
Rebalancing trade ties: India's path to reduced Chinese import dependence
Despite escalating geopolitical frictions and diplomatic tensions, India's merchandise trade with China has shown significant resilience, increasing by 81% to $128 billion in FY 2024-25 from $71 billion in FY2015-16.
iStock India's top imports from China in 2024 were concentrated in machinery and electronics, such as electronic integrated circuits, telephone sets and parts, automatic data processing machines, and photovoltaic cells. Over the past decade, India's merchandise trade with China has shown significant resilience, increasing by 81% from $71 billion in FY 2015-16 to $128 billion in FY 2024-25 (Figure 1), despite escalating geopolitical frictions and diplomatic tensions. However, this growth masks a significant imbalance for India. Although total trade has grown, this expansion has been largely driven by an 84% surge in imports. In 2024-25, imports from China accounted for about 16% of India's total import basket, totalling around $114 billion. This made China India's largest source of imports. The economic asymmetry has been further aggravated by the relatively sluggish growth in India's exports to China, leading to a widening trade deficit over the years. In 2024-25, this deficit reached a record high of $99.2 billion. China now accounts for nearly 35% of India's overall trade deficit, making it the country's biggest trade imbalance with another country. India's top imports from China in 2024 were concentrated in machinery and electronics, such as electronic integrated circuits, telephone sets and parts, automatic data processing machines, and photovoltaic cells. These items together accounted for 56% of total imports from China (Figure 2). Significant import volumes were also concentrated in critical sectors, such as chemical products (15%), which include pharmaceuticals, organic and inorganic chemicals, and fertilisers. Base metals, plastics, and rubber followed at 8% and 6%, respectively.Strikingly, 75% of India's imports from China comprised high- and medium-technology manufactures in 2024 (Figure 3). In terms of the industrial use, intermediate and capital goods accounted for 55%.China's dominance is further underscored by its overwhelming share in India's global imports in several products. In 2024, India imported 560 different products from China, with at least 80% of its total global imports originating from China alone. The combined value of these imports was approximately $19.5 billion.Such heavy dependence on Chinese imports raises critical concerns about India's industrial reliance and strategic autonomy. However, as highlighted in the Economic Survey 2023-24 and echoed by several prominent economists, a complete decoupling from Chinese supply chains may not be a viable option for India due to China's deep integration into global supply chains, particularly the large share of intermediate and capital goods sourced from China that are vital for sustaining India's manufacturing capacity. Hence, a more pragmatic approach would be to reduce overdependence on imports by encouraging greater Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) in India's manufacturing sector, especially through the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme. This approach holds particular promise for India's electronics and automobile sectors—areas where import dependence on China is high. Another key concern regarding the long-term sustainability of India's trade balance with China is the dominance of uncompetitive imports in India's import basket. A product imported from China can be considered uncompetitive when its per-unit import price is higher than that offered by at least one of India's top three alternative supplier countries for the same product. In 2024, of India's top 50 imported products from China at the HS-6-digit level, 23 were uncompetitive. For instance, penicillin, which India imports from China, is available from Hong Kong at a 15% lower price, and from the UAE, it is about 36% cheaper.
These uncompetitive products alone made up nearly $30 billion in imports, which is about two-thirds (64%) of the total value of India's top 50 imports from China, dominated primarily by machinery and electronics, followed by chemical goods, which include pharmaceuticals as well (Figure 4).The persistence of such uncompetitive imports despite available cheaper alternatives can, in part, be attributed to China's strategic export promotion practices. These include offering deferred payment options, low-interest financing, and technical cooperation arrangements for its exporters to make its exports more attractive to importing countries. Thus, the China Export and Credit Insurance Corporation—Sinosure, the country's official export credit agency (ECA), provides credit insurance to Chinese companies engaged in international trade, safeguarding them against the risk of non-payment. This protection encourages exporters to offer deferred payment terms to foreign buyers, enhancing trade turnover and benefiting both parties. Hence, these mechanisms significantly reduce payment risk, encourage higher trade turnover, and make Chinese products competitive.Nevertheless, reducing India's dependence on uncompetitive imports from China should remain a key strategic priority. This can be achieved by gradually diversifying towards more price-competitive suppliers and by seeking new source countries for imports. Simultaneously, India should make concerted efforts to encourage Chinese FDI into non-strategic sectors where the country faces high import dependence, as this could strengthen domestic manufacturing capacity along with paving the way for a more sustainable trade relationship with China.
The writers Nisha Taneja is Professor at ICRIER, and Vasudha Upreti is Research Assistant at ICRIER.
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com.)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tesla's China-Made EV sales drop 8.4% in July amid rising competition
Tesla's sales of China-made electric vehicles fell 8.4 per cent in July from a year earlier, reversing a small increase in June, amid rising competition from rivals offering lower-priced new models. Deliveries of China-made Model 3 and Model Y vehicles, including exports to Europe and other markets, reached 67,886 cars last month, down 5.2 per cent from June, data from the China Passenger Car Association showed on Monday. Top Chinese rival BYD, with its Ocean and Dynasty lineups of EVs and plug-in hybrids, delivered almost flat global passenger car sales at 341,300 vehicles in July. Tesla's July reading followed a 0.8 per cent rise year-on-year in sales of its China-made EVs in June, which ended an eight-month losing streak, but fell short of stopping quarterly declines. Elon Musk's EV company, grappling with weak demand and a backlash among some consumers against his political views, posted its biggest quarterly sales decline globally in over a decade in the second quarter. Reuters


Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
A decade after Jack Ma's bet, Paytm's China ties end
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills In November 2021, it conducted an offer for sale (OFS), offloading shares worth Rs 4,704 crore. In September 2023, it transferred a 10% stake to Resilient Asset Management, a Netherlands-based firm owned by Paytm founder Vijay Shekhar Sharma. This reduced AntFin's holding to 13%. It sold more shares in late 2023, bringing its stake below 9%. In May 2025, Ant sold an additional 4%, and is now looking to divest the final 5.8%. Chinese financial services giant AntFin is selling its remaining 5.8% stake in One 97 Communications , the parent company of Paytm , for Rs 3,800 crore. This move comes after another key investor, Japan's SoftBank, exited its entire holding in exits mark the end of a high-profile Japanese-Chinese investor chapter in Paytm's journey, from becoming India's most valued startup at $15 billion, to a lacklustre IPO in 2021, and a volatile public market performance Paytm's public listing, AntFin has been steadily paring its stake through multiple tranches:The Ant-Paytm story has come full circle in just under a decade. Back in September 2015 , Ant group, Alibaba's fintech affiliate, made a bold bet on India's digital payments space, investing over $500 million in the then mobile wallet valued Paytm at $3.4 billion, with Ant taking a 40% stake. Vijay Shekhar Sharma positioned this partnership as India's answer to Alibaba's China play. That narrative was reinforced when SoftBank, also an early Alibaba investor, pumped $1.4 billion into Paytm in 2017, taking its valuation to $7 Paytm's reliance on Alibaba's capital was once considered a strength, the geopolitical climate shifted sharply in 2020. As India toughened its stance on Chinese investments in local tech firms, Paytm came under early as 2018, questions were raised in Parliament regarding Chinese ownership in Paytm and its application for an NBFC Paytm denied sharing any user data with foreign entities, the association with Chinese investors increasingly became a liability for the exit also represents a significant financial hit. It invested approximately Rs 33,600 crore in Paytm over the years but hasn't seen meaningful returns. The 10% stake transferred to Resilient Asset Management in 2023 was structured as a debt owed by Sharma, to be repaid over stock closed at Rs 1,052 on the BSE today, down 2.3% intraday. While the company's share price has rebounded from Rs 480 to around Rs 1,100 in the past year, its current market capitalisation of $7.6 billion is still half of its peak private valuation.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Why Taiwan government has arrested three employees of the world's biggest chipmaker
Taiwan government have detained three current and former employees of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) for allegedly stealing trade secrets related to the world's most advanced chip technology. TSMC fired several employees after discovering the breach through routine internal monitoring, then initiated legal proceedings that led to the arrests. The case marks the first major prosecution under Taiwan's amended National Security Act, with suspects facing up to 12 years in prison and fines exceeding $3 million. The company, which produces 90% of the world's most advanced semiconductors for companies like Apple and Nvidia, detected unauthorized access to sensitive information about its cutting-edge 2-nanometer chip technology , expected to enter mass production later this year. TSMC's 2nm secrets at center of alleged theft The case involves proprietary information about TSMC's 2-nanometer manufacturing process, currently the most sophisticated chip technology globally. Taiwan's High Prosecutors Office confirmed that three suspects were detained on "serious suspicions of violating national security laws," while three others were released on bail. Prosecutors revealed the investigation began when TSMC detected unusual file access patterns by current employees. Internal investigations uncovered that former employees had allegedly colluded with current staff to obtain "national core technology trade secrets." The breach occurred at TSMC's Hsinchu facility, where the company produces its most advanced chips. Tough penalties under Taiwan's new security laws Taiwan amended its National Security Act in 2022 specifically to protect critical technologies from foreign adversaries, particularly targeting semiconductor innovations more advanced than 14-nanometer processes. The legislation addresses growing concerns about Chinese companies obtaining chip manufacturing expertise by recruiting Taiwanese engineers. Under the enhanced law, violations involving national core technologies carry severe penalties: imprisonment up to 12 years and fines reaching NT$100 million ($3.3 million). The comprehensive framework protects defense, aerospace, agricultural, semiconductor, and information security technologies deemed vital to Taiwan's national interests. TSMC emphasized its "zero-tolerance policy toward any actions that compromise the protection of trade secrets," stating it will pursue violations "to the fullest extent of the law." The company has previously fought extended legal battles against competitors who obtained its technology through former employees, including cases involving Samsung and China's Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation. The investigation continues as prosecutors work to determine the suspects' motives and whether any sensitive information was actually transmitted to competitors or foreign entities.