Rising Military Operations In West Papua Spark Concerns About Displacement Of Indigenous Papuans
It comes as the Indonesian military claims 18 members of the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB) were killed in an hour-long operation in Intan Jaya on 14 May.
In a statement, reported by Kompas Daily, Indonesia's military said its presence is "not to intimidate the people" but to protect them from violence.
"We will not allow the people of Papua to live in fear in their own land," it said.
Indonesia's military said it seized firearms, ammunition, bows and arrows. They also took morning star flags - used as a symbol for West Papuan independence - and communication equipment.
The United Liberation Movement for West Papua (ULMWP) interim president Benny Wenda, who lives in exile in the United Kingdom, told RNZ Pacific that seven villages in Ilaga, Puncak Regency in Central Papua are now being attacked.
"The current military escalation in West Papua has now been building for months. Initially targeting Intan Jaya, the Indonesian military have since broadened their attacks into other highlands Regencies, including Puncak," he said.
Wenda said women and children are being forced to leave their villages because of escalating conflict, often from drone attacks or airstrikes.
Earlier this month, ULMWP claimed one civilian and another was seriously injured after being shot at from a helicopter.
Last week, ULMWP shared a video of a group of indigenous Papuans walking through mountains holding an Indonesian flag, which Wenda said was a symbol of surrender.
"They look at us as primitive and they look at us as subhuman," Wenda said.
He said the increased military presence was driven by resources.
President Prabowo Subianto's administration has a goal to be able to feed Indonesia's population without imports as early as 2028.
A video statement from tribes in Mappi Regency in South Papua from about a month ago, translated to English, said they rejected Indonesia's food project and asked companies to leave.
In the video, about a dozen Papuans stood while one said the clans in the region had existed on customary land for generations and that companies had surveyed land without consent.
"We firmly ask the local government, the regent, Mappi Regency to immediately review the permits and revoke the company's permits," the person speaking said.
Wenda said the West Papua National Liberation Army (TPNPB) had also grown.
But he said many of the TPNPB were using bow and arrows against modern weapons.
"I call them home guard because there's nowhere to go."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
13 hours ago
- Scoop
Health Community Responds To Shell's PR Company Winning COP30 Climate Contract
Brasilia, Monday, August 4, 2025:- Responding to reports that PR company Edelman, which handles the global PR account for fossil fuel giant Shell, has won a contract to provide COP30 media services to the Brazilian presidency, Global Climate and Health Alliance Executive Director Dr Jeni Miller said: 'Hiring a PR company that earns millions from downplaying the fossil fuel industry's role in the climate crisis, to handle communications for this year's UN climate conference where countries come together to negotiate global climate action presents a serious conflict of interest. Climate change is already causing terrible impacts to livelihoods, health and wellbeing around the world, with health systems being pushed to the brink.' 'With disinformation developed by PR agencies for fossil fuel companies driving decades of delayed action, allowing the climate crisis to worsen dramatically, COP host countries must take every step possible to keep fossil fuel influences out of these crucial climate talks.' Recognizing the profound threat that disinformation poses, just this month, Brazil joined four other countries declaring an 'ethical and political imperative' to tackle disinformation and other threats to democracy (English translation here) 'Naming the problem is vital. The next step must be to align action with those words', added Miller. 'Brasil should reconsider its contract with Edelman, and future host countries should take a clear stand that will avoid this kind of conflict of interest and prevent the influence of the fossil fuel industry on negotiations to deal with the problem that industry created.' GCHA is calling on Australia and Turkey, the countries vying to host next year's COP, to set a new standard for hosting countries by committing to: Not hire PR or communications firms that also have fossil fuel industry clients. No fossil fuel industry sponsorships. No fossil fuel industry representatives or former representatives in the presidency team. No fossil fuel industry representatives or former representatives in the host country's own delegation. About Edelman: Edelman has a long and well established history of helping health-harming industries. Until 1997, Edelman led PR for the RJ Reynolds tobacco company, using strategies to create doubt about the science showing tobacco to be harmful to health, and working to delay or fend off regulation. The PR firm has used some of the same strategies to create doubt about climate change, in support of fossil fuel clients. About the Break the Fossil Influence Campaign: Since May of this year, more than 60 health organizations have joined the Break the Fossil Influence campaign, pledging not to work with communications agencies that also support the fossil fuel industry. On Friday August 1st, two prominent health professionals, Edward Maibach and Dr. Jemilah Mahmood published an article on Health Policy Watch calling for health organisations to join the Break the Fossil Influence initiative by committing to work only with PR and advertising agencies that do not serve fossil fuel clients. 'This is not just a reputational risk—it's an ethical failure', they write. 'A health organisation that contracts a PR firm that actively helps fossil polluters is undermining its own mission. It sends a dangerous message to the public: that it's acceptable to fight disease with one hand while enabling its cause with the other. It's time for the health sector to show leadership.'
NZ Herald
19 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Watch live: Education Minister Erica Stanford fronts press conference after mammoth NCEA announcement
Education Minister Erica Stanford will field questions from the site of her old high school following the Government's decision to radically overhaul New Zealand's main secondary school qualification. The press conference at Auckland's Rangitoto College will be live-streamed from the top of this article around 11.30am. Yesterday, the Government announced the decades-old NCEA scheme would be abolished completely and replaced with two new qualifications at Year 12 and 13. Under the new system, Year 11 students will face what is being called a 'Foundational Skills Award' with a focus on literacy and numeracy. English and mathematics will be required subjects for students at this year level. Year 12 and 13 students will seek to attain the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE) respectively. Under the proposal, students currently doing NCEA continue. Students who are Year 8 today will be the first affected by the changes which begin in 2028. Students would do a mix of internal and external exams that add up to a mark out of 100, replacing the current achieved, merit and excellence rankings. That figure aligns to a letter grade such as A, B or C. For example, a student who received 85/100 in English would get an A while 50/100 in History would get them a C. Opposing political parties have been critical, saying the Government is rushing through the radical changes. Labour's education spokeswoman, Willow-Jean Prime, said 'rushing changes through now for political expediency isn't the answer'. She said schools and parents told her they were concerned about 'how hasty' the proposed changes were. 'Previous rushed overhauls have led to students being the guinea pigs for failed change – like national standards – so we must get this right." The Green Party's education spokesman, Lawrence Xu-Nan, said NCEA was not perfect but it recognised learning took place in different ways. 'Today's announcement is another classic case of the Government favouring one-size-fits-all approaches. Our education system is too important to be reduced to a single, rigid framework that will leave many behind. 'We haven't seen any clear case for the scrapping of NCEA - the Government has not made it. We remain entirely unconvinced this is what our school system needs. In fact, it risks throwing the baby out with the bathwater.'
NZ Herald
20 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Education Minister Erica Stanford says pupils sitting NCEA in final years not disadvantaged
She also told Herald NOW's Ryan Bridge that the new curriculum would not 'sacrifice' the needs of students who have learning challenges. 'We are keeping that flexibility of having and that balance of having internals and externals, which caters for lots of different learners. So it's not just exam-based, but we do want to make sure that children do sit their exams.' Stanford said we can not 'cotton wool our kids' and having 'rigour' sets students up for success. 'When you live your life, you have to sit a driver's [test]. 'If you're going into the trades, you'll need to sit your trades exams. There are always going to be those sorts of situations.' On raising the age to be able to leave from 16 to 17, Stanford said although she would like to see kids in school 'till the very end' it is not something they have considered at this point. She said it did feature in the proposal, but only because it is something they wish to address in the future. Labour leader Chris Hipkins said he was concerned about the disruption to students still sitting NCEA and whether or not they were supported through the transition. 'I think they're a bit anxious about this because they're sort of thinking, 'What does this mean for the qualification that I am going to get and that I'm going out into the world with?' 'I think we just need to always keep that in mind.' He told Bridge the 'devil will be in the details', and although this is a promising start, it was too soon to say if the changes would actually work. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Education Minister Erica Stanford at yesterday's qualifications announcement. The proposal, which is open for consultation until September before final decisions are made, represents the most significant update to secondary school assessments since NCEA was introduced more than two decades ago. Under the new scheme, Year 11 students will face what is being called a 'Foundational Skills Award' with a focus on literacy and numeracy. English and mathematics will be required subjects for students at this year level. The intent of removing the Year 11 qualification is to give students time 'to focus on deep learning of foundational skills and knowledge before undertaking high-stakes assessments in Years 12 and 13'. Year 12 and 13 students will seek to attain the New Zealand Certificate of Education (NZCE) and the New Zealand Advanced Certificate of Education (NZACE), respectively. This will replace the current standards-based assessment system with a structured approach that requires students to take five subjects and pass at least four to receive the Year 12 and 13 certificates. The assessments will have a clear 'out of 100' marking system alongside A to E letter grades that the Government hopes will make sense to parents and students. The Government will seek to implement the changes over the next five years alongside a refreshed curriculum. The Year 11 foundational award will be introduced from 2028, the Year 12 certificate in 2029, and the Year 13 certificate in 2030. The discussion document being released yesterday also posed the idea of potentially lifting the school leaving age from 16 to 17 if that is what is necessary to encourage students to get a school certificate. In the first instance, the Ministry of Education will consider targeted support to get students to stay until the end of Year 12.
