Meet Andrew Yang, Who Is Keen to Help Musk's America Party
The former 2020 Democratic presidential candidate launched the Forward Party in 2022, expressing a keenness to create a space for the 'common-sense majority.'
'The United States badly needs a new political party—one that reflects the moderate, common-sense majority. Today's outdated parties have failed by catering to the fringes. As a result, most Americans feel they aren't represented,' Yang said alongside other Forward Party members in an op-ed for the Washington Post in 2022.
"A new party must stake out the space in between. On every issue facing this nation—from the controversial to the mundane—we can find a reasonable approach most Americans agree on."
But it's not the Forward Party that is dominating conversation in and outside of Washington, D.C., at the moment. Instead, it's Elon Musk's America party, of which he announced the formation of on July 5. In a post shared on his social media platform, X, Musk told his more than 220 million following: 'The America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.'
Musk has yet to disclose any specific proposed policies or state what the core tenets of his party would be, but he has expressed an eagerness to continue the mission he worked on as lead of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) by prioritizing cutting, what he perceives to be, wasteful spending within the government and reducing the country's deficit. In his continued opposition against President Donald Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill, which was signed on July 4, Musk has also seemingly committed to campaigning against any Republicans who showed support and voted for said bill.
As for how he plans to gain 'independence from the two-party system,' Musk has expressed an intention to maintain a 'laser-focus on just two or three Senate seats and eight to 10 House districts' for his party.
Critics, led by Trump himself—Musk's one-time ally—have been quick to point out that third parties have historically struggled to compete with the two-party system. Trump referred to Musk's aspirations as 'ridiculous' and said the 'one thing third parties are good for is the creation of complete and total disruption and chaos.'
But not everybody has been so bleak in their responses. Yang has proven to be a vocal supporter of Musk's move to establish a third party within the U.S. political spectrum, and is seemingly keen to help Musk succeed where he may have struggled.
Here's what to know about the political party founder:
Yang's stint as a Democratic presidential candidate in 2020
Born and raised in New York to Taiwanese parents, Yang, 50, spent the early part of his career as a businessman and entrepreneur.
He studied political science and economics at Brown University, followed by a law degree at Columbia. After working in business enterprise, Yang was named a Champion of Change by former President Barack Obama in 2012 for a fellowship program that sent top college graduates to work at start-up companies in economically-challenged cities across the U.S.
After filing the necessary paperwork to run as a Democratic candidate for President in November 2017, Yang began to share his ambitions, with his platform largely focused on protecting jobs from the rapidly-growing robotics and technology industry.
His campaign slogan 'Humanity First' demonstrated just that.
'I'm running for President to wake up America to the fact that it's not immigrants or globalization, but this technology that is transforming our way of life,' Yang told Quartz during his campaign.
Yang was also a strong advocate for universal basic income. The entrepreneur said that he would provide $1,000 monthly to Americans aged 18 to 64. 'This would improve Americans' nutrition and health, mental health, relationships, and stress levels. It would create millions of jobs around the country. It would be a catalyst for entrepreneurship and creativity,' he argued.
Despite his ambition, Yang called an end to his campaign after defeat in the New Hampshire Democratic presidential primary, in which Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont emerged victorious. Yang finished 8th in terms of voter share, gaining just 2.8% of the count.
'Endings are hard and I've always had the intention to stay in this race… I am the math guy, and it's clear from the numbers we're not going to win this campaign,' he told his supporters in February 2020 as the results came through.
The formation of the Forward Party
In July 2022, Yang joined forces with former Republican Governor for New Jersey Christine Todd Whitman to establish the Forward Party as a third political party. Forward was officially formed as a political action committee (PAC) in 2021 and the party was announced in Yang's book, Forward: Notes on the Future of Our Democracy.
The party launched with a clear message: "How will we solve the big issues facing America? Not Left. Not Right. Forward."
The party claims that 60% of American voters want a new political party, and puts itself forward as a possible solution. Amongst the centrist party's key values are respecting the rule of law, building 'from the bottom up,' and protecting individual liberties.
Another push from the Forward Party includes voting reform and promoting alternatives to the current voter system in place for most federal and state elections.
The Forward Party has advocated for methods such as ranked choice voting, which it argues 'improves fairness in elections by allowing voters to rank candidates in order of preference, rather than just cast a single vote.'
This method was recently used to elect Zohran Mamdani as the Democratic candidate for the New York Mayoral election.
Despite its ambition, the Forward Party has seemingly struggled to gain a strong momentum or presence in U.S. politics. Utah state Senator Daniel Thatcher is the only elected official in the U.S. to represent the party after switching from the Republican Party in March.
But the Forward Party has remained adamant in its messaging that it wants to change the traditional political structure in the U.S. With Musk's recent announcement of his own venture, Yang's party has been a vocal advocate.
'We welcome the growing realization that the two-party system isn't working and that the majority of Americans want more choices and more accountability… We encourage all new, Independent movements to prioritize healthy reform and real solutions above all else. Not Left. Not Right. Forward,' the party said on Monday.
What has Yang said about Musk and his America Party ambitions?
Since Musk initially floated the idea of forming a new political party, Yang has been vocal in his support for Musk's challenge to the two-party system.
In June, Yang expressed an eagerness to join forces with Musk in some capacity.
'Elon has built world-class companies from nothing more than an idea multiple times, and in this instance, you have the vast majority of Americans who are hungry for a new approach,' Yang said in an interview with Politico. 'I'm happy to spell it out for Elon, or anyone else who wants to head down this road. A third party can succeed very quickly.'
On July 6, after Musk renewed his intention to form the America Party, Yang said: 'Anyone who wants to bust up the duopoly has the right idea.'
Yang has since confirmed that he has been in touch with Musk and his team regarding the new rival party.
'I'm excited for anyone who wants to move on from the duopoly… And I'm happy to help give someone a sense of what the path looks like,' he told Politico on Monday.
On the same day, Yang doubled down on his stance, posting again on social media: 'If it breaks the duopoly, I'm all for it.'
TIME has reached out to Yang and Musk for comment and further information regarding them connecting over the America Party.
It's not out of the question that if support from Yang continues, a potential collaboration could begin, or perhaps even a merger.
Forward has done this before. As part of its founding as a party in 2022, the Forward PAC merged with the Renew America Movement, made up of former Republican officials, and the Serve America Movement, a group of Democrats, Republicans, and Independents. The groups merged to create the official Forward Party in its current form.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Guardians president responded to Trump's random tirade about name change
At this present moment in time, you might think Donald Trump would realize he has bigger fish to fry than ranting and raving about professional sports teams changing their nicknames to decidedly non-racist labels. And, well, you'd probably be right. But that didn't stop the 47th U.S. President from going on an arbitrary (and pretty nonsensical, with all things considered) diatribe about how American sports teams like the Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians should revert back to their old, decidedly racist nicknames. Somewhere along the way, Trump invented the concept of an "original six" in baseball out of thin air (which doesn't exist and is actually an NHL concept) to invoke the Guardians, for which an "original six" label wouldn't even apply. Again, it seems like Trump may be brazenly trying to drum up some sort of cannon fodder grievance to distract from other, more pressing issues. I mean, I'm just saying that I wouldn't rule it out, is all. Shortly after Trump's Sunday morning shot in the dark, er, I mean, testimonial, Guardians president Chris Antonetti responded to his reference about the franchise's name. In short, Antonetti politely declined, citing an "opportunity to build the [Guardians'] brand" while being "excited" for the future. You know what the amusing kicker is here? It would take years for the Guardians, or anyone in a similar position, to go back and earnestly rebrand. It's not as if it's some overnight, effortless operation that can be done on someone's whim. How long have the Cleveland Guardians had their current nickname? After years of backlash, in late 2020, the Guardians revealed they would drop their old "Indians" nickname after the conclusion of the 2021 season. They have been the Guardians ever since. It was the eighth official name change in franchise history for an organization that officially started as the Columbus Buckeyes/Senators in 1896. It was the fifth name change since they started calling Cleveland home in 1900. This article originally appeared on For The Win: Guardians president politely declines Donald Trump's demand for name change
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
What a GOP bill banning central digital currency means for consumer banking
A proposed GOP ban on a central bank digital currency (CBDC) could pump the brakes on grand visions to reshape electronic payment access around the Federal Reserve. Republican lawmakers pushed the ban through the House on Thursday over concerns the government could use a CBDC to surveil Americans' financial transactions. The banking industry has also lobbied against the currency, arguing the public already has sufficient access to easily usable and safe digital money. 'Nobody yet knows whether a CBDC is a good idea or not,' Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.), who has pushed for the government to explore a CBDC, said following the House's vote. 'There is potential for abuse and corruption, but also for extraordinary modernization that could serve unbanked communities, support the primacy of the U.S. dollar, and much more,' he added. Fed floated idea in 2022 white paper In 2022, the Federal Reserve issued a study of CBDCs that outlined their risks and benefits. 'All options for private digital money, including stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies, require mechanisms to reduce liquidity risk and credit risk. But all these mechanisms are imperfect,' the report notes. A traditional bank account is backed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which guarantees individual deposits up to $250,000 in the event a bank fails. But there are also riskier forms of digital financial services. In 2024, a financial technology company called Synapse collapsed and left customers unable to access some $265 million in deposits. A CBDC, backed with the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, would be the safest possible digital asset. The Fed paper said that a CBDC could make cross-border payments easier and potentially improve access to banking for low-income households. A 2022 study by Himes, the Connecticut Democrat, proposed that CBDCs could be used for depositing paychecks or even be integrated into federal programs like Social Security. A more ambitious version of a CBDC could allow Americans to hold digital dollars at a bank account with the Fed, enabling them to make digital payments without an account at a traditional bank. That could, as the Fed paper noted, 'fundamentally change the structure of the U.S. financial system, altering the roles and responsibilities of the private sector and the central bank.' A government-backed digital dollar — especially one that could bear interest — could also drive consumers away from traditional commercial bank accounts. A CBDC still would require significant study, from the impacts on the banking system to the technology that it would run on. A hypothetical CBDC could use existing technology, or it could be distributed on a blockchain, similar to how Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are issued. In 2022, former Federal Reserve Vice Chair Lael Brainard estimated that it would take ' a long time ' — at least five years, she said — to launch a digital currency if Congress decided to do so. Fed Chair Jerome Powell said in February that the bank would not develop a CBDC under his tenure. His term expires in May 2026. The bill, which now heads to the Senate, would bar the Fed from directly or indirectly issuing a CBDC or studying the issue. Other federal agencies are already barred from studying a CBDC due to a January executive order from President Trump. Republicans cite privacy concerns Privacy is the biggest concern about CBDCs aired by Republican lawmakers. House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), who led the CBDC ban through the House, said on the floor that a digital dollar would be tantamount to government surveillance. 'It is government-controlled programmable money that, if designed without the privacy protections of cash, this could give the federal government the ability to surveil and restrict Americans' transactions and monitor every aspect of our daily lives,' he said. In contrast to cash, which is essentially untraceable, a CBDC would likely leave a digital record of some form. If the government pursued a CBDC, it would have to balance concerns about privacy with safeguards to curb its use in money laundering or other illegal activities. Many lawmakers have cited China's digital yuan as a worrying example. Tech and China experts, as reported by WIRED, have raised concerns that the Chinese government could use its digital currency to track individual transactions or otherwise scoop up tranches of consumer data. Other Republicans have issued starker warnings about CBDCs. 'CBDC is an existential threat to Western civilization,' Rep. Warren Davidson (R-Ohio) wrote on the social platform X. Banking, crypto lobbies strongly oppose Banking and cryptocurrency lobbying groups are staunchly against a centrally issued digital currency. In a letter to Emmer in April, the American Banking Association argued that Americans already had sufficient access to digital payments. Alongside other digital transfer systems pioneered in the private sector, the Fed launched FedNow, an instant payment system that can operate 24/7, in 2023. Banks have to opt in to using the service, whose major clients include JPMorganChase and Wells Fargo. More broadly, the bank lobby argued that a CBDC would undercut the role banks play in the country's economic system. 'For example, a CBDC would be an advantaged competitor to retail bank deposits that would move money away from banks and into accounts at the Federal Reserve, severely limiting the ability of commercial banks to make loans that power economic growth in communities across the country,' the group wrote. A CBDC could also dampen hopes that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin or privately developed stablecoins — cryptocurrencies whose value is pegged to a reference asset like the U.S. dollar — could become the primary form of digital money. 'You wouldn't need stablecoins; you wouldn't need cryptocurrencies, if you had a digital U.S. currency,' Powell said at a congressional hearing in 2021. 'I think that's one of the stronger arguments in its favor.'
The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Himes: White House warning of ‘massive market reaction' if Trump fires Powell
Rep. Jim Himes (D-Conn.) said Sunday that a White House insider is warning President Trump of a 'massive market reaction' if he fires Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. 'I mean, what happens if there's a tweet that says the Fed chair is gone?' CBS's Margaret Brennan asked Himes on 'Face the Nation.' 'Well, interestingly, inside the White House — and I don't know who it is — my guess is, it's maybe the Treasury secretary — is saying — and this is a very difficult thing to say to a person like Donald Trump — that, if you fire the Fed chair, either illegally, which they're happy to do, or because you trump up some baloney-like charge associated with a renovation of the headquarters, there is going to be a massive market reaction, because you cannot lie to the capital markets,' Himes responded. Trump has recently grasped on to the Federal Reserve's multibillion-dollar makeover as a possible way to finally oust Powell. The president has for months criticized Powell over the Fed's decision not to cut interest rates, a move partly based on uncertainty surrounding Trump's tariffs. Trump has stated his desire to remove Powell, whom he appointed during his last term in the White House. Senate Republicans have recently warned Trump that it would be a large mistake to go forward on his threat to fire Powell, saying it would probably send a 'shock wave' through the financial markets and rattle the larger economy. Republican senators, including those who are strong supporters of the president, have warned that any action to oust Powell would jeopardize the Fed's independence, which could erode investors' confidence in American monetary policy and creditworthiness. 'I do not believe a president, any president, has the authority to fire the Federal Reserve chair,' Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) said previously.
