Trading Day: Sweeping US fiscal bill advances, rate path stays murky
NEW YORK () - -TRADING DAY
Making sense of the forces driving global markets
By Lewis Krauskopf, Markets Reporter
Jamie is enjoying some well-deserved time off, but the Reuters markets team will still keep you up to date on what moved markets today. We're watching President Donald Trump's tax cut-and-spending bill, which made it through the U.S. Senate on Tuesday and now goes back to the other U.S. legislative body, the House of Representatives. I'd love to hear from you, so please reach out to me with comments at .
Today's Key Market Moves
* Wall Street indexes were mixed, with the Nasdaq slumpingwhile the Dow rose and moved closer to a record high * The beaten-up U.S. dollar edged lower against a basketof major currencies * U.S. Treasury yields rose, after data showed the labormarket remained resilient * Gold prices jumped over 1%, continuing a massive run forthe metal this year * Oil prices edged higher, as investors weighed positivedemand indicators in China and elsewhere
Today's Key Reads
1. Six questions facing US stock investors as 2025's secondhalf kicks off 2. Trump's push for regulatory reform highlights 'Treasuryput': Jen 3. Corporate spending binge could spur long-term US growth:Guild 4. How Novo Nordisk misread the US market for its weightloss sensation 5. DOGE now targeting SEC policy, eyes SPAC rules, sourcessay
Sweeping US fiscal bill moves ahead, rate path stays murky
President Donald Trump's U.S. fiscal bill took a key step forward on Tuesday, carrying with it possible risks and rewards for investors.
The legislation, narrowly passed by the U.S. Senate, would extend Trump's 2017 personal and business tax cuts, otherwise due to expire at the end of this year, and give new tax breaks in areas such as tipped income and overtime. Investors hope the tax easing might provide stimulus that supports consumer spending.
But, according to nonpartisan analysts, the bill would add an estimated $3.3 trillion to the nation's debt. Growing deficits are continuing to cloud financial markets, especially after Moody's cut America's pristine sovereign credit rating in May.
The bill still must pass the House of Representatives, where Trump's Republican party holds a slim majority, and it remains to be seen if it will become law by Trump's hoped-for deadline of the July 4 Independence Day holiday.
Focus was also on the Federal Reserve, and when the U.S. central bank may next cut interest rates. At a central bank gathering in Portugal, Fed Chair Jerome Powell reiterated the need to understand the impact of Trump's tariffs on inflation before lowering rates.
But Powell also declined to rule out a possible rate cut at the Fed's July 29-30 meeting. Markets also seemed to include such a possibility: Fed Fund futures were baking in a roughly 20% chance of a cut at the July meeting, with chances deemed much more likely at the Fed's September meeting.
The rate path could become more clear with economic data in coming days, including the monthly U.S. jobs report on Thursday.
The dollar, which has fallen steeply this year, edged lower against a basket of major currencies.
In a mixed day on Wall Street, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq pulled back from record high levels, while another major U.S. index, the Dow Jones industrial average, moved closer to a record peak.
A 5% drop in Tesla shares weighed on the Nasdaq and S&P 500. Trump threatened to cut off subsidies for companies run by Tesla chief Elon Musk, escalating tensions between the one-time allies who have since fallen out.
Musk, who spent hundreds of millions on Trump's re-election, had renewed his criticism of the fiscal bill, which would eliminate subsidies for electric vehicle purchases that have benefited Tesla.
Tesla shares could get another jolt on Wednesday when the EV carmaker releases its quarterly delivery figures.
What could move markets tomorrow?
* ADP national employment report (June) * Challenger job cuts data (June) * ECB forum on central banking * Euro zone unemployment rate (May) * Japan monetary base (June) * Tesla quarterly deliveries
Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
Trading Day is also sent by email every weekday morning. Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also sign up here.
(By Lewis Krauskopf)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
A 30-Year-Old Asks Where's The Best Place To Invest $5,000 Per Month: 'Finally In A Place Where I Can Steadily Invest'
Many people will tell you to invest money if you want to build a nest egg and retire early. Putting your money to work in the stock market can allow it to multiply much faster than the cash in your savings account. However, the stock market can also feel overwhelming when you are getting started. That's why a 30-year-old who's ready to invest $5,000 per month turned to the Investing subreddit for some advice. He wanted to know the best place to put money and was eager to hear everyone's thoughts. "[I'm] finally in a place where I can steadily invest," he stated. Redditors shared their suggestions in the comments. These were some of the top responses. Don't Miss: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. Most Redditors recommended ETFs that tracked the S&P 500. This benchmark holds 500 of the largest and most profitable U.S. corporations. The index periodically adds and removes stocks from its holdings to trim the laggards and focus on promising stocks that fulfill the S&P 500's requirements. The index gives investors broad exposure to numerous industries. Tech stocks make up the highest percentage of the fund's total assets, with the Magnificent Seven stocks playing a key part in the S&P 500's overall performance. You don't have to know much about investing to get started with the S&P 500. If the economy continues to grow, the S&P 500 will continue to grow with it. You don't have to risk it all with a single stock pick or monitor a bunch of holdings when an ETF that follows the S&P 500's performance can work for most people. Trending: Invest early in CancerVax's breakthrough tech aiming to disrupt a $231B market. Redditors also recommended ETFs that follow the Nasdaq-100 due to its tech-heavy concentration. Tech stocks may produce outsized gains in the years ahead due to artificial intelligence. Although investors have heard about this technology for years, it's still in the early innings. Even without artificial intelligence, the Nasdaq-100 and other tech-heavy benchmarks have outperformed the S&P 500 over the past few years. For instance, the Nasdaq-100 is up by roughly 118% over the past five years, while the S&P 500 has only gained 97% during the same stretch. The Nasdaq-100 also outpaces the S&P 500 year-to-date and over the past year. When the stock market rallies, funds that track the Nasdaq-100 tend to grow faster than funds that track the S&P the S&P 500 and Nasdaq-100 are two popular benchmarks for ETF investors, Redditors emphasized the importance of investing in low-cost ETFs. While each investor has a different definition of a low-cost ETF, you'll be OK if you have an ETF with an expense ratio below 0.20%. You'll get the lowest expense ratios if you invest in passively managed ETFs. These funds follow a predetermined benchmark instead of doing anything fancy like selling covered calls to increase the yield. You can find some passively-managed ETFs with expense ratios below 0.10%. The expense ratio indicates how much money you must pay the fund manager to keep your money in the ETF. This expense happens automatically within the fund, so you'll never see the money directly leave your account. If you have $10,000 in a fund with a 0.10% expense ratio, you only have to pay a reasonable $10 to keep your money in the fund each year. However, if that same fund had a 1% expense ratio, you would have to pay $100 per year for that fund. Investors are willing to pay extra for funds that significantly outperform the market, but most actively-managed funds don't hold up to the S&P 500. It's better to invest in low-cost ETFs than it is to try your luck with an actively-managed ETF with a high expense ratio. Read Next: GoSun's Breakthrough Rooftop EV Charger Already Has 2,000+ Units Reserved — Image: Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article A 30-Year-Old Asks Where's The Best Place To Invest $5,000 Per Month: 'Finally In A Place Where I Can Steadily Invest' originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Politico
40 minutes ago
- Politico
How Trump's Very MAGA Tax Cuts Break with GOP Tradition
For decades, Republicans have extolled the virtues of removing loopholes and carveouts from the tax code, arguing it would make the system fairer and more efficient, while allowing for lower overall tax rates. 'The tax code is littered with hundreds of preferences and subsidies that pick winners and losers and create complexity,' House Republicans led by then-Speaker Paul Ryan and then-Rep. Kevin Brady, said in their 2016 tax plan. 'Instead of free-market competition that rewards success, our tax code directs resources to politically favored interests, creating a drag on economic growth and job creation.' Fast forward to the present day, and one thing is for sure: President Donald Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill is not an exercise in tax simplification. Instead, it began with a push to extend the party's 2017 tax cuts — which despite some streamlining also introduced some complexity — and piled more on top, in line with a slew of presidential campaign promises. Add in a heavy dose of congressional politics, and the result was a sprawling and quirky piece of legislation that is distinctively Trumpy: lower taxes and a bigger pile of tax breaks. 'It's certainly a departure from what Republicans were trying to do in 2017 and broadly a departure from what Republicans have been arguing for decades about tax reform,' Kyle Pomerleau, a senior fellow at the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute, told me. The question, though, is not just whether doing your taxes is complicated and annoying. It's whether that complexity serves a particular purpose. For example, a provision in the GOP bill allows businesses to deduct expenditures on machinery and equipment entirely from their taxes, which could both encourage investment and support Trump's reindustrialization goals. For other key parts of the bill, several economists I spoke with worried it is the worst of all combinations: increasing the debt to pay for tax breaks that lead to neither growth nor other economically useful outcomes. 'I don't want to say it's vote-buying because that's probably a normative statement that is outside of my wheelhouse, but … there's not a lot of pro-growth stuff,' said Kent Smetters, a University of Pennsylvania business professor who serves as the faculty director of the Penn Wharton Budget Model. Take, for example, Trump's popular campaign promises of no tax on tips and no tax on overtime. In some cases, those provisions simply reward people for their existing lifestyle. In others, it might lead businesses to restructure how they pay their employees. It's obviously great news either way for the employees who benefit. It's just unclear why the government is choosing to reward these particular subsets of workers over others. (It is presumably not an accident that Trump promised this tax perk to voters as he was pushing in the last election to win Nevada, a state where many hospitality and gaming industry workers rely on tipped income.) And cutting taxes without finding some way to offset the lost revenue — either by closing loopholes to broaden the scope of people and businesses that are taxed, like in 1986, or through some other method — leads to increased debt that can itself be a drag on growth. After all, investors are lending the money to the U.S. government rather than doing something else with it. And even after spending cuts, the new GOP tax law is still expected to add trillions to deficits over the next decade. 'The money has to come from somewhere,' said Alan Auerbach, a professor at the University of California at Berkeley. In that sense, the tax cuts under President George W. Bush weren't the ideal way to structure policy either, as they mostly just lowered rates while increasing the debt. But this bill? 'It's worse than the Bush tax cuts because the scale is so much bigger, and there's a lot more weird stuff in it,' Auerbach said. The gargantuan scale and eccentricity of the tax package is a reflection, above all, of the president who propelled it into law, and it reveals how much the Republican Party has changed under his leadership. In the 2016 GOP policy document, under Ryan and Brady's direction, the party cited tax reform legislation passed in 1986 — which decreased the number of tax brackets, slashed deductions and lowered rates — as a guiding light, saying the party's goal was to 'replicate and build upon this achievement.' But this is now the party of Donald Trump, not Ronald Reagan. Trump, ina 1999 Wall Street Journal op-ed, referred to the bipartisan 1986 law as 'an offense against the working man,' decrying the removal of certain deductions as 'predictably disastrous.' Now the Trump administration needs to defend the law and all its peculiarities. Joe Lavorgna, who works at the Treasury Department as a counselor to Secretary Scott Bessent, said many critiques of the new law miss the point. A critical priority for Trump, he said, was avoiding the expiration of the 2017 tax cuts, which would have led to higher tax rates and therefore slower growth. He said language that allows people to deduct the interest they pay on auto loans for American-made cars, for example, will help boost the goal of having a 'vibrant, healthy' domestic car industry. Lavorgna also said the provision removing taxes on overtime will lead to more output. 'Anything that incentivizes people to work an extra hour because they're not going to be taxed on it or be taxed at the same rate' creates benefits for the economy, he said. 'It's not a giveaway. They're creating something.' As for no tax on tips? That will 'help people who have been under significant cost of living pressure,' he said. Ultimately, what's clear is that cutting taxes is still the centerpiece of the Republican Party — the rallying cry that could bring together a fractious governing coalition. But tax reform? That conservative dream seems to have died quietly.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Trump administration has begun garnishing wages of student loan borrowers in default. These are the benefits businesses can offer employees to help with their debt
A few years ago, it seemed like the dream of widespread student debt forgiveness was alive and well. And although the hopes of millions of borrowers across the country have since been dashed, there are moves that employers can make to help workers toiling under the burden of defaulted loans and garnished wages. Student loan borrowers were able to take advantage of a repayments pause when the COVID pandemic began in 2020, but that expired in September of 2023. That same year, the Supreme Court struck down then-President Biden's decision to cancel up to $20,000 in debt for qualified borrowers. And in May of 2025, a five-year reprieve for student loan borrowers who were in default on their loans expired. That means that collections are now in play, and the Department of Education can garnish wages, tax refunds, and federal benefits. 'Resuming collections protects taxpayers from shouldering the cost of federal student loans that borrowers willingly undertook to finance their postsecondary education,' the Department of Education (DOE) wrote in a statement late April. 'There will not be any mass loan forgiveness.' This isn't just a problem for an unlucky few. Around 20.5% of student loan borrowers have a payment that's past due by 90 days or more, according to a TransUnion analysis. And around 5.3 million defaulted borrowers will get a notice from the Treasury Department that their wages could potentially be garnished, according to a May statement from the DOE. Workers of all ages have already been struggling for years with student loan repayment. But the latest move from the Trump administration has made the issue even more urgent. There are several different ways that employers can help their workers with student loan repayments, including through retirement benefits, educational assistant programs, and paid time off exchanges. Fortune sat down with benefits experts, who say that while offering these benefits do come with challenges, they can go a long way toward improving employee financial wellbeing. 'Business leaders can't ignore this financial pressure anymore,' says Jeremy Yonan, VP of total rewards at job site Indeed. 'Student loan debt isn't just a personal challenge, it's actually a business imperative because the ripple effect comes up in every corner of the workplace.' Many workers burdened by student loans face a tough financial tradeoff: either reduce their debt or invest in their future. That means they often miss out on contributing to their retirement plans, and their employer's valuable contributions. The Secure 2.0 Act of 2022 aimed to fix that problem. Companies can take the funds they'd use to match employee retirement contributions and instead use them to help them pay off student loans. 'When companies offer a contribution into retirement savings in connection with their student loan payments, they are helping to protect the financial future of those employees who are largely sidelined and sitting out of their primary benefit that they offer, which is the retirement match,' says Laurel Taylor, CEO of Candidly, a financial wellness company. Financially, this process is easy for employers because the money is essentially repurposed so it doesn't cost businesses extra to provide the benefit. But few employers are currently taking advantage of it because of the administrative burden. Only 11% of Candidly customers have launched the student loan retirement match in connection with secure 2.0. Benefit, according to Taylor. Goldman Sachs Ayco, an arm of the bank that specializes in workplace financial planning, says that while 31% of their corporate clients offer student loan assistance, only 10% do so through retirement. As the student loan crisis becomes more dire, however, we might see more businesses offer the benefit to their workforce. 'When employees start to see their wages garnished, it might lead some companies to accelerate adoption on the 401(K) side if participation is high enough,' says Kris Battistoni, VP of compensation and benefits solutions at Goldman Sachs Ayco. Companies that offer employees a certain number of days of paid-time off may want to consider a program that allows workers to exchange their unused time and dedicate those funds towards paying off student loan debt. The benefit is that it costs the employer itself very little, as they have already budgeted that time into their balance sheet. The drawback is that it can come with administrative burdens, because HR managers have to comply with a variety of state laws around what employees can and can't do with their PTO. There are, however, a variety of B2B businesses out there tailored to handle services like these. Businesses should also be aware that critics of these PTO exchanges argue that they incentivize employees to disregard work-life balance, which could lead to additional stress and burnout. The program also won't work for companies with flexible or unlimited PTO. 'The PTO model is interesting, because the biggest criticism that we've seen and heard and had had conversations with employers about is it sort of diminishes quality of life,' Stacey MacPhetres, senior director of education finance for EdAssist by Bright Horizons, which helps employers manage education benefits, tells Fortune. One of the easiest and most impactful ways to provide help to people with student loans is offering them financial counseling services. Student loan borrowers often have more than one loan in play at a time, with different interest rates and timelines. That can make it hard to figure out exactly how much of one's paycheck should be allocated toward paying off the debt, and which loans should be prioritized, says MacPhetres. 'It's incredibly beneficial to offer, not just the monetary contribution, but expert coaching behind the scenes to make sure that those funds are being applied in the most expedient way, based on what the employee wants to accomplish,' she says. Student loan education is just as important as the ability to pay off the debt, experts say, especially if planners can help employees refinance their loans to get a better interest rate. That kind of personalized assistance can not only help with student loans, but also ease worker anxiety around their finances. 'From recent grads and mid-career professionals to parents helping get through college, having that personalized care for different life stages can provide real short term relief,' says Yonan. 'It's not just about the case investment, it's also about education.' Employers have long been able to help workers fund their education through educational assistance programs. Businesses are allowed to contribute $5,250 per employee per year towards tuition, books, or supplies, or courses. But in 2020, the program was expanded to include the ability for companies to put this money towards paying off student loan debt, according to the IRS. Many employers have questions about how they can make sure the money is being used as intended. That's because employees mostly self-certify that they've spent the money on loans, and businesses need to find an efficient way to verify that without invading privacy in the process, says Jonathan Barber, VP head of compensation and benefits solutions, at Goldman Sachs Ayco. 'I think companies thus far are uncomfortable with it because they want to verify that they're actually doing something to pay off the debt and not just giving employees funds.' Under current law, the program is set to expire at the end of 2025, according to the IRS. But experts that Fortune spoke with are confident that the program will be made permanent through legislation later this year. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
