logo
Nikita Hand's lawyer asks court to refer Conor McGregor appeal affidavits to DPP

Nikita Hand's lawyer asks court to refer Conor McGregor appeal affidavits to DPP

The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) should examine affidavits making accusations against a woman who sued Conor McGregor, her lawyers have said, after the fighter decided to withdraw them from his appeal.
Former hairdresser Nikita Hand (35) successfully sued Mr McGregor in a civil court over an incident in which he was alleged to have 'brutally raped and battered' her in a penthouse at a south Dublin hotel in December 2018.
Advertisement
During a three-week case at the High Court in Dublin last November, Mr McGregor told the court he had consensual sex with Ms Hand.
Nikita Hand, who is also known as Nikita Ni Laimhin, leaving the Court of Appeal in Dublin. Photo: Niall Carson/PA
After six hours and 10 minutes of deliberating, the jury of eight women and four men found Mr McGregor civilly liable for assault.
Ms Hand, also known as Nikita Ni Laimhin, was awarded €248,603.60 in damages.
Her lawyers have said she was disadvantaged by 'highly disparaging and unfair criticisms' in 'widely published' claims Mr McGregor brought as part of his appeal that she did not have a chance to reply to in court before they were withdrawn.
Advertisement
It related to affidavits from two former neighbours of Ms Hand which said she had been assaulted by her then-partner at around the same time of the incident at the hotel.
On Tuesday, Mr McGregor's legal team dramatically withdrew that ground of appeal which would have introduced the new evidence into the proceedings – saying it would no longer be relying on the material.
John Gordon SC, for Ms Hand, said it was 'frankly not appropriate' for the ground to be withdrawn at a late basis.
He said his client, who had denied accusations within the affidavits, had been 'put through the wringer yet again'.
Advertisement
On Wednesday, Mr Gordon raised the matters again and asked the Court of Appeal to use its jurisdiction to refer matters to the DPP.
He said the application on the affidavits had been made 'some months ago' and the material the proposed witnesses were due to raise had been 'published widely'.
He said the court was aware of the 'scale of the accusations' made against his client, which he said were a series of 'highly disparaging and unfair criticisms' including that she had been lying.
Mr Gordon said the application to introduce the witnesses was not just to produce further evidence, but also to 'undermine my client's reputation'.
Advertisement
He said Ms Hand had described what was alleged as lies in her responding affidavit and that she should have been entitled for her opportunity to 'call this out in court'.
He said his client had been disadvantaged by the application.
Mr Gordon also said it amounted to discontinuation of part of the appeal and asked the court to add terms of the payment of costs to Ms Hand's side.
Mark Mulholland KC, for Mr McGregor, said that withdrawing the application did not amount to a discontinuation of proceedings and if Mr Gordon believed that a criminal investigation was necessary, it should be dealt with in that forum rather than the court.
Advertisement
Speaking before Mr Gordon dealt substantively with the issue on Wednesday, Mr Mulholland said it was an attempt to get the matter on the record for the media, adding that this would be 'wholly inappropriate'.
He said costs relating to this specific part of the appeal should be adjudicated within the final determination.
He said he had no further comment to make on whether the matters should be referred to the DPP.
The judges expressed concern that dealing with the materials relating to the affidavits created a risk of prejudicing any potential criminal prosecution.
Meanwhile, the appeal, which has yet to be decided, had proceeded on other grounds largely relating to the circumstances under which his 'no comment' answers to gardai were allowed to enter the trial.
Remy Farrell, SC, also for Mr McGregor, said on Tuesday that an 'enormous amount of no comment material' had been entered into the hearings to no actual proper end.
He said this occurred under cross-examination by Mr Gordon and was based on an 'entirely incorrect' paraphrasing of what the appellant had actually said.
Ireland
Conor McGregor continues appeal without fresh evid...
Read More
Mr Farrell said his client had made a comment about wanting to seek the best advice from his solicitors and accused Ms Hand's side of incorrectly interpreting the same comments as a suggestion that McGregor had sought to present himself as someone who was being fully co-operative with gardai.
Ray Boland SC, for Ms Hand, said it was clear from a holistic consideration of McGregor's evidence that he was putting forward that he wanted to be as co-operative as possible with the investigation.
He said it was appropriate for the line of questioning on the no-comment answers to be admissible.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Notorious road where tragic Diogo Jota died in crash is accident blackspot riddled with deep potholes and 75mph bends
Notorious road where tragic Diogo Jota died in crash is accident blackspot riddled with deep potholes and 75mph bends

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Notorious road where tragic Diogo Jota died in crash is accident blackspot riddled with deep potholes and 75mph bends

THE road Diogo Jota was killed on is "very dangerous" and notorious for accidents, according to local officials and drivers. Evil high-speed bends and deep potholes have spelled disaster for many motorists - with just-married Jota and his brother André, 26 its latest tragic victims. 11 11 11 11 Liverpool star Jota, 28, was killed late on Wednesday night when a tyre on his Lamborghini blew out and the car hurtled off the road, catching fire. The brothers were travelling through Zamora, Spain on the A-52 towards Santander, where they were to catch a ferry to the UK. A chorus of officials and local drivers have spoken out to warn about the perils of that particular high-speed dual carriageway. What we know so far: Angel Blanco, a central government representative for the province of Zamora, described the A-52 as 'very dangerous". Sources from Cernadilla town hall, close to where Diogo crashed, were quoted by local press as saying: 'As [the A-52] passes through Cernadilla it is full of bends at 120 kilometres per hour. 'Exceeding the speed limit or poor visibility at night tend are often the cause of accidents in these areas. 'Today it was two famous footballers, who had a great career ahead of them, but perhaps tomorrow the victims will be two more anonymous people.' The A-52 is the most dangerous road in the region, according to most recent annual accident report. Diogo Jota's classy act of humility left me and my U13s team stunned - he was a credit to his family and football There were more crashes along the route than any other nearby road, with a total of 19 in 2023, El Dia de Zamora reported. And the accidents are often fatal - with an average of 1.5 deaths per incident. Many of the crashes happen under good conditions - meaning a dry surface, good visibility and low traffic - suggesting the road itself poses danger. Drivers must content with various obstacles along the stretch - including animals. The area where Jota's Lamborghini Huracan flew off the tarmac is a black-spot for wolves. That region of Zamora is described as a "paradise" for the Ibernian wolf - and car collisions with the predators are not uncommon. 11 11 Deer are also common, and easy access to the for the animals poses a huge risk to drivers, according to Spanish newspaper La Razón. Complaints have been lodged about the poor safety conditions of the road to various organisations. In recent years, reports were filed to motorists' organisation AEA Club drawing attention to the treacherous potholes which "riddled" the roadsurface. One said: "The A-52 highway [...] is in poor condition with constant potholes, some of which are very dangerous," adding that the issue applied to the road in both directions. 11 There were more than 40 official pothole complaints made to Spain's transport ministry in a single month last year, according to local site La Opinión de Zamora. One family published a photo of a tyre that had been completely shredded by one of the hazards. A burst tyre is thought to be behind Jota's crash - though it isn't known what caused it. Photos from the scene show a single black tyre mark streaking into the verge. A separate 2018 complaint said a lack of signage almost caused a driver to crash because it failed to alert them an imminent lane ending. The driver wrote: "A-52 is a state-of-the-art motorway and doesn't deserve this safety flaw. Do a few cans of paint cost that much?" Jota was due to catch a ferry this morning after being advised not to take a plane due to a recent lung surgery, according to CNN Portugal. 11 11 The Portuguese ace had missed several matches last season after suffering a rib injury in October during a match against Chelsea. Jota was due to return to Liverpool to take part in the club's pre season games which start later this month. Emergency crews rushed to the crash site in the early hours of the morning and managed to put out the flames. Both brothers were tragically pronounced dead at the scene, according to the Zamora Provincial Council. Their bodies were taken to a forensics unit in Zamora so autopsies could be performed.

Man arrested after several stabbed in Finnish shopping centre
Man arrested after several stabbed in Finnish shopping centre

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Man arrested after several stabbed in Finnish shopping centre

Several people were stabbed near a shopping centre in Tampere, southern Finland. Police arrested one person, identified by local media as a man in his 20s, in connection with the incident. Authorities confirmed the situation no longer posed a danger to the public, with victims receiving first aid at the scene. Eyewitnesses described hearing screams and seeing people flee, with one person stating they heard a woman scream she had been stabbed. Emergency services, including police and ambulances, were present, and the Ratina shopping centre was cordoned off, with its doors blocked.

The key details that could help you survive a bear attack
The key details that could help you survive a bear attack

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

The key details that could help you survive a bear attack

A motorcyclist has been mauled to death by a brown bear in Carpathian Mountains of Romania, the latest fatal incident in a country home to the European Union's largest brown bear population. The attack, which occurred on Thursday, highlights ongoing concerns in Romania, where a recent DNA study estimates between 10,000 and 13,000 brown bears reside. The tragic event raises critical questions about how to respond to such encounters. The U.S. National Park Service stresses that understanding bear behaviour is crucial for survival. Bears are typically not aggressive without reason, usually attacking only when feeling threatened, protecting their young, or viewing a human as a food source. While each situation differs, charges are generally classified as either bluff or aggressive. Bluff charges Bluff charges are more common and aim to scare or intimidate. The park service says that when a bear bluff charges, it will usually have its head and ears up and forward, it will puff itself to look bigger, and bound on its front paws toward you, moving in big leaps before stopping short or veering off to one side. So what should you do? In this situation, regardless of the bear type, you should slowly back away while waving your arms above your head, and speak in a calm voice. When the bear charges you, hold your ground and stay calm, and only when it stops should you slowly retreat. Whatever you do, don't run off during a bluff charge. Aggressive charges Aggressive charges are cause for concern. The park service says warning signs of an aggressive charge may be when a bear yawns or clacks their teeth, pounds their front paws on the ground while huffing, has its head down and ears pointed back. Be ready to protect and defend yourself. But at this point, it's important to distinguish what kind of bear you're up against. Black bear If a black bear charges and attacks you, your best option is to stand your ground and fight back. 'Do not play dead. Direct punches and kicks at the bear's face, and use any weapon like rocks, branches, or bear spray to defend yourself,' the park service suggests. But they are agile and adept at climbing trees, so on no account ascend the branches to evade them. Hopefully, this will alarm the bear into a retreat. Brown bear If a grizzly or brown bear charges and attacks you, play dead. Panicking or screaming will alarm the bear and cause it to attack. 'Cover your head and neck with your hands and arms. Lay flat on your stomach, and spread your legs apart. Keep your pack on, it will help protect you during an attack. Stay still and don't make any noise,' it said. 'Fighting back during an attack from a grizzly/brown bear will usually worsen the attack, but if the attack persists, then fight back with everything you have.' Polar bears are slightly outside the remit of the U.S. National Park Service. As polar bears are driven inland as a result of climate change melting the sea ice, encounters with the largest land carnivore on earth are increasingly likely. And while intimidation tactics might work, you won't have a lot of options. Best to avoid the scenario at all costs if you can help it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store