Trump's Education Department layoffs got a green light. What now?
WASHINGTON – Keeping tabs on President Donald Trump's campaign to dismantle the U.S. Department of Education hasn't been easy for students, parents and teachers.
The effort has been multifaceted and drawn out. And it still isn't exactly close to over.
Another big development came on June 14, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration could move forward with laying off more than 1,300 Education Department workers.
The staffers – whose responsibilities included helping protect students and teachers from discrimination, assisting college financial aid offices and compiling data about the nation's schools – were laid off in March.
The Supreme Court's green light came with caveats, though: The justices didn't rule on the merits of the case. They only allowed the agency to carry out the layoffs while a legal challenge proceeds.
Education Dept. layoffs by the numbers: See which staff were ousted, where cuts hit hardest
To be clear, there isn't much changing in the wake of this week's Supreme Court decision. All the workers who were let go in March have been locked out of their jobs since then. The difference now is that their terminations are official (unless a judge subsequently rules otherwise).
And despite all the big talk from the White House, the Education Department isn't going away: Education Secretary Linda McMahon has made it clear that she knows her agency can't be fully eliminated without the help of Congress, and the coordinated effort required (including help from Democrats) isn't likely.
Read more: What does the Education Department do? Trump gets the OK to gut it
For many onlookers, the twists and turns in the Education Department saga have been unpredictable. The news has been confusing. And the rhetoric, coming from people on both sides of the issue, has left some scared.
Here's how it all might impact you:
Your child's school
Public K-12 schools are primarily overseen at the local level by school boards. But they receive about a tenth of their funding from the federal government. And that funding has strings attached, which is where the Education Department comes in.
The agency's layoffs have three main areas of potential impact for K-12 schools.
First, there may continue to be disruptions in federal funding, which could cause other problems for school administrators trying to balance their budgets. For example, funding estimates for low-income schools that rely on Title I grants were a month late this year. That kind of uncertainty can trigger cost-cutting measures, such as hiring freezes, for districts.
In addition, there will continue to be fewer federal workers on hand to address reports of discrimination affecting students and teachers. The Trump administration has dismissed hundreds of attorneys at the Education Department's Office for Civil Rights and closed more than half a dozen regional offices.
Lastly, federal data that school administrators and teachers rely on remains in jeopardy. The National Center for Education Statistics, which oversees some of the most important educational progress assessments in the country, was reduced to just a handful of people in March. Without that data, teachers could have a harder time ensuring their students' learning is on track.
Your financial aid
Since the Education Department layoffs were announced, universities across the country have reported widespread problems in administering financial aid.
That's because the division that lost the most employees was the Federal Student Aid office, which offers students help paying for college.
Read more: Colleges report widespread problems with financial aid since Education Department layoffs
A survey of roughly 900 colleges published on May 21 revealed new bottlenecks in the federal financial aid system. Missed emails, long call wait times and broader disruptions have made it harder for universities to help students access financial assistance, the National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators found.
Your student loans
Student loan borrowers will continue to have fewer supports because of the layoffs.
Education Department staffers responsible for holding student loan servicers accountable won't return to work. Nor will other workers who helped borrowers with the most complicated lending issues.
Despite the lack of staffing, the Education Department's workload just grew. After President Trump signed his massive tax and spending bill into law, the agency was tasked with implementing two new loan repayment programs, as well as a complex system for holding colleges accountable.
Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@usatoday.com. Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @zachschermele.bsky.social.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
4 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
How Big Is the DNC's Tent?
DNC Chairman Ken Martin believes his party will 'win through addition' ('Notable & Quotable: 'We Are a Big-Tent Party''). Asked about Zohran Mamdani's refusal to condemn the call to globalize the intifada, Mr. Martin said: 'We have conservative Democrats. We have centrist Democrats. We have labor progressives like me. And we have this new brand of Democrat, which is the leftist.' Interesting. How about Democrats who believe there are only two sexes or that abortion takes innocent lives? It seems the tent only stretches to fit in antisemitism.


CNN
5 minutes ago
- CNN
MAGA's Growing Fury - The Source with Kaitlan Collins - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
The Source with Kaitlan Collins 46 mins The controversy Trump was hoping would go away just won't. One day ago CNN reported Trump was urging his team to let the Jeffrey Epstein story die down. But, the story has done anything but go away.


Politico
6 minutes ago
- Politico
Democrats raked in money in the Michigan and Illinois Senate races
Senate Majority Leader John Thune says he will bring the first procedural vote to the floor Tuesday on the White House's request to claw back $9.4 billion in spending. It's not clear he has even the 51 votes necessary to start debate on the package. Congress needs to approve the request before it expires Friday, or the administration will have to spend the money as lawmakers originally intended. That deadline is looming large as several GOP senators insist the administration clarify what spending it is actually seeking to rescind. They'll question President Donald Trump's budget director Russ Vought during senators' closed-door lunch Tuesday afternoon. 'We still are lacking the level of detail that is needed to make the right decisions,' Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins told reporters Monday evening. 'It's extremely unusual for any senator to not be able to get that kind of detailed information.' The Maine Republican is concerned not just over the administration's proposal to scale down the global AIDS-fighting program PEPFAR, but also about broader cutbacks in overseas public health. Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) told POLITICO he's particularly interested in protecting funding for global food aid programs like Food for Peace and the McGovern-Dole International Food for Education and Child Nutrition Program. It's increasingly evident the rescissions package will have to be changed in order to pass the Senate, and Thune told reporters as he left the Capitol on Monday that leadership is working with wary senators to 'see what a path forward on amendments looks like.' Senate leaders expect a vote-a-rama on amendments to start Wednesday, teeing up a final vote late Wednesday or early Thursday. If senators are able to advance a package with tweaks, House GOP leaders plan to put the package on the floor Thursday; they have already started to clear away procedural hurdles that would prevent them from passing the spending cut proposal ASAP. Throwing another wrinkle into it all, though, is that House GOP leaders don't want the Senate amending the package at all, knowing their members will be jammed with changes they don't like and be forced to choose between passing a watered-down product or missing the deadline to act. 'I think you got to respect the White House's request, and that's what we did, so I hope that's what we get back,' Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters Monday. 'There are two big categories of rescissions, and I'm not sure either of them should be subject to dispute.' It's also unclear whether an amended rescissions package would even have the support in the Republican House. Fiscal hawks are already drawing red lines, with Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.) going as far as telling POLITICO he won't support a rescissions package that is 'a penny less' than the House-approved version. MEANWHILE, IN OTHER FUNDING FIGHTS — Senate appropriators remain at a standstill on moving a funding bill forward for the Commerce and Justice departments. They're trying to schedule a briefing with the FBI on the administration's rationale for abandoning the plan to move the bureau to suburban Maryland, according to Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), whose stand against Trump's desire for a site in the District of Columbia derailed a markup of the bill last week. But Van Hollen insists that even if the FBI assures senators that the Washington location is a secure site, he won't back off his attempt to block the administration from diverting about $1.4 billion that has been set aside for relocating the agency's campus to Maryland. Across the Capitol: House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole said that House leaders began whipping votes Monday night as the chamber prepares to take its vote on the $831.5 billion defense appropriations bill later this week. While defense appropriations bills have been bipartisan in the past, Republicans are expecting this measure to be a largely party-line affair. What else we're watching: — Epstein meltdown: We'll see if Republican leaders' headache from their members over the DOJ's failure to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein continues. Rep. Norman voted Monday in favor of a Democratic amendment in the House Rules Committee that would have forced a floor vote on the DOJ releasing more materials from the federal case. — Russia sanctions timeline: The bipartisan Russian sanctions bill might stall in the House and Senate after Trump announced secondary tariffs on countries trading with Russia. Thune said Monday he would hold off on advancing the bill for now. House Majority Leader Steve Scalise also said a vote could be delayed to post-August recess. — Dems' last stand against a controversial Trump pick: Senate Democrats are making a final bid to draw the spotlight to a whistleblower's allegations that Emil Bove, a top Justice Department official and 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals nominee, urged defiance of the same judicial branch he is seeking to join. Democrats want the whistleblower, Erez Reuveni, to testify before senators prior to their confirmation vote on Bove, which is set for Thursday morning. Jordain Carney, Katherine Tully-McManus, Jennifer Scholtes, Meredith Lee Hill and Cassandra Dumay contributed to this report.