logo
Amid a culture of fear, a celebrated artist's most important exhibition is pulled from Smithsonian

Amid a culture of fear, a celebrated artist's most important exhibition is pulled from Smithsonian

Boston Globe5 days ago
And it appears that Sherald's 'Trans Forming Liberty,' her 2024 portrait of a transgender woman dressed as the Statue of Liberty, rattled museum leadership in a climate of deep hostility from the administration toward transgender people.
Advertisement
Installation view of Amy Sherald: American Sublime (Whitney Museum of American Art, New York, April 9-August 10, 2025). Michelle LaVaughn Robinson Obama, 2018. (Tiffany Sage/BFA.com)
Tiffany Sage/BFA.com
Sherald said the Portrait Gallery had proposed replacing the painting in D.C. with a video of viewers' reactions both to it and transgender issues more broadly. In a
the museum countered, saying it wanted the video to accompany, not replace, the painting. Either way, no agreement could be struck, and Sherald withdrew.
Advertisement
'The video would have opened up for debate the value of trans visibility and I was opposed to that being a part of the 'American Sublime' narrative,' Sherald told the New York Times.
'Unfortunately, we could not come to an agreement with the artist. We remain appreciative and inspired by Ms. Sherald, her artwork and commitment to portraiture,' the museum
But even without 'Trans Forming Liberty,' it's a fair guess the show would have been under external pressures: Sherald's paintings are for the most part elegant, precise portraits of unnamed Black subjects painted life-sized. There are two exceptions in the exhibition. The first is her portrait of Breonna Taylor, a memorial image painted with dignified beauty of the innocent Black woman
but weary grace. It was the exhibition's centerpiece, an emblem of the artist's larger project to build Black life into a canon of American art long indifferent to its inclusion.
Artist Amy Sherald with her portrait of the late Breonna Taylor.
Joseph Hyde/Vanity Fair
Either one might easily raise the ire of the current administration. We don't have to look very long, or very far, to parse the current president's view of Obama's husband.
On his Truth Social website this week, the 47th president posted a shockingly raw AI-generated video of former President Barack Obama being violently arrested in the Oval Office and dragged away in handcuffs. But there's more here than a simple obsessive animus, one president to another (though it's also clearly that).
Advertisement
The current administration's blunt enforcement of what it deems acceptable expression now touches virtually all aspects of American life. That includes media (as in the 60 Minutes lawsuit debacle), entertainment (the cancellation of 'The Late Show with Stephen Colbert,' a known Trump tormentor), and higher education (see the administration's roughshod bullying of Harvard and Columbia over its specious claims of antisemitism).
A favorite target of the Trump administration, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion efforts by government, private business, and educational institutions, looms over Sherald's withdrawal, too. The most recent addition to the constellation of Smithsonians,
the National Museum of African American History and Culture, was one of the second Trump administration's prime targets.
In a March executive order titled '
(It also singled out the Smithsonian's Museum of American Art and the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum.)
In May, when
Advertisement
Here in Massachusetts, the National Endowment for the Arts in May refused to disburse funds already promised to the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art for 'Power Full Because We're Different,'
Which brings us back to Sherald, ensnared by the strident decree of a cultural bureaucracy in deep regressive mode. To be clear: This was her decision. She chose not to compromise her integrity and intentions, which have been consistent and clear from the start. She had been making portraits of Black subjects for years when the invitation to paint Michelle Obama arrived. It is completely in tune with her core sensibility to capture her subjects simply, truthfully, as they are.
Ruth Erickson from Cambridge with Jullian Kalim, 8, and his brother Cassidy Kalim, 3, looked at portraits of the Obamas at the MFA Boston in 2022.
David L. Ryan/Globe Staff
But the Obama portrait arrived in 2018 less as a painting than a heavy symbol amid a violent lurch in American life: From a two-term president who became a beacon of Black achievement to a political outsider openly hostile to the progress his predecessor seemed to embody.
When the painting went on national tour in 2022, along with Kehinde Wiley's portrait of the former president, it drew crowds, including
Advertisement
But is pulling back, in this moment, this place, defiance or acquiescence? That's a larger question that artists, thinkers, and institutions are grappling with in every corner and context. Either way, it's an outcome enjoyed primarily by just one person, and we know who that is.
Murray Whyte can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump job approval slips to 40 percent: Survey
Trump job approval slips to 40 percent: Survey

The Hill

time8 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump job approval slips to 40 percent: Survey

President Trump's job approval rating fell to 40 percent, the lowest of his second term, according to a new survey. The latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, conducted over the weekend, shows Trump slipped 1 point from the survey in mid-July, when 41 percent approved of his performance in office. The president's net approval rating remains 16 points underwater, with 56 disapproving of the way Trump is handling the job. In the previous poll, his performance was 13 points underwater, with 54 percent disapproving. Trump returned to the Oval Office in January with a net positive approval rating — 47 percent approval, 41 percent disapproval — but those numbers quickly flipped and have been largely moving away from each other since. The latest poll shows 83 percent of Republicans and 3 percent of Democrats approve of Trump's handling of his post. Roughly one-third of independents also say they approve of his actions since taking office. In recent weeks, the president has continued to see his approval ratings sour. In the latest Economist/YouGov poll, Trump's net approval was 15 points underwater, also the lowest of his second term, with only 40 percent approval. Among all adults, in the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, 38 percent approve of Trump's handling of the economy, up 3 points from the mid-July poll. On immigration, his approval also ticked up, from 41 percent in mid-July to 43 percent in the latest poll. The weekend survey concluded on Monday, July 28 and featured responses from 1,023 American adults. The margin of error was 3 percentage points.

The American right is falling out of love with Israel
The American right is falling out of love with Israel

The Hill

time8 minutes ago

  • The Hill

The American right is falling out of love with Israel

Unconditional American support for Israel — once the bedrock of conservative foreign policy — is crumbling in real time. From Congress to right-wing media and Trump-aligned grassroots organizations, a new tone is taking shape towards Israel: one of skepticism, impatience and in some cases outright hostility. The Republican Party's old covenant with Israel is no longer sacred — and the cracks are widening fast. In the mid-20th century, Republicans were generally skeptical of Israel, instead favoring Arab ties. Support grew later, driven by Cold War strategy, evangelical Zionism, neoconservatism and post-9/11 alliances — ultimately transforming the GOP into Israel's most loyal political partner. But that alliance is now eroding at a stunning pace. If Israel hopes to preserve its standing, it must act swiftly to reassert its dependability as a strategic ally — or risk forfeiting support not only from the American left, but from its most reliable partners on the right. Nowhere is the fracture more evident than in President Trump's second term. In April, his administration slapped Israel with a 17 percent reciprocal tariff. Israeli officials were 'in complete shock' after having abolished tariffs on U.S. imports in hopes of an exemption. This signaled that Trump would not give Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu everything he wanted — friendship doesn't mean favoritism. That message grew louder during the 12-day war between Israel and Iran. Trump brokered a fragile ceasefire that Israel broke within hours. On June 24, Trump erupted in fury. 'They don't know what the f— they're doing,' he snapped. 'I'm not happy with Israel … you don't go out in the first hour and just drop everything you have on them.' And it wasn't an isolated outburst. Two months earlier, Netanyahu had pleaded with Trump to take a hard line with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose military was planning on operating a military base in Syria, but the Israeli Air Force struck the base three days before the meeting in the White House. Trump refused. 'If you have a problem with Turkey, I think we'll be able to work it out … as long as you are reasonable,' he told Netanyahu in the Oval Office in front of the press. In effect, Trump told Netanyahu to sit down and compromise with a regional adversary. Then came Damascus. As sectarian violence between Druze and Bedouin communities engulfed Syria's Suwayda province, Israel launched airstrikes on government positions in the capital, ostensibly in support of the Druze. The strikes risked a wider regional war and drew immediate outrage from the White House. Trump personally phoned Netanyahu and demanded restraint, furious that Israel had acted without coordination and against his express wishes. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump was 'caught off guard' and unhappy with the airstrikes. It was the clearest signal yet that Trump's strategic patience with Netanyahu was gone and his instinct now was to rein Israel in. Influential conservatives are questioning U.S. support for Israel. Tucker Carlson, once staunchly pro-Israel, now voices deep skepticism. Carlson recently suggested that Jeffrey Epstein worked for Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, and argued that Americans serving in Israel's army should lose citizenship. Shifting Republican attitudes on Israel are increasingly visible in Congress. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) stunned colleagues this month by proposing an amendment to eliminate upwards of $500 million in U.S. military aid for Israel's missile defense. Greene cited Israel's recent bombing of Gaza's only Catholic church and railed against funding 'nuclear-armed Israel's missile defense system' while Americans face domestic needs. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) was the only GOP House member who voted with her, along with four Democrats. Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), perhaps Congress's most ardent pro-Israel voice, recently blasted violent attacks by Jewish settlers on Christians. 'There was a Catholic church burned in the West Bank,' Graham said angrily on Fox News, referring to a church compound torched by extremist Israeli settlers. 'What's happening in the West Bank bothers the hell out of me,' he added, demanding that Netanyahu punish those responsible. When a stalwart like Graham is 'incredibly upset' by Israeli settler violence, it's clear that the old consensus is cracking. Former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) recently delivered a blistering segment on One America News condemning Israeli settlers in the West Bank — rhetoric rarely heard on right-wing TV. 'The truth is, this isn't an isolated tragedy. It's part of a pattern of Israeli settler attacks on Palestinian communities … torching of homes, farms and lives,' he said, adding they're 'protected by Israeli forces who are funded by U.S. tax dollars.' Citing the killing of Saif Musallet, a Palestinian American, in the West Bank, Gaetz noted that 'Israel rarely holds these killers accountable.' Even Fox News is shifting. The network aired a surprising interview by Bret Baier with Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi. Such a platform for Israel's archenemy would have been unthinkable just a few years ago. The move reflects growing discomfort among right-wing audiences with one-sided pro-Israel narratives and a desire for an 'America First' approach. Polling confirms that conservative ardor for Israel is fading. A recent Quinnipiac poll found Republican sympathy for Israel had dropped to 64 percent, down from 78 percent a year earlier. Pollsters tied the decline to Israel's ongoing offensive in Gaza. Overall, more Americans now hold an unfavorable view of Israel's government than before the Gaza war began. The message to Israel from the American right is now unmistakable: Support is no longer unconditional. To preserve its standing, Israel must act as a responsible, stable and strategically aligned partner. That means wrapping up the war in Gaza quickly, reining in extremist settlers in the West Bank and credibly demonstrating respect for civilian life and the long-term viability of regional stability. The era of automatic American backing for Israel is ending. If Israeli leaders fail to adapt, they risk losing even their most loyal conservative allies.

Trump hits India with 25% tariff
Trump hits India with 25% tariff

NBC News

time9 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Trump hits India with 25% tariff

Imports from India will now face a 25% tariff, President Donald Trump announced Wednesday, his latest trade-war declaration in what has become a cornerstone of his second administration. Writing on Truth Social, Trump said India's own tariffs are 'far too high' while calling other trade barriers 'strenuous and obnoxious,' without specifying what he was referring to. In 2022, India applied an effective average tariff rate of 5.2% on U.S. goods. Meanwhile, the U.S. applied an effective average tariff of 2.4% to imports from India last year. India is one of the top sources of imports for American consumers and companies with nearly $90 billion of goods flowing in from India last year. The announcement comes ahead of a Friday deadline for countries to negotiate new trade terms that Trump also said Wednesday 'stands strong' and 'will not be extended.' The president has signaled dozens of other countries will face a new baseline tariff level of as much as 20% — higher than the already-elevated 10% he announced in April.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store