Assisted dying: BMA says patients should meet end-of-life care doctor first
The proposed legislation for assisted dying cleared the Commons with a majority of 23 votes on Friday and will move to the House of Lords for further debate.
To ensure patient care needs have been met, and to help detect coercion, any patient requesting assisted dying should be encouraged to attend face-to-face reviews by an independent specialist palliative care doctor before the assisted dying pathway begins Dr Samuel Parker, BMA
As it stands, the Bill would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
British Medical Association (BMA) members have now called for patients to also have an in-person review with an independent palliative care doctor at the very start of the process.
Speaking at the union's meeting, Dr Samuel Parker said: 'To ensure patient care needs have been met, and to help detect coercion, any patient requesting assisted dying should be encouraged to attend face-to-face reviews by an independent specialist palliative care doctor before the assisted dying pathway begins.
'This can also ensure whether the patient has received the best quality outcomes prior to preventing their assisted dying.'
Dr Sarah Foot added: 'Choice is only a choice if it is an informed choice… this is about making sure that patients know their options, that have had access to palliative care.
'What is uncomfortable is patients choosing to die when they haven't had access to palliative care and don't know what's available to them.
'Our united voice will help influence this Bill in the House of Lords later this year, be proud and proactive and stand up for some of our most vulnerable patients.
'Those who are dying are physically and emotionally dependent on us in society to help safeguard them. They need to be safe and supported.'
MPs voted in favour of the third reading of the assisted dying Bill by a majority of 23 (House of Commons/UK Parliament/PA)
Dr Parker warned that palliative care in the UK is under-resourced, 'with few specialists, a post-Covid lottery and a shortage of funding'.
He said patients deserve rapid access to high-quality care, adding that 'safety and patient welfare are essential'.
Dr Foot said: 'Hospices and palliative care does not have enough funding. We cannot live in a society were we fully fund assisted dying, but we don't fully fund hospice and palliative care.'
Last week, the Health Secretary – who was one of the most senior opponents of the legislation – warned that legalising assisted dying would take 'time and money' away from other parts of the NHS.
Writing on his Facebook page, Wes Streeting said he could not ignore the concerns 'about the risks that come with this Bill' raised by the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Royal College of Physicians, the Association for Palliative Medicine and charities representing under-privileged groups.
The motion at the BMA ARM also affirmed the right of doctors to decline involvement in the service. An opt-out for all healthcare professionals is already built into the Bill.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting voted against the Bill in Parliament (Lucy North/PA)
Speaking of the potential impact of assisted dying on the mental wellbeing of healthcare professionals, Dr Parker called on the BMA to ensure there are 'no subtle pressures' on doctors to participate, and 'no risk of professional sanction or discrimination'.
Dr Andrew Green, chairman of the BMA's medical ethics committee, said: 'While the BMA is neutral on the issue of assisted dying – that is whether the law should change or not – we have been engaging with legislation to ensure doctors are represented on a number of key issues.
'This motion reaffirms, and strengthens, a number of the BMA's existing positions, including the right for doctors to decline to participate for any reason should the law change, and the need for any assisted dying service to be funded through new money and not at the expense of other parts of health and social care.
'We have been clear that any future assisted dying provision should be offered via a separate service that doctors must opt in to, and not part of any doctor's existing regular work. This service must come with additional funding, alongside further investment in palliative care, which we know has for too long been under-resourced, leading to huge variations in availability across the country.
'In discussions around Kim Leadbeater's Bill in England and Wales, which has now passed its final stages in the Commons, we have strongly opposed moves to ban doctors from raising the subject of assisted dying with patients, but have been clear that this must be part of a discussion around all options available.
'This motion expands on this, ensuring that patients who may be considering assisted dying are able to access information about all possible treatment and routes available to them.'
Meanwhile, research has suggested that almost half (47%) of UK adults surveyed are worried they or their loved ones will have a painful or undignified death.
The survey, carried out by Focaldata for King's College London (KCL), found 44% feel worried about the quality of palliative and end-of-life care in the UK, although 46% said they feel confident services will be available when they or loved ones need them.
Meanwhile, the polling found 61% of the 2,106 adults asked in March were supportive of the assisted dying Bill which is currently being considered by Parliament for England and Wales.
KCL is launching The Impact Centre for Palliative and End-of-Life Care in autumn, a privately-run centre aiming to improve palliative care in the UK, and establish a framework for better care which it said could be applied around the world.
The centre, funded by the Kirby Laing Foundation, will be the first of its kind in the UK and will work to 'create long term, systemic change in the delivery of care for dying people'.
Centre lead Professor Katherine Sleeman, said: 'Although a wealth of evidence has now been generated on ways to improve experiences and outcomes for people approaching the end of life, too often this evidence is not used to improve care, meaning dying people suffer and those close to them are left to pick up the pieces.
'By closing the gap between evidence and practice, the Impact Centre for Palliative and End-of-Life Care will make a profound and lasting difference for people with life-limiting illnesses and their loved ones, now and in the future.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
3 hours ago
- Daily Mail
ALISON BOSHOFF: Dragon's podcast gives ‘biased and dangerous' advice, says cancer expert
Dragons' Den star Steven Bartlett stands accused of spreading 'dangerous' misinformation on his latest Diary Of A CEO podcast. Bartlett, 32, hosted Dr Roger Seheult, a 'vitamin D expert', who he described as a 'world-leading doctor in internal medicine, lung health, critical care and sleep medicine'. In the trailer for the podcast, already viewed 4.5 million times, Dr Seheult describes a patient who was 'cured', miraculously, 'by sunlight'. Dr Seheult said: 'A 15-year-old boy was diagnosed with blood cancer but he developed a flesh-eating infection in his lung. He wasn't going to make it. So he had one request – to go outside. That's what they did. After the second day, the infection was 60-70 per cent gone. It became clear to me that sunlight has so many health benefits.' He added: 'For example, if you are closer to the window, you are discharged from hospital faster.' Broadcaster and retired surgeon Dr Liz O'Riordan was alarmed by the claims in the trailer. 'This is one of the current problems with podcasts – clips carefully edited to go viral with shocking statements.' She added: 'The clip implies that leaving ITU for sunlight can stop people dying – and yes, it is dangerous. 'The medical information this doctor tells us is second-hand – from the boy's mum, who is not a doctor – and we don't know what made her tell him this. But as a guy pushing sunlight, there will have been some bias in this interview.' (Coincidentally, a link on the podcast's social media offered listeners the chance to buy a sunlight lamp.) Dr O'Riordan, a breast cancer awareness campaigner diagnosed with the disease herself in 2015, said: 'Steven doesn't appear to challenge his guests or ask for the evidence.' She noted the study Dr Seheult mentions, about patients by windows being discharged earlier, was only a small trial, decades ago, of people being treated for bipolar disorder. Meanwhile, on TikTok, a video criticising the Dr Seheult episode of Diary Of A CEO (DOAC) has received more than 15,000 likes. Last year, the BBC World Service broadcast an investigation into Bartlett's podcast – the biggest in the UK, according to Spotify. It flagged that, in one episode, claims by cardiologist Aseem Malhotra that the 'Covid vaccine was a net negative for society' went unchallenged, allowing misinformation to be spread. (In response to the BBC investigation Dr Malhotra said he accepted people disagreed with his views but 'that does not mean that they have been debunked'.) The Lancet medical journal estimates that Covid-19 vaccines saved up to 1.5 million lives. The BBC highlighted other episodes, which aired claims that autism and schizophrenia could be caused by gluten, and that cancer can be 'managed' by food rather than 'medieval' chemotherapy. A spokesperson for Bartlett's production company, FlightStory Studio, said: 'Each guest episode is thoroughly researched prior to commission. DOAC offers guests freedom of expression and believes that progress, growth and learning comes from hearing a range of voices, not just those Steven and the DOAC team agree with.' Dr O'Riordan told me: 'Podcasts like this are a big-money business. The more shocking you can make the story, the more clicks you get. Podcasts are not regulated, people can – and do – say anything they like.' Bartlett said in 2024 he expected to make £20 million that year from his podcast. Adria steps in to ensure it's not the end of the Affair... The Thomas Crown Affair – telling the story of a millionaire who commits heists for the sheer hell of it, and falls for the insurance investigator who is on his tail – is so good they've made it three times. First, of course, was the 1968 classic with Steve McQueen and Faye Dunaway (pictured below) – and soundtrack featuring The Windmills Of Your Mind. Then it was remade in 1999, with Pierce Brosnan alongside Rene Russo. And now comes another reboot with actor, director and producer Michael B. Jordan, who is hot right now thanks to the success of the film Sinners. His version, slated to come out in 2027, started filming in London a couple of weeks ago, but within days the leading lady Taylor Russell stepped away from the movie, with sources saying that there were 'creative differences' between her and Jordan. Luckily, Adria Arjona has leapt into the breach. Arjona, who is stepping out with actor Jason Momoa, appears in the Disney Star Wars spinoff Andor, and also starred in Hit Man with Glenn Powell and Blink Twice with Channing Tatum. Big new role for Barbie star Margot TIM Burton is set to direct Margot Robbie in a remake of the 1958 cult classic Attack Of The 50 ft Woman. The trade papers report that Robbie is going to star in and produce the project, which has been in development at Warner Bros since early 2024. In the movie, an heiress has a close encounter with an alien spacecraft, causing her to grow to the size of a skyscraper. The original starred Allison Hayes, and there was a 1993 TV version which starred Darryl Hannah. Meanwhile, Burton's Wednesday – his series for Netflix about Wednesday Addams – has been commissioned for series 3. The second series comes out next month. $6,000 a ticket, Macca? This had better be good Fans may have been stunned by the price of tickets to see Taylor Swift during her Eras tour – but they ain't seen nothing yet. While some resales to see TayTay ran to $900, the price of seeing Sir Paul McCartney on the US leg of his Got Back tour has reached … $6,308 a head. Tickets went on sale this week and were quickly snapped up, only to appear on resale sites like Viagogo, StubHub and Ticketmaster. Some tickets in Nashville and Pittsburgh are running at more than $6,000 each, with tickets elsewhere ranging between $200 and $1,600. McCartney's management team were not available for comment. But his former publicist Geoff Baker deplored the mess, saying on Facebook: 'The drawback with allowing dynamic pricing at your gigs to raise the cost of a ticket to $1,600 is the huge pressure that you then put on yourself. 'Because if people are paying that much many will expect … not only the best show that they have ever seen, but the best show that you have ever given.' Stephen Mangan met his wife Louise Delamere on the set of a film called Offending Angels. Mangan, who presents The Fortune Hotel on ITV from August 6, said proudly: 'It's the lowest grossing film in British history and made £94 at the box office.' The film, released in 2000, also starred Andrew Lincoln and Jack Davenport. LA sources say that the plastic surgeon's most requested standard of modern beauty is ... Emily Ratajkowski, who plays a super-beautiful influencer in Lena Dunham's hit Netflix comedy Too Much. Apparently everyone wants her cheekbones and jawline. Another satisfied customer! I hear that Olympic diving champ-turned-TV fixture Tom Daley has left the agency YMU, following Claudia Winkleman, Amanda Holden, Emily Atack, Gabby Logan, Rob Rinder, Amelia Dimoldenberg and others out of the door. Football's NOT coming home! Ted Lasso is back – but this time nearly all the filming will be done outside the UK. The popular Apple TV+ show made a bit of a star of the London borough of Richmond, and also filmed around south London. But the latest series is being made mainly in ... Kansas City, where star Jason Sudeikis grew up. (Though it's still set in Richmond.) The new episodes will see Lasso start coaching a women's football team. Hannah Waddingham and Brett Goldstein are among the returning cast.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The TRUTH about resident doctors' pay and their eye-watering demands for up to £20,000 extra a year - ahead of 5-day NHS strike
Striking NHS doctors are wielding misleading statistics to justify their eye-watering pay demands, analysis suggests. In pursuit of salary hikes worth up to £20,000, resident doctors will bring hospitals to a standstill from Friday as they walkout for five consecutive days. Militant union bosses orchestrating the carnage claim the medics – previously known as junior doctors – need a rise worth in excess of 29 per cent to make up for 17 years of 'pay erosion'. This is on top of the average 28.9 per cent awarded to resident doctors over the last three years, including an inflation-busting hike this year of 5.4 per cent – the most generous in the public sector. British Medical Association (BMA) bosses argue this is not enough. Health Secretary Wes Streeting blasted the BMA's strike action, calling it 'shockingly irresponsible' and insisting he will not budge on pay. The Government claims the average full-time basic pay of a resident doctor now sits at £54,300. This is up from around £42,000 in 2022/23. If the BMA's demands are met, their average basic salary would exceed £70,000 per year. Compared with 2024/25 pay packets, this would give the most senior resident doctors an extra £20,000. Ministers are still seeking a deal to avert more strike chaos, which could see doctors have some of their student loan debt wiped off to appease them. Resident doctors have taken industrial action 11 times since initial negotiations began in 2022. Campaign materials pushed out by the BMA say pay erosion equates to 21 per cent below inflation since 2008/09. On its website, the union writes: 'Put another way, resident doctors are still working a fifth of their time for free.' However, this sum is calculated against the Retail Price Index (RPI) inflation measure. Tracking resident doctors' salary against the Consumer Price Index (CPI) instead, the Nuffield Trust found they are just 4.7 per cent below since 2008. Addressing this erosion would amount to an average lift of around five per cent. This would amount to an average pay boost of below £3,000. When measured against CPI levels since 2015/16, the Nuffield Trust revealed resident doctors have actually had a 7.9 per cent pay increase. Government sources have criticised the BMA's use of RPI in its calculations because it overstates inflation. It was, for this reason, the statistics watchdog downgraded RPI as an official national measure in 2013. Since then, CPI and CPIH (CPI including housing costs) have been the accepted standards for calculating inflation. MailOnline understands the Government will phase out its use by the end of the decade. Grilled about the pay of other NHS staff, Mr Streeting told MPs that cash is 'finite'. He said: 'These sorts of choices and trade-offs about resources are precisely why I asked BMA resident doctors to understand why, having received a 28.9 per cent pay rise from this government in the last year, they ought to remember the responsibility that I have, and they also have to some of their lower paid colleagues. 'Resources are finite, and it is important that I act in the interests of all NHS staff and have particular concern for those who work extremely hard but are not properly rewarded.' However, the BMA has defended its use of RPI, arguing it is a more accurate metric for everyday people. A BMA spokesperson said: 'RPI is a measure which we, in line with the wider trade union movement, believe best reflects the real life experience of working people in the UK, and which the Government continues to use when it suits. 'For one thing, RPI sets student loan repayments. In a country where new doctors often have student debts of over £100,000 this is a hefty chunk of their living costs. 'Car taxes and train fare caps are also set by RPI, making up a huge part of the costs of many doctors finding themselves with long commuting distances as they get moved around the country on rotations. 'These moves also mean the need to find housing, a cost which itself feeds back into the calculations of RPI and make it even more relevant to the life of a working doctor.' MailOnline analysis shows that basic full-time equivalent (FTE) pay packets for all but one group of resident doctors has risen over the past 15 years against CPIH. Just foundation year 2 (FY2) doctors have seen a pay erosion when looking at the figures this way. FY1, core training and speciality registrar doctors' salaries were 1.1, 6.5 and 1.7 per cent higher, respectively, in March 2025 than August 2010, when compared with CPIH inflation. Our calculations only include basic pay, so the approximate one-quarter of doctors' salaries which is additional pay – such as overtime and uplifts for unsocial hours – is not included. In September, BMA members voted to accept a Government pay deal worth 22.3 per cent on average over two years to end a swathe of strike action plaguing the previous Tory government. The 2025/26 pay deal saw resident doctors given a 4 per cent uplift plus £750 'on a consolidated basis'. This worked out as an average pay rise of 5.4 per cent, totalling 28.9 per cent over the three years. However, this did not prove enough to ward off further strike action, with BMA members overwhelmingly voting in favour of fresh action over the offer. Nearly 90 per cent of 30,000 doctors (55 per cent turnout) voted to walk out. A spokesperson for the Department for Health and Social Care told MailOnline: 'Resident doctors have seen the biggest pay rises in the public sector two years in a row thanks to this government, and a pay increase of 28.9 per cent across three years. 'Public support for resident doctors strikes has collapsed and the majority of BMA resident doctors did not even vote for these strikes.' Nuffield Trust researcher Lucina Rolewicz said: 'You can paint a very different picture of real-terms changes to resident doctors' pay packets over time, depending on the methods you use. 'It's important to look at a range of baseline years to get a more complete understanding of what has happened to pay. For example, if you look at what's changed since 2008, pay erosion appears much worse than if you looked at the changes since 2015 in isolation. 'Against the CPI measure of inflation, this can make the difference of showing a 4.7 per cent fall in pay since 2008 or a 7.9 per cent increase since 2015. 'Comparing changes to pay at the same point in time, using different measures of inflation, also results in very different answers. For instance, resident doctor pay has fallen by 4.7 per cent since 2008 against CPI, but has decreased by 17.9 per cent over the same period when using RPI. 'Given the importance of the debate for doctors, their colleagues, patients and taxpayers, it is crucial that we look at all the ways that pay can be seen to have changed.' It comes after a report yesterday warned the looming strikes could cause 250,000 appointments to be cancelled or postponed this month. The walkouts may also cost the NHS £87million in staffing cover, the Policy Exchange think-tank said. Charities have expressed their 'deep concern' at the action and warned it will cause 'significant distress, pain and worsening health for patients'. Consultants will be able to cash-in by charging hospitals inflated rates of up to £2,504 a shift to cover for absent junior colleagues, depleting them of funds that could have been used to buy new scanners, repair buildings or deliver more procedures. Resident doctors have qualified from medical school but remain in clinical training for up to eight years. They work under the supervision of senior doctors during their on-the-job experience. Previous strikes by junior doctors led to the deaths of at least five patients, an audit revealed last week. NHS leaders have warned even 'more lives could be put at risk' during next week's five-day full walkout.
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Shock as beloved TV doctor is suddenly fired from job without explanation
A highly acclaimed, Emmy Award–winning physician known for her groundbreaking medical reporting has revealed she was abruptly let go after more than two decades at CBS Boston. Dr. Mallika Marshall, a specialist in internal medicine and pediatrics who has served as WBZ-TV's prominent HealthWatch Reporter since 2000, has announced that she has been laid off, as reported by The Boston Globe. This Friday will mark her final day at the station after more than 20 years on air, she confirmed to the outlet on Wednesday. 'It has been one of the greatest honors of my life to provide reliable and credible health advice to the residents of the Commonwealth, New England, and all over the world for more than 25 years, especially now when it's needed the most!' Marshall said. 'I'm certainly looking forward to what the next chapter brings.' Marshall also informed her colleagues of the layoff on Wednesday, sending a heartfelt email that not only acknowledged her sudden departure, but also paid tribute to the people she worked with and the lasting memories she made at the station. 'Everyone has been kind and supportive and professional and that's a rare find in a workplace these days,' Marshall's email, which was obtained by the Globe, read. 'You have been like family, and I'm going to miss chatting and laughing and dancing and joking and planning and executing and reporting and broadcasting with each and every one of you,' she added. 'And don't forget who you are. You're WBZ News, dagnabbit!!! The best news station in all of New England.' With years of media experience, Marshall - who is the daughter of former ABC news anchor Carole Simpson - has also become a recognizable national figure. According to her CBS biography, she has made regular appearances on programs such as CBS Mornings and the CBS Evening News - covering a wide range of health topics including mental health, reconstructive surgery, the flu, and various forms of cancer. Marshall also served as the Medical Director for Everyday Health, one of digital media's leading sources for medical news. She hosted Dr. Mallika Marshall - a nationally syndicated health news series that aired in over 70 markets, including major cities like San Francisco, Atlanta, St. Louis, Cleveland, and Houston. Marshall is on the faculty at Harvard Medical School and provides care at Massachusetts General Hospital, working at both the MGH Chelsea Urgent Care and the MGH Revere Health Center, according to the bio. During the pandemic, Marshall was on the frontlines, providing care to patients battling COVID-19, according to her CBS bio. Marshall's exceptional work has earned her numerous awards, including a prestigious New England Emmy Award for her health reporting. She was recently honored as one of Boston's Most Impactful Black Women, a testament to her influence both on and off the screen. Beyond journalism, Marshall has channeled her passion for health education into a new venture - writing a series of children's books designed to inspire young readers with engaging stories that promote healthy living. This isn't the first time the station has parted ways with Dr. Marshall - back in 2010, as her contract neared its end, WBZ claimed it no longer required a full-time health anchor and reporter, according to the Globe's earlier reporting. However, in 2014, she returned to WBZ as a medical reporter, once again contributing regular health and science segments to the station's newscasts. The reasons behind her dismissal remain unclear, and it is not yet known whether additional layoffs at the station are expected.
