logo
Should India worry about China's massive dam? – DW – 07/30/2025

Should India worry about China's massive dam? – DW – 07/30/2025

DW2 days ago
China's construction of a massive dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo has raised fears in India over water flows, agriculture and regional security.
China began building a massive dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo river near the disputed border with the northeastern Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh — which Beijing also claims — earlier this month at a ceremony attended by Chinese Premier Li Qiang.
It has sparked alarm in India given both the environmental risks and the potential leverage it offers China over water flow into northeast India and Bangladesh.
The estimated $170 billion (€147.4 billion) hydropower project aims to generate 300 billion kilowatt hours of electricity annually, supplying power primarily for transmission to other parts of China and meeting local demand in Tibet. It surpasses the giant Three Gorges Dam's capacity, currently the largest in the world.
Some experts and former diplomats believe the dam is likely to renew tensions between India and China, despite recent signs of a cautious improvement in ties, such as addressing border concerns.
The two nations have accused each other of trying to seize territory along their de facto border, known as the Line of Actual Control (LAC), which India claims is 3,488 kilometers (2,167 miles) long and China says is shorter.
After years of tension, both countries have renewed efforts to normalize relations.
In January, both sides agreed to resume flights after nearly five years. Three months later, India and China's special representatives decided to move forward by resuming pilgrimages and border trade.
However, the dam project introduces a major new fault line, as the ecological changes to the landscape are expected to trigger a range of geopolitical and environmental issues related to habitats and demography across the lower Himalayas.
India considers the Expert Level Mechanism (ELM) — a bilateral data-sharing framework — inadequate given the scale of dam project, as the ELM mainly provides information during the monsoon season, when flooding is a major risk.
"In the long run, as India argues, it will not only trap nutrient-rich sediments vital for downstream soil fertility in Assam and Bangladesh, thereby affecting irrigation," Aravind Yelery, associate professor at the Centre for East Asian Studies in Delhi's Jawaharlal Nehru University, told DW.
The dam will "also impact crop yields and agricultural productivity, and compromise riverine ecosystems," Yelery added.
In Yelery's estimate, the transboundary rivers and China's approach to unilaterally altering the riverine ecosystem is disastrous environmentally and diplomatically.
"From a legal aspect, China is taking a felonious route to neglect its responsibility for preserving river flows due to geopolitical ambitions," said Yelery, adding that this has already had a profound impact on India's strategic approach to engaging in border talks.
China took a similar stance on the Mekong River, asserting upstream control while constructing several dams. Since the mid-1980s, China has built 11 large dams on the Mekong (Lancang), with more underway.
"China has not entered into riparian agreement with any of its neighbours even though it controls the headworks of most major rivers in Asia," Atul Kumar, a China expert and fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, told DW.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
"Beijing has adopted a similar stance in the Yarlung Tsangpo case and kept India and Bangladesh uninformed on these dam projects. Even the hydrological data sharing, a harmless technical detail, often depends on bilateral relationship and has often remained unavailable during tense periods," said Kumar.
A statement by Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun that the project "will not have any negative impact on the downstream regions" during a media briefing last week has been met with skepticism.
Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu described the Chinese mega dam project as a ticking "water bomb" and an existential threat that is a far bigger issue than the military threat.
"The issue is that China cannot be trusted. No one knows what they might do," Khandu told news agency PTI, stressing that China is not a signatory to the international water treaty that could have forced it to abide by global norms.
Kumar also raised concerns over the dam's risk of failure, which "would always remain a ticking bomb for downstream areas in northeast India and Bangladesh."
"In an unstable and earthquake-prone Himalayas, a natural disaster, conflict or even sabotage can bring destruction all over the downstream areas," said Kumar.
Former diplomat Anil Wadhwa called for a consultative mechanism and said China should disclose details about the dam's capacity, water flows and alignments, once construction has been completed.
"It is imperative that India takes all defensive measures in Arunachal Pradesh by constructing its own dam at the earliest," Wadhwa told DW.
"The local opposition should be compensated and open communication with the affected community will help lest the issue spiral as we have seen with other mega projects in the country."
That sentiment was echoed by former diplomat Ajay Bisaria, who told DW, "Given China's recent history of leveraging economic interdependence and trade as a geopolitical tool, India should assume China will weaponize the waters."
"While China's willingness to do so is evident, its capacity and the technical feasibility are yet to be seen. To mitigate that risk, India must proactively assess and game the worst-case scenario," Bisaria concluded.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Trump's high tariffs against Brazil could backfire – DW – 08/01/2025
How Trump's high tariffs against Brazil could backfire – DW – 08/01/2025

DW

time7 hours ago

  • DW

How Trump's high tariffs against Brazil could backfire – DW – 08/01/2025

Brazil will pay as much as 50% tariffs on goods exported to the United States. But experts say the tariffs, along with sanctions on a Brazilian judge, indicate this isn't about economics but about Trump's politics. The newly announced tariffs by the US government on Brazilian imports, as well as Washington's move to sanction Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes "for serious human rights abuse," has caused a strong reaction in Brazil. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has condemned American interference in the Brazilian legal system, calling it "unacceptable." The political motivation behind these measures undermines Brazil's sovereignty and threatens the relationship between the two countries, Lula said. From August 6, the US will impose tariffs of 50% on Brazilian imports into America. Somewhat surprisingly, around 700 Brazilian products were exempted. But experts have said this still puts the average tariff on Brazilian goods at around 30%. The European Union and Japan are only paying 15% tariffs. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The US government, under President Donald Trump, has justified its new global tariffs by blaming a bilateral trade imbalance. The Trump administration has also given the prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro as an explanation for the punitive tariffs. Judge de Moraes is presiding over the trial of Bolsonaro, who is accused of masterminding a plot to stay in power despite his 2022 election defeat. The personal sanctions on de Moraes come under the US' Magnitsky Act, which allows the American government to sanction foreign government officials worldwide for human rights offenses. Among other things, de Moraes could see any assets he has in the US frozen. The US government had already prevented de Moraes and other Brazilian Supreme Court judges from entering the country. "The Magnitsky Act was previously used against the US' enemies but it always used to have a basis in human rights," said Demetrio Magnoli, a sociologist and foreign affairs columnist in Brazil. "But by using it for the first time against a judge in a democracy, Trump is shattering the human rights foundations of this law." As for the high tariffs, Magnoli told DW it's not unusual for Trump to use tariffs as a weapon in his trade war and deal-making. "But in the case of Brazil, he is using both tariffs and the Magnitsky Act for political and ideological reasons," the commentator noted. "A unique case worldwide and a direct attack on a democratic country and a US ally." Judge de Moraes has been seen as a nuisance by American right wingers since he ordered social media platform, X (formerly Twitter) blocked for several weeks in late 2024. De Moraes demanded that user accounts that violated Brazilian law be removed, part of an attempt to crack down on anti-democratic, far-right voices. Billionaire Elon Musk, the owner of X, tried to get around the court-ordered block and called for de Moraes to be impeached. But de Moraes actually became a target for Trump earlier than that, because of Bolsonaro. In late 2022, the former president was accused of planning a coup against his successor, Lula, something that could carry a sentence of up to 40 years in prison. Bolsonaro and his co-defendants have disputed this charge, and Trump has described it as "a witch hunt." De Moraes has also investigated Bolsonaro for, among other things, manufacturing disinformation and has convicted Bolsonaro's supporters for storming the government district in Brasilia in January 2023. As a result, the judge has been celebrated as a defender of democracy in Brazil, particularly by those on the left. But perhaps because of the parallels to Trump's own past — his supporters also stormed government buildings in January 2021, and Trump previously insisted the 2020 election was "stolen" from him — de Moraes' actions have been like a red rag to Brazil's bullish right wingers, and now also to Trump supporters. However, Guilherme Casaroes, a professor at the Sao Paulo School of Business Administration at the Getulio Vargas Foundation, sees a bright side. The fact that, contrary to his initial announcement two weeks ago, Trump is allowing numerous tariff exemptions means that Brazil did well in negotiations with the US, he said. "But it also clearly shows that Trump's motivation is not so much commercial and more political," said Casaroes. "Especially because Brazil actually has a trade deficit with the US." The expert believes there are three key factors influencing Trump's attack on Brazil. Firstly, the country's closer ties with China, which makes Brazil a battleground in the geopolitical conflict between the US and China. Secondly, this fight is ideological: Trump wants to be seen supporting his allies around the world. That includes Bolsonaro. And thirdly, the economic interests of US tech giants: "They don't want social media regulation," said Casaroes. In Brazil, Trump's onslaught has triggered Brazilian nationalism, especially on social media. That's fair, said sociologist and political commentator Celso Rocha de Barros. He described what he calls the "American intervention against the Brazilian Supreme Court" as "unacceptable imperialist aggression" and insisted that in the future, Brazil must "negotiate economic agreements without giving an inch on democratic and political issues." Rocha de Barros believes de Moraes is actually looking stronger after this episode. Even Supreme Court justices who felt more favorably about Bolsonaro don't want to be giving anybody the impression that they support foreign intervention in their own court, he said. But Demetrio Magnoli believes the US' attacks on de Moraes could actually find favor with parts of the Brazilian population. Many locals are unhappy with their Supreme Court, he pointed out. This is partially because what some think are the judges' too-high salaries, but it's also because of the high penalties meted out to what Magnoli called "the useful idiots of the Bolsonaro camp," those who participated in the January 2023 rioting. Some Brazilians also believe de Moraes became too powerful during the trial against Bolsonaro. In other ways, Trump's attacks actually offers the Brazilian president an opportunity. Lula is polling badly, but if he manages to convince the Brazilian parliament to help an economy badly hit by Trump's tariffs, he might become more popular again. And that would be the opposite of what the US leader was hoping for, Magnoli said.

Ukraine updates: Trump deploys nuclear subs near Russia – DW – 08/01/2025
Ukraine updates: Trump deploys nuclear subs near Russia – DW – 08/01/2025

DW

time7 hours ago

  • DW

Ukraine updates: Trump deploys nuclear subs near Russia – DW – 08/01/2025

President Donald Trump said he ordered two nuclear submarines near Russia after what he called "foolish and inflammatory" statements from a former Russian president. DW has more Russia has intensified its attacks on Ukraine, even as US President Donald Trump threatens tougher sanctions unless President Vladimir Putin agrees to a ceasefire in the coming days. A day of mourning was being held in Ukraine's capital on Friday a day after Russia launched waves of missiles and drones on Kyiv, killing 31 people and wounding over 150 others., On Thursday, Trump slammed Russia's military actions in Ukraine as "disgusting." He has given Putin until August 8 to reach a ceasefire or face President Donald Trump said Friday that he had ordered the deployment of two nuclear submarines in response to "provocative" comments by a senior Russian official. "Based on the highly provocative statements of the Former President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev... I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that," Trump posted on his Truth Social platform. "Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances," he added. Trump's comments continue an ongoing war of words on social media between the US president and Russian former President Medvedev. Medvedev served as Russian president from 2008 to 2012, between President Vladimir Putin's terms in power, and is now deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video He attracted Trump's ire when he said the US president's threat to impose tariffs on buyers of Russian oil, such as India, constituted an "ultimatum game" whereby "each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war" between Moscow and Washington. On Thursday, Medvedev wrote in a post on Telegram that, "if some words from the former president of Russia trigger such a nervous reaction from the high-and-mighty president of the United States, then Russia is doing everything right and will continue to proceed along its own path." He also said Trump should remember "how dangerous the fabled 'Dead Hand' can be" — a reference to a secretive, semi-automated, Soviet-era command system designed to launch Moscow's nuclear missiles in the event of its leadership being eliminated. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reiterated on Friday his willingness to sit down with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. Zelenskyy was reacting to the Russian president's statements on Friday that Moscow hoped for more peace talks with Ukraine. Zelenskyy said Ukraine wants to "move beyond" statements and lower-level meetings on the matter. "If these are signals of a genuine willingness to end the war with dignity and establish a truly lasting Ukraine once again reaffirms its readiness to meet at the level of leaders at any time," he wrote on social media. Earlier, Putin said the momentum of the war was in Russia's favor, signaling no shift in his stance despite a looming sanctions deadline from the United States. US President Trump said he would impose sanctions on Russia unless it stopped the war by August 8. "We need a lasting and stable peace on solid foundations that would satisfy both Russia and Ukraine, and would ensure the security of both countries," Putin told reporters, adding: "The conditions (from the Russian side) certainly remain the same." Russian President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that he hopes peace talks between Russia and Ukraine will continue. He said talks should be conducted "without cameras and in a calm atmosphere." He mentioned that working groups could discuss possible compromises. However, he made it clear that Moscow's goals have not changed. At the same time, Putin said Russian troops were attacking Ukraine along the entire front line and that the momentum was in their favor. He cited his Defence Ministry's statement that it had captured the town of Chasiv Yar in eastern Ukraine after nearly 16 months of fighting. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Thursday dismissed Russian claims of capturing Chasiv Yar as "disinformation." "Ukrainian units are holding our positions," Zelenskyy said in his daily video address on Thursday evening. "It is not easy, but it is the defense of Ukrainians' very right to life." European Union foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas said tougher sanctions on Russia are the fastest way to end the war in Ukraine. She also said Kyiv needs more weapons. "Getting more air defenses to Ukraine fast is our priority," she said after a deadly Russian attack on Kyiv. She described the Russian attacks as "depraved" and posted a photo of the bloc's flag at half-staff. The United States welcomed over 180,000 Ukrainians fleeing war under a program started by the previous Joe Biden administration. With Donald Trump back in office, the program has been suspended, and Ukrainians are quietly being pressured to leave. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Germany will deliver two Patriot systems to Ukraine after reaching an agreement with the United States, the Bundeswehr said. In return, Germany has agreed with the US Defense Department that it will be the first country to receive expedited delivery of new-generation Patriot systems. The Patriot is one of the world's most advanced air defense systems, capable of intercepting aircraft and missiles. Germany had delivered three Patriot systems to Ukraine earlier in the war. Defense Minister Boris Pistorius said the announcement "shows once again that Germany is by far Ukraine's strongest supporter when it comes to air defense." The two launchers will head to Ukraine in the coming days, followed by additional system components to be handed over in two to three months. Patriot systems are fully mobile batteries that include a command center, a radar station to detect incoming threats, and launchers. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio described India's continued oil imports from Russia as a "point of irritation" for Washington. Speaking to Fox News Radio, Rubio said, "Unfortunately, that is helping to sustain the Russian war effort. So it is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India, not the only point of irritation." US President Trump has signed an order imposing new tariffs set to take effect August 7, including 25% duties on goods from India. He also added penalties due to India's reliance on Russia for oil and military equipment. India has faced pressure from Western countries, including the United States, to reduce its ties with Russia since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine. New Delhi has resisted, citing its longstanding relationship with Russia, through the BRICS alliance and bilaterally, and its economic needs. Russia used over 3,800 drones and nearly 260 missiles for its attacks on Ukraine in July, according to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In a post on social media, he urged "increased pressure on Moscow and additional sanctions." "They must target everything that enables such attacks to continue," he wrote in the wake of a deadly attack on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv. Zelenskyy added that the Russian attacks can only be stopped through joint efforts by the US, Europe, and other global actors. US President Donald Trump criticized the latest Russian missile and drone attack on Ukraine, suggesting that new sanctions against Moscow were coming. "Russia, I think it's disgusting what they're doing," Trump told journalists as he took questions after an executive order signing at the White House. Trump, who initially gave Russia 50 days to reach a ceasefire with Ukraine or face tariffs, shortened the deadline to "10 or 12 days" on Monday and said Tuesday the countdown was now at 10 days. On Thursday, he said, "I don't know that sanctions bother him," referring his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin. White House envoy Steve Witkoff was expected to travel to Russia, but it was not clear if he would meet with Putin. The death toll from Russian missile and drone strikes on Kyiv on Thursday has risen to 31, President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Friday. The toll was revised upward after rescuers recovered more bodies, including a two-year-old child from a residential building in the Sviatoshynsky district. "Once again, this vile strike by Russia demonstrates the need for increased pressure on Moscow and additional sanctions," Zelenskyy wrote on social media. "No matter how much the Kremlin denies their effectiveness, sanctions do work – and they must be strengthened. They must target everything that enables such attacks to continue." The mayor of the Ukrainian capital, Vitali Klitschko, said more than 150 people had been injured, including 16 children. Klitschko said it was the highest number of children wounded in a single night since Russia's full-scale invasion began. Russia's Defense Ministry said it had targeted Ukrainian military airfields and ammunition depots linked to Kyiv's military-industrial complex. However, officials reported that schools and hospitals were damaged in 27 locations across the city. City authorities have declared Friday a day of mourning. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Kyiv is observing a day of mourning following Thursday's deadly bombardment, one of the worst attacks since Russia launched its full-scale offensive in February 2022. In this blog, we'll take a closer look at the geopolitical fallout. US President Donald Trump's patience with Russian President Vladimir Putin appears to be wearing thin. Over the past few days, Trump has repeatedly shortened the deadline to impose sanctions on Russia over its actions in Ukraine. His envoy, Steve Witkoff, is expected to travel to Russia after his current stop in Israel. The outcome of the trip could be telling.

Bangladesh still polarized a year after Hasina's ouster – DW – 08/01/2025
Bangladesh still polarized a year after Hasina's ouster – DW – 08/01/2025

DW

time10 hours ago

  • DW

Bangladesh still polarized a year after Hasina's ouster – DW – 08/01/2025

While the country has made progress on some fronts, expectations that last year's student-led uprising would bring substantial change have not yet been met. DW spoke with citizens, activists and officials in Dhaka. Sheikh Hasina resigned as Bangladesh's long-serving prime minister in August 2024 after weeks of deadly protests that started over a controversial quota system for government jobs, but morphed into a wider anti-government movement. Hasina fled to India, while other members of her Awami League party were either arrested in connection with the protests or went into hiding. Today, in the country's capital, Dhaka, the main office of the powerful opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), led by Hasina rival and former prime minister Khaleda Zia, is a hub of activity. Many BNP members, including Zia, who had been imprisoned on charges including graft, vandalism and violence — which the BNP says were politically motivated during Hasina's 15-year tenure — are now free. Abdus Salam, a prominent BNP leader, told DW that the only change he sees since Hasina fled to India in August 2024 is political freedom. "We were in hiding during this time last year. We were not able to stay in our homes. We were facing numerous court cases. We didn't have a normal life. That suffering may have ended," Salam told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video In another busy Dhaka street, Ambia, a garment factory worker, told DW that, while she admires the students who led last year's uprising to bring change in her country, she said her expectations have not yet been met. "I hoped that the anarchy would end, and that people wouldn't politicize every incident," Ambia told DW. "The political parties create many issues whenever something happens. I didn't expect that. The feeling of security hasn't returned yet." The interim government led by Muhammad Yunus, a former banker and prominent economist, had been aiming to hold elections in April next year, saying it needed time to implement constitutional reforms, changes to the electoral process, and progress in judicial independence and press freedoms. However, Yunus' administration did not rule out a possibility of polls in February, which has been demanded by the BNP and its allies. Bangladesh has seen some economic progress, but human rights remain a concern. London-based rights group Human Rights Watch (HRW) said that the Yunus-led interim government is "falling short" on its promise to improve human rights in Bangladesh. "Some of the fear and repression that marked Sheikh Hasina's Awami League Party's 15-year rule, and abuses such as widespread enforced disappearances, appear to have ended," according to HRW. "However, the interim government has used arbitrary detention to target perceived political opponents and has yet to deliver systemic reforms to protect human rights." "The hope of the thousands who braved lethal violence a year ago when they opposed Sheikh Hasina's abusive rule to build a rights-respecting democracy remains unfulfilled," said Meenakshi Ganguly, HRW's deputy Asia director. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video At the same time, Islamist parties have increased their visibility since Hasina's ouster. The Yunus government also withdrew a ban on the country's largest Islamist party last August, reversing a decision by the Hasina government. An influential Islamist group's rally drew thousands to the streets of Dhaka, in May. As many as 20,000 people turned out to show support for the Hefazat-e-Islam group that laid out a list of demands for Bangladesh's interim government. They opposed government proposals that include equal inheritance rights for women, a ban on polygamy, and recognition of sex workers as laborers. Foyez Ahammad, senior assistant press secretary of the interim government, told DW that HRW's expectation of reducing human rights violations to zero may not have been achieved, but significant progress has been made towards reducing it. "HRW has expressed its dissatisfaction [with] many issues as their expectation after the era of Sheikh Hasina didn't meet to the level they expected," Ahammad said. "Bangladesh was in a condition of massive human rights violations, where hundreds of secret prisons were operating, and enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings happened," he added, noting that press freedom "went down to zero" under Hasina's rule. "We have made progress from that situation within a short period. For example, media houses that were closed down in the past reopened," added Ahammad, who said that ordinary people are expressing their opinions openly, including on social media. "They are even criticizing the government in state-run broadcasters, which didn't happen in the past," he said. Hasina's supporters, however, do not agree with these claims and point to a crackdown on their party under the interim government. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Yunus' interim government has banned all political activities of Hasina's Awami League until a special tribunal completes a trial of the party and its leaders over the deaths of hundreds of people during last year's mass uprising. Following the ban, senior Awami League politician Mohammad A. Arafat claimed Yunus was trying to "keep his unconstitutional regime in power and delay elections." Speaking to DW from an unknown location in May, the former information minister said Yunus was trying to secure the support of Islamists and the National Citizens' Party — which spearheaded the move against the Awami League — by banning the former ruling party. "The only way the Islamists can make their way into parliament is by banning AL," Arafat said. The tribunal against Hasina, former Home Minister Asaduzzaman Khan and former police chief Chowdhury Abdullah Al-Mamun has set August 3 and 4 for the prosecution's statement. Despite the human rights situation, the interim government has made some economic progress. It has announced training programs for young people and courted foreign investment to create jobs. Bangladesh, the world's second-largest garment supplier, on Friday secured a reduced 20% tariff on exports to the United States — down from the 35% initially proposed by US President Donald Trump. The 20% rate, which will come into effect on August 7, is comparable to Bangladesh's key apparel-sector competitors such as Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Pakistan, and Indonesia, which received rates between 19% and 20%. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store