logo
Pakistan's New Travel Policy For Shia Pilgrims Reveals A Deep Sectarian Fault Line

Pakistan's New Travel Policy For Shia Pilgrims Reveals A Deep Sectarian Fault Line

News186 days ago
Last Updated:
From January 1, 2026, Pakistani nationals undertaking pilgrimages to Shia sacred sites in Iran and Iraq will no longer be allowed to travel independently
In a move justified through bureaucratic reasoning but deeply rooted in longstanding sectarian inequalities, the Pakistani government has unveiled extensive new measures that will significantly affect the country's Shia community. On July 15, interior minister Mohsin Naqvi announced that, starting from January 1, 2026, Pakistani nationals undertaking pilgrimages to Shia sacred sites in Iran and Iraq will no longer be allowed to travel independently. Instead, such religious journeys must be conducted exclusively in closely monitored groups, overseen by government-certified operators known as Zaireen Group Organisers (ZGOs).
Presented as a necessary reaction to diplomatic concerns from Iran and Iraq regarding visa overstays and unauthorised activities, the newly announced policy has raised more concerns than clarity, drawing attention to the pronounced sectarian bias embedded within it. The government's rationale fails to hold under closer examination, particularly when contrasted with its tolerant approach to similar violations committed by Sunni pilgrims visiting Saudi Arabia. Consequently, this directive represents more than a mere procedural alteration—it conveys a veiled message to Pakistan's Shia population that they are not deemed trustworthy to travel independently.
The double standard is unmistakable. For example, in December 2024 alone, Saudi Arabia deported nearly 5,000 Pakistani citizens in just one month—primarily Sunni pilgrims who had overstayed their Umrah visas and were found begging. This issue is not limited to Saudi Arabia; other Gulf nations such as Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have also deported hundreds of Pakistanis for similar infractions. In fact, in April 2025, Saudi authorities imposed a temporary visa ban on 14 countries, including Pakistan, citing the need to curb unauthorised Hajj participation and widespread visa violations.
Despite these developments, the Pakistani government has not implemented any restrictions on individual Sunni pilgrimages to Mecca or Medina, nor has it introduced a system of regulated group travel for them. If the core concern truly lies in visa breaches and diplomatic pressures, it raises a pressing question: why has only one sect been subjected to such punitive regulation, particularly when Gulf monarchies have consistently expressed concerns about Pakistani nationals engaging in begging and other illicit activities?
The stance adopted by the Pakistani government reveals a clear sectarian inclination and forms part of a broader, long-standing pattern of discriminatory practices against the Shia minority, which constitutes an estimated 15-20 per cent of the national population. For decades, Pakistan's Shia citizens have faced state-backed marginalisation —ranging from explicit exclusion in key government positions to more covert institutional apathy that overlooks violence perpetrated by the Sunni majority, as notably seen in Parachinar within the Kurram district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. While many such forms of bias are subtle, others have been overt and violently repressive.
Viewed within the broader historical context, the newly introduced pilgrimage regulation is merely another addition to a persistent trend of policies that have implicitly, if not explicitly, relegated the Shia community to a subordinate status. This so-called 'administrative requirement" fails to withstand scrutiny when placed against the wider backdrop of the state's consistent alignment with Sunni orthodoxy.
For many Shia Muslims, visiting the sacred sites of Najaf and Karbala in Iraq, as well as Qom and Mashhad in Iran, represents more than merely a religious duty—it serves as a profound emotional, spiritual, and cultural connection. These pilgrimages, primarily undertaken during the Islamic months of Muharram (for Ashura) and Safar (for Arbaeen), are vital expressions of faith and identity within the Shia tradition.
Under the newly imposed regulations, such pilgrimages must now be conducted exclusively through state-approved organisers, many of whom impose prohibitively high charges and operate with little transparency. Independent travel options, which tend to be more affordable and allow for greater flexibility, will be rendered unlawful under this system. As a result, this policy effectively marginalises low-income Shia families and places additional constraints on their already restricted religious liberties.
The disparity is striking. Sunni pilgrims travelling to Saudi Arabia for Umrah continue to benefit from a largely unmonitored travel framework, despite persistent reports of visa overstays, unlawful employment, and even infractions such as widespread begging. The government's reaction has typically been to ignore these issues or, at most, issue mild advisories—without imposing any broad restrictions or invoking claims of 'administrative necessity".
Although it is accurate that the Iranian and Iraqi authorities have raised concerns about certain pilgrims, particularly during mass gatherings like Arbaeen, it is misleading to argue that the new restrictions are solely a response to these issues. If that were genuinely the case, the Pakistani government would have already put in place a regulatory policy addressing Umrah travel to Saudi Arabia—especially given Riyadh's repeated complaints regarding visa violations and begging by Pakistani citizens. Yet, instead of devising such a framework, Islamabad has consistently chosen to overlook these infractions committed by Sunni nationals deported from these Gulf states.
The sole discernible distinction appears to lie in sectarian affiliation. Pakistan's centres of power—particularly its military-intelligence apparatus and dominant Sunni religious institutions—have long influenced the definition of full citizenship. Consequently, this measure does not merely constitute a travel regulation; it symbolises what appears to be a litmus test for citizenship, wherein a Pakistani Shia is denied the right to undertake pilgrimages independently, while a Sunni remains free to do so. By implementing such exclusionary travel protocols, the state not only marginalises a segment of its population but also risks exacerbating sectarian divisions in a nation already burdened by deep polarisation, political suppression, and widespread instability.
Historically, Pakistan's constitution guaranteed equal rights to all citizens regardless of their faith or sect, although it has explicitly discriminated against the Ahmadiyya community—another oppressed group alongside Hindus, Shias, and Christians. Yet, for many within the Shia community, as with other religious minorities, that constitutional assurance has rarely translated into practice. The introduction of the new travel regulation serves as a stark reminder that in the Islamic Republic, religious liberty is not a universal entitlement but rather a tightly controlled and selectively granted privilege, managed and rationed by the state.
Although visa enforcement, like border control, is a legitimate responsibility of the state, its impartiality is compromised when its execution aligns with sectarian fault lines. At that point, it no longer remains a neutral administrative act but becomes a vehicle for discrimination. If Pakistan genuinely seeks to foster national unity, it must reject the selective application of the law and commit to governance grounded in fairness—applying rules uniformly across all communities without favour or prejudice. This approach should also support, rather than restrict, religious expression, regardless of sectarian identity. Crucially, it requires avoiding the misuse of bureaucratic mechanisms as tools of sectarian exclusion.
top videos
View all
Until such principles are upheld, the concept of 'equal citizenship" in Pakistan will continue to ring hollow—serving more as a bitter irony than a constitutional assurance. This is particularly evident for communities that are repeatedly compelled to demonstrate their loyalty, even in their most sacred journeys of faith.
The writer is an author and a columnist. His X handle is @ArunAnandLive. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
tags :
pakistan Shia sunni
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
July 22, 2025, 19:32 IST
News opinion Global Watch | Pakistan's New Travel Policy For Shia Pilgrims Reveals A Deep Sectarian Fault Line
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Op Sindoor debate in Parl today, PM Modi says precision strikes a message for terrorists
Op Sindoor debate in Parl today, PM Modi says precision strikes a message for terrorists

First Post

time11 minutes ago

  • First Post

Op Sindoor debate in Parl today, PM Modi says precision strikes a message for terrorists

PM Modi set the tone of the government as the Parliament prepares for a fiery debate on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor. The Prime Minister warned that there will be no safe havens for terrorists read more As the Indian parliament gears up to debate the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said on Sunday that the precision strikes of Pakistani terror camps in May were India's message that there are no safe havens for terrorists and their masters. While speaking at an event in Tamil Nadu's Gangaikonda Cholapuram, the prime minister said that India places the highest priority on its national security. He emphasised that Operation Sindoor has created a new awakening and a new self-confidence across the country. PM Modi was attending the event to honour Chola emperor Rajendra Chola when he made his stance on the matter clear. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The world witnessed India's firm and decisive response to the threat against its sovereignty during Operation Sindoor, and it has sent a clear message: there is no haven for terrorists and enemies of the nation,' the prime minister said in his address. PM Modi sets the tone of the government ahead of the debate Many believe that with this address, the prime minister has set the tone for the government's response to the debate in parliament, which will take place in the Lok Sabha on Monday. Meanwhile, the Opposition is planning to open the front by talking about the big terror attacks under 'PM Modi's watch'. The debate in Lok Sabha is coming after a first week of disruption of Parliament's Monsoon session and is expected to be a fiery one. The two sides have agreed to a marathon 16-hour debate in each House, which invariably stretches longer in practice. Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh is likely to initiate the debate immediately after the question hour in the Lok Sabha. Sources close to the matter told The Times of India that Home Minister Amit Shah, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, and External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar will be speaking on the issues amid indications that the PM may intervene to convey his government's 'robust' stand against terrorism. Meanwhile, the Leader of the Opposition in LS and RS - Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge - would lead the charge against the government along with Samajwadi Party's Akhilesh Yadav. It is believed that Congress is planning to attack the government and particularly PM Modi over national security. The Opposition is most likely to point toward the repeated big terror attacks under PM Modi's watch. Since the Pahalgam terror attack, Congress and the opposition have been pointing out that the terrorists singled out the tourists by religion to execute them. Ahead of the debate, Congress also raised the issue of US President Donald Trump's claims of halting Operation Sindoor and calling for a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. On Sunday, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh pointed out that since May 10, Trump has claimed '26 times' that he stopped the operation by 'threatening to cut off trade with India, and claimed that five fighter jets may have been shot down'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Even though Congress had been demanding a special two-day session of Parliament immediately after Operation Sindoor was abruptly halted, that demand was ignored. Nevertheless, better late than never,' he wrote in a post on X.

Parl braces for fiery debate on Pahalgam, Op Sindoor
Parl braces for fiery debate on Pahalgam, Op Sindoor

Hans India

time41 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Parl braces for fiery debate on Pahalgam, Op Sindoor

New Delhi: After a week-long washout, Parliament is all set to return to work on Monday with a debate on Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor in Lok Sabha even as some Opposition parties are expected to raise noise on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of Bihar electoral rolls. Top guns on both sides like Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, Home Minister Amit Shah, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi, Samajwadi Party's Akhilesh Yadav and Trinamool Congress' Abhishek Banerjee are likely to speak in Lok Sabha during the debate. Singh is expected to be the first speaker, and he will spell out the contours of Operation Sindoor and subsequent developments, including the circumstances of the ceasefire and claims of US President Donald Trump that he brokered the de-escalation. All eyes will be on Singh on whether he would reveal the details of fighter aircraft India lost in the military confrontation, an issue on which the Opposition has been insisting that the government clean. Similarly, it will be keenly watched whether Congress would list Shashi Tharoor as a speaker, as he is at loggerheads with his party over his endorsement of the Modi government on the issue and leading a delegation to the US and other countries. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is likely to intervene in the 'Special Discussion on India's Strong, Successful and Decisive Operation Sindoor in Response to the Terrorist Attack in Pahalgam for which 16 others have been allocated. The debate in the Rajya Sabha will start on Tuesday where also 16 hours is earmarked. The ruling BJP would be highlighting the Indian military's successful dismantlingof terror infrastructure in Pakistan, including Jaish-e-Mohammed headquarters in Bahawalpur and hitting for the first time the Pakistani side of Punjab since the 1971 war. The party would also try to corner the Congress by highlighting the inner-party differences over its MPs participating in the multi-party delegations sent by the government.

Parliament monsoon session: Op Sindoor, Pahalgam attack on agenda today after week of disruption
Parliament monsoon session: Op Sindoor, Pahalgam attack on agenda today after week of disruption

Hindustan Times

time2 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Parliament monsoon session: Op Sindoor, Pahalgam attack on agenda today after week of disruption

The Monsoon Session of Parliament is set to resume on Monday, July 28, with a scheduled discussion on 'Operation Sindoor' – India's military response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack that killed 26 people. The operation targeted Pakistan-based terror groups in retaliation. The session began on July 21 and ran for five days, marked by repeated disruptions, including the unexpected resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar as Vice President of India.(Sansad TV) The session began on July 21 and ran for five days, marked by repeated disruptions, including the unexpected resignation of Jagdeep Dhankhar as Vice President of India. Operation Sindoor has emerged as a major flashpoint between the ruling BJP and the Opposition, with Opposition parties insisting on a dedicated debate, while the BJP maintained that the discussion was always planned but delayed due to procedural disruptions. Opposition leaders have linked the April 22 terror attack to alleged intelligence failures and have also cited US President Donald Trump's claims of mediating a ceasefire to criticise the government. Rahul Gandhi has targeted the government's foreign policy, arguing that India lacked global backing for Operation Sindoor and has used Trump's repeated mediation remarks to attack the BJP-led alliance. The government has outright dismissed Trump's statements. The conflict between India and Pakistan lasted four days, during which India carried out targeted strikes on terror infrastructure. Pakistan responded militarily, but eventually sought a ceasefire, after which both sides halted hostilities. India claims that its strikes caused serious damage to several Pakistani air bases. PM Modi has declared that India has set a 'new normal' in dealing with cross-border terrorism and will treat both terrorists and their sponsors the same. The Monsoon Session includes 21 sittings over 32 days, starting July 21 and ending August 21. Both Houses will be adjourned on August 12 and reconvene on August 18, after the Independence Day break. Here's what on agenda today Defence minister Rajnath Singh is expected to start the Lok Sabha debate on Operation Sindoor on Monday. Home minister Amit Shah, external affairs minister S Jaishankar, and BJP MPs Anurag Thakur and Nishikant Dubey are also likely to participate in the discussion. Prime Minister Narendra Modi is likely to intervene in the debate in the Lok Sabha and may also do so in the Rajya Sabha. The Rajya Sabha discussion on Operation Sindoor is scheduled to begin on Tuesday, with Rajnath Singh and S Jaishankar among the ministers expected to speak. As per the Lok Sabha's listed agenda, the House will hold a 'special discussion on India's strong, successful and decisive Operation Sindoor in response to terrorist attack in Pahalgam'. In addition to key ministers and leaders like Anurag Thakur, Sudhanshu Trivedi, and Nishikant Dubey, NDA members from the seven multi-party delegations that visited over 30 world capitals after Operation Sindoor are expected to speak, including Shrikant Shinde, Sanjay Jha, and Harish Balayogi. A major uncertainty remains over whether Shashi Tharoor, who led a delegation to the US and had praised the government's response, will be selected to speak by the Congress, as his stance has strained his relationship with the party. TDP MPs Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu and GM Harish Balayogi are expected to join the Lok Sabha debate, with the party allotted 30 minutes. Samajwadi Party's Akhilesh Yadav and Rajiv Rai will also take part. Union parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju said, 'Operation Sindoor will be debated for 16 hours in the Lok Sabha on Monday (July 28) and for 16 hours in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday (July 29),' adding that 'All issues cannot be discussed together... The opposition has raised several issues, like the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise in Bihar and others. We have told them that Operation Sindoor will be discussed first. We will decide which issues to discuss after that.' Leaders from the INDIA bloc will protest outside Parliament at Makar Dwar at 10.30 am on Monday against the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar. On July 25, several opposition MPs in the Rajya Sabha submitted Suspension of Business notices demanding a debate on the SIR issue during the Monsoon Session. The SIR in Bihar remains a point of tension, with the opposition alleging it is designed to benefit the BJP-led alliance in the upcoming state polls, while the Election Commission has maintained that the process is to ensure only eligible voters are included. Rijiju has said the government will consider the demand for a discussion on SIR later, stating that not every issue can be discussed at once and decisions will follow Parliamentary rules. Bihar SIR, Yashwant Varma impeachment trigger disruptions: A recap Opposition parties continued their protests in the Parliament complex over the first five days, disrupting proceedings in both the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha during the Monsoon Session. Their main demand was a discussion on the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of the electoral rolls in Bihar. Leaders from the INDIA bloc, including Rahul Gandhi and Akhilesh Yadav, staged a demonstration at the Parliament's Makar Dwar, alleging that the SIR process was disenfranchising voters. Several opposition leaders carried placards with slogans like 'stealing of Indian Rights' and 'death of democracy' to condemn the revision exercise. The INDIA bloc has repeatedly demanded a parliamentary discussion on the SIR issue, which has become a major point of contention during the session. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla criticised the opposition's conduct and warned about the negative impression it could leave on new MPs. He emphasised the importance of Question Hour as a key mechanism for accountability, adding that many members were frustrated at not getting a chance to speak. Despite assurances from the Speaker that issues would be addressed as per procedure, several opposition MPs submitted adjournment notices seeking an immediate debate on the Bihar electoral roll revision. Trinamool Congress MP Kalyan Banerjee accused the BJP of influencing constitutional institutions and said, 'The Election Commission has become a political tool now, removing and appointing names based on the BJP's preferences.' BJP MP Jagdambika Pal countered by blaming the opposition for disruptions, stating that both the government and Speaker were open to discussions through the Business Advisory Committee. 'I even appealed to Rahul Gandhi, but it seems they've decided not to let the House function,' he said. Separately, on the opening day of the Monsoon Session, 145 MPs in the Lok Sabha and 63 in the Rajya Sabha submitted a petition seeking the impeachment of Justice Yashwant Varma, citing allegations of corruption. The petition, filed under Articles 124, 217, and 218 of the Constitution, included signatures from leaders across parties such as Anurag Thakur, Ravi Shankar Prasad, Rahul Gandhi, Rajiv Pratap Rudy, PP Chaudhary, Supriya Sule, and KC Venugopal. Union minister Kiren Rijiju later confirmed that the Lok Sabha would initiate proceedings to remove Justice Varma, stating, 'We shouldn't remain in any doubt, proceedings to remove Justice Yashwant Varma will begin in Lok Sabha,' and noted that all parties supported the move. Justice Varma had earlier been relieved of his duties and repatriated to the Allahabad High Court in April, following a fire at his Delhi residence in March, during which large bundles of cash were allegedly recovered, triggering a judicial inquiry. The Supreme Court is likely to hear Justice Varma's plea on Monday, July 28, in which he challenges the findings of the in-house inquiry committee. The committee had found 'strong inferential evidence' linking him to the cash recovered and concluded he had 'covert or active control' over the money. Justice Varma, however, has argued that he was not given a fair chance to respond to the allegations before the report was made public, according to ANI. His legal team has requested an urgent hearing on the matter.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store