
Ukraine holding firm against Russia's summer push
With the war now in its fourth year after Russia's February 2022 invasion of its neighbour, the effort is draining resources on both sides, although Russia has more resources and people to sustain its fight.
Ukraine is seeking further support from Western partners.
"They are not advancing. It's very tough for our guys out there. And it's tough everywhere," Zelenskiy told reporters.
"It's also very hard for the Russians — and that's good for us."
Russia has claimed the capture of some villages and hamlets in recent weeks, but no defensively stronger urban areas have fallen to its troops.
Russian sabotage and reconnaissance groups have repeatedly attempted to stage minor incursions near Pokrovsk in the eastern Donetsk region to film symbolic footage, such as raising a Russian flag, but Ukrainian forces have repelled those efforts, Zelenskiy said.
Zelenskiy described the situation in the northeastern Sumy border region as "much better" than in recent months, noting progress by Ukrainian forces over the past six weeks.
Russia has also intensified its bombardment of Ukrainian cities, with the second-largest city Kharkiv, struck with a powerful glide bomb for a second straight day on Friday.
Seven people were injured, officials said. On Thursday, 42 were injured.
Joyce Msuya, the United Nations' deputy humanitarian chief, told the Security Council on Friday that Ukraine's humanitarian situation is deteriorating due to expanding Russian attacks on civilian areas across the country.
"There is no safe place left in Ukraine," she said.
Zelenskiy said Ukraine is working with international partners to secure 10 US-made Patriot air defence systems, which can shoot down missiles, with three already confirmed from Germany and Norway.
The Trump administration will sell the systems, he said, but Ukraine's task is to find funding for all 10.
Each system costs more than $US1 billion ($A1.5 billion).
Ukraine is also seeking to obtain a licence to manufacture the Patriot systems itself.
The Ukrainian leader expressed little hope for progress in direct talks between delegations from Russia and Ukraine, though he said the Kremlin envoys have begun discussing the possibility of a leaders' summit with Ukraine.
"We need an end to the war, which probably begins with a meeting of leaders. It won't work any other way with (the Russians)," Zelenskiy said.
The Kremlin, however, remained set against top-level talks before a potential comprehensive peace agreement is fleshed out.
"A high-level meeting can and must put a final point in the settlement and seal the modalities and agreements that are yet to be worked out by experts," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Friday.
"It's impossible to act otherwise."
In domestic politics, Zelenskiy said public protests against changes earlier this week to Ukraine's anti-corruption law were "legitimate".
The changes threatened the independence of anti-graft watchdogs and also drew rebukes from European Union officials and international rights groups, prompting Zelenskiy to propose new legislation to restore the independence of the anti-graft agencies.
"It's very important that society speaks. I respect the opinion of society," Zelenskiy said.
"People asked for changes. We responded."
Demonstrators gathered for the third day on Thursday evening, but drew a smaller crowd.
He said those agencies must be "truly independent," adding that "the most important thing in this war is the unity of our state. It is critical not to lose unity".
However, the risk now remains that the Verkhovna Rada, Ukraine's parliament, will fail to approve the new bill, which could bring even larger crowds to the streets.
Zelenskiy expressed confidence that it would pass in a vote scheduled for July 31.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Trump and Starmer meet in Scotland to discuss the Middle East and Ukraine
US President Donald Trump has met UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer during his high-profile trip to Scotland. The pair discussed issues such as the conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine. President Trump gave Russian President Vladimir Putin 50 days to reach a peace deal with Ukraine off his sanctions, but now, he has changed his plans. 'I'm going to make a new deadline of about 10 or 12 days from today,' Mr Trump said during a meeting with Mr Starmer.


The Advertiser
2 hours ago
- The Advertiser
All energy costs rise but small nuclear most reactive
Next-generation nuclear reactors are the most expensive of all energy-producing technologies, a report has found, and would significantly increase electricity prices in Australia. Establishing a large-scale nuclear power plant for the first time would also require more than double the typical costs, and estimates for wind projects had inflated by four per cent due to unforeseen requirements. The CSIRO, Australia's national science agency, released its GenCost report on Tuesday, revealing rising construction and finance costs would push up prices for energy projects of all kinds in the coming years. The findings come after a heated debate about introducing nuclear power to Australia and after members of the federal coalition questioned the nation's reliance on renewable energy projects to achieve net zero by 2050. The final GenCost report for 2024-2025 analysed the cost of several energy-generating technologies, including variations of coal, gas, nuclear, solar and wind projects. Renewable technology continued to provide the cheapest energy generation, the report's lead author and CSIRO chief energy economist Paul Graham said. "We're still finding that solar PV and wind with firming is the lowest-cost, new build low-emission technology," he told AAP. "In second place is gas with (carbon capture storage) ... then large-scale nuclear, black coal with CCS, then the small modular reactors." Small modular nuclear reactors proved the most expensive technology of the eight options by a large margin, with the report basing its costs on Canada's Darlington nuclear project, announced in May. The 1200-megawatt development is estimated to cost $23.2 billion and will be the first commercial small modular reactor built in a Western country. The new reactors produce one-third the power of typical nuclear reactors and can be built on sites not suitable for larger plants, but have only been built in China and Russia. "This is a big deal for Canada - it's their first nuclear build in 30 years," Mr Graham said. "It's not just about meeting electricity demand ... they've said a few things that indicate they're trying to build a nuclear SMR industry and export the technology." In addition to the cost of different technologies, the report estimated "premiums" for establishing first-of-a-kind energy projects, with the first large-scale nuclear project expected to command 120 per cent more and the first offshore wind development expected to cost an extra 63 per cent. The cost of wind projects also grew by four per cent as researchers factored in building work camps to accommodate remote employees, and capital financing costs rose by one per cent. Developing energy projects was also expected to cost between six and 20 per cent more by 2050, the report found, due to the rising price of materials such as cement and wages, as detailed in a report by Oxford Economics Australia. Findings from the CSIRO report would help inform the design of future energy infrastructure, Australian Energy Market Operator system design executive general manager Merryn York said. "We'll use the capital costs for generation and storage from GenCost in the upcoming Draft Integrated System Plan in December," she said. Nuclear technology is banned as an energy source in Australia, which has a target of achieving 82 per cent renewable energy in the national grid by 2030 and reaching net zero by 2050. Next-generation nuclear reactors are the most expensive of all energy-producing technologies, a report has found, and would significantly increase electricity prices in Australia. Establishing a large-scale nuclear power plant for the first time would also require more than double the typical costs, and estimates for wind projects had inflated by four per cent due to unforeseen requirements. The CSIRO, Australia's national science agency, released its GenCost report on Tuesday, revealing rising construction and finance costs would push up prices for energy projects of all kinds in the coming years. The findings come after a heated debate about introducing nuclear power to Australia and after members of the federal coalition questioned the nation's reliance on renewable energy projects to achieve net zero by 2050. The final GenCost report for 2024-2025 analysed the cost of several energy-generating technologies, including variations of coal, gas, nuclear, solar and wind projects. Renewable technology continued to provide the cheapest energy generation, the report's lead author and CSIRO chief energy economist Paul Graham said. "We're still finding that solar PV and wind with firming is the lowest-cost, new build low-emission technology," he told AAP. "In second place is gas with (carbon capture storage) ... then large-scale nuclear, black coal with CCS, then the small modular reactors." Small modular nuclear reactors proved the most expensive technology of the eight options by a large margin, with the report basing its costs on Canada's Darlington nuclear project, announced in May. The 1200-megawatt development is estimated to cost $23.2 billion and will be the first commercial small modular reactor built in a Western country. The new reactors produce one-third the power of typical nuclear reactors and can be built on sites not suitable for larger plants, but have only been built in China and Russia. "This is a big deal for Canada - it's their first nuclear build in 30 years," Mr Graham said. "It's not just about meeting electricity demand ... they've said a few things that indicate they're trying to build a nuclear SMR industry and export the technology." In addition to the cost of different technologies, the report estimated "premiums" for establishing first-of-a-kind energy projects, with the first large-scale nuclear project expected to command 120 per cent more and the first offshore wind development expected to cost an extra 63 per cent. The cost of wind projects also grew by four per cent as researchers factored in building work camps to accommodate remote employees, and capital financing costs rose by one per cent. Developing energy projects was also expected to cost between six and 20 per cent more by 2050, the report found, due to the rising price of materials such as cement and wages, as detailed in a report by Oxford Economics Australia. Findings from the CSIRO report would help inform the design of future energy infrastructure, Australian Energy Market Operator system design executive general manager Merryn York said. "We'll use the capital costs for generation and storage from GenCost in the upcoming Draft Integrated System Plan in December," she said. Nuclear technology is banned as an energy source in Australia, which has a target of achieving 82 per cent renewable energy in the national grid by 2030 and reaching net zero by 2050. Next-generation nuclear reactors are the most expensive of all energy-producing technologies, a report has found, and would significantly increase electricity prices in Australia. Establishing a large-scale nuclear power plant for the first time would also require more than double the typical costs, and estimates for wind projects had inflated by four per cent due to unforeseen requirements. The CSIRO, Australia's national science agency, released its GenCost report on Tuesday, revealing rising construction and finance costs would push up prices for energy projects of all kinds in the coming years. The findings come after a heated debate about introducing nuclear power to Australia and after members of the federal coalition questioned the nation's reliance on renewable energy projects to achieve net zero by 2050. The final GenCost report for 2024-2025 analysed the cost of several energy-generating technologies, including variations of coal, gas, nuclear, solar and wind projects. Renewable technology continued to provide the cheapest energy generation, the report's lead author and CSIRO chief energy economist Paul Graham said. "We're still finding that solar PV and wind with firming is the lowest-cost, new build low-emission technology," he told AAP. "In second place is gas with (carbon capture storage) ... then large-scale nuclear, black coal with CCS, then the small modular reactors." Small modular nuclear reactors proved the most expensive technology of the eight options by a large margin, with the report basing its costs on Canada's Darlington nuclear project, announced in May. The 1200-megawatt development is estimated to cost $23.2 billion and will be the first commercial small modular reactor built in a Western country. The new reactors produce one-third the power of typical nuclear reactors and can be built on sites not suitable for larger plants, but have only been built in China and Russia. "This is a big deal for Canada - it's their first nuclear build in 30 years," Mr Graham said. "It's not just about meeting electricity demand ... they've said a few things that indicate they're trying to build a nuclear SMR industry and export the technology." In addition to the cost of different technologies, the report estimated "premiums" for establishing first-of-a-kind energy projects, with the first large-scale nuclear project expected to command 120 per cent more and the first offshore wind development expected to cost an extra 63 per cent. The cost of wind projects also grew by four per cent as researchers factored in building work camps to accommodate remote employees, and capital financing costs rose by one per cent. Developing energy projects was also expected to cost between six and 20 per cent more by 2050, the report found, due to the rising price of materials such as cement and wages, as detailed in a report by Oxford Economics Australia. Findings from the CSIRO report would help inform the design of future energy infrastructure, Australian Energy Market Operator system design executive general manager Merryn York said. "We'll use the capital costs for generation and storage from GenCost in the upcoming Draft Integrated System Plan in December," she said. Nuclear technology is banned as an energy source in Australia, which has a target of achieving 82 per cent renewable energy in the national grid by 2030 and reaching net zero by 2050. Next-generation nuclear reactors are the most expensive of all energy-producing technologies, a report has found, and would significantly increase electricity prices in Australia. Establishing a large-scale nuclear power plant for the first time would also require more than double the typical costs, and estimates for wind projects had inflated by four per cent due to unforeseen requirements. The CSIRO, Australia's national science agency, released its GenCost report on Tuesday, revealing rising construction and finance costs would push up prices for energy projects of all kinds in the coming years. The findings come after a heated debate about introducing nuclear power to Australia and after members of the federal coalition questioned the nation's reliance on renewable energy projects to achieve net zero by 2050. The final GenCost report for 2024-2025 analysed the cost of several energy-generating technologies, including variations of coal, gas, nuclear, solar and wind projects. Renewable technology continued to provide the cheapest energy generation, the report's lead author and CSIRO chief energy economist Paul Graham said. "We're still finding that solar PV and wind with firming is the lowest-cost, new build low-emission technology," he told AAP. "In second place is gas with (carbon capture storage) ... then large-scale nuclear, black coal with CCS, then the small modular reactors." Small modular nuclear reactors proved the most expensive technology of the eight options by a large margin, with the report basing its costs on Canada's Darlington nuclear project, announced in May. The 1200-megawatt development is estimated to cost $23.2 billion and will be the first commercial small modular reactor built in a Western country. The new reactors produce one-third the power of typical nuclear reactors and can be built on sites not suitable for larger plants, but have only been built in China and Russia. "This is a big deal for Canada - it's their first nuclear build in 30 years," Mr Graham said. "It's not just about meeting electricity demand ... they've said a few things that indicate they're trying to build a nuclear SMR industry and export the technology." In addition to the cost of different technologies, the report estimated "premiums" for establishing first-of-a-kind energy projects, with the first large-scale nuclear project expected to command 120 per cent more and the first offshore wind development expected to cost an extra 63 per cent. The cost of wind projects also grew by four per cent as researchers factored in building work camps to accommodate remote employees, and capital financing costs rose by one per cent. Developing energy projects was also expected to cost between six and 20 per cent more by 2050, the report found, due to the rising price of materials such as cement and wages, as detailed in a report by Oxford Economics Australia. Findings from the CSIRO report would help inform the design of future energy infrastructure, Australian Energy Market Operator system design executive general manager Merryn York said. "We'll use the capital costs for generation and storage from GenCost in the upcoming Draft Integrated System Plan in December," she said. Nuclear technology is banned as an energy source in Australia, which has a target of achieving 82 per cent renewable energy in the national grid by 2030 and reaching net zero by 2050.


Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
All energy costs rise but small nuclear most reactive
Next-generation nuclear reactors are the most expensive of all energy-producing technologies, a report has found, and would significantly increase electricity prices in Australia. Establishing a large-scale nuclear power plant for the first time would also require more than double the typical costs, and estimates for wind projects had inflated by four per cent due to unforeseen requirements. The CSIRO, Australia's national science agency, released its GenCost report on Tuesday, revealing rising construction and finance costs would push up prices for energy projects of all kinds in the coming years. The findings come after a heated debate about introducing nuclear power to Australia and after members of the federal coalition questioned the nation's reliance on renewable energy projects to achieve net zero by 2050. The final GenCost report for 2024-2025 analysed the cost of several energy-generating technologies, including variations of coal, gas, nuclear, solar and wind projects. Renewable technology continued to provide the cheapest energy generation, the report's lead author and CSIRO chief energy economist Paul Graham said. "We're still finding that solar PV and wind with firming is the lowest-cost, new build low-emission technology," he told AAP. "In second place is gas with (carbon capture storage) ... then large-scale nuclear, black coal with CCS, then the small modular reactors." Small modular nuclear reactors proved the most expensive technology of the eight options by a large margin, with the report basing its costs on Canada's Darlington nuclear project, announced in May. The 1200-megawatt development is estimated to cost $23.2 billion and will be the first commercial small modular reactor built in a Western country. The new reactors produce one-third the power of typical nuclear reactors and can be built on sites not suitable for larger plants, but have only been built in China and Russia. "This is a big deal for Canada - it's their first nuclear build in 30 years," Mr Graham said. "It's not just about meeting electricity demand ... they've said a few things that indicate they're trying to build a nuclear SMR industry and export the technology." In addition to the cost of different technologies, the report estimated "premiums" for establishing first-of-a-kind energy projects, with the first large-scale nuclear project expected to command 120 per cent more and the first offshore wind development expected to cost an extra 63 per cent. The cost of wind projects also grew by four per cent as researchers factored in building work camps to accommodate remote employees, and capital financing costs rose by one per cent. Developing energy projects was also expected to cost between six and 20 per cent more by 2050, the report found, due to the rising price of materials such as cement and wages, as detailed in a report by Oxford Economics Australia. Findings from the CSIRO report would help inform the design of future energy infrastructure, Australian Energy Market Operator system design executive general manager Merryn York said. "We'll use the capital costs for generation and storage from GenCost in the upcoming Draft Integrated System Plan in December," she said. Nuclear technology is banned as an energy source in Australia, which has a target of achieving 82 per cent renewable energy in the national grid by 2030 and reaching net zero by 2050.