logo
New Tax Bill may allow late ITR refunds, protect NGO income from heavy tax

New Tax Bill may allow late ITR refunds, protect NGO income from heavy tax

In a key move that could impact millions of taxpayers and not-for-profit organisations (NPOs), a Parliamentary Select Committee led by BJP MP Baijayant Panda has recommended critical changes to the draft Income Tax Bill, 2025, which seeks to replace the six-decade-old Income Tax Act, 1961. The panel's 4,575-page report, tabled in the Lok Sabha on Monday, focuses on simplifying the tax code while safeguarding key exemptions for religious-charitable institutions and easing compliance for small taxpayers.
Relief for Religious-cum-Charitable Trusts
One of the most significant recommendations is to retain the existing tax exemption on anonymous donations made to religious-cum-charitable trusts. Clause 337 of the new Bill had proposed a flat 30% tax on all anonymous donations, except for those made to purely religious trusts. This marked a sharp departure from current law, under which religious and charitable trusts receive broader exemptions unless the donations are specifically earmarked for hospitals or educational institutions they run.
The Committee flagged this as a "critical omission" and urged the reintroduction of a provision similar to Section 115BBC of the current Act to prevent adverse consequences for religious-charitable trusts. 'The proposed clause could significantly disrupt the NPO ecosystem,' the report warned.
Tax Only 'Income', Not 'Receipts'
Another major concern addressed is the proposed shift from taxing 'income' to 'receipts' of NPOs. The Committee strongly opposed this move, arguing it goes against the principle of real income taxation. Taxing gross receipts would unfairly include capital recoveries and inflows that do not represent actual earnings, it said.
Instead, the Committee recommended a return to net income-based taxation, urging a rewrite of Clause 335 to ensure only surplus income is taxed, not donations or reimbursements.
TDS Refunds Without ITR Filing
In a taxpayer-friendly move, the Committee also proposed allowing TDS refunds without mandatory ITR filing. The current draft Bill requires individuals to file a return within the due date to claim a TDS refund — even if their total income is below the taxable limit.'This may inadvertently criminalise small taxpayers who are otherwise non-filers,' the report cautioned. The Committee has therefore suggested removal of Sub-clause (1)(ix) from Clause 263, which mandates return filing for refund claims.
Shift to 'Tax Year' Welcomed
The Committee has also welcomed the government's decision to replace the concepts of 'previous year' and 'assessment year' with a unified 'tax year'. This move is expected to streamline tax references, reduce confusion, and improve accessibility of the law to non-specialists.
Additional Recommendations
According to experts, the Committee has made over 566 suggestions aimed at refining the draft Bill. These include:
Modernising definitions such as "capital asset" and "infrastructure capital company"
Clarifying property-related deductions
Re-emphasising the "actual payment" rule for claiming business expense deductions
Making penalties for non-maintenance of books discretionary
Creating procedural safeguards to prevent excessive penalisation of honest taxpayers
Nangia Andersen LLP, M&A Tax Partner, Sandeep Jhunjhunwala said the Committee has suggested modernising definitions such as "capital asset" and "infrastructure capital company", clarifying property-related deductions, and reinforcing the "actual payment" rule for business expenses. It has also recommended procedural safeguards such as making penalties for non-maintenance of books discretionary and permitting refund claims even where returns are not filed on time.
According to Amit Baid, Head of tax at BTG Advaya:
1) Reintroducing Nil withholding certificates helps prevent refund backlogs for genuine zero-tax cases — including non-residents entitled to treaty relief on cross-border transactions.
(2) Disallowing all deductions just because a return was late would have punished lakhs of genuine taxpayers. The Committee's fix restores sanity by limiting this to only certain income-linked deductions.
(3) Without the phrase 'in the circumstances of the case', GAAR could have become a tax sledgehammer - treating even bona fide restructurings as abuse. The Committee's intervention restores balance and guards against overreach on honest transactions.
(4) Many legacy trusts were staring at disqualification under vague definitions. By recommending clarity on 'wholly for charitable or religious purpose', the Committee saves hundreds of older institutions from legal limbo.
Chance missed
The Committee missed the chance to resolve the double taxation risk in holding company structures. Denying inter-corporate dividend deduction under the 22% concessional regime not only breaks with past policy logic, but could make this regime unattractive for investment vehicles and cross-border structures.
Tax-neutral treatment for fast-track demergers could be challenging. By not addressing this, the Committee has left a key gap that may discourage intra-group restructurings."
As the Monsoon Session of Parliament begins on July 21, the debate on the Committee's recommendations will shape the final contours of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, before it replaces one of India's longest-standing laws.
"The report provides clause by clause evaluation of the Bill with total 566 observations / recommendations for change. This is a mammoth task performed in a record time with precise and relevant recommendations. Now the Lok Sabha has to debate the recommendations and identify the changes that are required in the current Bill to make it futuristic and relevant for common tax-payers. It is highly desirable to defunct the old law and bring a new law which is transparent, easy to comprehend, in line with current business requirements and help to reduce tax disputes," said Preeti Sharma, Partner, Tax and Regulatory Services, BDO India.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Palghar: 65 establishments get notices for not displaying nameplates in Marathi
Palghar: 65 establishments get notices for not displaying nameplates in Marathi

Time of India

time42 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Palghar: 65 establishments get notices for not displaying nameplates in Marathi

The district administration of Palghar in Maharashtra has issued notices to the owners of 65 commercial establishments for not displaying their nameplates in Marathi , officials said on Saturday. The action was taken following reports that several hotels, shops and other establishments failing to comply with the rules. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Data Science Artificial Intelligence Project Management Management Product Management Technology Data Analytics Public Policy Finance Leadership Design Thinking others MBA Operations Management CXO Others Digital Marketing Data Science PGDM Cybersecurity Degree MCA healthcare Healthcare Skills you'll gain: Strategic Data-Analysis, including Data Mining & Preparation Predictive Modeling & Advanced Clustering Techniques Machine Learning Concepts & Regression Analysis Cutting-edge applications of AI, like NLP & Generative AI Duration: 8 Months IIM Kozhikode Professional Certificate in Data Science and Artificial Intelligence Starts on Jun 26, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Data Analysis & Interpretation Programming Proficiency Problem-Solving Skills Machine Learning & Artificial Intelligence Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT MSc in Data Science Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details A special campaign was launched at multiple locations across the district as per the directions of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour , a release said. "Various teams carried out an operation to check the language used in the nameplates. The establishments that failed to display the nameplates in Marathi were identified," it said. The enforcement teams then issued notices to 65 such establishments. These businesses were directed to immediately change the nameplates by adhering to the laid-down norms. Those who fail to comply will face legal action as per the provisions of the Act, the statement added. Live Events Deputy Commissioner of Labour Vijay Chowdhary said the inspection drive will continue for the next few days, and urged all business owners across the district to ensure compliance. Under Section 36(a)(1) of the Maharashtra Shops and Establishments (Regulation of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 2017, it is mandatory for all commercial establishments to display nameplates in Marathi language using the Devanagari script , he said.

Bengal Governor confirms sending back 'Aparajita Bill' to Mamata govt for reconsideration
Bengal Governor confirms sending back 'Aparajita Bill' to Mamata govt for reconsideration

Hans India

time42 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Bengal Governor confirms sending back 'Aparajita Bill' to Mamata govt for reconsideration

Kolkata: West Bengal Governor, C.V. Ananda Bose on Saturday brought an end to the confusion over contradictory information regarding sending back of Aparajita Women and Child (West Bengal Criminal Laws Amendment) Bill -- meant for harshest of punishment for accused in cases of rape and rape and murder -- to the state government for reconsideration. Earlier, an information regarding this was passed on to the media on Friday by a section of the insiders in Raj Bhavan. It was claimed that the Governor has sent the Bill back to the state government for reconsideration following serious objections raised by the Union Government. However, confusion started surfacing over the development, since none in the state or within the ruling Trinamool Congress were agreeing to accept that the said Bill has been referred back to the state government for reconsideration. On Saturday evening, while interacting with the media persons at Raj Bhavan in Kolkata, the Governor brought an end to the confusion, saying that he had to send back the Bill back to the state government for reconsideration following serious objections raised by the Union Government. 'There are three options for the government when a Bill is sent from the Assembly secretariat for the Governor's assent. The first is that the Governor could give assent to that Bill, which I have done in several cases. The second option is that the Governor can send the Bill back to the assembly authorities, raising queries and suggesting changes. But in that case, if the assembly resends the bill to the Governor without making any change, the Governor has no other option but to give assent to the Bill,' Bose said. He added that the third option for the Governor was to send the Bill for consideration of the Office of the Indian President, which he did in case of the Aparajita Bill. 'Now, the Union government has some queries about certain provisions in the Aparajita Bill, and so it has been sent back to the state government for reconsideration,' the Governor added. The Bill was passed on the floor of the West Bengal assembly last year amid the ghastly tape and murder of a lady junior doctor at the state-run R.G. Kar Medical College & Hospital in Kolkata within the hospital premises. Subsequently, the office of the West Bengal Governor forwarded the Bill to the office of President Droupadi Murmu for the latter's consideration. Now, with information surfacing about the Bill being sent back to the state government for reconsideration, uncertainties have started surfacing over the fate of the Bill. The said Bill has provisions for completion of investigation in such cases in 21 days and filing of chargesheets within 30 days. In the Bill, there are provisions for quick completion of the trial process in the matter, as well as some proposed additions in the provisions under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POSCO) Act.

Congress accuses the government of doing ‘petty politics' over the motion to remove Justice Yashwant Varma
Congress accuses the government of doing ‘petty politics' over the motion to remove Justice Yashwant Varma

The Hindu

time2 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Congress accuses the government of doing ‘petty politics' over the motion to remove Justice Yashwant Varma

The Congress on Saturday (July 26, 2025) accused the haratiya Janata Party of doing 'petty politics', unbothered about Constitutional principles, referring to reports which claimed that the Opposition-backed notice in the Rajya Sabha for removal of Justice Yashwant Varma had only been submitted but not admitted in the Upper House. The Congress attack on the Narendra Modi government came a day after Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju asserted that there shouldn't remain any doubt and that the proceedings would begin in the Lok Sabha. In the Lok Sabha, the government secured the signatures of 152 MPs across the political spectrum to move a notice against Justice Varma – who faces allegations of corruption after wads of half-burnt currency notes were discovered at his official residence in Delhi on March 14 – while in the Rajya Sabha, 63 Opposition members had moved the notice. Addressing a press conference at the All India Congress Committee (AICC) office, Congress spokesperson and Rajya Sabha member Abhishek Singhvi quoted former Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar's July 21 statement in the House to argue that the notice, signed by 63 Opposition members, had been admitted by the Chair. Mr. Singhvi further argued that the former Chairman's comments had made it clear that only a statutory committee of inquiry, under the Judges (Inquiry) Act, had to be formed after consulting with the Lok Sabha Speaker since an identical motion for the removal of the judge was submitted in the Lower House. 'Dhankhar's a political exit' 'If the motion [in the Rajya Sabha] has not been admitted, then was a shadow boxing going on or a drama was going on?' the Congress leader asked. He asked if the BJP believed in 'one nation one party approach' since it doesn't want to acknowledge the Opposition notice and claimed that Mr. Dhankhar's departure was a 'political exit camouflaged as a constitutional lie'. Mr. Singhvi also accused the BJP of adopting double standards in its approach to judicial matters, particularly regarding Justice Varma as well as Justice Shekhar Yadav against whom the Opposition had moved a notice for removal for allegedly making communal remarks. 'We are also very concerned about this selective outrage and selective silence on Justice Varma, Justice Yadav — two judges' issues. This is typical BJP's double standard. The BJP's game of motions is less about law and more about optics... On judicial propriety, on anti-corruption movement and on judicial accountability, the BJP's mantra is talk the talk, never walk the walk. It is the worst example of hypocrisy on this entire episode,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store