&w=3840&q=100)
New Tax Bill may allow late ITR refunds, protect NGO income from heavy tax
Relief for Religious-cum-Charitable Trusts
One of the most significant recommendations is to retain the existing tax exemption on anonymous donations made to religious-cum-charitable trusts. Clause 337 of the new Bill had proposed a flat 30% tax on all anonymous donations, except for those made to purely religious trusts. This marked a sharp departure from current law, under which religious and charitable trusts receive broader exemptions unless the donations are specifically earmarked for hospitals or educational institutions they run.
The Committee flagged this as a "critical omission" and urged the reintroduction of a provision similar to Section 115BBC of the current Act to prevent adverse consequences for religious-charitable trusts. 'The proposed clause could significantly disrupt the NPO ecosystem,' the report warned.
Tax Only 'Income', Not 'Receipts'
Another major concern addressed is the proposed shift from taxing 'income' to 'receipts' of NPOs. The Committee strongly opposed this move, arguing it goes against the principle of real income taxation. Taxing gross receipts would unfairly include capital recoveries and inflows that do not represent actual earnings, it said.
Instead, the Committee recommended a return to net income-based taxation, urging a rewrite of Clause 335 to ensure only surplus income is taxed, not donations or reimbursements.
TDS Refunds Without ITR Filing
In a taxpayer-friendly move, the Committee also proposed allowing TDS refunds without mandatory ITR filing. The current draft Bill requires individuals to file a return within the due date to claim a TDS refund — even if their total income is below the taxable limit.'This may inadvertently criminalise small taxpayers who are otherwise non-filers,' the report cautioned. The Committee has therefore suggested removal of Sub-clause (1)(ix) from Clause 263, which mandates return filing for refund claims.
Shift to 'Tax Year' Welcomed
The Committee has also welcomed the government's decision to replace the concepts of 'previous year' and 'assessment year' with a unified 'tax year'. This move is expected to streamline tax references, reduce confusion, and improve accessibility of the law to non-specialists.
Additional Recommendations
According to experts, the Committee has made over 566 suggestions aimed at refining the draft Bill. These include:
Modernising definitions such as "capital asset" and "infrastructure capital company"
Clarifying property-related deductions
Re-emphasising the "actual payment" rule for claiming business expense deductions
Making penalties for non-maintenance of books discretionary
Creating procedural safeguards to prevent excessive penalisation of honest taxpayers
Nangia Andersen LLP, M&A Tax Partner, Sandeep Jhunjhunwala said the Committee has suggested modernising definitions such as "capital asset" and "infrastructure capital company", clarifying property-related deductions, and reinforcing the "actual payment" rule for business expenses. It has also recommended procedural safeguards such as making penalties for non-maintenance of books discretionary and permitting refund claims even where returns are not filed on time.
According to Amit Baid, Head of tax at BTG Advaya:
1) Reintroducing Nil withholding certificates helps prevent refund backlogs for genuine zero-tax cases — including non-residents entitled to treaty relief on cross-border transactions.
(2) Disallowing all deductions just because a return was late would have punished lakhs of genuine taxpayers. The Committee's fix restores sanity by limiting this to only certain income-linked deductions.
(3) Without the phrase 'in the circumstances of the case', GAAR could have become a tax sledgehammer - treating even bona fide restructurings as abuse. The Committee's intervention restores balance and guards against overreach on honest transactions.
(4) Many legacy trusts were staring at disqualification under vague definitions. By recommending clarity on 'wholly for charitable or religious purpose', the Committee saves hundreds of older institutions from legal limbo.
Chance missed
The Committee missed the chance to resolve the double taxation risk in holding company structures. Denying inter-corporate dividend deduction under the 22% concessional regime not only breaks with past policy logic, but could make this regime unattractive for investment vehicles and cross-border structures.
Tax-neutral treatment for fast-track demergers could be challenging. By not addressing this, the Committee has left a key gap that may discourage intra-group restructurings."
As the Monsoon Session of Parliament begins on July 21, the debate on the Committee's recommendations will shape the final contours of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, before it replaces one of India's longest-standing laws.
"The report provides clause by clause evaluation of the Bill with total 566 observations / recommendations for change. This is a mammoth task performed in a record time with precise and relevant recommendations. Now the Lok Sabha has to debate the recommendations and identify the changes that are required in the current Bill to make it futuristic and relevant for common tax-payers. It is highly desirable to defunct the old law and bring a new law which is transparent, easy to comprehend, in line with current business requirements and help to reduce tax disputes," said Preeti Sharma, Partner, Tax and Regulatory Services, BDO India.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
3 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Kannur jailbreak reveals negligence among top officials of prisons dept
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: Though the jailbreak of Govindachamy has raised questions on the safety aspects of prisons, equally glaring is the lethargy of senior officers of the Prisons Department. Highly-placed sources said senior officials, starting from Prisons Department Director General Balram Kumar Upadhyay, have been turning a blind eye towards the daily monitoring of the functioning of the prisons. As per the Kerala Prisons and Correctional Services (Management) Act, the Prisons DG should visit the central prisons and the high-security prison once every six months. This practice helps the DG personally take stock of the security situations inside the prisons and suggest measures to address them. However, the incumbent DG has been reluctant to visit prisons, sources said. The central prisons, open prisons, women prisons and the high-security prison have jail advisory boards that meet every six months. The norm that was keenly followed earlier was that the DGs would go the prisons to take part in the advisory board meetings so that both purposes- attending the meeting and jail visit- were served. However, in the case of the incumbent DG, he prefers attending the meetings, which are held offline, online.


Hindustan Times
3 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
To make city slum-free, all slums to be surveyed by year-end
Mumbai: The Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) is working on completing the survey of all slums in the city by the end of this year, with an eye on creating a reliable databank for future slum rehabilitation projects and curbing the emergence of new, illegal slum settlements. The survey, incorporating biometric details of slum residents and Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping, will help make Mumbai slum-free, said officials. (Hindustan Times) 'We have set a target of completing the survey of all slums in Mumbai by December 31,' said Dr Mahendra Kalyankar, chief executive officer, SRA. The authority will rope in specialised agencies over and above two agencies it currently relies on to complete the work on time, he added. The decision to finish the survey this year was taken during a review meeting chaired by chief minister Devendra Fadnavis on June 12, wherein he directed officials to accelerate the exercise. The SRA had, via a drone survey in 2021, identified 2,597 slum clusters across Mumbai, which were differentiated into 13,79,086 slum settlements. Till Thursday, Pioneer Foundation Private Limited and Saar IT Resources Private Limited – two agencies which conduct surveys on behalf of the SRA – had conducted door-to-door surveys in 5,75,136 slum settlements while another 8,03,950 slum settlements remained to be surveyed. 'Since over 8 lakh slums have to be surveyed in about five months, we will appoint more agencies by floating a tender,' said an SRA official. Around 1.4 lakh of the settlements that remain to be surveyed are located on plots owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (Mhada) and the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC), and both agencies are conducting separate surveys as well, the official mentioned. 'Once completed, our survey will provide comprehensive information about all slums in the city and prevent any new addition,' the SRA official told HT. Slums that spring up after the survey can be identified easily, which will help in initiating punitive action, he said. 'It will also prevent any attempt by developers to add fake tenants in SRA projects,' he added. According to the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971, residents of slums built until January 1, 2000 must be provided free rehabilitation tenements when they are evicted. In May 2018, during Devendra Fadnavis' first term as chief minister, the cut-off date for rehabilitation was extended to January 1, 2011, but it was mandated that those residing in slums built between 2001 and 2011 would not be eligible for free rehabilitation, following a Supreme Court decision.


Hindustan Times
8 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Bengal anti-rape bill sent back, says TMC
The Aparajita Woman and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill, 2024, passed by the state legislative assembly in September last year seeking the death penalty and other stringent punishments for rape convicts, has been returned by the Centre after review, the Trinamool Congress said on Friday. Bengal anti-rape bill sent back, says TMC 'Chief minister Mamata Banerjee is the driving force behind the Bill. While she wants stringent punishment for people involved in atrocities on women, the Bharatiya Janata Party has proved by returning the Bill that it doesn't want death penalty for such offenders,' Trinamool Congress state general secretary Kunal Ghosh said. Governor C V Ananda Bose referred the Bill to President Droupadi Murmu for review on September 6 last year, three days after the assembly unanimously passed the Bill amid a nationwide row over the rape and murder of a junior doctor inside Kolkata's RG Kar Medical College and Hospital on August 9. Drafted at the behest of the chief minister, the Bill seeks changes in Sections 64, 65, 66, 70 and 71 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The Bill also proposes amendments to various sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. Section 64 of BNS says punishment for rape 'shall not be less than 10 years'; section 65 says punishment for raping a minor under 16 shall be rigourous imprisonment 'not less than 20 years'; section 66 says punishment for injuring a woman leading to death or persistent vegetative state shall be death or no less than 20 years of rigorous imprisonment; section 70 says punishment for gang rape shall be no less than 20 years of rigorous imprisonment; and section 71 says repeat offenders previously convicted under sections 64 or 65 or 66 or 67 shall be punished with either death penalty or imprisonment for rest of natural life. A delegation of TMC Parliament members met the President in February seeking her assent to the Bill while it was being studied by the Centre. Neither the Raj Bhawan, through which the Bill was sent back, nor West Bengal assembly speaker Biman Banerjee commented on the issue on Friday. Assembly officials aware of the details said that while returning the Bill on Thursday for further review by the state, the Centre wrote in its note that punishments proposed for some of the crimes mentioned in the document clashed with existing provisions in Sections 63, 64 and 65 of the BNS which replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in 2023. The Constitution says that since criminal law falls under the Concurrent list, both the state and central legislatures have the authority to make amendments. States can enact their own laws as long as they are not in conflict with Central legislation. In cases of conflict or repugnancy, the Central law takes precedence. However, if a state law that has a conflict with a Central legislation receives the President's assent, it becomes effective within that state, the Constitution says. Union minister of state and former Bengal BJP unit president Sukanta Majumdar countered Kunal Ghosh, saying the Constitution does not empower a state government to enforce independent laws prescribing the death penalty. 'There is no such provision. The Constitution says that when a state's law confronts or contradicts a Central law then the latter always prevails. Unlike TMC, we obey the Constitution,' Majumdar said. The chief minister addressed the assembly when the Bill was tabled for discussion. 'The Bill seeks to ensure prompt investigation, prompt punishment and prompt justice,' she said during the debate. The BJP backed the Bill but leader of the opposition Suvendu Adhikari asked whether the state followed constitutional norms while framing it. In response, Banerjee said: 'Please tell the governor to sign the bill so that it can be sent to the President for assent. We will see how law is not framed even after that.' After the Bill was sent to the governor, his office sought the text of the debates. The assembly secretariat furnished the details on September 6 after chief secretary Manoj Pant met the governor.