logo
Judge Dennis Davis blasts government over climate inaction, says courts alone can't save the planet

Judge Dennis Davis blasts government over climate inaction, says courts alone can't save the planet

Daily Maverick18 hours ago
At a recent climate law discussion at Stellenbosch University, former judge Dennis Davis took aim at government inertia on both the environment and the economy, saying the real work lies not in the courts, but in politics.
South Africa's climate crisis is not just about emissions – it's about accountability. And the courts, for all their power, cannot substitute for the political will of a government that has failed to rise to the challenge.
This was the message delivered with characteristic candour by former judge Dennis Davis in a keynote address at Stellenbosch University's Faculty of Law on 28 June 2025.
Speaking at a colloquium on climate change law and green finance, Davis gave a blistering critique of government policy, warning that while civil society and the judiciary have done their part to uphold constitutional rights, it is ultimately the legislature and the executive who must 'just do their job'.
'The South African growth story is nothing more than absolutely disastrous,' he said.
He traced the country's failure to strike a suitable balance between economic growth and environmental protection to a deeper absence of political leadership – and urged a 'serious debate' on the kind of policy South Africa actually needs.
Legal dimensions of sustainable development
The event was jointly hosted by two research chairs in the faculty – the Chair in Urban Law and Sustainability Governance, held by Professor Anél du Plessis, and the Gys Steyn Chair in Financial Regulation, held by Professor Johann Scholtz. Both chairs underscore the university's growing focus on the legal dimensions of sustainable development.
Introducing the keynote, Scholtz described Davis as uniquely qualified to speak on the subject – a jurist, scholar and former director of the Centre for Applied Legal Studies, who handed down landmark judgments on socioeconomic rights, including the seminal Grootboom decision in 2000, which confirmed that socioeconomic rights are not merely aspirational but legally enforceable.
Constitutional prescience
Davis opened with a reminder of South Africa's own legal promise – section 24 of the Constitution, which guarantees the right to an environment that is not harmful to health or wellbeing, and mandates protection of the environment for present and future generations.
'That was in 1996,' he said, 'and I'm not sure anyone drafting it then grasped the immensity of the challenge we face today.'
Citing a 2023 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report, he highlighted the disproportionate toll of climate change on vulnerable populations. 'Between 2010 and 2020, human mortality from floods, droughts and storms was 15 times higher in highly vulnerable regions than in regions with very low vulnerability.'
'Rolls-Royce framework lacking traction'
But recognising rights on paper is not the same as enforcing them. 'One of the great problems in South Africa,' Davis noted, 'is that we're very good at having Rolls-Royce regulatory proposals without the foggiest idea as to how they should be implemented, or what their traction is going to be in practice.'
So where does that leave the courts?
'Lawfare' not enough
Davis pointed to a series of landmark judgments in South Africa as reasons for hope. These decisions, he said, showed that section 24 was more than symbolic – it could be a tool for real change. But that tool had its limits.
'There's a significant limitation to the process of 'lawfare',' he said. 'As attractive as it may be for lawyers to march into court, relying on the judiciary alone will not suffice.'
Civil society, he argued, had played an essential role. The NGOs who brought these cases were 'brave' and 'not prepared to shut up'. But their success only highlighted the failures elsewhere.
Shell case 'a milestone'
A case that looms large for Davis is Sustaining the Wild Coast, in which the courts found in 2022 that Shell's proposed seismic surveys for offshore gas deposits had been authorised without adequate consultation. The court's insistence on meaningful engagement with affected indigenous communities – in their own languages and cultural context – was, for Davis, a milestone in recognising both environmental and human rights.
But he questioned the broader system that allowed such authorisations in the first place. 'To what extent are we talking about intergenerational justice? To what extent are we actually grappling with these issues in economic policy?'
Deep divisions
To illustrate the gap, Davis recounted his recent interview with Minister of Mineral and Petroleum Resources Gwede Mantashe for his television programme Judge for Yourself – a follow-on from his earlier Future Imperfect, the show that first made him a household name for probing some of South Africa's toughest policy questions.
He argued that post-apartheid economic policy had consistently failed to address inequality and unemployment. Instead of inclusive growth, he said, the benefits of development had disproportionately flowed to a small elite, leaving the majority of South Africans 'not just historically disadvantaged but presently disadvantaged'.
According to Davis, Mantashe defended South Africa's pursuit of fossil fuel projects, pointing out that the country's northern neighbour, Namibia, was forging ahead with offshore exploration. By Davis's account, Mantashe argued that if South Africa embraced similar projects, economic growth could have reached 3% or 4%, easing many of the concerns raised by environmental critics.
What troubled Davis most was the minister's proposal for some kind of environmental panel – à la a similar tribunal in Namibia – to expedite approvals and sidestep litigation. 'That is now being considered by Cabinet,' Davis warned. 'It raises profound questions about the extent to which the executive is committed to the rights enshrined in section 24.'
This exchange starkly illustrates the deep division between judicial expectations and executive priorities regarding climate action and economic development.
'Challenge political, not legal'
Davis returned to the principle of intergenerational justice – and the need for politics, not just litigation, to uphold it. He praised the Deadly Air judgment in 2022, in which High Court Judge Colleen Collis compelled the government to improve air quality in Mpumalanga, where most of South Africa's coal-fired power stations are situated. Crucially, the ruling was upheld by the Supreme Court of Appeal in April 2025, with Justice Mahube Betty Molemela confirming that the Constitution could be invoked to protect future generations and that the state bore a positive duty to act.
'And that's the point,' Davis concluded. 'The real challenge is not legal. It's political.'
If South Africa is serious about leaving its children 'a society that's worth living in', he said, it must adopt an economic policy that confronts inequality, poverty and environmental degradation together.
'Presently disadvantaged'
'We have failed to achieve a balance between green growth and the socioeconomic needs of an emerging economy. The vast majority of South Africans are not just historically disadvantaged – they're presently disadvantaged. The question is: what would an economic policy look like if we took these things seriously?'
For now, at least, Davis's answer is clear: 'It's not for the judiciary to manage the process. It's for the legislature and the executive. The rest of us are just squealing at the margins.' DM
Desmond Thompson is a freelance journalist.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shocking claims by KZN Police Commissioner, General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi is a political tsunami
Shocking claims by KZN Police Commissioner, General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi is a political tsunami

IOL News

time30 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Shocking claims by KZN Police Commissioner, General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi is a political tsunami

KZN Police Commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi's explosive revelations about political corruption and abuse of police funds could change the landscape of South African politics. Image: Tumi Pakkies / Independent Newspapers A few months ago, during an exclusive interview with IOL, KZN Police Commissioner, General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, dropped a few bombshells - but stopped short of revealing names - publicly at least. During our interview Mkhwanazi referred to politicians abusing the police secret fund which has an annual budget of R600 million. The fund is highly secretive with very little control. It's meant to be used to fund informants, covert police operations and safe houses for witnesses. Mkhwanazi also revealed to IOL how some senior politicians and politically connected individuals were claiming thousands per month through contracts with the SA Police Service. Those politicians were allegedly offering their properties as safe houses. Except, says Mkhwanazi, many of those claiming were actually living in those properties and they were not used as safe houses - corruption masked as a valid contract. Mkhwanazi knew who they were and was livid at their blatant abuse of position and powers. Some of those names are known to IOL. Some are parliamentarians and some are political heavyweights in KZN. During our interview, he also revealed his anger at the shutting down of the KZN investigative unit for political killings. He was outraged. That unit, claimed Mkhwanazi, was also hot on the heels of corrupt politicians. The killing of rapper AKA too was mentioned - and links with connected individuals and drug cartels. Now, three months later, Mkhwanazi has repeated some of those bombshell claims - without dropping all names. But he has gone further. This time, he's unleashed his wrath and gone for the political jugular. National Police Minister, Senzo Mchunu and deputy National Police Commissioner, Crime Detection, Shadrack Sibiya were alleged to have interfered in investigations - with Mchunu also accused of links to drug cartels. Damning accusations. Shocking claims and a perfect political tsunami. So much for a festive Durban July Sunday. Mchunu has - until now, had the most solid track record in the ANC. A Ramaphosa loyalist, ANC party insiders describe him as a hard working, quietly disciplined comrade. He has not been a subject of scandals or links to corrupt activities which have befallen many in his party at some point. So the recent allegations against him have come as a shocker, given his credentials. Mchunu is not the type you would associate with the underworld. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading But the question is why did Mkhwanazi expose it now? Was there a link between Mkhwanazi's explosive revelations and the arrest of Crime Intelligence Head, Dumisani Khumalo? He was afterall, said to be close to Mkhwanazi. But, despite being the darling of South Africans, Mkhwanazi's past has also been questioned. His rapid rise to the top, catapulted to acting national police commissioner by former president Jacob Zuma had tongues wagging back then. And, before there could be more tongue wagging and barking over his appointment, he was a victim of the Zuma curse - thrown under the bus and dismissed by Zuma, ostensibly following an ongoing rift between himself (Mkhwanazi) and then Police Minister Nathi Mthetwa. But, in 2018, Mkhwanazi was back, this time as KZN Police Commissioner, under President Cyril Ramaphosa - a move which was largely criticised quietly as many felt he was too young and others with more experience had been overlooked for the top job. Mkhwanazi shrugged off the criticism back then and said he was ready to take on crime & corruption within police ranks. Since then, he has fallen out of favour with many within his ranks. Some say it's because of his leadership style - abrasive and no nonsense, while others feel he wants the top position as national police commissioner. More recently, he claimed he was being silenced for coming down on corruption and the drug cartels. Was he getting too close for comfort? Is that why he was suddenly the subject of investigation by the Investigative Police Directorate (IPID)? That investigation, bizarrely, was said to have been sparked by a complaint from Mchunu, claimed IPID. Then, they quickly retracted it, saying it was an anonymous complaint. South Africans are political sleuths and were not buying it. But Mkhwanazi knew dark clouds were brewing. He claimed his refusal to concede to corrupt politicians had made him a marked target. And now, a torrential downpour is here. A storm, tsunami in one. Having met Mkhwanazi and observed his media engagements, he is careful with his words. He is not foolish enough to make damning claims without proof - or at least doesn't appear to be. He has a file of evidence against senior politicians and their corrupt activities - he's confirmed this. What ever his reason for going public now, his bombshell claims should have been backed with evidence. How else will South Africans know the truth? We don't need another commission of enquiry costing thousands of rands if Mkhwanazi has the proof. It's time he revealed them. Show South Africans the receipts. Back up his claims or sink his reputation. Mkhwanazi's claims are heading for a parliamentary showdown as political parties are already demanding answers. Many have already written to the portfolio committee. Those implicated will no doubt work fast and furiously to prevent their names from being exposed if not out already. Behind the scenes, there's a frenzy. The question is what will be done to silence the release of more information? Sibiya has challenged Mkhwanazi to take South Africans into his confidence and produce the proof. Mchunu's response was more muted but characteristic. He will review Mkhwanazi's statements before considering what action to take. Mchunu does not respond in a knee-jerk way so his response is to be expected. But he will fire back. Mkhwanazi's revelations are a tip of the iceberg. He has a lot more. It goes beyond the task team into killings, or the abuse of the police slush fund. At the heart is this claim - the close relationship between drug cartels and senior politicians and how this extends into the judiciary. That's the power at play. Mkhwanazi knows he's a marked man. His every move, every call is now being monitored. But he's fired the shot and there's no going back. In his own words, he is prepared to go down fighting for justice. He must release that file and produce evidence to back up his claims. The era of shielding corrupt politicians is over. That cycle must be broken. South Africans deserve to know the truth. * Zohra Teke is a seasoned freelance journalist and contributor. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.

Doubts surround potential probe into allegations of police corruption
Doubts surround potential probe into allegations of police corruption

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

Doubts surround potential probe into allegations of police corruption

Political analyst warns of systemic corruption in South Africa's police force Image: File/Archive Questions are mounting over the likelihood and sincerity of any investigation into allegations raised by KZN police head General Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, amid concerns about political bias and systemic corruption. Independent political analyst Joe Mhlanga expressed scepticism about the current political climate, suggesting that entrenched interests may compromise justice. This was after Mkhwanazi made shocking claims alleging serious corruption involving a network of criminals, drug lords, police Minister Senzo Mchunu and National deputy police commissioner Shadrack Sibiya. Mhlanga pointed to the broader pattern of impunity among those aligned with the president, citing the foreign currency hidden under the couches at Ramaphosa's Phala Phala farm. 'We might have seen the report from the Public Protector that cleared President Cyril Ramaphosa of any wrongdoing, but if you look at the laws, laws-particularly the banking regulations, and the facts surrounding the arrest of a young woman found with over a million US dollars, the picture becomes murky," stated Mhlanga. 'She was arrested around the same time President Ramaphosa was cleared of any misconduct, despite allegations that his house contained more foreign currency than legally permissible. This raises serious questions about the integrity of these investigations.' 'There's a clear tendency for people close to him to avoid repercussions. If those around him continue to shield misconduct, it suggests that corruption is deeply rooted and unlikely to be addressed unless there's a major shift.' He further criticised the political establishment's reliance on the police and justice mechanisms to protect allies rather than uphold the rule of law. 'South African politicians seem to view the Ministry of Police as a tool to shield their own, rather than a public institution to serve justice. Appointments within the police, judiciary, and prosecutorial agencies appear based on loyalty rather than merit, making it almost impossible to hold powerful figures accountable.' Mhlanga also highlighted concerns about President Ramaphosa's pattern of appointing close allies to key positions. 'He ensures that those in critical roles, including the Chief Justice, police chiefs, and NPA officials, are aligned with him. This significantly reduces the chances of any internal investigations leading to his downfall. It's a cycle of protection that has persisted for years, with past leaders and officials similarly shielded from scrutiny.' He warned that this systemic issue is unlikely to change unless there is a deliberate effort to break the cycle. 'Given the history and current appointments, it's clear that any investigation into Mchunu's actions will likely be managed and manipulated to produce a favourable outcome for him. The whole process seems orchestrated to prevent any real accountability.' Meanwhile, the African People's Convention (APC) has commended Mkhwanazi for his courageous stance against drug syndicates and political corruption within SAPS. In a Monday statement, the APC lauded Mkhwanazi and his team for their unwavering commitment to putting citizens' safety first. 'By openly revealing that drug cartels are the cancer within SAPS, and implicating powerful political figures and parliamentarians, General Mkhwanazi demonstrates that some officers are willing to stand against corruption,' the statement read. The party highlighted concerns over allegations that the Minister of Police is involved in undermining investigations, possibly to protect vested interests. 'The reported instructions to dismantle anti-crime units and the alleged links between the Minister and questionable entities point to a systemic capture of the police service,' the APC noted. 'This jeopardises the safety of our citizens and hampers efforts to fight crime effectively.' The APC also stressed the importance of accountability. 'There must be a thorough investigation into the Minister's conduct, whether through parliamentary inquiries or a judicial commission. The serious allegations of misleading parliament and illicit funding require urgent attention.' The party's president, Themba Godi, who previously served as SCOPA chair, reaffirmed their support for officers like Mkhwanazi. 'His integrity and discipline reflect the true spirit of policing. It's time for all citizens to support those in blue who risk their lives to defend justice and fight corruption.' Ramaphosa's spokesperson Vincent Mangwenya did not respond to questions from IOL. [email protected] IOL Politics

Correctional Services minister expected to explain 'bring back corporal punishment' proposal to portfolio committee
Correctional Services minister expected to explain 'bring back corporal punishment' proposal to portfolio committee

IOL News

timean hour ago

  • IOL News

Correctional Services minister expected to explain 'bring back corporal punishment' proposal to portfolio committee

Correctional Services Minister Pieter Groenewald stresses protecting vulnerable communities, especially women and children, by tightening parole approvals and urges honest dialogue on crime solutions, including revisiting corporal punishment despite its ban since 1996. Image: GCIS Minister of Correctional Services Pieter Groenewald will have to explain his recent suggestion that corporal punishment should be revisited to alleviate overcrowding in prisons when he appears before the Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services on Tuesday morning. The minister made the remarks when delivering his budget vote in the National Assembly on Tuesday last week. Groenewald was addressing the challenges faced by correctional services, including overcrowding, dilapidated infrastructure, a rising number of remand detainees, deteriorating facilities, staff shortages, the presence of crime syndicates and gangs within our institutions, and emerging crime patterns. He said corporal punishment will help ease overcrowding in the country's prisons. Corporal punishment in South African schools was officially banned in 1996. 'If you look at our criminal justice system, and specifically justice, we must start a debate to say, shouldn't we bring back corporal punishment?' Groenewald said. 'A young person who steals 10 loaves of bread will sit in prison for perhaps three years waiting for sentencing. Go think (whether we should) bring it back... to address this issue,' Groenewald said in Afrikaans. During the briefing by the Peace and Security Cluster Committee Chairpersons on Monday, the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services, Kgomotso Anthea Ramolobeng, said that they will be expecting Groenewald to explain the rationale behind his remarks. She explained that there were largely legal milestones which led to the abolition of corporal punishment and that the decision to abolish it stemmed from a violation of human rights. 'What is my view? I believe that it is in the best interest of whoever is in the executive or whoever is in government to abide by the Constitution of the country. Why has the minister taken a step to say, we should perhaps open debates on corporal punishment? We have yet to be taken into (his) confidence, as the portfolio committee. 'I can assure you that tomorrow we do have a Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services meeting from 9.30am, and we will probe the minister on why he made those assertions, and what informs them? So that he takes us through that,' Ramolobeng said. 'There are other measures that we can try to deal with, or come up with alternatively, that must deal with overcrowding, outside of corporal punishment, especially of those who have less (serious) crimes that leads to them having bail of R300." Ramolobeng added that what could come out of the discussion on corporal punishment is perhaps one focused on community services for those who have committed petty crimes. 'Put more focus on rehabilitative outlined programmes that talk to the current challenges we are facing.' [email protected]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store