Five deputies to biggest British Jewish body suspended over Israel criticisms
All 36 signatories to an open letter published in April have been found to have breached the Board of Deputies' code of conduct after a two-month investigation.
The letter said 'Israel's soul is being ripped out' by military action that renewed in March, and that the signatories could no longer 'turn a blind eye or remain silent' on the issue.
It caused a furore within the UK's Jewish community amid growing divisions over the war and distress at the suffering of Palestinians in Gaza.
Statements from the Board of Deputies issued since the war began after the atrocities committed by Hamas on 7 October 2023 have been broadly supportive of the Israeli government's actions.
The board released the findings of its investigation on Tuesday evening. It said that 'many media outlets, individuals and other community stakeholders initially understood [the letter] to be a statement of the board'.
Its code of conduct required deputies not to misrepresent the position of the board and not to bring the institution into disrepute, it added.
The investigative panel unanimously found the 36 signatories to be in breach of the code.
After considering the panel's findings, the board's executive body decided to send a 'notice of criticism' to 31 of the 36 signatories.
But five deputies have been suspended from the board for two years and, where applicable, removed from elected positions. In three cases, the suspension may be reduced to six months 'by way of apology to affected parties', the board said.
Michael Wegier, its chief executive, said: 'We are a democratic organisation that welcomes debate, diversity and free speech. Managing diversity of opinion within our organisation depends on our code of conduct.
'That code ensures deputies do not create misunderstandings about the position of the board or its members, do not bring the institution into disrepute, and treat one another and the institution with respect.'
The letter, published by the Financial Times on 16 April and signed by about one in eight of the board's elected representatives, said: 'The inclination to avert our eyes is strong, as what is happening is unbearable, but our Jewish values compel us to stand up and to speak out.'
It added: 'We know in our hearts we cannot turn a blind eye or remain silent at [the] renewed loss of life and livelihoods, with hopes dwindling for a peaceful reconciliation and the return of the hostages.
'This most extremist of Israeli governments is openly encouraging violence against Palestinians in the West Bank, strangling the Palestinian economy and building more new settlements than ever … Israel's soul is being ripped out and we, members of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, fear for the future of the Israel we love and have such close ties to.'
The signatories said: 'We stand against the war … It is our duty, as Jews, to speak out.'
The board launched its investigation after receiving an unspecified number of complaints about the letter.
Many of the complaints reportedly came from members of the United Synagogue, the largest communal denomination in the UK. Most of the letter's signatories belong to Reform, Liberal or Masorti communities.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
31 minutes ago
- Times
Who is Zarah Sultana? MP taking stand against Starmer
From the moment Zarah Sultana entered the House of Commons six years ago she made clear that she had no intention of following the rules. It is the custom for maiden speeches to be uncontroversial, but Sultana, then 26, railed against 40 years of Thatcherism. She told her new colleagues that her generation had 'only ever faced a future of rising rents, frozen wages and diminishing opportunities'. She added: 'For my whole adult life, I have only known Tory governments who wage war on working-class communities like mine.' The speech was not out of tune with Labour at the time. The new MP for Coventry South was elected under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn, but within month Sir Keir Starmer had taken the reigns, telling MPs the party was 'failing in our historic purpose' and vowing to 'rethink'. As Starmer moved the party to the centre, Sultana and other members of the Socialist Campaign Group became increasingly disenchanted with the direction Labour was taking. With Labour in opposition, those tensions were largely kept under control, but on entering power any sense of unity disappeared. Within a month of Labour's election victory Sultana and six other Labour MPs had the whip withdrawn for voting against the government and in favour of an SNP amendment to end the two-child benefit cap. She said at the time that she had defied the party because she had to 'stand up for what I believe are the true values of the Labour Party'. Although the suspensions were initially said to be for six months, Sultana has still not had the whip restored and has been increasingly moving away from Labour and towards the group of independent MPs nominally led by Corbyn. While any new party attacking Labour from the left will worry Starmer, Sultana's involvement will not surprise the party. The surprise in some ways is that she has lasted this long.
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer: I'm a hard bastard
Sir Keir Starmer has claimed he is a 'hard bastard' as marked the first anniversary of his time in Downing Street. The Prime Minister made the quip in an interview with Nick Robinson on BBC Radio 4's Political Thinking podcast one year on from the general election. Mr Robinson said he had been told by one of Sir Keir's five-a-side football teammates that he was a 'hard bastard'. The presenter asked: 'Are you a hard enough bastard to look in the mirror to say I've got to change, the party's got to change, something serious has to change in year two for Keir Starmer?' Sir Keir responded: 'We need to reflect on where things haven't gone according to plan [...] but we also need to emphasise the very many good things we have done.' Adding that he was 'really proud' of his record in office, he said: 'I'm a hard enough bastard to find out who it was who said that, so that I can have a discussion with him.' The first year of Sir Keir's premiership has seen Labour tank in the polls, two ministers quit his front bench and a number of about-turns on major policies. He was forced to tear up large parts of his flagship welfare Bill to starve off a Labour revolt. Asked if was a football manager who had 'lost the dressing room' after 49 MPs voted against his reforms, Sir Keir said: 'Absolutely not, Nick. As soon as we go through the long list of things that we've achieved this year, the Labour dressing room – the PLP [Parliamentary Labour Party] – is proud as hell of what we've done. 'And their frustration, my frustration, is that sometimes the other stuff, welfare would be an example, can obscure us being able to get that out. But you'll be hearing a lot from me about that.' Sir Keir also expanded on the bond he has struck up with Donald Trump since the US president returned to the White House in January, despite a sharp contrast in their policies and leadership styles. The Prime Minister admitted last week that a focus on international affairs had distracted him from the recent rebellion over welfare reforms. Asked if he was spending 'too much time' with the likes of Mr Trump instead of his own MPs, he replied: 'It is important to have a good relationship with President Trump – it is in the national interest. 'But it also helped us when we were negotiating a trade deal.' When it was pointed out that he and Mr Trump were very different, Sir Keir said: 'We are different people and we've got different political backgrounds and leanings, but we do have a good relationship and that comes from a number of places. 'I think I do understand what anchors the president – what he really cares about – but also we have a good personal relationship. 'The first time I ever spoke to him was when I picked up the phone to him after he had been shot when he was at a rally before he became president. 'And that was a phone call really to ask him how it was and in particular I wanted to know how it had impacted on his family. So that was the beginning of his relationship.' Discussing the relationship they have beyond 'important matters of state', he added: 'I think for both of us we really care about family and there's a point of connection there in terms of how we care about our families. 'In having a good relationship with President Trump we were able to do a trade deal.' The UK-US trade deal came into force on Monday after being signed in June and has reduced tariffs for the British automotive and aerospace sectors. Sir Keir recalled receiving a call from Mr Trump a few days after Nick Starmer, his younger brother, died on Boxing Day after fighting cancer. Reflecting on the loss of his brother, Sir Keir said he had been a 'very vulnerable man' and that he would not have wanted his stage-four diagnosis to come under the spotlight. 'I made it my business to be there in the hospital when he was told so that I could begin to help to look after him,' he added. 'I don't think he would have wanted or withstood any public knowledge of where he was at. And I wanted fiercely to protect him and that's why both before and after the election I went secretly to see him at home, secretly to see him in hospital, he was in intensive care for a long time.' Sir Keir continued: 'It was important for me to do that to support him and very important for me not to share that with the world because this was my brother – I deeply cared about him and I wanted to and would always have protected him and his privacy.'
Telegraph
40 minutes ago
- Telegraph
French police puncture migrant boats at sea for first time
French police have punctured Channel migrants' boats at sea for the first time in a change of tactics backed by Yvette Cooper. Officers entered the sea on a beach near Boulogne-sur-Mer on Friday armed with knives to puncture the dinghies in water that was enough water for the migrants to wade back to shore. Dozens of migrants, including some women and children, had to give up their attempt to reach the UK as the boat started to deflate and sink. Ms Cooper, the Home Secretary, said it was a 'different' and 'welcome' strategy that was part of wider plans for French border police and gendarmes to start intervening in shallow waters within 300 metres of the shore to stop migrants' boats leaving. The new strategy is expected to be unveiled at next week's Anglo-French summit when Emmanuel Macron comes to the UK for a three-day state visit. It comes as a record 20,422 migrants have reached the UK so far this year, up nearly 50 per cent on last year and the highest number in the first six months of any year since the Channel crossings started in 2018. Some 5,170 arrived in June alone. Ms Cooper has been in talks with the French for their border sea patrols and officers to intercept people smugglers' taxi boats not only in the shallow waters as they leave the beaches, but also when they make their way from rivers and inland waterways to pick up the migrants. 'I've been talking to the French interior minister about the importance of action in French waters,' Ms Cooper said. 'That's what we need in order to prevent boat crossings. We've seen criminal gangs this year really exploiting the fact that the French rules for too long have meant that they could not intervene in French waters,' Ms Cooper said. 'The French interior minister has been determined to change those rules. He has been working to do that. I've been working very closely with him on it. 'We do think that there's a wider range of interventions that can be used. Our small boats operational command has been working closely with the French authorities on what those options might be. 'That work is still underway, but both of us, as interior ministers, the French minister and I, are pressing for this to happen as swiftly as possible and as extensively as possible.' French foot-dragging There has been growing frustration at apparent foot-dragging by the French, who so far have stopped fewer than 40 per cent of the boats this year, the lowest proportion on record, despite a three-year £480 million Anglo-French deal to combat the crossings. Until now, the French have refused to intervene in the water because they claim maritime laws prevent them from taking action that could put lives at sea at risk. But French ministers have given the green light to do so while 'respecting' the 'law of the sea'. Ms Cooper also said that every migrant who arrived on a small boat where someone had died should face prosecution. 'I think it's just totally appalling that you see boats where children are being crushed to death on these overcrowded boats, and yet the boat still continues to the UK. So we want to strengthen the law to have endangerment of life at sea be part of our laws, so we can prosecute,' she said. 'Frankly, I want to see everybody who is arriving on a boat where a child's life has been lost, frankly, should be facing prosecution, either in the UK or in France.' Labour's new borders Bill, currently before Parliament, would create a new offence where any migrant who prevents offers of rescue at sea anywhere on the Channel or who uses physical aggression, intimidation or coercive behaviour to overload boats will face prosecution. They will face up to five years in jail. Ms Cooper told the BBC that increased overcrowding of boats was part of the reason that the number of arrivals had increased this year. Earlier on LBC, the Home Secretary refused three times to say that the number of migrants crossing the Channel would be lower this time next year, saying only that she wanted it to be the case and the Government was introducing measures with the aim of achieving it.
