debate. The petition, which has gained significant traction online, seeks the deportation of the First Lady of the United States (FLOTUS), Melania Trump, her parents, and her son, Barron largely symbolic, the petition is a response to what critics call the hypocrisy of Trump's immigration stance — targeting immigrants while his own wife and in-laws benefited from the very system he seeks to from being a progressive public policy advocacy group, MoveOn is also a political action committee formed in 1998. The criticism is focussed on Melania Trump's use of the EB-1 visa, which is also nicknamed the "Einstein visa", typically reserved for individuals with extraordinary abilities in fields like science, arts, or business. Critics are saying that if Trump wants to investigate and deport naturalised citizens for possibly taking advantage of immigration rules, then he shouldn't ignore his own wife's was born in the former Yugoslavia (now Slovenia) and became a US citizen in 2006, according to official government biographies of the First Lady, Fox News reported. She is the first US First Lady who is a naturalised First Lady sponsored her parents, who were also from current-day Slovenia, for green cards and then citizenship after securing her own citizenship, The New York Times reported in the petition was originally created five months ago, it has recently gained renewed traction, according to a report in an Ireland-based newspaper, Irish had 100 signatures a few days ago, but had risen to over 6,000 by the time this report went for CALLS OUT TRUMP 'S IMMIGRATION POLICYThe petition questioned Melania Trump's immigration status and called out Trump's immigration policy."Since Trump wants to deport naturalised citizens, I believe it is only fair that Melania and her parents are on the first boat out. In addition, Melania's anchor baby, Barron, should be forced to leave as well because we know that his mother's mother was born in a different country," the petition petition further added, "That is part of the criteria that Trump is putting into place. Your mother's mother has to have been born in the United States and we know Melania's mother was born elsewhere. If it's good for one, it's good for all! There should be no exceptions! On the first boat or flight out."advertisementThe petition also claimed that such action would help avoid any appearance of bias."It is important that this is done to show that it is not a matter of favouritism. If this is truly about national security, then Melania needs to go," the petition also MAXINE WATERS HAD FIRST CALLED FOR MELANIA'S DEPORTATIONThe petition emerged shortly after Democratic California Representative Maxine Waters, at an anti-DOGE protest in Los Angeles on March 25, called for Trump to look into and possibly deport Melania Trump."When he (Trump) talks about birthright, and he's going to undo the fact that the Constitution allows those who are born here, even if the parents are undocumented, they have a right to stay in America. If he wants to start looking so closely to find those who were born here and their parents were undocumented, maybe he ought to first look at Melania," Fox News quoted Waters as saying."We don't know whether or not her parents were documented. And maybe we better just take a look," she was referencing President Trump's executive order, signed on his first day in office, which aimed to eliminate birthright executive order works to clarify the 14th Amendment and tighten the rules for birthright citizenship, which states, "All persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."CONGRESSWOMAN JASMINE CROCKETT ALSO QUESTIONED MELANIA 'S EINSTEIN VISACommonly dubbed the "Einstein visa", the EB-1A is a US immigration program that offers a path to permanent residency for individuals with extraordinary ability in fields such as science, the arts, education, business, or athletics. Reserved for those who have achieved national or international acclaim, the visa targets top-tier talent at the pinnacle of their Representative Jasmine Crockett raised concerns over how Melania Trump, a former model, secured a visa generally intended for individuals demonstrating "extraordinary ability" in their said when she last checked, the First Lady had none of those accolades under her belt."You're supposed to have some sort of significant achievement, like being awarded a Nobel Peace Prize or a Pulitzer; being an Olympic medallist; or having other sustained extraordinary abilities and success in sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics. Last time I checked, the First Lady had none of those accolades under her belt," US-based weekly magazine Newsweek quoted Crockett as saying.- Ends advertisement

Punjab: Newly elected Ludhiana West MLA Sanjeev Arora sworn-in as Cabinet minister
Punjab: Newly elected Ludhiana West MLA Sanjeev Arora sworn-in as Cabinet minister

Time of India

time17 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Punjab: Newly elected Ludhiana West MLA Sanjeev Arora sworn-in as Cabinet minister

Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann on Thursday expanded his Cabinet, inducting newly elected Ludhiana West MLA Sanjeev Arora as minister. Governor Gulab Chand Kataria administered oath of office and secrecy to Arora at a ceremony at the Raj the Bhavan here. Mann, Cabinet ministers and several other party leaders were present on the occasion. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Play War Thunder now for free War Thunder Play Now Undo With Arora's induction, the strength of the Cabinet in the Mann government reached 17. The Punjab Cabinet can have 18 ministers, including the chief minister. The AAP government had carried out its last cabinet rejig in September last year when it inducted five new ministers after dropping four. Live Events Arora, 61, is a Ludhiana-based industrialist and is also known for his social welfare work. He runs the Krishna Pran Breast Cancer Charitable Trust . The businessman-turned-politician became Rajya Sabha member from Punjab in 2022. On Tuesday, he submitted his resignation from the Upper House to Rajya Sabha chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar, who accepted it. Arora was elected as an MLA in the June 19 Ludhiana West assembly bypoll after defeating Congress candidate Bharat Bhushan Ashu by a margin of 10,637 votes. The bypoll was necessitated following the death of AAP MLA Gurpreet Bassi Gogi in January. Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) supremo Arvind Kejriwal had said during the bypoll campaign that Arora would be made a minister, if elected as legislator.

UK charges four activists over airbase break-in tied to Palestine protest
UK charges four activists over airbase break-in tied to Palestine protest

Indian Express

time31 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

UK charges four activists over airbase break-in tied to Palestine protest

British counter-terrorism police have charged four pro-Palestinian activists in connection with a break-in at a UK military airbase, where two planes were vandalised as part of a protest against the UK government's support for Israel. The activists, aged between 22 and 35, are accused of conspiring to enter a prohibited place for purposes harmful to the UK's safety or interests, and conspiring to commit criminal damage, according to a Reuters report. The four remain in custody and are scheduled to appear before a court in London on Thursday. Police said they will submit evidence in court linking the incident to terrorism-related activity. Protest group Palestine Action claimed responsibility for the June 20 break-in at the RAF Brize Norton airbase in Oxfordshire, Central England. In a statement, the group said activists sprayed red paint on two military aircraft, which are used for transport and refuelling, to symbolise bloodshed and protest Britain's role in arming Israel. Police said the damage to the aircraft is estimated at £7 million ($9.55 million). Just a day before the court hearing, British lawmakers voted to ban Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation. The group condemned the move, calling it an 'abuse of power', and announced plans to challenge the decision in court. Palestine Action has frequently targeted UK-based defence contractors, including facilities linked to Israeli weapons manufacturer Elbit Systems, as part of its campaign to end what it calls the UK's complicity in Israeli military actions. Palestine Action has been involved in a series of high-profile direct actions, often involving property damage or site occupations. The group argues these protests are necessary to draw attention to what it views as the UK's active role in enabling Israeli operations in Gaza. UK authorities, however, have raised concerns over the escalating tactics and security risks, culminating in this week's charges and the group's formal terrorist designation. (With inputs from Reuters)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store