How UAE's interest deduction limitation rule is impacting businesses – A need for balanced reform
The UAE's Interest Deduction Limitation Rule as per Article 30 Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 on Corporate Taxation aims to enhance fiscal transparency and to maintain adequate capital and not be excessively leveraged. While designed to prevent excessive interest deductions, its implications for capital-intensive industries necessitate a balanced approach.
Understanding the Interest Deduction Limitation Rule
Ministerial Decision no 126 of 2023 limits interest deductions to 30 per cent of EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortisation), with an exception allowing up to Dh12 million or 30 per cent of EBITDA, whichever is higher. Any excess interest is non-deductible and added to taxable income, increasing corporate tax liability.
Challenges for UAE Businesses
1. Impact on Capital-Intensive and Commodity Trading Sectors
Industries such as real estate development, manufacturing, and commodity trading (including oil and energy trading) depend heavily on debt financing. As these sectors operate on thin margins, limiting interest deductions could increase tax burdens and affect competitiveness.
2. Increased Tax Burden Due to EBITDA-Based Limitation
While EBITDA is a common financial metric, using it as a deduction benchmark can significantly raise effective tax rates for businesses with substantial financing costs.
Illustrative Example:
This increased tax rate poses financial challenges for debt-reliant industries, potentially discouraging investment.
Global Best Practices and Considerations
Many countries apply sector-sensitive approaches to interest deduction rules. OECD guidelines emphasise proportionality, and several jurisdictions offer exemptions for highly leveraged sectors to maintain investment viability.
Recommendations for Policy Refinement
1. Industry-Specific Adjustments – Relief for commodity traders, infrastructure, and energy sectors to reflect their capital-intensive nature.
2. Increased Deduction Threshold – Raising the cap to 50 per cent of EBITDA to provide greater flexibility for debt-financed businesses.
3. Gradual Implementation – Phased adoption to help businesses transition to new financial structures.
4. Alternative Financial Metrics – Using debt-equity ratios instead of EBITDA-based limitations to ensure fairer taxation.
Conclusion
The Interest Deduction Limitation Rule is a key component of the UAE's tax framework. However, an approach that considers sector-specific financial structures while maintaining fiscal integrity will enhance investment attractiveness. By engaging with businesses and industry experts, policymakers can foster a tax environment that supports long-term economic growth.
Visit: www.kgrnaudit.com/ for expert corporate tax consultation services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
4 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Billions for arms, rather than troops, won't make us safer
William D. Hartung, Tribune News Service The Pentagon got a whopping $150 billion increase in the budget bill passed by Congress and signed by the president July 4. That will push next year's proposed Pentagon budget to more than $1 trillion. Most of that enormous amount will go to weapons manufacturers. A new report by the Quincy Institute and the Costs of War Project at Brown University found that for the period from 2020 to 2024, more than half of the Pentagon budget — 54% — went to private companies. That figure has climbed considerably since the immediate post-Cold War period of the 1990s, when the contractor share was 41%. The surge of spending on the Pentagon and its primary weapons suppliers won't necessarily make us safer. It may just enrich military companies while subsidising overpriced, underperforming weapons systems, even as it promotes an accelerated arms race with China. While weapons firms will fare well if the new budget goes through as planned, military personnel and the veterans who have fought in America's wars in this century will not. The Donald Trump administration is seeking deep cuts in personnel, facilities and research at the Veterans Affairs, and tens of thousands of military families have to use food stamps, a program cut by 20% in the budget bill, to make ends meet. The $150 billion in add-ons for the Pentagon include tens of billions for the Trump administration's all-but-impossible dream of a leak-proof Golden Dome missile defense system, a goal that has been pursued for more than 40 years without success. Other big winners include the new F-47 combat aircraft, and the military shipbuilding industry, which is slated for a huge infusion of new funding. The question of how to allocate the Pentagon's orgy of weapons spending is complicated by the fact that there are now two powerful factions within the arms industry fighting over the department's budget, the traditional Big Five, composed of Lockheed Martin, RTX (formerly Raytheon), Boeing, General Dynamics and Northrop Grumman, and emerging military tech firms such as SpaceX, Palantir and Anduril. The Big Five currently get the bulk of Pentagon weapons spending, but the emerging tech firms are catching up, winning lucrative contracts for military-wide communications systems and antidrone technology. And there will be more such contracts. Even after the public falling out between Elon Musk and the president, the emerging tech firms have a decided advantage, with advocates such as Vice President JD Vance, who maintains close ties with his mentor and political supporter Peter Thiel of Palantir, and dozens of staff members from military tech firms who are now embedded in the national security and budget bureaucracies of the Trump administration. Meanwhile, the tech sector's promises of a new, revolutionary era of defense made possible by artificial-intelligence-driven weapons and other technologies are almost certainly overstated. If past practice tells us anything, it is that new, complex high-tech weapons will not save us. The history of Pentagon procurement is littered with 'miracle weapons,' from the electronic battlefield in Vietnam to Ronald Reagan's 'impenetrable' Star Wars missile shield to networked warfare and precision-guided bombs used in the Iraq and Afghan wars. When push came to shove, these highly touted systems either failed to work as advertised, or were irrelevant to the kinds of wars they were being used in. Just one example: Despite the fact that the Pentagon spent well over $10 billion to find a system that could neutralise improvised explosive devices in Iraq and Afghanistan, only modest progress was made. Even after the new technology was deployed, 40% of could not be cleared. Technology is a tool, but it is not the decisive factor in winning wars or deterring adversaries. An effective military should be based on well-trained, well-compensated and highly motivated troops. That means taking some of that 54% of the Pentagon budget that goes to contractors and investing in supporting the people who are actually tasked with fighting America's wars.
Sharjah 24
11 hours ago
- Sharjah 24
SEC approves executive regulations of Human Resources Law
During the meeting, the SEC discussed various important issues, focusing on how to effectively monitor the performance of government departments and agencies. The Council also discussed updating laws and regulations to ensure that workers' rights are protected in Sharjah. The Council would like to extend its heartfelt thanks to His Highness Sheikh Dr Sultan bin Mohammad Al Qasimi, Supreme Council Member and Ruler of Sharjah, for his unwavering support and insightful leadership. His Highness's efforts have greatly improved the working conditions for government employees. His Highness is committed to establishing a robust government that functions effectively and prioritizes its citizens. By focusing on the needs of employees and enhancing their quality of life, His Highness has established important rules and guidelines that ensure job security. This commitment is essential for fostering overall development in Sharjah, making it a better place for everyone. The Council has approved new rules based on Decree-Law No. (2) of 2025 that focus on human resources in Sharjah. These changes aim to create clear and effective guidelines for managing and developing the workforce. The goal is to enhance the work environment, clarify the roles and responsibilities of employees in government jobs, and promote efficiency, fairness, and job security in alignment with the government's goals for the emirate. The executive regulations outline the procedures for how employees and government agencies interact and manage their work relationships. These regulations encompass a comprehensive set of rules and guidelines that address various administrative topics. In total, there are nine main sections, 130 articles detailing specific points, 33 tables for easy reference, and 30 forms and applications that employees may need to use. The regulations cover various aspects of employment and hiring practices. They establish guidelines for various committees that oversee these processes, as well as rules governing bonuses, incentives, and benefits. There are also details about how promotions work and how to resolve any workplace status issues. Additionally, the regulations outline rules for working hours, leave policies, and expectations for workplace behavior. They specify when disciplinary actions can be taken and the circumstances under which an employee may be terminated. Finally, there are some concluding points that wrap up the regulations. The Council has approved new rules to enhance the efficiency of the Sharjah Government. This is part of their ongoing effort to modernize systems, support local talent, and foster a work environment that prioritizes innovation and productivity. The Council also encouraged all Sharjah Government employees to work harder and more sincerely to help achieve the vision set by His Highness the Ruler of Sharjah and to support the overall growth goals of the emirate.
Zawya
2 days ago
- Zawya
Rebalancing economy: Egypt's shift toward private sector-led growth
In recent years, Egypt has embarked on a transformative journey aimed at rebalancing its economic landscape. A cornerstone of this ambitious endeavor is the strategic imperative to expand the role of the private sector significantly while reducing the state's pervasive presence in various economic activities. This shift is not merely an ideological preference; it is a pragmatic response to pressing economic realities and a forward-looking vision for sustainable growth. Private Sector Dominance: Why Imperative Now? For years, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) operating across numerous sectors have created an uneven playing field for private businesses. While the government has recently taken steps to level the competition for all firms, private enterprises frequently face challenges. These challenges are mainly in securing financing, largely due to banks' overwhelming preference for lending to the government. This is according to 2024 economic surveys on Egypt by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In this regard, Ahmed Fawzy Hussein, a PhD holder and an assistant professor of economics, tells Arab finance: 'The historical entrenchment of the state within the Egyptian economy has engendered several structural inefficiencies. Chief among them is the crowding-out effect, where public sector dominance in key sectors has marginalized private initiatives, stifled competition, and impeded productivity growth.' 'This has often led to a misallocation of resources, where investment decisions were driven by political or social imperatives rather than economic rationality. Furthermore, SOEs frequently operated under soft budget constraints, enjoying implicit state guarantees that discouraged efficiency and innovation. The cumulative effect has been a distortion of market dynamics, reduced foreign investor confidence, and an underdeveloped entrepreneurial ecosystem,' Hussein added. However, the Egyptian government is actively working to expand the role of the private sector in the national economy. Egypt has cultivated robust relationships with international institutions and development partners, strategically leveraging these alliances to channel development finance, particularly towards the private sector. This concerted effort, coupled with ongoing economic and structural reform measures, has yielded a significant increase in financing volumes. By the end of 2024, financing for private sector businesses reached approximately $4.2 billion, notably surpassing government financing for the first time, as revealed by the Ministry of Planning, Economic Development, and International Cooperation last June. With the efforts exerted, there are promising sectors for private investments in Egypt. Ahmed Ghaly, a trade economist, tells Arab Finance: 'There are several high-potential sectors that are aligned with both Egypt's economic priorities and the broader regional and global investment landscape. Energy, especially renewables like solar and wind, stands out as a priority area. Logistics and transportation also offer significant opportunities.' Other promising sectors include fintech and manufacturing, while sectors with less obvious opportunities include healthcare services, pharmaceuticals, and education, especially EdTech, Ghaly highlights. He adds, "Water desalination, renewable infrastructure services, and circular economy sectors are also emerging as strategic areas where the private sector can play a leading role, especially as Egypt intensifies its focus on sustainability and climate resilience." The State Ownership Policy Document: A Blueprint for Change In December 2022, Egypt finalized and issued the State Ownership Policy Document. This document outlines the government's approach to SOEs and aims to increase private sector participation in the Egyptian economy. 'The State Ownership Policy Document is a landmark in Egypt's economic policymaking. It is the first time the government has clearly defined the sectors in which it intends to exit, reduce its role, or retain a strategic presence,' according to Ghaly. 'By publicly committing to increase private sector participation in total investment to 65% within a few years, the document sends a strong message to both local and international investors that Egypt is serious about rebalancing its economic structure,' he says. To meet the aspirations of Egyptians, the State Ownership Policy Document seeks to elevate economic growth rates by boosting investment rates to between 25% and 30%. This is projected to increase the economic growth rate to a range of 7% to 9%, thereby generating sufficient job opportunities to reduce unemployment rates. Ghaly adds, 'The document outlines a three-tier approach: full exit, partial presence, and strategic retention. It identifies over 60 sectors and subsectors where the state's role will change.' The State Ownership Policy Document further aims to empower the Egyptian private sector and diversify its opportunities across all economic activities. This is crucial for significantly increasing its contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP), investments, employment, exports, and government revenues. Moreover, the document also aims to focus government investment in asset ownership on key, state-confined sectors, particularly those the private sector is hesitant to enter. Developing these strategic sectors will directly enhance the overall business environment for private enterprises. Furthermore, the document seeks to improve the governance of the state's economic presence by establishing clear criteria for government involvement. This signifies a shift from direct institutional management to a focus on managing state capital, achieved by defining clear mechanisms for the state's exit from both the management and ownership of its assets. Although the document aims to achieve competitive neutrality, it might not be the only means. Hussein explains, 'Competitive neutrality is indeed a cornerstone for ensuring a balanced economic environment where private enterprises can compete fairly with SOEs. Achieving this in Egypt requires a comprehensive regulatory overhaul, including transparent governance frameworks for SOEs, the elimination of preferential access to finance and land, and the imposition of uniform taxation and compliance standards. Equally important is the reinforcement of independent regulatory bodies to ensure impartial oversight across sectors.' 'While the State Ownership Policy Document signals a commendable policy direction, confidence in its effective implementation hinges on political will, institutional capacity, and the establishment of clear timelines with measurable benchmarks. Without these, reforms risk being superficial or selectively applied,' he adds. Meanwhile, Ghaly explains, 'The document's clarity is welcome. However, the key challenge now is operationalizing this policy. Investors will need to see concrete timelines, clear criteria for public-private partnerships (PPPs), and governance reforms in how state-owned enterprises are managed and divested. Transparency in asset valuation, open bidding processes, and consistency in messaging will be critical to building trust.' Sustainability of Private Sector-Led Growth Egypt's efforts to empower the private sector and ensure its sustainable growth do not stand only at the State Ownership Policy Document. 'Egyptian government has undertaken several initiatives beyond the document to attract private and foreign direct investment (FDI). Notable among these are the new Investment Law No. 72 of 2017, which provides a range of fiscal and non-fiscal incentives, particularly in underdeveloped regions, as well as guarantees against nationalization and arbitrary decisions.' 'Additionally, the push towards the Golden License system aims to streamline licensing procedures for strategic investments, reducing bureaucratic hurdles significantly. Furthermore, ongoing efforts to liberalize the exchange rate and enhance financial inclusion through digital transformation are pivotal in restoring investor confidence,' according to Hussein. With efforts to boost private sector contributions in Egypt, investments are starting to see good results. During the third quarter of FY2024/2025, private investment, at constant prices, surged by 24.2% year-on-year (YoY), marking the third consecutive quarter it outpaced public investment, constituting 62.8% of total implemented investments (excluding inventory). However, this growth was insufficient to counteract the substantial 45.6% YoY contraction in public investment (at constant prices). Consequently, the overall contribution of investment to GDP growth was negative, diminishing the aggregate growth rate by approximately 2.44 percentage points, as revealed by the Ministry of Planning, Economic Development, and International Cooperation in June 2025. Yet, more needs to be done to ensure better results in the future. Hussein points out, 'The sustainability of the incentives [taken by the government] depends critically on addressing underlying issues of regulatory predictability, judicial efficiency, and macroeconomic stability.' Ghaly notes, 'Global investors are closely watching Egypt, but to attract long-term investment, reforms must shift from plans to credible, actionable policies. Strengthening the private sector is no longer just an economic choice; it is a necessity for resilience, innovation, and job creation.' Egypt's economic trajectory is at a pivotal point, marked by a determined shift towards empowering the private sector as the primary engine of growth and development. The historical dominance of state-owned enterprises has created structural inefficiencies, stifled competition, and led to resource misallocation. Recognizing these challenges, the government has strategically committed to fostering a more level playing field, attracting investment, and driving sustainable job creation. The path ahead requires sustained effort, but the strategic direction is clear: a dynamic private sector is indispensable for Egypt's long-term economic aspirations.
